Philip A. Read

Targeted left ventricular lead placement to guide cardiac resynchronization therapy: the TARGET study: a randomized, controlled trial.

OBJECTIVES This study sought to assess the impact of targeted left ventricular (LV) lead placement on outcomes of cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT). BACKGROUND Placement of the LV lead to the latest sites of contraction and away from the scar confers the best response to CRT. We conducted a randomized, controlled trial to compare a targeted approach to LV lead placement with usual care. METHODS A total of 220 patients scheduled for CRT underwent baseline echocardiographic speckle-tracking 2-dimensional radial strain imaging and were then randomized 1:1 into 2 groups. In group 1 (TARGET [Targeted Left Ventricular Lead Placement to Guide Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy]), the LV lead was positioned at the latest site of peak contraction with an amplitude of >10% to signify freedom from scar. In group 2 (control) patients underwent standard unguided CRT. Patients were classified by the relationship of the LV lead to the optimal site as concordant (at optimal site), adjacent (within 1 segment), or remote (≥2 segments away). The primary endpoint was a ≥15% reduction in LV end-systolic volume at 6 months. Secondary endpoints were clinical response (≥1 improvement in New York Heart Association functional class), all-cause mortality, and combined all-cause mortality and heart failure-related hospitalization. RESULTS The groups were balanced at randomization. In the TARGET group, there was a greater proportion of responders at 6 months (70% vs. 55%, p = 0.031), giving an absolute difference in the primary endpoint of 15% (95% confidence interval: 2% to 28%). Compared with controls, TARGET patients had a higher clinical response (83% vs. 65%, p = 0.003) and lower rates of the combined endpoint (log-rank test, p = 0.031). CONCLUSIONS Compared with standard CRT treatment, the use of speckle-tracking echocardiography to the target LV lead placement yields significantly improved response and clinical status and lower rates of combined death and heart failure-related hospitalization. (Targeted Left Ventricular Lead Placement to Guide Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy [TARGET] study); ISRCTN19717943).

DPP-4 Inhibition by Sitagliptin Improves the Myocardial Response to Dobutamine Stress and Mitigates Stunning in a Pilot Study of Patients With Coronary Artery Disease

Background—Glucagon-like peptide-1 (GLP-1) is an incretin hormone secreted postprandially that promotes myocardial glucose uptake. The active amide GLP-1 (7-36) is degraded by the enzyme DPP-4, and drugs that inhibit this enzyme (such as sitagliptin) have been introduced to treat type 2 diabetes. We assessed the hypothesis that increasing the plasma concentration of GLP-1 by DPP-4 inhibition would protect the heart from ischemic left ventricular (LV) dysfunction during dobutamine stress echocardiography in patients with coronary artery disease. Methods and Results—Fourteen patients with coronary artery disease and preserved LV function awaiting revascularization were studied. After either a single dose of 100 mg sitagliptin or placebo, 75 g of glucose was given orally to promote GLP-1 secretion and dobutamine stress echocardiography was conducted with tissue Doppler imaging at rest, peak stress, and 30 minutes. After sitagliptin, plasma GLP-1 (7-36) was increased at peak stress (16.5±10.7 versus 9.7±8.7 pg/mL; P=0.003) and in recovery (12.4±5.5 versus 9.0±5.5 pg/mL; P=0.01), and the LV response to stress was enhanced (ejection fraction, 72.6±7.2 versus 63.9±7.9%, P=0.0001; mitral annular systolic velocity, 12.54±3.18 versus 11.49±2.52 cm/s; P=0.0006). DPP-4 inhibition also improved LV regional function in the 12 paired nonapical segments assessed by peak systolic tissue Doppler (velocity, 10.56±4.49 versus 9.81±4.26 cm/s, P=0.002; strain, −15.9±6.3 versus −14.6±6.6%, P=0.01; strain rate, −2.04±1.04 versus −1.75±0.98 s−1, P=0.0003). This was predominantly due to a cardioprotective effect on ischemic segments (velocity in ischemic segments, 9.77±4.18 versus 8.74±3.87, P=0.007; velocity in nonischemic segments, 11.51±4.70 versus 11.14±4.38, P=0.14). In recovery, sitagliptin attenuated the postischemic stunning seen after the control study. Conclusions—The augmentation of GLP-1 (7-36) by inhibition of DPP-4 improves global and regional LV performance in response to stress and mitigates postischemic stunning in humans with coronary artery disease. Clinical Trial Registration—URL: http://www.isrctn.org. Unique identifier: ISRCTN78649100.

A Pilot Study to Assess Whether Glucagon-Like Peptide-1 Protects the Heart From Ischemic Dysfunction and Attenuates Stunning After Coronary Balloon Occlusion in Humans

Background— The incretin hormone glucagon-like peptide-1 (GLP-1) has been shown to have cardioprotective properties in animal models of ischemia and infarction due to promotion of myocardial glucose uptake and suppression of apoptosis. We investigated whether GLP-1 protected the heart from dysfunction caused by supply ischemia during percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). Methods and Results— Twenty patients with normal left ventricular (LV) function and single-vessel coronary disease within the left anterior descending artery undergoing elective PCI were studied. A conductance catheter was placed into the LV through the femoral artery, and pressure-volume loops were recorded at baseline and during a 1-minute low-pressure balloon occlusion at the site of the stenosis. The patients were randomized to receive an infusion of either GLP-1(7–36) amide at 1.2 pmol/kg per minute or saline immediately after the first balloon occlusion. Coronary balloon occlusion caused LV stunning in the control group with cumulative LV dysfunction on subsequent occlusion that was not seen in the GLP-1 group. GLP-1 improved recovery of LV systolic and diastolic function at 30 minutes after balloon occlusion compared with control (delta dP/dtmax from baseline, −1.6% versus −12.2%; P=0.02) and reduced the LV dysfunction after the second balloon occlusion (delta dP/dtmax, −13.1% versus −25.3%; P=0.01). Conclusions— In this pilot study, infusion of GLP-1 has been demonstrated to reduce ischemic LV dysfunction after supply ischemia during coronary balloon occlusion in humans and mitigates stunning. The findings require confirmation in a larger scale clinical trial. Clinical Trial Registration— URL: http://www.isrctn.org. Unique identifier: ISRCTN 77442023.

Cardioprotection against ischaemia induced by dobutamine stress using glucagon-like peptide-1 in patients with coronary artery disease

Background Glucagon-like peptide-1 (GLP-1) is an incretin hormone which has been shown to promote myocardial glucose uptake. Its pharmacological properties as a cardioprotective agent are attractive because it has a short half-life and there is minimal risk of hypoglycaemia. Objective To assess the hypothesis that intravenous infusion of GLP-1 would protect the heart from ischaemic left ventricular (LV) dysfunction during dobutamine stress echocardiography (DSE) in patients with coronary artery disease (CAD). Design Randomised crossover study. Patients and Interventions 14 patients with CAD and good LV function awaiting revascularisation underwent two DSE scans in a randomised order. GLP-1 was infused intravenously at 1.2 pmol/kg/min starting 30 min before the DSE for one of the scans and the other scan acted as a control. Main outcome measurements Global and regional wall LV function assessed using tissue Doppler imaging at rest, peak stress and 30 min into recovery. Results Global LV function was greater at peak stress during GLP-1 infusion compared with control (ejection fraction 77.0±4.4 vs 70.8±5.0%, p<0.0001; mitral annular systolic velocity 12.18±3.10 vs 11.31±3.11 cm/s, p=0.0004). GLP-1 infusion improved regional wall LV function in 12 non-apical segments assessed by velocity, strain and strain rate. This beneficial effect was predominantly seen in ischaemic segments. In recovery, infusion of GLP-1 mitigated the post-ischaemic stunning seen in the control scan. Conclusion Intravenous infusion of GLP-1 protects the heart from ischaemic LV dysfunction induced by dobutamine stress in patients with CAD. Clinical trial registration URL: http://isrctn.org. Registration number ISRCTN 69686930.

Chronic Dipeptidyl Peptidase-4 Inhibition With Sitagliptin Is Associated With Sustained Protection Against Ischemic Left Ventricular Dysfunction in a Pilot Study of Patients With Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus and Coronary Artery Disease

Background—The incretin hormone, glucagon-like peptide-1, promotes myocardial glucose uptake and may improve myocardial tolerance to ischemia. Endogenous glucagon-like peptide-1 (7–36) is augmented by pharmacological inhibition of dipeptidyl peptidase-4. We investigated whether chronic dipeptidyl peptidase-4 inhibition by sitagliptin protected against ischemic left ventricular dysfunction during dobutamine stress in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus and coronary artery disease. Methods and Results—A total of 19 patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus underwent dobutamine stress echocardiography with tissue Doppler imaging on 2 separate occasions: the first (control) while receiving oral hypoglycemic agents, and the second after the addition of sitagliptin (100 mg once daily) for ≈4 weeks. Sitagliptin increased plasma glucagon-like peptide-1 (7–36) levels and, at peak stress, enhanced both global (ejection fraction, 70.5±7.0 versus 65.7±8.0%; P<0.0001; mitral annular systolic velocity, 11.7±2.6 versus 10.9±2.3 cm/s; P=0.01) and regional left ventricular function, assessed by peak systolic velocity and strain rate in 12 paired, nonapical segments. This was predominantly because of a cardioprotective effect on ischemic segments (strain rate in ischemic segments, −2.27±0.65 versus −1.98±0.58 s−1; P=0.001), whereas no effect was seen in nonischemic segments (−2.19±0.48 versus −2.18±0.54 s−1; P=0.87). At 30 minutes recovery, dipeptidyl peptidase-4 inhibition mitigated the postischemic stunning seen in the control scan. Conclusions—The addition of dipeptidyl peptidase-4 inhibitor therapy with sitagliptin to the treatment regime of patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus and coronary artery disease is associated with a sustained improvement in myocardial performance during dobutamine stress and a reduction in postischemic stunning. Clinical Trial Registration—URL: http://www.isrctn.org. Unique identifier ISRCTN61646154.

Effect of Low-Amplitude Two-Dimensional Radial Strain at Left Ventricular Pacing Sites on Response to Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy

BACKGROUND Left ventricular (LV) lead placement to areas of scar has detrimental effects on response to cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT). Speckle-tracking radial two-dimensional strain offers assessment of the extent of regional myocardial deformation. The aim of this study was to assess the impact of LV lead placement at areas of low-amplitude strain on CRT response. METHODS The optimal cutoff of radial strain amplitude at the LV pacing site associated with an unfavorable CRT response was determined in a derivation group (n = 65) and then tested in a second consecutive validation group (n = 75) of patients with heart failure. Patients had concordant LV leads if placed at the most delayed site, and dyssynchrony was defined as anteroseptal to posterior delay ≥ 130 msec. CRT response was defined as a ≥15% reduction in LV end-systolic volume at 6 months. RESULTS In the derivation group, a derived cutoff for radial strain amplitude of <9.8% defined low-amplitude segments (LAS) and had a high specificity but low sensitivity for predicting LV reverse remodeling, suggesting a strong negative predictive value. In the validation group, compared with patients without LAS at the LV pacing site, in patients with LAS (n = 16), CRT response was significantly lower (62.7% vs 31.3%, P < .05). By multivariate analysis, LV lead concordance and the absence of an LAS at the LV pacing site but not dyssynchrony were significantly related to CRT response. CONCLUSION LV lead placement over segments with two-dimensional radial strain amplitudes <9.8% is associated with poor outcomes of CRT.

The Impact of the Right Ventricular Lead Position on Response to Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy

Introduction: Left ventricular (LV) lead placement to the latest contracting area (concordant LV lead) is associated with better response to cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) compared to a discordant LV lead. However, the effect of the right ventricular (RV) lead site on CRT response is unclear. We investigated the relationship of the RV and LV lead positions on CRT response.

Cardiac resynchronization therapy optimization using noninvasive cardiac output measurement.

Aims:  Noninvasive cardiac output (CO) measurement (NICOM) is a novel method to assess ventricular function and offers a potential alternative for optimization of cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) devices. We compared the effect of NICOM‐based optimization to no optimization (empiric settings) on CRT outcomes.

Non-invasive cardiac output measurements based on bioreactance for optimization of atrio- and interventricular delays.

AIMS Non-invasive cardiac output monitoring (NICOM) based on bio-reactance offers a portable method to assess ventricular function. Optimization of cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) by echocardiography is labour-intensive. We compared the ability of NICOM and echocardiography to facilitate optimum CRT device programming. METHODS AND RESULTS Forty-seven patients in sinus rhythm were evaluated within 14 days of CRT implantation. The atrio- (AV) and interventricular (VV) delay intervals were incrementally adjusted and at each setting, NICOM and echocardiographic data were recorded. Left ventricular (LV) volumes and function were assessed by echocardiography at baseline and 3 months. Response to CRT was defined as a reduction in LV end-systolic volume (LVESV) by >15%. In all patients, cardiac output (CO) increased significantly at optimized settings compared with baseline (5.66 +/- 1.4 vs. 4.35 +/- 1.1 L/min, P < 0.001). A 20% increase in acute CO following CRT predicted LVESV reduction of >15% with a sensitivity of 81% and specificity of 92% (AUC 0.86). The optimum AV delay determined by NICOM was confirmed by echocardiography in 40 of 47 patients (85%, r = 0.89, P < 0.01) and for VV delay in 39 of 47 patients (83%, r = 0.89, P < 0.01). CONCLUSION Non-invasive cardiac output monitoring is a simple, reliable, and portable alternative to echocardiography to program CRT devices.

Pre-treatment with glucagon-like Peptide-1 protects against ischemic left ventricular dysfunction and stunning without a detected difference in myocardial substrate utilization.

OBJECTIVES This study sought to determine whether pre-treatment with intravenous glucagon-like peptide-1 (GLP-1)(7-36) amide could alter myocardial glucose use and protect the heart against ischemic left ventricular (LV) dysfunction during percutaneous coronary intervention. BACKGROUND GLP-1 has been shown to have favorable cardioprotective effects, but its mechanisms of action remain unclear. METHODS Twenty patients with preserved LV function and single-vessel left anterior descending coronary artery disease undergoing elective percutaneous coronary intervention were studied. A conductance catheter was placed into the LV, and pressure-volume loops were recorded at baseline, during 1-min low-pressure balloon occlusion (BO), and at 30-min recovery. Patients were randomized to receive an infusion of either GLP-1(7-36) amide at 1.2 pmol/kg/min or saline immediately after baseline measurements. Simultaneous coronary artery and coronary sinus blood sampling was performed at baseline and after BO to assess transmyocardial glucose concentration gradients. RESULTS BO caused both ischemic LV dysfunction and stunning in the control group but not in the GLP-1 group. Compared with control subjects, the GLP-1 group had a smaller reduction in LV performance during BO (delta dP/dTmax, -4.3 vs. -19.0%, p = 0.02; delta stroke volume, -7.8 vs. -26.4%, p = 0.05), and improved LV performance at 30-min recovery. There was no difference in transmyocardial glucose concentration gradients between the 2 groups. CONCLUSIONS Pre-treatment with GLP-1(7-36) amide protects the heart against ischemic LV dysfunction and improves the recovery of function during reperfusion. This occurs without a detected change in myocardial glucose extraction and may indicate a mechanism of action independent of an effect on cardiac substrate use. (Effect of Glucgon-Like-Peptide-1 [GLP-1] on Left Ventricular Function During Percutaneous Coronary Intervention [PCI]; ISRCTN77442023).