Philip Burrows
University of Oxford
Network
Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.
Publication
Featured researches published by Philip Burrows.
Nuclear Instruments & Methods in Physics Research Section A-accelerators Spectrometers Detectors and Associated Equipment | 2016
E. Gschwendtner; E. Adli; L. D. Amorim; Robert Apsimon; R. Assmann; A.M. Bachmann; F. Batsch; J. Bauche; V. K. Berglyd Olsen; M. Bernardini; R. Bingham; B. Biskup; T. Bohl; C. Bracco; Philip Burrows; Graeme Burt; B. Buttenschön; A. Butterworth; A. Caldwell; M. Cascella; Eric Chevallay; S. Cipiccia; H. Damerau; L. Deacon; P. Dirksen; S. Doebert; Ulrich Dorda; J. Farmer; Valentin Fedosseev; Eduard Feldbaumer
The Advanced Proton Driven Plasma Wakefield Acceleration Experiment (AWAKE) aims at studying plasma wakefield generation and electron acceleration driven by proton bunches. It is a proof-of-principle R&D experiment at CERN and the world׳s first proton driven plasma wakefield acceleration experiment. The AWAKE experiment will be installed in the former CNGS facility and uses the 400 GeV/c proton beam bunches from the SPS. The first experiments will focus on the self-modulation instability of the long (rms ~12 cm) proton bunch in the plasma. These experiments are planned for the end of 2016. Later, in 2017/2018, low energy (~15 MeV) electrons will be externally injected into the sample wakefields and be accelerated beyond 1 GeV. The main goals of the experiment will be summarized. A summary of the AWAKE design and construction status will be presented.
European Physical Journal C | 1987
W. Braunschweig; R. Gerhards; F. J. Kirschfink; H.-U. Martyn; P. Rosskamp; B. Bock; J. Eisenmann; H. M. Fischer; H. Hartmann; E. Hilger; A. Jocksch; V. Mertens; R. Wedemeyer; B. Foster; A. J. Martin; A. J. Sephton; F. Barreiro; E. Bernardi; J. J. Chwastowski; Y. Eisenberg; A. Eskreys; K. Gather; H. Hultschig; K. Genser; P. Joos; H. Kowalski; A. Ladage; B. Löhr; D. Lüke; P. Mättig
AbstractWe present data on energy-energy correlations (EEC) and their related asymmetry (AEEC) ine+e− annihilation in the centre of mass energy range 12<W≦46.8 GeV. The energy and angular dependence of the EEC in the central region is well described byOαs2 QCD plus a fragmentation term proportional to
Journal of Instrumentation | 2010
Javier Resta-Lopez; Philip Burrows; Glenn Christian
Nuclear Instruments & Methods in Physics Research Section A-accelerators Spectrometers Detectors and Associated Equipment | 2000
Philip Burrows
{1 \mathord{\left/ {\vphantom {1 {\sqrt s }}} \right. \kern-\nulldelimiterspace} {\sqrt s }}
ieee particle accelerator conference | 2007
Philip Burrows; G. Christian; C. Clarke; B. Constance; Hamid Dabiri Khah; T. Hartin; C. Perry; C. Swinson; A. Kalinin; R. Arnold; S. Molloy; S. Smith; Gannon White; M. Woods
Physical Review E | 2017
Muhammad Firmansyah Kasim; Luke Ceurvorst; Naren Ratan; James Sadler; Nicholas Fang Yew Chen; Alexander Sävert; Raoul Trines; R. Bingham; Philip Burrows; Malte C. Kaluza; P. A. Norreys
. BareO(α)s2 QCD reproduces our data for the large angle region of the AEEC. Nonperturbative effects for the latter are estimated with the help of fragmentation models. From various analyses using different approximations, we find that values for
ieee particle accelerator conference | 2007
Philip Burrows; Glenn Christian; C. Clarke; B. Constance; H. Dabiri Khah; T. Hartin; C. Perry; C. Swinson; A. Kalinin
ieee particle accelerator conference | 2007
A. F. Hartin; Philip Burrows; G. Christian; C. Clarke; B. Constance; H. Khan; C. Perry; C. Swinson; R. Arnold; S. Molloy; S. Smith; Glen White; M. Woods; A. Kalinin
\Lambda _{\overline {MS} }
Archive | 2017
Neven Blaskovic Kraljevic; Rebecca Ramjiawan; Douglas Bett; C. Perry; Talitha Bromwich; Philip Burrows; Glenn Christian
7th Int. Particle Accelerator Conf. (IPAC'16), Busan, Korea, May 8-13, 2016 | 2016
Neven Blaskovic Kraljevic; Douglas Bett; Ryan Bodenstein; Talitha Bromwich; Philip Burrows; Glenn Christian; M.R.Davis; C. Perry; Rebecca Ramjiawan
in the range 0.1–0.3 GeV give a good description of the data. We also compare analytical calculations in QCD for the EEC in the back-to-back region to our data. The theoretical predictions describe well both the angular and energy dependence of the data in the back-to-back region.