Philip Butcher
Open University
Network
Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.
Publication
Featured researches published by Philip Butcher.
Interacting with Computers | 1999
Ann Jones; Eileen Scanlon; C. Tosunoglu; Erica Morris; Shelagh Ross; Philip Butcher; Joel Greenberg
The evaluation of educational software is of concern to two particular academic communities: HCI and educational technology. There is a danger that usability features are considered at the expense of educational issues (and the converse of this is of course equally true). This paper considers how the notion and practice of evaluation in the educational community differs from that in HCI and also identifies areas of overlap. It then describes how particular influences and contexts have led one group of evaluators from the educational community to develop a context, interactions, attitudes and outcomes (CIAO!) model of evaluation for computer assisted learning (CAL) evaluation in distance education. The application of this model is illustrated by case studies from a recent evaluation project and related research. The paper concludes with a discussion of the issues raised for both communities by this model for evaluation. q 1999 Published by Elsevier Science B.V. All rights reserved.
Computer Education | 1998
Eileen Scanlon; C. Tosunoglu; Ann Jones; Philip Butcher; Shelagh Ross; Joel Greenberg; Josie Taylor; Peter A. Murphy
Abstract At the Open University (OU), the perception of computer assisted learning (CAL) is shifting from its current position as an optional extra in a battery of course components to that of a key teaching medium. This paper presents the authors’ experiences of the evaluation of a range of current OU produced computer assisted learning materials, mainly but not exclusively in science and technology reported in terms of evaluation framework. These materials include interactive tutorial packages, simulations used largely in a support role to the main teaching and multimedia packages which are expected to carry more of the initial presentation of key ideas in the courses. The overall purpose of the evaluations was to gain insight into how computers can have an impact on learning, particularly of science and technology subjects, and to explore a portfolio of evaluation techniques to be used in the development and assessment of computer based learning materials. In this paper the techniques are discussed and illustrated with reference to a number of case studies of a range of programs used by students. Some conclusions are drawn about how the use of programs leads to the support of students’ science and technology learning.
Computers in Education | 1996
Ann Jones; Eileen Scanlon; C. Tosunoglu; Shelagh Ross; Philip Butcher; Peter A. Murphy; Joel Greenberg
The paper reviews both the types of CAL in use at the Open University over the previous fifteen years and currently in the context of the literature on CAL in HE more generally. A framework for evaluating CAL is then proposed that focuses on Context, Interactions and Outcomes (CIAO) and an example of the evaluation approach in action is given.
international conference on computers in education | 1996
Ann Jones; Eileen Scanlon; C. Tosunoglu; Steven J. Ross; Philip Butcher; Peter A. Murphy; Joel Greenberg
Archive | 2006
Shelagh Ross; Sally Jordan; Philip Butcher
Archive | 2008
Philip Butcher
Research in Learning Technology | 1996
C. Tosunoglu; Philip Butcher; Eileen Scanlon; Ann Jones
Archive | 2010
Sally Jordan; Philip Butcher
Archive | 2003
Sally Jordan; Philip Butcher; Shelagh Ross
Archive | 2006
Niall Sclater; Philip Butcher; Pete Thomas; Sally Jordan