Philip E. Lee

Antipsychotic Drug Use and Mortality in Older Adults with Dementia

Context Recent reports suggest that antipsychotics are associated with increased risk for death in patients with dementia. Contribution This large, population-based study from Canada assessed the risk for death after dispensation of antipsychotics in older adults with dementia. New use of antipsychotics compared with nonuse was associated with increased risk for death at 30 days. Conventional agents were associated with higher risks than were atypical agents. Caution Sensitivity analyses showed that unmeasured confounders might diminish or erase observed associations. Implication Both conventional and atypical antipsychotics may be associated with an increased risk for death in elderly persons with dementia. The Editors Various challenging behavioral and psychological symptoms commonly develop in older adults with dementia and predispose them and their caregivers to poor outcomes (1). Nonpharmacologic strategies are recommended as first-line management for these symptoms (2), but they may be difficult to implement in clinical practice (3). For many reasons, antipsychotic medications are routinely prescribed in this setting (4, 5). Conventional antipsychotics, such as haloperidol, have been available since the 1950s. Meta-analyses of clinical trials evaluating conventional antipsychotics to treat agitation in dementia show that these agents have modest efficacy and important adverse effects compared with placebo (6, 7). In the past decade, use of newer atypical antipsychotics has been rapidly increasing in clinical practice because these agents were thought to produce fewer adverse effects than conventional agents (2). A Canadian study found that the prevalence of antipsychotic use in older adults increased from 2.2% in 1993 to 3.0% at the end of 2002. In that study, atypical antipsychotics, which were unavailable in 1993, accounted for 82.5% of all antipsychotics dispensed in 2002 (8). Short-term randomized, controlled trials (RCTs) have studied the role of atypical antipsychotics in the management of behavioral and psychological symptoms of dementia (2, 9). An RCT involving 421 outpatients with Alzheimer disease and psychosis, aggression, or agitation concluded that the adverse effects of these newer drugs offset their advantages (10). As a result, improvements in behavioral symptoms with antipsychotic drug treatment do not necessarily lead to improvements in overall quality of life for patients or their caregivers (11). In April 2005, the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) issued a public health advisory that the use of atypical antipsychotics to treat elderly patients with dementia was associated with an increased risk for death compared with placebo (12). In June 2005, Health Canada issued a similar warning and additional data (13). These warnings stem from reviews of RCTs that involve the atypical agents risperidone, olanzapine, quetiapine, and aripiprazole. The mortality rate was approximately 1.6 to 1.7 times higher than with placebo and was greater with antipsychotics than with placebo in 15 of the 17 trials reviewed by the U.S. FDA (12). The warnings extend to all currently available atypical antipsychotics. Other publications have provided support for these warnings and have raised further safety concerns about older conventional antipsychotics (1416). Important questions remain unanswered. Although RCTs provide the best evidence of treatment efficacy and harm, the individual RCTs in this case had low event rates. Reliable estimates of the mortality risk were generated only when data were combined by meta-analysis (14). Furthermore, these RCTs were generally short in duration and could not provide information about the long-term effect of antipsychotics on mortality (14, 17). Finally, these trials provide estimates of harm primarily for atypical antipsychotics. Relatively few data are available on harms associated with older conventional antipsychotics. Studies suggest that important differences may exist in the safety profiles of conventional and atypical agents (15, 16, 18, 19). Using population-based data, we sought to determine the risk for all-cause mortality in older adults with dementia who received atypical antipsychotics, conventional antipsychotics, or no antipsychotic. Because important baseline differences exist among these groups, we used propensity score matching to improve their comparability. We also evaluated the effect of duration of treatment with antipsychotics on the risk for death. Methods Data Sources Ontario is Canadas most populous province. During our study, Ontario had a population of approximately 12 million people, of whom 1.4 million were 65 years of age or older. A universally funded health program covers nearly all physician services, medications, and hospital services for patients 65 years of age or older in Ontario. Information from 4 administrative health care databases was linked to develop the study cohort: pharmacy records from the Ontario Drug Benefit program, hospitalization records from the Canadian Institute for Health Information Discharge Abstract Database, physician billing information for inpatient and outpatient services from the Ontario Health Insurance Plan, and basic demographic information and vital statistics from the Registered Persons Database. We used encrypted unique identifiers that are common among databases to link anonymous information on demographic characteristics and health services utilization for patients in our study. Little basic information on patients is missing in these databases. For example, the coding accuracy of drug claims in the Ontario Drug Benefit program database is excellent, with an error rate of only 0.7% (20). The study was approved by the ethics review board of Sunnybrook and Womens College Health Sciences Centre, Toronto, Ontario, Canada. Dementia Cohort We identified a cohort of all Ontario residents 66 years of age or older with a diagnosis of dementia (in the Ontario Health Insurance Plan or Discharge Abstract Database) between 1 April 1997 and 31 March 2002. To focus on antipsychotic drug treatment for behavioral and psychological symptoms of dementia, we excluded patients who had evidence of other psychotic disorders (such as schizophrenia) or were receiving palliative care services. To reduce the potential for selection bias, we studied only new users of antipsychotics and excluded those who had received antipsychotics in the year before cohort entry (21). Exposure to Antipsychotics We identified new use of antipsychotics if any agent available through the Ontario Drug Benefit program was dispensed after cohort entry. Cohort entry (that is, the index date) was defined as the date of the first dispensed antipsychotic drug. Available atypical drugs included olanzapine, quetiapine, and risperidone, and available conventional drugs included chlorpromazine, flupenthixol, fluphenazine, haloperidol, loxapine, pericyazine, perphenazine, pimozide, thioridazine, and trifluoperazine. Clozapine was rarely used in Ontario during the study period, and we therefore excluded patients who were receiving this medication. Other atypical antipsychotics (such as aripiprazole and ziprasidone) are not licensed for use in Canada. We decided that exposure to an antipsychotic was discontinued (and we censored follow-up) if the patient did not refill his or her antipsychotic prescription within an interval composed of the days of drug supply plus a grace period of 20%. For example, we censored follow-up for a patient who did not refill his or her 60-day antipsychotic prescription within 72 days. We also censored follow-up for patients who switched from atypical to conventional antipsychotics (or vice versa). However, we continued follow-up for patients who switched from 1 atypical antipsychotic to another, because data suggest no statistically significant difference in the risk for death associated with individual drugs in this class (13, 14, 16). We applied the same rules to conventional antipsychotics. All-Cause Mortality The primary outcome was all-cause mortality, as recorded in the Registered Persons Database (for patients who were not hospitalized at the time of death) or the Discharge Abstract Database (for patients who died while hospitalized). To assess the influence of the duration of antipsychotic exposure on the outcome, we evaluated the risk for death at 30, 60, 120, and 180 days after the initial dispensing of antipsychotic medication. Cohort Matching We stratified the dementia cohort to support separate analyses among persons living in the community and those residing in long-term care at cohort entry. Studies have demonstrated that rates of antipsychotic prescribing are substantial among older adults newly admitted to long-term care facilities (4). Furthermore, long-term care residents typically carry a greater burden of comorbid disease and are more vulnerable to adverse drug events than are their counterparts in the community (22, 23). Our first objective was to determine the risk for death among older adults with dementia who received atypical antipsychotics compared with those who were not exposed to any antipsychotic. Because antipsychotic use was not randomly assigned in the study cohorts, we addressed potential confounding and selection biases by developing a propensity score for antipsychotic use. We then applied this score to match users of atypical antipsychotics with nonusers in the dementia cohort. The rationale and methods underlying the use of a propensity score for a proposed causal exposure variable are described elsewhere (24). Recent studies provide guidance on the selection of variables to include in the propensity score (25, 26). We developed a logistic regression model by using 42 covariates describing patient characteristics. Tables 1 and 2 list many of the characteristics included in the propensity score. After a structured and iterative assessment of the balance of measured covariates betwe

Atypical antipsychotic drugs and risk of ischaemic stroke: population based retrospective cohort study

Abstract Objective To compare the incidence of admissions to hospital for stroke among older adults with dementia receiving atypical or typical antipsychotics. Design Population based retrospective cohort study. Setting Ontario, Canada. Patients 32 710 older adults (≤ 65 years) with dementia (17 845 dispensed an atypical antipsychotic and 14 865 dispensed a typical antipsychotic). Main outcome measures Admission to hospital with the most responsible diagnosis (single most important condition responsible for the patients admission) of ischaemic stroke. Observation of patients until they were either admitted to hospital with ischaemic stroke, stopped taking antipsychotics, died, or the study ended. Results After adjustment for potential confounders, participants receiving atypical antipsychotics showed no significant increase in risk of ischaemic stroke compared with those receiving typical antipsychotics (adjusted hazard ratio 1.01, 95% confidence interval 0.81 to 1.26). This finding was consistent in a series of subgroup analyses, including ones of individual atypical antipsychotic drugs (risperidone, olanzapine, and quetiapine) and selected subpopulations of the main cohorts. Conclusion Older adults with dementia who take atypical antipsychotics have a similar risk of ischaemic stroke to those taking typical antipsychotics.

Atypical antipsychotic drugs in the treatment of behavioural and psychological symptoms of dementia: systematic review

Abstract Objective To review the role of oral atypical antipsychotic drugs in the management of the behavioural and psychological symptoms of dementia (BPSD). Data sources Medline, Embase, and the Cochrane Library. Reference lists were reviewed and experts were contacted to identify additional trials. Study selection Double blind randomised controlled trials that evaluated the four oral atypical antipsychotic therapies for BPSD. Review methods Two reviewers assessed trial validity independently. Data extraction Demographics of patients, study duration, dose of antipsychotic, primary end points, adverse events. Results 77 abstracts were reviewed. Five randomised trials (1570 patients) evaluating risperidone and olanzapine were identified. The quality of trials was generally good. Most participants were in an institution (> 96%), elderly (weighted mean 82.3 years), and had Alzheimers disease (76.3%). Trials lasted 6-12 weeks. Treatment with atypical antipsychotic drugs was superior to placebo for the primary end point in three of the five trials. Two trials comparing risperidone with haloperidol did not find any differences in the primary measures of efficacy. Adverse events were common and included extrapyramidal symptoms, somnolence, and abnormal gait. Conclusions Although atypical antipsychotic drugs are being used with increasing frequency, few randomised trials have evaluated their use for BPSD. Limited evidence supports the perception of improved efficacy and adverse event profiles compared with typical antipsychotic drugs.

Antipsychotic medications and drug-induced movement disorders other than parkinsonism: a population-based cohort study in older adults.

Objectives: To study the relationship between initiating therapy with an antipsychotic medication and a subsequent new diagnosis of a drug‐induced movement disorder other than parkinsonism in older adults with dementia.

OCRL1 Mutations in Dent 2 Patients Suggest a Mechanism for Phenotypic Variability

Background/Aims: Dent disease is an X-linked renal proximal tubulopathy associated with mutations in CLCN5 (Dent 1) or OCRL1 (Dent 2). OCRL1 mutations also cause the oculocerebrorenal syndrome of Lowe. Methods: Dent patients with normal sequence for CLCN5 were sequenced for mutations in OCRL1. By analyzing these and all other OCRL1 mutations reported, a model relating OCRL1 mutations to the resulting disease (Dent 2 or Lowe’s) was developed. Results: Six boys with Dent disease had novel OCRL1 mutations: two missense (R301H, G304E) and four mutations predicted to produce premature termination codons (L56DfsX1, S149X, P161PfsX3, and M170IfsX1). These include one of the original patients reported by Dent and Friedman. Slit lamp examinations revealed early cataracts in only one boy with normal vision. None of these Dent 2 patients had metabolic acidosis; 3 had mild mental retardation. Analysis of all known OCRL1 mutations show that Dent 2 mutations fall into two classes that do not overlap with Lowe mutations. Bioinformatics analyses identified expressed OCRL1 splice variants that help explain the variability of those clinical features that distinguish Dent disease from Lowe syndrome. Conclusions:OCRL1 mutations can cause the renal phenotype of Dent disease, without acidosis or the dramatic eye abnormalities typical of Lowe syndrome. We propose a model to explain the phenotypic variability between Dent 2 and Lowe’s based on distinctly different classes of mutations in OCRL1 producing splice variants.

Promotion of the mind through exercise (PROMoTE): a proof-of-concept randomized controlled trial of aerobic exercise training in older adults with vascular cognitive impairment

BackgroundSub-cortical vascular ischaemia is the second most common etiology contributing to cognitive impairment in older adults, and is frequently under-diagnosed and under-treated. Although evidence is mounting that exercise has benefits for cognitive function among seniors, very few randomized controlled trials of exercise have been conducted in populations at high-risk for progression to dementia. Aerobic-based exercise training may be of specific benefit in delaying the progression of cognitive decline among seniors with vascular cognitive impairment by reducing key vascular risk factors associated with metabolic syndrome. Thus, we aim to carry out a proof-of-concept single-blinded randomized controlled trial primarily designed to provide preliminary evidence of efficacy aerobic-based exercise training program on cognitive and everyday function among older adults with mild sub-cortical ischaemic vascular cognitive impairment.Methods/DesignA proof-of-concept single-blinded randomized trial comparing a six-month, thrice-weekly, aerobic-based exercise training group with usual care on cognitive and everyday function. Seventy older adults who meet the diagnostic criteria for sub-cortical ischaemic vascular cognitive impairment as outlined by Erkinjuntti and colleagues will be recruited from a memory clinic of a metropolitan hospital. The aerobic-based exercise training will last for 6 months. Participants will be followed for an additional six months after the cessation of exercise training.DiscussionThis research will be an important first step in quantifying the effect of an exercise intervention on cognitive and daily function among seniors with sub-cortical ischaemic vascular cognitive impairment, a recognized risk state for progression to dementia. Exercise has the potential to be an effective, inexpensive, and accessible intervention strategy with minimal adverse effects. Reducing the rate of cognitive decline among seniors with sub-cortical ischaemic vascular cognitive impairment could preserve independent functioning and health related quality of life in this population. This, in turn, could lead to reduced health care resource utilization costs and avoidance of early institutional care.Trial RegistrationClinicalTrials.gov Protocol Registration System: NCT01027858.

Published randomized controlled trials of drug therapy for dementia often lack complete data on harm

OBJECTIVE The objective of the study was to determine the extent to which published randomized controlled trials (RCTs) report data on harm. STUDY DESIGN AND SETTING A systematic search strategy was used to identify RCTs published between 1996 and 2005 on the use of cholinesterase inhibitors or atypical antipsychotics in patients with dementia. A structured abstraction form was used to determine if data on mortality or serious adverse events were reported and if the articles followed Consolidated Standards of Reporting Trials format for reporting harm. RESULTS Thirty-three RCTs were identified (27 on cholinesterase inhibitors and 6 on atypical antipsychotics). Nineteen trials (58%) had explicit data on mortality and only four (12%) reported regulatory-agency-defined serious adverse events. Most abstracts (31, 94%) stated that harm was studied but few studies (9, 27%) provided a clear definition of the measures of harm. CONCLUSIONS Although most published RCTs state that they examine harm, many failed to provide data on mortality and most lacked clear definitions or detailed analyses of harm. Better reporting of harm would provide timely and important information that could help physicians and the public to make more informed decisions.

Multiple pathologies are common in Alzheimer patients in clinical trials.

OBJECTIVE To determine the frequency of multiple pathology [Alzheimer Disease (AD) plus Vascular Dementia and/or Dementia with Lewy Bodies] in patients enrolled in clinical trials of AD therapy, and to compare the cognitive and functional assessments between patients with pure AD and AD with multiple pathology. METHODS We conducted a retrospective analysis of patients with a clinical diagnosis of AD who were enrolled in AD therapy clinical trials and subsequently received an autopsy for confirmation of their diagnosis from 2000 to 2009. Performance on cognitive screening tests, namely Modified Mini Mental state (3MS) exam, Mini Mental state Exam (MMSE) and Functional Rating Scale (FRS) were compared between patients with pure AD and multiple pathology. RESULTS Autopsy reports were available for 16/47 (34%) of deceased patients. Of these 16 patients, 5 (31%) had pure AD pathology, 10 (63%) had AD with other pathology, and 1 (6%) had non-AD pathology. Compared to patients with pure AD, patients with AD mixed with other pathology had poorer baseline FRS in problem-solving (p<0.01) and community affairs (p<0.02). CONCLUSION While the strict enrollment criteria for clinical trials identified the presence of AD pathology in the majority of cases (15/16), multiple pathology was more common than pure AD in our series of autopsied patients. Premortem biomarkers that can distinguish between pure AD and AD with multiple pathology will be beneficial in future clinical trials and dementia patient management.

Aerobic exercise and vascular cognitive impairment A randomized controlled trial

Objective: To assess the efficacy of a progressive aerobic exercise training program on cognitive and everyday function among adults with mild subcortical ischemic vascular cognitive impairment (SIVCI). Methods: This was a proof-of-concept single-blind randomized controlled trial comparing a 6-month, thrice-weekly, progressive aerobic exercise training program (AT) with usual care plus education on cognitive and everyday function with a follow-up assessment 6 months after the formal cessation of aerobic exercise training. Primary outcomes assessed were general cognitive function (Alzheimers Disease Assessment Scale–Cognitive subscale [ADAS-Cog]), executive functions (Executive Interview [EXIT-25]), and activities of daily living (Alzheimers Disease Cooperative Study–Activities of Daily Living [ADCS-ADL]). Results: Seventy adults randomized to aerobic exercise training or usual care were included in intention-to-treat analyses (mean age 74 years, 51% female, n = 35 per group). At the end of the intervention, the aerobic exercise training group had significantly improved ADAS-Cog performance compared with the usual care plus education group (−1.71 point difference, 95% confidence interval [CI] −3.15 to −0.26, p = 0.02); however, this difference was not significant at the 6-month follow-up (−0.63 point difference, 95% CI −2.34 to 1.07, p = 0.46). There were no significant between-group differences at intervention completion and at the 6-month follow-up in EXIT-25 or ADCS-ADL performance. Examination of secondary measures showed between-group differences at intervention completion favoring the AT group in 6-minute walk distance (30.35 meter difference, 95% CI 5.82 to 54.86, p = 0.02) and in diastolic blood pressure (−6.89 mm Hg difference, 95% CI −12.52 to −1.26, p = 0.02). Conclusions: This study provides preliminary evidence for the efficacy of 6 months of thrice-weekly progressive aerobic training in community-dwelling adults with mild SIVCI, relative to usual care plus education. ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT01027858. Classification of evidence: This study provides Class II evidence that for adults with mild SIVCI, an aerobic exercise program for 6 months results in a small, significant improvement in ADAS-Cog performance.

Cost-effectiveness: cholinesterase inhibitors and memantine in vascular dementia.

BACKGROUND Several randomized controlled trials of cholinesterase inhibitors and memantine in mild to moderate vascular dementia have demonstrated the efficacy of these treatments. However, given these drugs incur considerable cost, the economic argument for their use is less clear. OBJECTIVE To determine the incremental cost-effectiveness of cholinesterase inhibitors and memantine for mild to moderate vascular dementia. DESIGN A decision analysis model using a 24-28 week time horizon was developed. Outcomes of cholinesterase inhibitors and memantine and probabilities of adverse events were extracted from a systematic review. Costs of adverse events, medications, and physician visits were obtained from local estimates. Robustness was tested with probabilistic sensitivity analysis using a Monte Carlo simulation. INTERVENTIONS Donepezil 5 mg daily, donepezil 10 mg daily, galantamine 16-24 mg daily, rivastigmine flexible dosing up to 6 mg twice daily, or memantine 10 mg twice daily versus standard care. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES Incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) expressed as cost per unit decrease in the Alzheimers Disease Assessment Scale-cognitive (ADAS-cog) subscale. RESULTS Donepezil 10 mg daily was found to be the most cost-effective treatment with an ICER of