Philip J. DiSaia

Carcinoma of the cervix treated with radiation therapy I. A multi‐variate analysis of prognostic variables in the gynecologic oncology group

Between 1977 and 1985, the Gynecologic Oncology Group (GOG) conducted three clinical trials in locally advanced carcinoma of the cervix, clinical Stages I to IVA as classified by the International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics (FIGO). All 626 patients had primary carcinoma of the cervix and underwent operative assessment of the para‐aortic (PA) lymph nodes. Patients received standardized external radiation therapy to the pelvis or to the pelvis and PA lymph nodes followed by one or two brachytherapy applications. To date, no statistically significant differences in progression‐free interval (PFI) or survival time have been identified between the randomization treatment arms on any of these studies. Basic similarities among these studies led us to pool these data to identify patient characterisitcs and tumor characteristics associated with an increased risk of treatment failure. Multi‐variate analysis showed patient age, performance status (PS), PA lymph node status, tumor size, and pelvic node status to be significantly associated with PFI. When modeling for survival, all these factors and clinical stage and bilateral extension were significant.

Randomized trial of three cisplatin dose schedules in squamous-cell carcinoma of the cervix: a Gynecologic Oncology Group study.

The Gynecologic Oncology Group has conducted a randomized prospective trial comparing cisplatin 50 mg/m2 every 21 days (regimen 1), 100 mg/m2 every 21 days (regimen 2), and cisplatin 20 mg/m2 for five consecutive days repeated every 21 days (regimen 3). Four hundred ninety-seven evaluable patients have been accrued on this study. The response rates were 20.7%, 31.4%, and 25.0%, for regimens 1, 2, and 3, respectively; the complete remission rates were 10.0%, 12.7%, and 8.6% for regimens 1, 2, and 3, respectively. The median duration of response ranged from 3.9 to 4.8 months, the median progression-free interval from 3.7 to 4.6 months, and the median survival time from 6.1 to 7.1 months. The difference in response rates for regimens 1 and 2 is statistically significant (P = .015) but less than the magnitude originally considered clinically significant. The differences in complete remission rates, response duration, progression-free interval, and survival times are not statistically significant. The following types of toxicity were observed: serum creatinine level greater than 2 mg/dL and/or BUN level greater than 40 mg/dL was 7%, 14%, and 17% on regimens 1, 2, and 3, respectively; leukocyte count less than 4,000/microL was 27%, 44%, and 41% on regimens 1, 2, and 3, respectively. Nausea and vomiting occurred in 74 patients (83%). The regimen consisting of a 100-mg/m2 single dose has produced a statistically significant higher response rate than the 50 mg/m2 regimen while producing no appreciable differences in complete remission rate, response duration, progression-free interval, or survival. In addition, the higher dose regimen was associated with greater myelosuppression and nephrotoxicity.

Treatment of recurrent or advanced uterine sarcoma. A randomized trial of doxorubicin versus doxorubicin and cyclophosphamide (a phase III trial of the Gynecologic Oncology Group).

Recurrent or metastatic uterine sarcoma represents an ominous and aggressive form of malignant disease. In an attempt to define a beneficial treatment program, we compared treatment with doxorubicin (A) 60 mg/m2 versus a combination of doxorubicin 60 mg/m2 and cyclophosphamide 500 mg/m (CA), each regimen given every 3 weeks. Of 132 patients entered on study, 104 were eligible; 50 received A and 54 CA. Pretreatment characteristics were similar, and no patient had received prior chemotherapy. The proportion of complete responses (CR) + partial responses (PR) for measurable disease patients was 5 of 26 (19%) for both A and CA. Multivariate analysis done on progression‐free interval (PFI) and survival (S) showed CA to be of no benefit over A (PFI, P = 0.22; S, P = 0.55). For both A and CA patients, measurable disease (PFI, P = 0.002; S, P = 0.02, respectively), performance status (PFI, P = 0.004; S, P = 0.0002; respectively), and sites of residual disease (PFI, P = 0.008; S, P = 0.003, respectively) were detected as prognostic variables. Conversely, histologic type, age, and recurrence status (primary versus recurrent at entry) were not prognostic indicators. These data indicate no significant benefit of CA versus A alone in patients with uterine sarcoma.

Survival and patterns of recurrence in cervical cancer metastatic to periaortic lymph nodes

Ninety-eight of 621 evaluable patients (16%) with cervical cancer enrolled into Gynecologic Oncology Group protocols were found to have periaortic lymph node metastases at staging laparotomy or at exploration for definitive operative management. As expected there was a progressive increase in the prevalence of periaortic metastases including 5% of 150 patients with Stage IB, 16% of 222 patients with Stage II, and 25% of 135 patients with Stage III. Periaortic lymph node metastases in the absence of pelvic lymph node metastases was an infrequent occurrence in patients so evaluated. The median survival of patients with periaortic metastases was 15.2 months with a survival probability of 25% at 3 years. The median duration of survival following recurrence was only 5 months. Recurrences were divided approximately equally between the pelvis and distant sites.

A randomized comparison of doxorubicin alone versus doxorubicin plus cyclophosphamide in the management of advanced or recurrent endometrial carcinoma: A Gynecologic Oncology Group study.

PURPOSE From 1979 to 1984, 356 eligible patients with advanced or recurrent endometrial carcinoma no longer amenable to therapy with surgery, radiotherapy, or progestins were treated with doxorubicin alone or doxorubicin in combination with cyclophosphamide. PATIENTS AND METHODS Patients were randomized to receive doxorubicin 60 mg/m2 intravenously (i.v.) with or without cyclophosphamide 500 mg/m2 i.v. every 3 weeks for eight drug courses. All patients had received prior therapy with progestins with subsequent progression of disease. No patients had received prior therapy with cytotoxic drugs. Of 356 patients, 300 had measurable disease. RESULTS Among 132 patients treated with doxorubicin alone, there were seven complete responses (5%), 22 partial responses (17%), 73 with stable disease (55%), and 30 with increasing disease within 2 months of study entry (23%). For the 144 patients who received the combination, there were 18 complete responses (13%), 25 partial responses (17%), 75 with stable disease (52%), and 26 with increasing disease (18%). The median progression-free interval for those patients who received doxorubicin alone was 3.2 months, while it was 3.9 months for those who received the combination. The median survival duration for doxorubicin patients was 6.7 months, while it was 7.3 months for the combination patients. None of the unadjusted estimates of treatment differences are statistically significant. Prognostic features that had an impact on outcome included one factor associated with an increased likelihood of response (presence of measurable lung metastases) and four features associated with a poorer survival (poor performance status [PS] of 2 or 3, high pathologic grade, and presence of liver metastases or other intraabdominal disease). If these features are taken into account in multivariate analyses, there is no statistically significant evidence for differences in response rates (relative odds of response, 1.58; P = .06, one-tailed test), and survival duration is slightly longer in the combination regimen (17% reduction in death rate; P = .048). CONCLUSION The combination of doxorubicin plus cyclophosphamide thus appears to offer a small advantage over doxorubicin alone in the management of endometrial carcinoma at the expense of more frequent and severe myelosuppression and gastrointestinal toxicity.

Adenocarcinoma of the endometrium: its metastatic lymph node potential. A preliminary report.

Abstract Stage I adenocarcinoma of the endometrium has been evaluated prospective in 140 patients in regards to grade, depth of myometrial invasion, uterine size, pelvic and paraaortic lymph node metastasis. Metastasis to the lymph nodes appears to correlate well with other important prognostic factors. When additional cases are added and the total data base further analyzed, we hope to develop treatment protocols that will test optimal individualized management.

Malignant germ cell tumors of the ovary

Objective To evaluate the efficacy of adjuvant therapy for ovarian germ cell tumors. Methods We reviewed records of women who had malignant germ cell tumors of the ovary from 1977–1997. Results Seventy-two women had surgical resections of malignant ovarian germ cell tumors and most received adjuvant therapy. Fifty-six women (78%) presented with stage I disease, and 16 (22%) had more advanced disease. Tumor subtypes included dysgerminoma (n = 20), yolk sac tumor (n = 8), immature teratoma (n = 29) and mixed germ cell tumor (n = 15). Surgical management of the 56 with stage I disease consisted of total abdominal hysterectomy, bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy, and extensive surgical staging in ten women, whereas a conservative surgical approach, consisting of unilateral adnexectomy with or without comprehensive surgical staging, was adopted in later years (n = 46). Fifty-six women were treated with postoperative chemotherapy, predominantly platinum-based regimens. The 5-year actuarial survival rate was 93%. None of the 36 women who presented after 1984 have died of disease. Conclusion These data confirmed that platinum-based adjuvant treatments allow most women with ovarian germ cell malignancies to have conservative surgery without compromising survival.

Methylprednisolone as an antiemetic during cancer chemotherapy—a pilot study

Abstract The possibility that prostaglandin release is involved in the nausea and emesis of chemotherapy prompted this investigation to determine if prostaglandin inhibition by corticosteroid administration would be beneficial. Methylprednisolone (Solu-Medrol, Upjohn) was given to 19 patients receiving cancer chemotherapy. Of 11 patients with prior chemotherapy and emesis, 8 obtained noticeable relief. Six patients had no prior chemotherapy and only 1 experienced emesis. Two patients with prior chemotherapy had no emesis associated with their chemotherapy, although 1 had marked nausea which did not recur when treated with the steroid.

Phase II trial of ifosfamide and mesna in mixed mesodermal tumors of the uterus (A gynecologic oncology group study)

A phase II trial of ifosfamide (isophosphamide, NSC 109724) and mesna (2-mercaptoethane sodium sulfonate, NSC 113891) in women with advanced or recurrent mixed mullerian tumors of the uterus was conducted by the Gynecologic Oncology Group. The starting dose of ifosfamide was 1.5 gm/m2 daily, intravenously, for 5 days. The starting dose of ifosfamide was reduced 1.2 gm/m2 daily in patients who had received prior radiotherapy. Mesna was given intravenously immediately and at 4 and 8 hours after the administration of ifosfamide. Each mesna dose was 20% of the total daily dose of ifosfamide. Twenty-nine patients are evaluable for toxicity, and 28 patients are evaluable for response. Twenty-one patients had received prior abdominal hysterectomy, and eight patients had prior radiotherapy. Thirteen tumors were homologous and 15 heterologous. Gynecologic Oncology Group grade 3 or 4 granulocytopenia occurred in seven (25%) patients and two (7.1%) had grade 3 or 4 thrombocytopenia. Two patients (7.1%) had grade 3 or 4 neurotoxicity. One patient experienced lethargy and confusion that responded to discontinuation of the ifosfamide. A second patient developed progressive cerebellar dysfunction, left hemiparesis, and coma. This patient died after 3 days of therapy. Complete responses were seen in five (17.9%) patients and partial responses occurred in four (14.3%) patients for a total response rate of 32.2%. These results indicate that ifosfamide is an unusually active drug in patients with advanced or recurrent mixed mullerian tumors of the uterus. Studies with combination regimens incorporating ifosfamide are warranted. The toxicity of ifosfamide in Gynecologic Oncology Group studies is being evaluated retrospectively.

A randomized comparative trial of carboplatin and iproplatin in advanced squamous carcinoma of the uterine cervix: a Gynecologic Oncology Group study.

A total of 394 patients with advanced, measurable squamous carcinoma of the uterine cervix and no prior chemotherapy were randomized to therapy with either carboplatin or iproplatin. There were 23 patients ineligible for the study and 10 patients who were not evaluable; the remaining 361 patients were evaluable for response and adverse effects. Randomization was well balanced for age, performance status, and prior therapy. Both platinum analogs were given every 28 days with starting doses of 400 mg/m2 for carboplatin (340 mg/m2 if the patient underwent prior radiation) and 270 mg/m2 for iproplatin (230 mg/m2 if the patient underwent prior radiation). These doses are equivalent to cisplatin doses of 75 to 100 mg/m2. Hematologic toxicity was dose-limiting, among which thrombocytopenia was slightly more common than leukopenia. Gastrointestinal toxicity was also prominent with both agents; however, iproplatin was significantly more toxic than carboplatin (P less than .001). Renal, otic, and peripheral nervous system toxicities were absent or infrequent with both analogs. No electrolyte abnormalities were observed. The percentage of planned dosages that were actually administered was 100% of carboplatin doses and 85% of iproplatin doses (P less than .0001). The reduction in iproplatin dose was apparently due to gastrointestinal toxicity. Response rates were similar for both agents (15% for carboplatin, 11% for iproplatin) and appear to be inferior to those noted with the parent compound, cisplatin.