Philip J. Farabaugh

Ribosomal frameshifting in the yeast retrotransposon Ty: tRNAs induce slippage on a 7 nucleotide minimal site

Abstract Ribosomal frameshifting regulates expression of the TYB gene of yeast Ty retrotransposons. We previously demonstrated that a 14 nucleotide sequence conserved between two families of Ty elements was necessary and sufficient to support ribosomal frameshifting. This work demonstrates that only 7 of these 14 nucleotides are needed for normal levels of frameshifting. Any change to the sequence CUU-AGG-C drastically reduces frameshifting; this suggests that two specific tRNAs, tRNALeu UAG and tRNAArg CCU, are involved in the event. Our tRNA overproduction data suggest that a leucyl-tRNA, probably tRNALeu UAG, an unusual leucine isoacceptor that recognizes all six leucine codons, slips from CUU-Leu onto UUA-Leu (in the +1 reading frame) during a translational pause at the AGG-Arg codon induced by the low availability of tRNAArg CCU, encoded by a single-copy essential gene. Frameshifting is also directional and reading frame specific. Interestingly, frameshifting is inhibited when the “slip” CUU codon is located three codons downstream, but not four or more codons downstream, of the translational initiation codon.

A novel programed frameshift expresses the POL3 gene of retrotransposon Ty3 of yeast: Frameshifting without tRNA slippage

Abstract Most retroviruses and retrotransposons express their pol gene as a translational fusion to the upstream gag gene, often involving translational frameshifting. We describe here an unusual translational frameshift event occurring between the GAG3 and POL3 genes of the retrotransposon Ty3 of yeast. A +1 frameshift occurs within the sequence GCG AGU U (shown as codons of GAG3), encoding alanine-valine ( GCG A GUU ). Unlike other programed translational frameshifts described, this event does not require tRNA slippage between cognate or near-cognate codons in the mRNA. Two features distal to the GCG codon stimulate frameshifting. The low availability of the tRNA specific for the “hungry” serine codon, AGU, induces a translational pause required for frameshifting. A sequence of 12 nt distal to the AGU codon (termed the Ty3. “context”) also stimulates the event.

How translational accuracy influences reading frame maintenance

Most missense errors have little effect on protein function, since they only exchange one amino acid for another. However, processivity errors, frameshifting or premature termination result in a synthesis of an incomplete peptide. There may be a connection between missense and processivity errors, since processivity errors now appear to result from a second error occurring after recruitment of an errant aminoacyl‐tRNA, either spontaneous dissociation causing premature termination or translational frameshifting. This is clearest in programmed translational frameshifting where the mRNA programs errant reading by a near‐cognate tRNA; this error promotes a second frameshifting error (a dual‐error model of frameshifting). The same mechanism can explain frameshifting by suppressor tRNAs, even those with expanded anticodon loops. The previous model that suppressor tRNAs induce quadruplet translocation now appears incorrect for most, and perhaps for all of them. We suggest that the ‘spontaneous’ tRNA‐induced frameshifting and ‘programmed’ mRNA‐induced frameshifting use the same mechanism, although the frequency of frameshifting is very different. This new model of frameshifting suggests that the tRNA is not acting as the yardstick to measure out the length of the translocation step. Rather, the translocation of 3 nucleotides may be an inherent feature of the ribosome.

A New Model for Phenotypic Suppression of Frameshift Mutations by Mutant tRNAs

According to the prevailing model, frameshift-suppressing tRNAs with an extra nucleotide in the anticodon loop suppress +1 frameshift mutations by recognizing a four-base codon and promoting quadruplet translocation. We present three sets of experiments that suggest a general alternative to this model. First, base modification should actually block such a four-base interaction by two classical frameshift suppressors. Second, for one Salmonella suppressor tRNA, it is not mutant tRNA but a structurally normal near cognate that causes the +1 shift in-frame. Finally, frameshifting occurs in competition with normal decoding of the next in-frame codon, consistent with an event that occurs in the ribosomal P site after the translocation step. These results suggest an alternative model involving peptidyl-tRNA slippage at the classical CCC-N and GGG-N frameshift suppression sites.

Translational frameshifting: implications for the mechanism of translational frame maintenance.

The ribosome rapidly translates the information in the nucleic sequence of mRNA into the amino acid sequence of proteins. As with any biological process, translation is not completely accurate; it must compromise the antagonistic demands of increased speed and greater accuracy. Yet, reading-frame errors are especially infrequent, occurring at least 10 times less frequently than other errors. How do ribosomes maintain the reading frame so faithfully? Geneticists have addressed this question by identifying suppressors that increase error frequency. Most familiar are the frameshift suppressor tRNAs, though other suppressors include mutant forms of rRNA, ribosomal proteins, or translation factors. Certain mRNA sequences can also program frameshifting by normal ribosomes. The models of suppression and programmed frameshifting describe apparently quite different mechanisms. Contemporary work has questioned the long-accepted model for frameshift suppression by mutant tRNAs, and a unified explanation has been proposed for both phenomena. The Quadruplet Translocation Model proposes that suppressor tRNAs cause frameshifting by recognizing an expanded mRNA codon. The new data are inconsistent with this model for some tRNAs, implying the model may be invalid for all. A new model for frameshift suppression involves slippage caused by a weak, near-cognate codon.anticodon interaction. This strongly resembles the mechanism of +1 programmed frameshifting. This may mean that infrequent frameshift errors by normal ribosomes may result from two successive errors: misreading by a near-cognate tRNA, which causes a subsequent shift in reading frame. Ribosomes may avoid phenotypically serious frame errors by restricting apparently innocuous errors of sense.

Nonsense-mediated decay mutants do not affect programmed -1 frameshifting.

Sequences in certain mRNAs program the ribosome to undergo a noncanonical translation event, translational frameshifting, translational hopping, or termination readthrough. These sequences are termed recoding sites, because they cause the ribosome to change temporarily its coding rules. Cis and trans-acting factors sensitively modulate the efficiency of recoding events. In an attempt to quantitate the effect of these factors we have developed a dual-reporter vector using the lacZ and luc genes to directly measure recoding efficiency. We were able to confirm the effect of several factors that modulate frameshift or readthrough efficiency at a variety of sites. Surprisingly, we were not able to confirm that the complex of factors termed the surveillance complex regulates translational frameshifting. This complex regulates degradation of nonsense codon-containing mRNAs and we confirm that it also affects the efficiency of nonsense suppression. Our data suggest that the surveillance complex is not a general regulator of translational accuracy, but that its role is closely tied to the translational termination and initiation processes.

A comprehensive analysis of translational missense errors in the yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae.

The process of protein synthesis must be sufficiently rapid and sufficiently accurate to support continued cellular growth. Failure in speed or accuracy can have dire consequences, including disease in humans. Most estimates of the accuracy come from studies of bacterial systems, principally Escherichia coli, and have involved incomplete analysis of possible errors. We recently used a highly quantitative system to measure the frequency of all types of misreading errors by a single tRNA in E. coli. That study found a wide variation in error frequencies among codons; a major factor causing that variation is competition between the correct (cognate) and incorrect (near-cognate) aminoacyl-tRNAs for the mutant codon. Here we extend that analysis to measure the frequency of missense errors by two tRNAs in a eukaryote, the yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae. The data show that in yeast errors vary by codon from a low of 4 x 10(-5) to a high of 6.9 x 10(-4) per codon and that error frequency is in general about threefold lower than in E. coli, which may suggest that yeast has additional mechanisms that reduce missense errors. Error rate again is strongly influenced by tRNA competition. Surprisingly, missense errors involving wobble position mispairing were much less frequent in S. cerevisiae than in E. coli. Furthermore, the error-inducing aminoglycoside antibiotic, paromomycin, which stimulates errors on all error-prone codons in E. coli, has a more codon-specific effect in yeast.

Ribosome structure: revisiting the connection between translational accuracy and unconventional decoding

Abstract The ribosome is a molecular machine that converts genetic information in the form of RNA, into protein. Recent structural studies reveal a complex set of interactions between the ribosome and its ligands, mRNA and tRNA, that indicate ways in which the ribosome could avoid costly translational errors. Ribosomes must decode each successive codon accurately, and structural data provide a clear indication of how ribosomes limit recruitment of the wrong tRNA (sense errors). In a triplet-based genetic code there are three potential forward reading frames, only one of which encodes the correct protein. Errors in which the ribosome reads a codon out of the normal reading frame (frameshift errors) occur less frequently than sense errors, although it is not clear from structural data how these errors are avoided. Some mRNA sequences, termed programmed-frameshift sites, cause the ribosome to change reading frame. Based on recent work on these sites, this article proposes that the ribosome uses the structure of the codon–anticodon complex formed by the peptidyl-tRNA, especially its wobble interaction, to constrain the incoming aminoacyl-tRNA to the correct reading frame.

SPECIAL PEPTIDYL-TRNA MOLECULES CAN PROMOTE TRANSLATIONAL FRAMESHIFTING WITHOUT SLIPPAGE

Recently we described an unusual programmed +1 frameshift event in yeast retrotransposon Ty3. Frameshifting depends on the presence of peptidyl-tRNA(AlaCGC) on the GCG codon in the ribosomal P site and on a translational pause stimulated by the slowly decoded AGU codon. Frameshifting occurs on the sequence GCG-AGU-U by out-of-frame binding of a valyl-tRNA to GUU without slippage of peptidyl-tRNA(AlaCGC). This mechanism challenges the conventional understanding that frameshift efficiency must correlate with the ability of mRNA-bound tRNA to slip between cognate or near-cognate codons. Though frameshifting does not require slippery tRNAs, it does require special peptidyl-tRNAs. We show that overproducing a second isoacceptor whose anticodon had been changed to CGC eliminated frameshifting; peptidyl-tRNA(AlaCGC) must have a special capacity to induce +1 frameshifting in the adjacent ribosomal A site. In order to identify other special peptidyl-tRNAs, we tested the ability of each of the other 63 codons to replace GCG in the P site. We found no correlation between the ability to stimulate +1 frameshifting and the ability of the cognate tRNA to slip on the mRNA--several codons predicted to slip efficiently do not stimulate frameshifting, while several predicted not to slip do stimulate frameshifting. By inducing a severe translational pause, we identified eight tRNAs capable of inducing measurable +1 frameshifting, only four of which are predicted to slip on the mRNA. We conclude that in Saccharomyces cerevisiae, special peptidyl-tRNAs can induce frameshifting dependent on some characteristic(s) other than the ability to slip on the mRNA.

Near-cognate peptidyl-tRNAs promote +1 programmed translational frameshifting in yeast.

Translational frameshifting is a ubiquitous, if rare, form of alternative decoding in which ribosomes spontaneously shift reading frames during translation elongation. In studying +1 frameshifting in Ty retrotransposons of the yeast S. cerevisiae, we previously showed that unusual P site tRNAs induce frameshifting. The frameshift-inducing tRNAs we show here are near-cognates for the P site codon. Their abnormal decoding induces frameshifting in either of two ways: weak codon-anticodon pairing allows the tRNA to disengage from the mRNA and slip +1, or an unusual codon-anticodon structure interferes with cognate in-frame decoding allowing out-of-frame decoding in the A site. We draw parallels between this mechanism and a proposed mechanism of frameshift suppression by mutant tRNAs.