Philip K. Louie

Effect of Surgeon Volume on Complications, Length of Stay, and Costs Following Anterior Cervical Fusion

Study Design. Retrospective cohort. Objective. To identify the association between surgeon volume and inpatient complications, length of stay, and costs associated with ACF. Summary of Background Data. Increased surgeon volume may be associated with improved outcomes after surgical procedures. However, there is a lack of information on the effect of surgeon volume on short-term outcomes after anterior cervical fusion (ACF). Methods. A retrospective cohort study of ACF patients was performed using the Nationwide Inpatient Sample (NIS) from 2003 to 2009. Surgeon volume was divided into three categories, volume <25th percentile, 25th to 74th percentile, and ≥75th percentile of surgeon volume. Multivariate regression was used to compare the rates of adverse events, hospital length of stay, and total hospital costs between surgeon volume categories. Results. A total of 419,212 ACF patients were identified. The 25th percentile for volume was 5 cases per year, and the 75th percentile for volume was 67 cases per year. Volume <25th percentile was associated with increased rates of any adverse event (odd ratio, OR 3.8, P < 0.001), and multiple individual complications including death (OR 2.5, P=0.014), myocardial infarction (OR4.4, P < 0.001), sepsis (OR 4.1, P < 0.001), and surgical site infection (OR 4.0, P < 0.001). Notably, volume ≥75th percentile was associated with decreased rates of any adverse event (OR 0.7, P < 0.001) and death (OR 0.6, P = 0.028). On multivariate analysis, length of stay was significantly increased by 2.3 days (P < 0.001) for surgeons <25th percentile of volume and was decreased by 0.3 days for surgeons with volume ≥75th percentile. Hospital costs were

Spine Surgeon Selection Criteria: Factors Influencing Patient Choice.

4569 more for surgeons with <25th percentile of volume and

Multimodal Versus Patient-Controlled Analgesia After an Anterior Cervical Decompression and Fusion.

1213 less for surgeons with ≥75th percentile volume. Conclusion. In this nationally representative sample, surgeons with volume <25th percentile had significantly increased complications, length of stay, and costs. Conversely, surgeons with ≥75th percentile volume experienced decreased complications, length of stay, and costs. Level of Evidence: 4

Epidemiologic trends in the utilization, demographics, and cost of bone morphogenetic protein in spinal fusions

Study Design. A prospective questionnaire. Objective. The aim of this study was to evaluate factors that patients consider when selecting a spine surgeon. Summary of Background Data. The rise in consumer-driven health insurance plans has increased the role of patients in provider selection. The purpose of this study is to identify factors that may influence a patients criteria for selecting a spine surgeon. Methods. Two hundred thirty-one patients who sought treatment by one spine surgeon completed an anonymous questionnaire consisting of 26 questions. Four questions regarded demographic information; 16 questions asked respondents to rate the importance of specific criteria regarding spine surgeon selection (scale 1–10, with 10 being the most important); and six questions were multiple-choice regarding patient preferences toward aspects of their surgeon (age, training background, etc.). Results. Patients rated board certification (9.26 ± 1.67), in-network provider status (8.10 ± 3.04), and friendliness/bedside manner (8.01 ± 2.35) highest among factors considered when selecting a spine surgeon. Most patients (92%) reported that 30 minutes or less should pass between check-in and seeing their surgeon during a clinic appointment. Regarding whether their spine surgeon underwent training as a neurosurgeon versus an orthopedic surgeon, 25% reported no preference, 52% preferred neurosurgical training, and 23% preferred orthopedic training. Conclusion. Our findings suggest that board certification and in-network health insurance plans may be most important in patients’ criteria for choosing a spine surgeon. Advertisements were rated least important by patients. Patients expressed varying preferences regarding ideal surgeon age, training background, proximity, medical student/resident involvement, and clinic appointment availability. The surgeon from whom patients sought treatment completed an orthopedic surgery residency; hence, it is notable that 52% of patients preferred a spine surgeon with a neurosurgical background. In the context of patients’ increasing role in health care decision-making and provider selection, understanding the factors that influence patients’ selection of a spine surgeon is important. Level of Evidence: 3

Multimodal Analgesia versus Intravenous Patient-controlled Analgesia For Minimally Invasive Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion Procedures.

Study Design. Retrospective analysis of a prospectively maintained surgical registry. Objective. To compare postoperative narcotic consumption between multimodal analgesia (MMA) and patient-controlled analgesia (PCA) after an anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF). Summary of Background Data. Studies suggest that a multimodal approach to pain management leads to decreased pain and morphine consumption after total joint arthroplasty and lumbar spinal procedures. Patients and surgeons would benefit from knowing whether a multimodal approach to pain management is superior to PCA for ACDF. Methods. A retrospective cohort study of ACDF patients receiving either MMA or PCA was conducted. Inpatient narcotic consumption, pain scores, nausea/vomiting, hospital length of stay, and narcotic dependence during the months after surgery were compared between MMA and PCA. Results. A total of 239 patients met inclusion criteria. Of these, 55 (23.0%) received MMA and 184 (77.0%) received PCA. Patients who received MMA had a lower rate of inpatient narcotic consumption (2.5 OME/h vs. 5.8 OME/h, P < 0.001) were less likely to experience nausea/vomiting during the hospitalization (5.5% vs. 37.5%, P < 0.001), and had a shorter hospital length of stay (27.3 vs. 40.1 h, P < 0.001). However, there was no difference between groups in mean visual analogue pain scale during postoperative day zero (4.7 for MMA vs. 5.2 for PCA, P = 0.126) or during postoperative day one (4.1 for MMA vs. 4.1 for PCA, P = 0.937). In addition, there was no difference in the rate of narcotic dependence at the first (P = 0.626) or second (P = 0.480) postoperative visits. Conclusion. These data suggest that MMA results in lower narcotic consumption than PCA after an ACDF. This difference is associated with a shorter inpatient stay and a decrease in postoperative nausea/vomiting. Critically, MMA and PCA appear to provide similar postoperative analgesia. Level of Evidence: 3

Involvement of Residents Does Not Increase Postoperative Complications After Open Reduction Internal Fixation of Ankle Fractures: An Analysis of 3251 Cases

Bone morphogenetic protein (BMP) utilization as an adjunct for spinal arthrodesis has gained considerable momentum among spine surgeons. Despite carrying Food and Drug Administration approval for only single level anterior lumbar interbody fusion from L4-S1, the majority of BMP administration is in “off label” settings. Over the last decade, BMP utilization has increased in all facets of spine surgery with the only exception being the anterior cervical spine, in which a downward trend resulted following the 2008 Food and Drug Administration warnings. The future application of BMP in spinal fusion, especially in anterior cervical fusions, will need to be further clarified in terms of efficacy, complications, and cost-effectiveness.

Stability-preserving decompression in degenerative versus congenital spinal stenosis: demographic patterns and patient outcomes

Study Design. Retrospective analysis. Objective. To compare postoperative narcotic consumption and pain scores between multimodal analgesia (MMA) and patient-controlled analgesia (PCA) following minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (MIS TLIF). Summary of Background Data. A multimodal analgesic approach to pain management may lead to decreased pain and narcotic consumption after orthopedic procedures. Additional evidence is, however, required to determine how MMA compares to intravenous PCA after MIS TLIF. Methods. Patients undergoing 1-level MIS TLIF followed by either MMA or PCA at our institution were compared in terms of inpatient pain scores, narcotic consumption, hospital length of stay, rates of surgical complications, rates of inpatient nausea/vomiting, rates of postoperative urinary retention, and rates of narcotic consumption during the months after discharge. Results. A total of 139 patients met inclusion criteria. Of these, 39 (28.1%) received MMA and 100 (71.9%) received PCA. Demographic and comorbidity characteristics did not differ between cohorts. Compared with patients receiving PCA, patients receiving MMA had a lower rate of inpatient narcotic consumption (2.8 ± 1.9 vs. 5.3 ± 4.4 oral morphine equivalents/hour, P < 0.001), a lower rate of inpatient nausea/vomiting (20.5% vs. 48.0%; P = 0.003), and a shorter hospital length of stay (53.0 ± 25.3 vs. 62.6 ± 24.4 h, P = 0.041). There were no differences in Numeric Rating Scale pain score between cohorts for day 0, postoperative day 1, or postoperative day 2 (P > 0.05 for each). There was no difference in the rate of postoperative urinary retention (P > 0.05). Similarly, there were no differences in narcotic consumption at 6 or 12 weeks postoperatively (P > 0.05 for each). Conclusion. These findings suggest that MMA results in reduced inpatient hospital narcotic consumption compared with PCA after MIS TLIF. The decrease in narcotic consumption may contribute to the observed decrease in the rate of inpatient nausea/vomiting and shorter hospital length of stay. Importantly, MMA and PCA resulted in similar analgesia for patients during the inpatient stay. Level of Evidence: 4

There is No Increased Risk of Adjacent Segment Disease at the Cervico-Thoracic Junction Following an Anterior Cervical Discectomy and Fusion to C7

ABSTRACT Ankle fractures are common injuries frequently treated by foot and ankle surgeons. Therefore, it has become a core competency for orthopedic residency training. Surgical educators must balance the task of training residents with optimizing patient outcomes and minimizing morbidity and mortality. The present study aimed to determine the effect of resident involvement on the 30‐day postoperative complication rates after open reduction and internal fixation of ankle fractures. A second objective of the present study was to determine the independent risk factors for complications after this procedure. We identified patients in the American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program database who had undergone open reduction internal fixation for ankle fractures from 2005 to 2012. Propensity score matching was used to help account for a potential selection bias. We performed univariate and multivariate analyses to identify the independent risk factors associated with short‐term postoperative complications. A total of 3251 open reduction internal fixation procedures for ankle fractures were identified, of which 959 (29.4%) had resident involvement. Univariate (2.82% versus 4.54%; p = .024) and multivariate (odds ratio 0.71; p = .75) analyses demonstrated that resident involvement did not increase short‐term complication rates. The independent risk factors for complications after open reduction internal fixation of ankle fractures included insulin‐dependent diabetes, increasing age, higher American Society of Anesthesiologists score, and longer operative times.

Effects of Intraoperative Anesthetic Medications on Postoperative Urinary Retention After Single-Level Lumbar Fusion.

BACKGROUND CONTEXT Although lumbar spinal stenosis often presents as a degenerative condition (degenerative stenosis [DS]), some patients present with symptoms from lifelong narrowing of the spinal canal. These patients have congenital stenosis (CS) and present with symptoms of stenosis at a younger age. Patients with CS often have a distinct pathophysiology with fewer degenerative changes but present with multilevel involvement. In the setting of neurologic symptoms, decompression alone while preserving stability has been proposed for both patient populations. PURPOSE The purpose of this study is to evaluate if the different etiology for narrowing in CS and DS results in a different natural history of pain progression, different locations requiring decompression, and different outcomes following a stability-preserving decompression procedure. STUDY DESIGN/SETTING This study used a retrospective cohort study patient sample: We retrospectively reviewed consecutive patients of a single surgeon with DS or CS who underwent surgical decompression without fusion between 2008 and 2014. Patients were excluded if they had undergone a previous lumbar surgical procedure (decompression or fusion) or follow-up less than 12 months. OUTCOME MEASURES Pre- and postoperative clinical outcome scores including visual analogue scale (VAS) and Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) were recorded. Postoperatively, data were collected regarding complications, the presence of new radicular or myelopathic symptoms, and necessity of reoperation in the lumbar spine. METHODS Demographic information included age, sex, body mass index, smoking status, and Charleston Comorbidity Index (CCI). Preoperative clinical symptoms as well as the presence of lower extremity radiculopathy and claudication were evaluated. Patients were determined to have a diagnosis of CS by the treating surgeon if primary radiographs revealed shortened pedicles and decreased cross-sectional area of the spinal canal as detailed by previous studies. Binary outcomes were compared between congenital and degenerative cohorts using bivariate and multivariate logistic regression. Multivariate regressions controlled for baseline patient and operative characteristics. RESULTS The average age of the DS cohort was 66.7±10.7 years, whereas for the CS group, it was 47.1±9.2 years. Average follow-up was 27.6 months. The patients with DS had significantly more comorbidities as shown by the CCI score (2.8±1.6 vs. 0.5±0.6); p<.001) and the American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) score ≥3 (52.8% vs. 11.1%; p<.001). Patients with CS presented with higher VAS back (8.0 vs. 5.1; p=.008) and leg (7.9 vs. 4.5; p<.001) scores. Patients with DS presented with significantly greater duration of preoperative back pain and leg pain (42.7 vs. 30.5 months; p=.042). Postoperatively, there were no significant differences in VAS back, leg, or ODI scores. However, a trend toward a lower VAS leg score was present in the patients with CS when compared with patients with DS (2.6±3.0 vs. 4.2±3.2; p<.117). Both patient groups experienced similar levels of symptomatic relief and improvement in VAS and ODI scores. There were no significant differences in new-onset radicular symptoms requiring conservative treatment or reoperation. In both groups combined, 81.9% of patients reported resolution of lower extremity symptoms at final follow-up. Overall, 20.6% of patients experienced new lower-extremity radicular symptoms after a period of resolution of symptoms postoperatively. There were significantly more reoperations following surgical decompression in patients with DS (13.9% vs. 2.8%; p=.02). CONCLUSIONS Patients with CS and patients with DS respond well to decompression alone, without a supplemental fusion, despite differences in pain experience and presentation. The localization of pathology requiring decompression is similar. The patients with DS were more susceptible to require another operation resulting in a fusion, which confirms the theory that initial microinstability can progress in DS, but is likely not part of the disease process in CS. At just over 2 years after decompression, patients with CS may not need to be treated by a fusion in the setting of lower back pain; however, longer-term follow up is necessary to further assess these outcomes.

Stand-alone lateral lumbar interbody fusion for the treatment of symptomatic adjacent segment degeneration following previous lumbar fusion

BACKGROUND CONTEXT Anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF) is a very common operative intervention for the treatment of cervical spine degenerative disease in those who have failed non-operative measures. However, studies examining long-term follow-up on patients who underwent ACDF reveal evidence of radiographic and clinical degenerative disc disease at the levels adjacent to the fusion construct. Consistent with other junctional regions of the spine, the cervicothoracic junction (CTJ) has significant morphologic variations. As a result, the CTJ undergoes significant static and dynamic stress. Given these findings, there has been some thought that ACDF down to C7 may experience additional risks for adjacent segment degeneration/disease (ASD) when compared with ASDFs that are cephalad to C7. PURPOSE The goal of this study is to evaluate the rate of radiographic and clinical ASD in patients who have undergone single- or multilevel ACDF, down to C7. STUDY DESIGN This is a retrospective cohort study. PATIENT SAMPLE The sample included consecutive patients from a single orthopedic surgeon at one quaternary referral medical center who underwent an ACDF between January 2008 and November 2014. Indications for surgery included radiculopathy, myelopathy, or myeloradiculopathy in the setting of failed conservative treatments. Patients were excluded if they had an ACDF of which the caudal level was cephalad to C7 or if they had undergone a previous cervical fusion. OUTCOME MEASURES Radiographic diagnosis of ASD was determined by the presence of disc space narrowing >50%, new or enlarged osteophytes, end plate sclerosis, or increased calcification of the anterior longitudinal ligament (ALL). Postoperatively, data were collected on the presence of new radicular or myelopathic symptoms indicative of pathology at C7-T1, indicating a diagnosis of clinical ASD. METHODS Demographic information was collected for all patients, which included age, sex, body mass index, smoking status, and Charleston Comorbidity Index (CCI). Several radiographic parameters were measured preoperatively, immediately postoperatively, and at the last follow-up: C2-C7 lordosis, sagittal vertical axis (SVA), thoracic inlet angle (TIA), and T1 slope C2-C7 lordosis were measured using the Cobb angle between the inferior end plate of C2 to the inferior end plate of C7. Radiographic and clinical factors associated with ASD were analyzed postoperatively. RESULTS Four patients (4.8%) presented with clinical evidence of ASD, all of whom also showed signs of radiographic ASD and improved with conservative measures. No patients underwent reoperation for ASD at the C7-T1 junction. Thirty patients (36.1%) presented radiographic evidence of ASD. These were generally older (54.4 vs. 48.4 years; p=.014). There were neither significant differences in radiographic parameters nor between single- versus multilevel ACDFs and the development of ASD. CONCLUSIONS The cervicothoracic junction may present with vulnerability to ASD given the junctional biomechanics. However, this study provides evidence that an ACDF with the caudal level of C7 does not incur additional risk of ASD, showing similar outcomes to ACDFs at other levels.