Philip M. Blomgren

Prevention of Lithotripsy-Induced Renal Injury by Pretreating Kidneys with Low-Energy Shock Waves

Lithotripsy shock waves (SW) to one renal pole damage that pole but protect the opposite pole from the damage inflicted by another, immediate application of SW. This study investigated whether the protection (1) occurs when the first treatment causes no injury, (2) is caused by SW or injury, (3) exhibits a threshold, and (4) occurs when the same pole receives both treatments. Six- to 7-wk-old anesthetized female pigs were studied. The following groups were studied: group 1 (n=4), 2000 SW at 12 kV to one pole and 2000 SW at 24 kV (standard) to the opposite pole; group 2 (n=6), same as group 1 except 500 12-kV SW pretreatment; group 3 (n=8), 500 12-kV, 2000 standard SW, all to the same pole; and group 4 (n=8), same as group 3 except 100 12-kV SW pretreatment. Mean+/-SD lesion size in group 1, first pole treated, was 0.66+/-0.82% of functional renal volume (FRV; P<0.05 versus 5.22+/-3.6% FRV with no pretreatment [NP]; 95% confidence interval [CI] -7.0 to -2.1) and 0.50+/-0.68% FRV in the opposite pole after 2000 standard SW (P<0.05 versus NP; 95% CI -9.4 to -0.08). Mean lesion size (first pole) in group 2 was 0.020+/-0.028% FRV (P<0.01 versus NP; 95% CI -9.2 to -1.2) and 0.43+/-0.54% FRV in the opposite pole after 2000 standard SW (P<0.05 versus NP; 95% CI -8.8 to -0.82). Same-pole SW (groups 3 and 4) also protected. Mean lesion sizes were 0.28+/-0.33% (P<0.01 versus NP; 95% CI -8.0 to -1.9) in group 3 and 0.39+/-0.48% FRV (P<0.01 versus NP; 95% CI -8.2 to -1.7) in group 4. It is concluded that the pretreatment protocol substantially limits the renal injury that normally is caused by SWL and occurs when the pretreatment and standard SW are applied to the same pole. The threshold for the protection may be <100 SW.

Renal injury during shock wave lithotripsy is significantly reduced by slowing the rate of shock wave delivery

To assess the tissue protection afforded by simply reducing the rate of shock wave (SW) delivery, compared with studies in the pig in which SW lithotripsy (SWL)‐induced vascular damage was significantly reduced by initiating treatment using low‐amplitude SWs.

Quantitation of shock wave lithotripsy-induced lesion in small and large pig kidneys.

Shock wave lithotripsy (SWL) is known to cause injury to the kidney. However, it is not known how lesion size varies as the parameters of SWL treatment (number of shocks, kilovoltage, kidney size) are changed. This hypothesis could not be tested because there was no method available to quantitate accurately the SWL‐induced renal lesion.

Branching patterns of the renal artery of the pig

The pig kidney is similar in structure and function to the human kidney, thus making it a useful model in understanding the human kidney in health and disease. However, little is known about the branching pattern of the pig renal artery as compared with the human and other animals.

Extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy at 60 shock waves/min reduces renal injury in a porcine model

To determine if extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy (ESWL) at 60 shock waves (SWs)/min reduces renal damage and haemodynamic impairment compared to treatment at 120 SWs/min.

Effect of initial shock wave voltage on shock wave lithotripsy‐induced lesion size during step‐wise voltage ramping

To determine if the starting voltage in a step‐wise ramping protocol for extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy (SWL) alters the size of the renal lesion caused by the SWs.

Independent assessment of a wide‐focus, low‐pressure electromagnetic lithotripter: absence of renal bioeffects in the pig

To assess the renal injury response in a pig model treated with a clinical dose of shock waves (SWs) delivered at a slow rate (27 SW/min) using a novel wide focal zone (18 mm), low acoustic pressure (<20 MPa) electromagnetic lithotripter (Xi Xin‐Eisenmenger, XX‐ES; Xi Xin Medical Instruments Co. Ltd., Suzhou, PRC).

Prefocal alignment improves stone comminution in shockwave lithotripsy

BACKGROUND The Dornier HM-3 machine continues to be one of the most effective lithotripters in use. However, tissue damage occurs in most, if not all, shockwave lithotripsy (SWL) treatments. Cavitation appears to contribute to desired stone comminution as well as to undesired tissue damage. Studies of cavitation in electrohydraulic shockwave lithotripters indicate that the greatest cavitation activity occurs, not at the geometric focus, F2, but at a site proximal to F2 by 1 to 3 cm. In clinical practice, however, stones are aligned with F2. MATERIALS AND METHODS In vitro stone comminution, hemolysis, and free-radical production were assessed along the focal axis, and pig kidneys treated with SWL in vivo were sectioned to determine the extent of hemorrhagic injury along the focal axis. Model gypsum stones received 200 shockwaves in vitro at 18 kV. RESULTS At F2, the average number of fragments >1.5 mm was 1.3 +/- 0.5, and the weight loss was 11.3 +/- 1.1%. At 2 cm from F2 (F2-2 cm), these values increased to 4 +/- 2.8 and 16.1 +/- 4.2%, respectively. Samples of 10% hematocrit blood were similarly exposed. Hemolysis was equivalent at F2-2 cm (14.7 +/- 2.3%) and F2 (15.2 +/- 3%) but decreased significantly at all other positions. Samples of iodine solution received 1500 shockwaves at 20 kV. Hydroxyl radical production was greatest at F2-2 cm (0.384 +/- 0.035 microM) and decreased significantly distal to this position. The volume of tissue injury in pig kidneys was greatest with prefocal shockwave exposure. CONCLUSION Stone comminution may be achieved more rapidly without greater tissue damage by a simple shift in stone alignment to F2-2 cm.

Ultrasound-guided localized detection of cavitation during, lithotripsy in pig kidney in vivo

It is supposed that inertial cavitation plays a significant role in tissue damage during extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy (ESWL). In this work we attempted to detect cavitation in tissue. In vivo experiments with pigs were conducted in a Dornier HM3 electrohydraulic lithotripter. Kidney alignment was made using fluoroscopy and B-mode ultrasound. Cavitation was detected by a dual passive cavitation detection (DPCD) system consisting of two confocal spherical bowl PZT transducers (1.15 MHz, focal length 10 cm, radius 10 cm). An ultrasound scanhead was placed between the transducers, an hyperechoic spots in the image indicated pockets of bubbles during ESWL. A coincidence-detection algorithm and the confocal transducers made it possible to localize cavitation to within a 4 mm diameter region. The signals from both the collecting system and kidney tissue were recorded. The targeting of the DPCD focus was confirmed by using the DPCD transducers as high intensity focused ultrasound (HIFU) sources at HIFU durations below the lesion formation threshold. In this HIFU regime, a bright spot appears in the B-mode image indicating the position of the DPCD focus. In this way we could confirm that refraction and scattering in tissue did not cause a misalignment. The tissue region interrogated was also marked with a lesion produced by HIFU. Clear cavitation signals were detected from the collecting system and from pools of blood that formed near the kidney capsule and weak signals were recorded from tissue during the ESWL treatment.

Evaluation of shock wave lithotripsy injury in the pig using a narrow focal zone lithotriptor.

Whats known on the subject? and What does the study add?