Philip M. Rose
AmeriCorps VISTA
Network
Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.
Publication
Featured researches published by Philip M. Rose.
Journal of the Acoustical Society of America | 1984
Philip M. Rose
A sandwich type acoustical absorbing panel for use adjacent high speed gas flow areas in and around the engines of high speed aircraft. The panel comprises a pan type base having an imperforate base member and upstanding sides and end walls, an acoustic absorbing medium is disposed within the pan type base, a rigid perforated plate is secured to the distal surfaces of the upstanding sides and end walls for enclosing the acoustic absorbing medium and a sheet of fine woven mesh is secured to the outer surface of the rigid perforated plate. The outer positioned fine woven mesh enhances acoustic properties of the panel and substantially prevents entry of water, dust, chemicals and similar foreign matter from penetrating into the panel structure and reduces the aerodynamic drag loss normally encountered by high speed gas flows across perforated material, such as, that normally used for the outer surface of acoustic panels.
Journal of the Acoustical Society of America | 2010
Geoffrey Stewart Morrison; Julien Epps; Philip M. Rose; Tharmarajah Thiruvaran; Cuiling Zhang
Recently there has been a great deal of concern in forensic science about validity and reliability (accuracy and precision). The log‐likelihood‐ratio cost (Cllr), developed for automatic speaker recognition, is increasingly applied as a standard measure of accuracy in forensic voice comparison, but so far there has been little work on developing a metric of precision within this field. Because voice data can have a large amount of intrinsic variation at the source, and likelihood ratios are typically calculated using a single suspect recording and a single offender recording, assessing the precision of a forensic‐voice‐comparison system is extremely important. This presentation discusses the importance of measuring precision and describes two procedures, one parametric and one non‐parametric, for calculating 95% credible intervals for the likelihood ratios resulting from running tests of forensic‐voice‐comparison systems (in which some comparisons are known to be same‐speaker comparisons and others are kn...
Journal of the Acoustical Society of America | 1989
Philip M. Rose; Alojzy A. Mikolajczak
Archive | 1979
Philip M. Rose; Frank J. Riel
Archive | 1979
Philip M. Rose; Frank J. Riel
Journal of the Acoustical Society of America | 1990
Thomas W. Carr; Philip M. Rose; Alan H. Marsh
Archive | 1984
Philip M. Rose
Archive | 1979
Philip M. Rose; Frank J. Riel
The Lancet | 2011
Geoffrey Stewart Morrison; Cuiling Zhang; Philip M. Rose
2008 HCSNet Workshop on#N#Designing the Australian National Corpus | 2009
Denis Burnham; Eliathamby Ambikairajah; Joanne Arciuli; Mohammed Bennamoun; Catherine T. Best; Steven Bird; Andrew Richard Butcher; Steve Cassidy; Girija Chetty; Felicity Cox; Anne Cutler; Robert Dale; Julien Epps; Janet Fletcher; Roland Goecke; David B. Grayden; John Hajek; John Ingram; Shunichi Ishihara; Nenagh Kemp; Yuko Kinoshita; Takaaki Kuratate; Trent W. Lewis; Deborah Loakes; Mark Onslow; David M. W. Powers; Philip M. Rose; Roberto Togneri; Dat Tran; Michael Wagner