Philip Sell

Incidental durotomy in lumbar spine surgery: incidence and management

There is increasing awareness of the need to inform patients of common complications that occur during surgical procedures. During lumbar spine surgery, incidental tear of the dural sac and subsequent cerebrospinal fluid leak is possibly the most frequently occurring complication. There is no consensus in the literature about the rate of dural tears in spine surgery. We have undertaken this study to evaluate the incidence of dural tears among spine surgeons in the United Kingdom for commonly performed spinal procedures. Prospective data was gathered for 1,549 cases across 14 institutions in the United Kingdom. The results give us a baseline rate for the incidence of dural tears. The rate was 3.5% for primary discectomy, 8.5% for spinal stenosis surgery and 13.2% for revision discectomy. There was a wide variation in the actual and estimated rates of dural tears among the spine surgeons. The results confirm that prospective data collection by spine surgeons is the most efficient and accurate way to assess complication rates for spinal surgery.

Corticosteroids in peri-radicular infiltration for radicular pain: a randomised double blind controlled trial. One year results and subgroup analysis

The objective of this study is to evaluate the efficacy of corticosteroids in patients with radicular pain due to lumbar disc herniation or lumbar spinal stenosis through a prospective randomised, double blind controlled trial, and whether there was an effect on subsequent interventions such as additional root blocks or surgery. Peri-radicular infiltration of corticosteroids has previously been shown to offer no additional benefit in patients with sciatica compared to local anaesthetic alone. It is not known if the response to peri-radicular infiltration is less marked in certain subgroups of patients such as those with radicular pain due to lumbar spinal stenosis. Previous studies have suggested that peri-radicular infiltration of corticosteroids may obviate the need for subsequent interventions and we therefore further investigated this in the current study. We randomised 150 patients to receive a single injection with either bupivacaine alone or bupivacaine and methylprednisolone. Patients were assessed at 6xa0weeks and 3xa0months after the injection using standard outcome measures including Oswestry Disability Index (ODI), visual analogue score for leg pain and patient’s subjective assessment of outcome. At 1-year follow-up, we looked at the outcome in terms of the need for subsequent interventions such as additional root blocks or surgery. At 3-month follow-up, there was no statistically significant difference in the standard outcome measures between the two injection groups. At a minimum 1-year post injection, there was no difference in the need for subsequent interventions in either group. Patients with lumbar spinal stenosis had a less marked reduction in the ODI at 3xa0months with a mean change of 3.3 points when compared with 15 points for patients with lumbar disc herniation. In conclusion, peri-radicular infiltration of corticosteroids for sciatica does not provide any additional benefit when compared to local anaesthetic injection alone. Corticosteroids do not obviate the need for subsequent interventions such as additional root blocks or surgery.

The effect of duration of symptoms on standard outcome measures in the surgical treatment of spinal stenosis

The effect of the duration of symptoms on the outcome of lumbar decompression surgery is not known. The aim of our study was to determine the predictors of functional outcome of lumbar decompression surgery for degenerative spinal stenosis with particular emphasis on the duration of symptoms. In this prospective cohort study, we recruited 100 patients with a full data set available at 1-year and 85% at 2-year follow-ups: 49 females and 51 males with an average age of 62 (range 52–82). The pre- and post-operative outcome measures were Oswestry disability index (ODI), low back outcome score (LBOS), pain visual analogue score (VAS), modified somatic perception (MSP) and modified Zung depression (MZD) score. Dural tear occurred in 14%, and there was one post-operative extra-dural heamatoma. Overall, the ODI improved from a pre-operative of 56 (±13) to a 1-year ODI of 40 (±22) and at 2-year ODI of 40 (±21). The VAS improved from an average of 8 to 5.2 at 1xa0year and 4.9 at 2xa0years. There was a statistical significant association between symptom duration and the change in ODI (P=0.007 at 1-year follow-up, P=0.001 at 2-year follow-up), LBOS (P=0.001 at 1-year follow-up, P<0.001 at 2-year follow-up) and VAS (P=0.003 at 1-year follow-up, P=0.001 at 2-year follow-up). Subgroup analyses showed that patients with symptom duration of less than 33xa0months had a more favourable result. In addition, the patients who rated the operation as excellent had a statistically significantly shorter duration of symptoms. We have not found a predictive value for age at operation, MSP or MZD. The number of levels of decompression and the different types of decompression surgery did not influence the surgical results. Our study indicates that the symptom duration of more than 33xa0months has a less favourable functional outcome.

Patient information and education with modern media: the Spine Society of Europe Patient Line

The role of the patient as an active partner in health care, and not just a passive object of diagnostic testing and medical treatment, is widely accepted. Providing information to patients is considered a crucial issue and the central focus in patient educational activities. It is necessary to educate patients on the nature of the outcomes and the benefits and risks of the procedures to involve them in the decision-making process and enable them to achieve fully informed consent. Information materials must contain scientifically reliable information and be presented in a form that is acceptable and useful to patients. Given the mismatch between public beliefs and current evidence, strategies for changing the public perceptions are required. Traditional patient education programmes have to face the potential barriers of storage, access problems and the need to keep content materials up to date. A computer-based resource provides many advantages, including “just-in-time” availability and a private learning environment. The use of the Internet for patient information needs will continue to expand as Internet access becomes readily available. However, the problem is no longer in finding information, but in assessing the credibility and validity of it. Health Web sites should provide health information that is secure and trustworthy. The large majority of the Web sites providing information related to spinal disorders are of limited and poor quality. Patient Line (PL), a patient information section in the Web site of Eurospine, was born in 2005 to offer patients and the general population the accumulated expertise represented by the members of the society and provide up-to-date information related to spinal disorders. In areas where evidence is scarce, Patient Line provides a real-time opinion of the EuroSpine membership. The published data reflect the pragmatic and the common sense range of treatments offered by the Eurospine membership. The first chapters have been dedicated to sciatica, scoliosis, cervical pain syndromes, low back pain and motion preservation surgery. Since 2008, the information has been available in English, German, French and Spanish. The goal is for Patient Line to become THE European patient information Web site on spinal disorders, providing reliable and updated best practice and evidence-based information where the evidence exists.

The development of an evidence-based patient booklet for patients undergoing lumbar discectomy and un-instrumented decompression

Post-operative management after lumbar surgery is inconsistent leading to uncertainty amongst surgeons and patients about post-operative restrictions, reactivation, and return to work. This study aimed to review the evidence on post-operative management, with a view to developing evidence-based messages for a patient booklet on post-operative management after lumbar discectomy or un-instrumented decompression. A systematic literature search produced a best-evidence synthesis of information and advice on post-operative restrictions, activation, rehabilitation, and expectations about outcomes. Evidence statements were extracted and developed into patient-centred messages for an educational booklet. The draft text was evaluated by peer and patient review. The literature review found little evidence for post-operative activity restrictions, and a strong case for an early active approach to post-operative management. The booklet was built around key messages derived from the literature review and aimed to reduce uncertainty, promote positive beliefs, encourage early reactivation, and provide practical advice on self-management. Feedback from the evaluations were favourable from both review groups, suggesting that this evidence-based approach to management is acceptable and it has clinical potential.

Randomised placebo-controlled trial on the effectiveness of nasal salmon calcitonin in the treatment of lumbar spinal stenosis

This is a double blind randomised controlled trial to assess the effectiveness of nasal salmon calcitonin in the treatment of lumbar spinal stenosis. The trial compared the outcome of salmon calcitonin nasal spray to placebo nasal spray in patients with MRI confirmed lumbar spinal stenosis. Lumbar spinal stenosis is one of the commonest conditions encountered by spine surgeons. It more frequently affects elderly patients and lumbar decompression has been used to treat the condition with variable success. Non operative measures have been investigated, but their success ranges from 15% to 43% in patients followed up for 1–5xa0years (Simotas in Clin Orthop 1(384):153–161, 2001). Salmon calcitonin injections have been investigated in previous trials and may have a treatment effect. Nasal salmon calcitonin has become available and if effective would have advantages over injections. Forty patients with symptoms of neurogenic claudication and MRI proven lumbar spinal stenosis were randomly assigned either nasal salmon calcitonin or placebo nasal spray to use for 4xa0weeks. This was followed by a ‘washout’ period of 6xa0weeks, and subsequent treatment with 6xa0weeks of nasal salmon calcitonin. Standard spine outcome measures including Oswestry disability index (ODI), low back outcome score, visual analogue score and shuttle walking test were administered at baseline, 4, 10 and 16xa0weeks. Twenty patients received nasal salmon calcitonin and twenty patients received placebo nasal spray. At 4xa0weeks post treatment there was no statistically significant difference in the outcome measures between the two groups. The change in ODI was a mean 1.3 points for the calcitonin group and 0.6 points for the placebo group (Pxa0=xa00.51), the mean change in visual analogue score for leg pain was 10xa0mm in the calcitonin group and 0xa0mm in the placebo group (Pxa0=xa00.51). There was no significant difference in walking distance between the two groups, with a mean improvement in walking distance of 21xa0m in the calcitonin group and 8xa0m in the placebo group (Pxa0=xa00.78). At the end of the trial the ODI had improved by a mean of 3.7 points in the calcitonin group and 3.8 points in the placebo group (Pxa0=xa00.44). This randomised placebo controlled trial has not shown any treatment effect in patients with lumbar spinal stenosis treated with nasal salmon calcitonin.

Outcome scores in spinal surgery quantified: excellent, good, fair and poor in terms of patient-completed tools

Outcome scores are very useful tools in the field of spinal surgery as they allow us to assess a patient’s progress and the effect of various treatments. The clinical importance of a score change is not so clear. Although previous studies have looked at the minimum clinically important score change, the degree of score change varies considerably. Our study is a prospective cohort study of 193 patients undergoing discectomy, decompression and fusion procedures with minimum 2-year follow-up. We have used three standard outcome measures in common usage, the oswestry disability index (ODI), the low back outcome score (LBOS) and the visual analogue score (VAS). We have defined each of these scores according to a global measure of outcome graded by the patient as excellent, good, fair or poor. We have also graded patient perception and classified excellent and good as success and fair and poor as failure. Our results suggest that a median 24-point change in the ODI equates with a good outcome or is the minimum change needed for success. We have also found that different surgical disorders have very different minimal clinically important differences as perceived by patient perception. We found that for a discectomy a minimum 27-point change in the ODI would be classed as a success, for a decompression the change in ODI needed to class it as a success would be 16 points, whereas for a fusion the change in the ODI would be only 13 points. We believe that patient-rated global measures of outcome are of value and we have quantified them in terms of the standard outcome measures used in spinal surgery.

Management of mechanical low back pain: A survey of beliefs and attitudes in GPs from Leicester and Nottingham

Mechanical low back pain creates a significant economic burden in the industrial world. The costs of treating mechanical back pain in terms of sickness absenteeism and compensation claims are increasing rapidly.1-3 There is robust evidence that staying active and continuing or resuming ordinary activities is more effective than rest in the management of mechanical back pain.4 This evidence in the international literature has been incorporated in a set of Clinical Guidelines produced by the Royal College of General Practitioners (RCGP).5 These guidelines recommend that early investigation and referral to a specialist for simple mechanical back pain are unwarranted in most cases. Positive advice to stay active and continue ordinary activities is emphasised. The RCGP guidelines recommend the use of educational material for patients in the form of The Back Book, to reinforce positive messages.6 This book has been shown to be clinically effective in a randomised, controlled trial.7 A comparative study from Australia8 showed that a public education campaign based on The Back Book had a positive effect on GP management of mechanical back pain and related morbidity.

CT scanning reduces the risk of missing a fracture of the thoracolumbar spine

The aim of this study was first, to determine whether CT scans undertaken to identify serious injury to the viscera were of use in detecting clinically unrecognised fractures of the thoracolumbar vertebrae, and second, to identify patients at risk of missed injury. We retrospectively analysed CT scans of the chest and abdomen performed for blunt injury to the torso in 303 patients. These proved to be positive for thoracic and intra-abdominal injuries in only 2% and 1.3% of cases, respectively. However, 51 (16.8%) showed a fracture of the thoracolumbar vertebrae and these constituted our subset for study. There were eight women and 43 men with mean age of 45.2 years (15 to 94). There were 29 (57%) stable and 22 (43%) unstable fractures. Only 17 fractures (33.3%) had been anticipated after clinical examination. Of the 22 unstable fractures, 11 (50%) were anticipated. Thus, within the whole group of 303 patients, an unstable spinal injury was missed in 11 patients (3.6%); no harm resulted as they were all protected until the spine had been cleared. A subset analysis revealed that patients with a high Injury Severity Score, a low Glasgow Coma Scale and haemodynamic instability were most likely to have a significant fracture in the absence of positive clinical findings. This is the group at greatest risk. Clinical examination alone cannot detect significant fractures of the thoracolumbar spine. It should be combined with CT imaging to reduce the risk of missed injury.

Expert’s comment concerning Grand Rounds case entitled “Posterior listhesis of a lumbar vertebra in spinal tuberculosis” (by Matthew A. Kirkman and Krishnamurthy Sridhar)

There are many different ways of achieving the same surgical objective, and where evidence is not available then clinician judgement is based on experience and local resources. n nThe concept of ‘practical wisdom’ is that synthesis of experience, wisdom, and evaluation of the evidence base in local context. n nThe latest advances in imaging and diagnostic methods may not be relevant to a specific case management. n nShared care of the medical management and multidisciplinary rehabilitation after surgery is extremely important to improved outcomes for the patient and society.