Network


Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.

Hotspot


Dive into the research topics where Philip Tideman is active.

Publication


Featured researches published by Philip Tideman.


Heart Lung and Circulation | 2016

National Heart Foundation of Australia & Cardiac Society of Australia and New Zealand: Australian Clinical Guidelines for the Management of Acute Coronary Syndromes 2016.

Derek P. Chew; Ian A. Scott; Louise Cullen; John K. French; Tom Briffa; Philip Tideman; Stephen Woodruffe; Alistair Kerr; Maree Branagan; Philip E. Aylward

Executive Summary . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 897 Key Evidence-Based Recommendations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 898 1 Preamble . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 901 1.1 Incidence . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 901 1.2 Contemporary Outcomes of ACS and Chest Pain in Australia . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 901 1.3 The Process of Developing the 2016 ACS Guidelines . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 901 1.4 Conflicts of Interest Process . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 902 1.5 Development of Recommendations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 903 2 Assessment of Possible Cardiac Chest Pain . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 904 2.1 Initial Evaluation . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 904 2.1.1 Outpatient Presentation . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 904 2.1.2 Emergency Department Presentation . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 904 2.1.3 Initial ECG and Assessment . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 904 2.2 Differential Diagnosis . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 905 2.3 Initial Clinical Management . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 905 2.4 Risk Scores and Clinical Assessment Protocols . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 907 2.5 Biomarkers . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 909 2.6 Further Diagnostic Testing . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 915 2.7 Representation with Symptoms. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 916 2.8 Discharge Advice . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 916 3 Diagnostic Considerations and Risk Stratification of Acute Coronary Syndromes . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 917 3.1 Diagnostic Considerations. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 917 3.2 Risk Stratification for Patients with Confirmed ACS . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 917 4 Acute Reperfusion and Invasive Management Strategies in Acute Coronary Syndromes. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 919 4.1 Reperfusion for STEMI . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 919 4.2 Ongoing Management of Fibrinolytic-Treated Patients . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 921 4.3 Early Invasive Management for NSTEACS . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 921 5 Pharmacotherapy of Acute Coronary Syndromes . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 926 5.1 Acute Anti-Ischaemic Therapies . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 926 5.2 Antiplatelet Therapy . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 926 5.3 Anticoagulant Therapy . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 930 5.4 Duration of Cardiac Monitoring . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 931


The Medical Journal of Australia | 2016

National Heart Foundation of Australia and Cardiac Society of Australia and New Zealand: Australian clinical guidelines for the management of acute coronary syndromes 2016

Derek P. Chew; Ian A. Scott; Louise Cullen; John K. French; Tom Briffa; Philip Tideman; Stephen Woodruffe; Alistair Kerr; Maree Branagan; Philip E. Aylward

Introduction: The modern care of suspected and confirmed acute coronary syndrome (ACS) is informed by an extensive and evolving evidence base. This clinical practice guideline focuses on key components of management associated with improved clinical outcomes for patients with chest pain or ACS. These are presented as recommendations that have been graded on both the strength of evidence and the likely absolute benefit versus harm. Additional considerations influencing the delivery of specific therapies and management strategies are presented as practice points.


PLOS ONE | 2016

Effect of health literacy on quality of life amongst patients with ischaemic heart disease in Australian general practice

David Alejandro González-Chica; Zandile Mnisi; Jodie Avery; Katherine M Duszynski; Jenny Doust; Philip Tideman; Andrew W. Murphy; Jacquii Burgess; Justin Beilby; Nigel Stocks

Background Appropriate understanding of health information by patients with cardiovascular disease (CVD) is fundamental for better management of risk factors and improved morbidity, which can also benefit their quality of life. Objectives To assess the relationship between health literacy and health-related quality of life (HRQoL) in patients with ischaemic heart disease (IHD), and to investigate the role of sociodemographic and clinical variables as possible confounders. Methods Cross-sectional study of patients with IHD recruited from a stratified sample of general practices in two Australian states (Queensland and South Australia) between 2007 and 2009. Health literacy was measured using a validated questionnaire and classified as inadequate, marginal, or adequate. Physical and mental components of HRQoL were assessed using the Medical Outcomes Study Short Form (SF12) questionnaire. Analyses were adjusted for confounders (sociodemographic variables, clinical history of IHD, number of CVD comorbidities, and CVD risk factors) using multiple linear regression. Results A total sample of 587 patients with IHD (mean age 72.0±8.4 years) was evaluated: 76.8% males, 84.2% retired or pensioner, and 51.4% with up to secondary educational level. Health literacy showed a mean of 39.6±6.7 points, with 14.3% (95%CI 11.8–17.3) classified as inadequate. Scores of the physical component of HRQoL were 39.6 (95%CI 37.1–42.1), 42.1 (95%CI 40.8–43.3) and 44.8 (95%CI 43.3–46.2) for inadequate, marginal, and adequate health literacy, respectively (p-value for trend = 0.001). This association persisted after adjustment for confounders. Health literacy was not associated with the mental component of HRQoL (p-value = 0.482). Advanced age, lower educational level, disadvantaged socioeconomic position, and a larger number of CVD comorbidities adversely affected both, health literacy and HRQoL. Conclusion Inadequate health literacy is a contributing factor to poor physical functioning in patients with IHD. Increasing health literacy may improve HRQoL and reduce the impact of IHD among patients with this chronic CVD.


The Medical Journal of Australia | 2014

Impact of a regionalised clinical cardiac support network on mortality among rural patients with myocardial infarction.

Philip Tideman; Rosy Tirimacco; David P Senior; John J Setchell; Luan T. Huynh; Rosanna Tavella; Philip E. Aylward; Derek P. Chew

Objective: To evaluate the impact of the regionalised Integrated Cardiovascular Clinical Network (ICCNet) on 30‐day mortality among patients with myocardial infarction (MI) in an Australian rural setting.


BMJ Open | 2013

A comparison of Australian rural and metropolitan cardiovascular risk and mortality: the Greater Green Triangle and North West Adelaide population surveys

Philip Tideman; Anne W. Taylor; Ed Janus; Benjamin Philpot; Robyn Clark; Elizabeth Peach; Tiina Laatikainen; Erkki Vartiainen; Rosy Tirimacco; Alicia Montgomerie; Janet Grant; Vincent L. Versace; James Dunbar

Objectives Cardiovascular (CVD) mortality disparities between rural/regional and urban-dwelling residents of Australia are persistent. Unavailability of biomedical CVD risk factor data has, until now, limited efforts to understand the causes of the disparity. This study aimed to further investigate such disparities. Design Comparison of (1) CVD risk measures between a regional (Greater Green Triangle Risk Factor Study (GGT RFS, cross-sectional study, 2004–2006) and an urban population (North West Adelaide Health Study (NWAHS, longitudinal cohort study, 2004–2006); (2) Australian Bureau of Statistics (ABS) CVD mortality rates between these and other Australian regions; and (3) ABS CVD mortality rates by an area-level indicator of socioeconomic status, the Index of Relative Socioeconomic Disadvantage (IRSD). Setting Greater Green Triangle (GGT, Limestone Coast, Wimmera and Corangamite Shires) of South-Western Victoria and North-West Adelaide (NWA). Participants 1563 GGT RFS and 3036 NWAHS stage 2 participants (aged 25–74) provided some information (self-administered questionnaire +/− anthropometric and biomedical measurements). Primary and secondary outcome measures Age-group specific measures of absolute CVD risk, ABS CVD mortality rates by study group and Australian Standard Geographical Classification (ASGC) region. Results Few significant differences in CVD risk between the study regions, with absolute CVD risk ranging from approximately 5% to 30% in the 35–39 and 70–74 age groups, respectively. Similar mean 2003–2007 (crude) mortality rates in GGT (98, 95% CI 87 to 111), NWA (103, 95% CI 96 to 110) and regional Australia (92, 95% CI 91 to 94). NWA mortality rates exceeded that of other city areas (70, 95% CI 69 to 71). Lower measures of socioeconomic status were associated with worse CVD outcomes regardless of geographic location. Conclusions Metropolitan areas do not always have better CVD risk factor profiles and outcomes than rural/regional areas. Needs assessments are required for different settings to elucidate relative contributions of the multiple determinants of risk and appropriate cardiac healthcare strategies to improve outcomes.


The Medical Journal of Australia | 2014

A framework for overcoming disparities in management of acute coronary syndromes in the Australian Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander population. A consensus statement from the National Heart Foundation of Australia

Marcus Ilton; Warren Walsh; Alex Brown; Philip Tideman; C. Zeitz; Jinty Wilson

Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander patients with acute coronary syndromes (ACS) experience lower intervention rates and poorer outcomes compared with non‐Indigenous patients. A broad range of geographical, cultural and systemic factors contribute to delays and suboptimal treatment for ACS. Every Indigenous ACS patient, regardless of where they live, should be able to expect a coordinated, patient‐centred pathway of care provided by designated provider clinical networks and supported by Indigenous cardiac coordinators, Aboriginal liaison officers (ALOs) and health workers. These designated provider clinical networks provide: ➢appropriate prehospital and inhospital treatment ➢an individualised patient care plan developed jointly with the patient and his or her family ➢culturally appropriate education initiated within the hospital setting and involving families with support from ALOs ➢effective follow‐up care and access to relevant secondary prevention programs. We outline generic pathways to provide policymakers, health planners and health care providers with a framework for ACS diagnosis and management that can be implemented across the diverse settings in which Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander people reside and their care is delivered, in order to optimise care and assertively address the current disparities in outcomes.


Asia-Pacific Journal of Public Health | 2009

Chronic disease risk factors in rural Australia: results from the greater green triangle risk factor surveys.

Tiina Laatikainen; Ed Janus; Annamari Kilkkinen; Sami Heistaro; Philip Tideman; Andrew Baird; Rosy Tirimacco; Malcolm Whiting; Lucinola Franklin; Anna Chapman; Anna Kao-Philpot; James Dunbar

The aim of this article was to assess the level and prevalence of major chronic disease risk factors among rural adults. Two cross-sectional surveys were carried out in 2004 and 2005 in the southeast of South Australia and the southwest of Victoria. Altogether 891 randomly selected persons aged 25 to 74 years participated in the studies. Surveys included a self-administered questionnaire, physical measurements, and a venous blood specimen for lipid analyses. Two thirds of participants had cholesterol levels ≥5.0 mmol/L. The prevalence of high diastolic blood pressure (≥90 mm Hg) was 22% for men and 10% for women in southeast of South Australia, and less than 10% for both sexes in southwest of Victoria. Two thirds of participants were overweight or obese (body mass index ≥25 kg/m2). About 15% of men and slightly less women were daily smokers. The abnormal risk factor levels underline the need for targeted prevention activities in the Greater Green Triangle region. Continuing surveillance of levels and patterns of risk factors is fundamentally important for planning and evaluating preventive activities.


Clinical Biochemistry | 2010

Assessing agreement between point of care and laboratory results for lipid testing from a clinical perspective.

Angela Gialamas; Caroline Laurence; Lisa N. Yelland; Philip Tideman; Paul Worley; Mark Douglas Shephard; Rosy Tirimacco; Kristyn Willson; Philip Ryan; Janice Gill; David W. Thomas; Justin Beilby

OBJECTIVES Investigate agreement between lipid pathology results from point-of-care testing (PoCT) devices and laboratories. DESIGN AND METHODS Agreement was assessed using the Bland-Altman method. RESULTS : Mean difference (limits of agreement) were: -0.28 mmol/L (-1.04, 0.48) for total cholesterol, -0.09 mmol/L, (-0.55, 0.36) for HDL-C. Median difference (nonparametric limits of agreement) were 0.07 mmol/L, (-0.40, 3.04) for triglycerides. CONCLUSIONS The clinical acceptability of the variation between lipid PoCT and laboratory test results is debatable but our work provides baseline data for further research.


The Medical Journal of Australia | 2016

Disparities in acute in-hospital cardiovascular care for Aboriginal and non-Aboriginal South Australians.

Rosanna Tavella; Katharine McBride; Wendy Keech; Janet Kelly; Amanda Rischbieth; C. Zeitz; John F. Beltrame; Philip Tideman; Alex Brown

Objectives: To assess differences in the rates of angiography and subsequent revascularisation for Aboriginal and non‐Aboriginal South Australians who presented with an acute coronary syndrome (ACS); to explore the reasons for any observed differences.


Internal Medicine Journal | 2016

Subspecialisation in cardiology care and outcome: should clinical services be redesigned, again?

B. Pathik; C. De Pasquale; A. McGavigan; A. Sinhal; J. Vaile; Philip Tideman; D. Jones; C. Bridgman; Joseph B. Selvanayagam; W. Heddle; Derek P. Chew

Inpatient management of cardiac patients by cardiologists results in reduced mortality and hospitalisation. With increasing subspecialisation of the field because of growing management complexity and use of technological innovations, the impact of sub‐specialisation on patient outcomes is unclear.

Collaboration


Dive into the Philip Tideman's collaboration.

Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Ed Janus

University of Melbourne

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Tiina Laatikainen

National Institute for Health and Welfare

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Paul Simpson

Flinders Medical Centre

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Researchain Logo
Decentralizing Knowledge