Network


Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.

Hotspot


Dive into the research topics where Philip W. Davis is active.

Publication


Featured researches published by Philip W. Davis.


Language | 1975

Bella Coola Nominal Deixis.

Philip W. Davis; Ross Saunders

The principal nominal deictic affixes of Bella Coola, a Salishan language of British Columbia, are examined. Semantically, a three-way distinction is found: Proximal, Middle, and Distal for deictic space; Present, Near Past, and Distant Past for deictic time. The notion of neighborhood and a definition of natural and unnatural circumstance are introduced to explain the usage of the affixes and the observed neutralization of the semantic components of space and time.*


International Journal of American Linguistics | 1988

Absence of Noun Marking in Alabama

Philip W. Davis; Heather K. Hardy

I Alabama is a Muskogean language of the Eastern Branch. It is spoken by a number of residents of the Alabama-Coushatta reservation some fifteen miles east of Livingston, Texas. We wish to express here our appreciation to Ms. Cora Sylestine and Ms. Wanda Poncho for sharing their language with us and for their patience in enduring our questions about it. The work reported in this paper, originally presented to the XXIVth Conference on American Indian Languages, has been supported by the Department of Linguistics and Semiotics, Rice University and by a Faculty Research Grant from North Texas State University. Finally, we wish to express our thanks to the reviewers for their comments on the paper; all deficiencies remain ours. We shall use abbreviations as follows: Asp = Aspect; Aug = Augmentative; Aux = Auxiliary; Caus = Causative; Decl = Declarative; Dim = Diminutive; DO = Direct Object; DP = Distant Past; Evid = Evidential; For = Foreign; Fut = Future; IndPro = Indefinite Pronoun; Inst = Instrument; Neg = Negative; Nom = Nominative; Obj = Object; Obl = Oblique; P1 = Plural; Prox = Proximal; Q = Question; Refl = Reflexive; Recip = Reciprocal; Sem = Semifactitive; Sg = Singular; Subj = Subject; Subjn = Subjunctive; Top = Topic. The symbols used in transcribing Alabama are those used in an orthography created by Heather K. Hardy and Cora Sylestine (ms.) for use by the speakers of the language, and with the exception of orthographic ch to represent /c/, they take their normal phonetic values.


International Journal of American Linguistics | 1993

The Semantics of Agreement in Alabama

Heather K. Hardy; Philip W. Davis

Les As. discutent des donnees sur les marqueurs pronominaux en alabama (langue muskogee) et veulent montrer que le choix du marqueur pronominal exprime la semantique de la relation entre les participants et les evenements. Ils offrent une analyse alternative des marqueurs pronominaux en alabama basee sur la semantique du controle, au sens de Klaiman


Journal of Anthropological Research | 1974

Bella Coola Head Bone Nomenclature

Ross Saunders; Philip W. Davis

The toponymy of head bones in Bella Coola is described and compared with the corresponding English scientific system. The differences between the two systems reflect the different evolutionary stages to which each system belongs. The Bella Coola system remains in a topographical stage, while the English scientific system has passed through this stage to a morphological one. In addition, the following points are made: (1) Bella Coola has a system of head bone names, not merely a random array of head bone names; (2) that a system exists is shown by evidence of a nonlinguistic or linguistically neutral nature, namely the results of the part-whole test; (3) that a system exists is also manifest in the linguistic data that constitute the nomenclature; (4) that the systems of (2) and (3) are, with one exception, identical.


International Journal of American Linguistics | 1986

Control and Development in Bella Coola

Philip W. Davis; Ross Saunders

attached to the element within the sentence that conveys information of some EVENT.1 Rather than further specifying the EVENT itself, in the manner, say, of aspectual marking, these suffixes encode information concerning the PARTICIPANTS. The members of this affixal set are displayed in table 1. Visual inspection immediately suggests the hypothesis that they themselves are morphologically complex, and our discussion proceeds along the lines of determining the degree to which this initial impression is valid. In doing this, we shall include some elaboration on the syntax and semantics of the recurrent partials by way of justifying that segmentation. Let us begin by considering the following forms: (la) nuyamf-tnm-c sing-I (lb) *nuyamf-atnm-c (2a) Xs-tnm-c fat-I


Language | 1996

Alternative linguistics : descriptive and theoretical modes

Penny Lee; Philip W. Davis


Language | 1999

A Grammar of Bella Coola

Michael Darnell; Philip W. Davis; Ross Saunders


Archive | 1980

Bella Coola texts

Philip W. Davis; Ross Saunders


International Journal of American Linguistics | 1975

Bella Coola Referential Suffixes

Ross Saunders; Philip W. Davis


International Journal of American Linguistics | 1988

Comparatives in Alabama

Heather K. Hardy; Philip W. Davis

Collaboration


Dive into the Philip W. Davis's collaboration.

Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Penny Lee

University of Western Australia

View shared research outputs
Researchain Logo
Decentralizing Knowledge