Philipp le Coutre

Nilotinib is effective in patients with chronic myeloid leukemia in chronic phase after imatinib resistance or intolerance: 24-month follow-up results

Nilotinib is a potent selective inhibitor of the BCR-ABL tyrosine kinase approved for use in patients with newly diagnosed chronic myeloid leukemia in chronic phase (CML-CP), and in CML-CP and CML-accelerated phase after imatinib failure. Nilotinib (400 mg twice daily) was approved on the basis of the initial results of this phase 2 open-label study. The primary study endpoint was the proportion of patients achieving major cytogenetic response (CyR). All patients were followed for ≥ 24 months or discontinued early. Of 321 patients, 124 (39%) continue on nilotinib treatment. Overall, 59% of patients achieved major CyR; this was complete CyR (CCyR) in 44%. Of patients achieving CCyR, 56% achieved major molecular response. CyRs were durable, with 84% of patients who achieved CCyR maintaining response at 24 months. The overall survival at 24 months was 87%. Adverse events were mostly mild to moderate, generally transient, and easily managed. This study indicates that nilotinib is effective, with a manageable safety profile, and can provide favorable long-term benefits for patients with CML-CP after imatinib failure.

Multicenter Independent Assessment of Outcomes in Chronic Myeloid Leukemia Patients Treated With Imatinib

BACKGROUND Imatinib slows development of chronic myeloid leukemia (CML). However, available information on morbidity and mortality is largely based on sponsored trials, whereas independent long-term field studies are lacking. PATIENTS AND METHODS Consecutive CML patients who started imatinib treatment before 2005 and who were in complete cytogenetic remission (CCyR) after 2 years (± 3 months) were eligible for enrollment in the independent multicenter Imatinib Long-Term (Side) Effects (ILTE) study. Incidence of the first serious and nonserious adverse events and loss of CCyR were estimated according to the Kaplan-Meier method and compared with the standard log-rank test. Attainment of negative Philadelphia chromosome hematopoiesis was assessed with cytogenetics and quantitative polymerase chain reaction. Cumulative incidence of death related or unrelated to CML progression was estimated, accounting for competing risks, according to the Kalbleisch-Prentice method. Standardized incidence ratios were calculated based on population rates specific for sex and age classes. Confidence intervals were calculated by the exact method based on the χ(2) distribution. All statistical tests were two-sided. RESULTS A total of 832 patients who were treated for a median of 5.8 years were enrolled. There were 139 recorded serious adverse events, of which 19.4% were imatinib-related. A total of 830 nonserious adverse events were observed in 53% of patients; 560 (68%) were imatinib-related. The most frequent were muscle cramps, asthenia, edema, skin fragility, diarrhea, tendon, or ligament lesions. Nineteen patients (2.3%) discontinued imatinib because of drug-related toxic effects. Forty-five patients lost CCyR, at a rate of 1.4 per 100 person-years. Durable (>1 year) negative Philadelphia chromosome hematopoiesis was attained by 179 patients. Twenty deaths were observed, with a 4.8% mortality incidence rate (standardized incidence ratio = 0.7; 95% confidence interval = 0.40 to 1.10, P = .08), with only six (30%) associated with CML progression. CONCLUSIONS In this study, CML-related deaths were uncommon in CML patients who were in CCyR 2 years after starting imatinib, and survival was not statistically significantly different from that of the general population.

Severe peripheral arterial disease during nilotinib therapy

(36.4%) had a history of nicotine abuse, seven (63.6%) had arterial hypertension, three (27.3%) had diabetes mellitus, five (45.5%) had dyslipidemia, three (27.3%) were obese, six (54.5%) were male, and seven (63.6%) were older than 60 years (all cardiovascular risk factors). All 11 PAD patients had at least a cytogenetic remission while on nilotinib. One patient with hyper eosinophilic syndrome and one patient with CML received nilotinib as first-line treatment. Previous treatments for the remaining patients were hydroxyurea (nine patients), interferon alpha (seven patients), imatinib (nine patients), dasatinib (one patient), or another agent (four patients). In these 11 patients, the mean time from CML diagnosis to initiation of nilotinib was 347 weeks (range = 8–651 weeks) and the mean time from initiation of nilotinib to the first PAD event was 105.1 weeks (range = 16–212 weeks) (Table 1). In all cases, the lower limbs were affected; in nine patients, the femoral superficial artery was involved. These patients were treated with angioplasty (eight patients), stent implantation (eight patients), and/or amputation (four patients).

Long-term outcome with dasatinib after imatinib failure in chronic-phase chronic myeloid leukemia: follow-up of a phase 3 study.

We present long-term follow-up of a dasatinib phase 3 study of patients with imatinib-resistant/-intolerant chronic myeloid leukemia (CML). In the CA180-034 study, 670 patients with imatinib-resistant/-intolerant CML in chronic phase (CML-CP) received dasatinib 100 mg once daily, 50 mg twice daily, 140 mg once daily, or 70 mg twice daily. At 6 years, 188 (28%) of 670 patients remained on study treatment. Estimated 6-year protocol-defined progression-free survival (PFS) rates were 49%, 51%, 40%, and 47%, respectively, and estimated 6-year overall survival (OS) rates were 71%, 74%, 77%, and 70%, respectively (intent-to-treat population, including protocol-defined progression or death after discontinuation). Estimated 6-year rates of survival without transformation on study treatment were 76%, 80%, 83%, and 74%, respectively. Major molecular response was achieved in 43% (100 mg once daily) and 40% (all other arms) of patients by 6 years. Molecular and cytogenetic responses at 3 and 6 months were highly predictive of PFS and OS. Notably, estimated 6-year PFS rates based on ≤1%, >1% to 10%, and >10% BCR-ABL transcripts at 3 months were 68%, 58%, and 26%, respectively. Most adverse events occurred by 2 years. Imatinib-resistant/-intolerant patients with CML-CP can experience long-term benefit with dasatinib therapy, particularly if achieving BCR-ABL ≤10% at 3 months. This study was registered at ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT00123474.

Ponatinib versus imatinib for newly diagnosed chronic myeloid leukaemia: an international, randomised, open-label, phase 3 trial

BACKGROUND Ponatinib has shown potent activity against chronic myeloid leukaemia that is resistant to available treatment, although it is associated with arterial occlusion. We investigated whether this activity and safety profile would result in superior outcomes compared with imatinib in previously untreated patients with chronic myeloid leukaemia. METHODS The Evaluation of Ponatinib versus Imatinib in Chronic Myeloid Leukemia (EPIC) study was a randomised, open-label, phase 3 trial designed to assess the efficacy and safety of ponatinib, compared with imatinib, in newly diagnosed patients with chronic-phase chronic myeloid leukaemia. Patients from 106 centres in 21 countries were randomly assigned (1:1, with stratification by Sokal score at diagnosis) using an interactive voice and web response system to receive oral ponatinib (45 mg) or imatinib (400 mg) once daily until progression, unacceptable toxicity, or other criteria for withdrawal were met. Eligible patients were at least 18 years of age, within 6 months of diagnosis, and Philadelphia chromosome-positive by cytogenetic assessment, with Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status of 0-2, and had not previously been treated with tyrosine kinase inhibitors. The primary endpoint was major molecular response at 12 months. Patients who remained on study and had molecular assessments at specified timepoints were studied at those timepoints. Safety analyses included all treated patients, as per study protocol. This trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT01650805. FINDINGS Between Aug 14, 2012, and Oct 9, 2013, 307 patients were randomly assigned to receive ponatinib (n=155) or imatinib (n=152). The trial was terminated early, on Oct 17, 2013, following concerns about vascular adverse events observed in patients given ponatinib in other trials. Trial termination limited assessment of the primary endpoint of major molecular response at 12 months, as only 13 patients in the imatinib group and ten patients in the ponatinib group could be assessed at this timepoint; the proportion of patients achieving a major molecular response at 12 months did not differ significantly between the two groups (eight [80%] of ten patients given ponatinib and five [38%] of 13 patients given imatinib; p=0·074). 11 (7%) of 154 patients given ponatinib and three (2%) of 152 patients given imatinib had arterial occlusive events (p=0·052); arterial occlusive events were designated serious in ten (6%) of 154 patients given ponatinib and in one (1%) of 152 patients given imatinib (p=0·010). The data monitoring committee criterion for risk assessment (significant difference in serious grade 3 or 4 ischaemic events between groups) was not met (five [3%] of 154 vs one [1%] of 152; p=0·21). Grade 3 or 4 adverse events observed in more than 5% of patients in the ponatinib group were increased lipase (22 [14%] of 154 vs three [2%] of 152 with imatinib), thrombocytopenia (19 [12%] of 154 vs ten [7%] of 152 with imatinib), rash (ten [6%] of 154 vs two [1%] of 152 with imatinib). In the imatinib group, grade 3 or 4 adverse events observed in more than 5% of patients were neutropenia (12 [8%] of 152 vs five [3%] of 154 with ponatinib) and thrombocytopenia (ten [7%] of 152 vs 19 [12%] of 154 with ponatinib). Serious adverse events that occurred in three or more patients given ponatinib were pancreatitis (n=5), atrial fibrillation (n=3), and thrombocytopenia (n=3). No serious adverse event occurred in three or more patients given imatinib. INTERPRETATION The efficacy of ponatinib treatment of newly diagnosed chronic-phase chronic myeloid leukaemia compared with imatinib could not be assessed due to trial termination, but preliminary data suggest there might be benefit, although with more arterial occlusive events than with imatinib at the doses studied. Because the EPIC trial was terminated early, efficacy of ponatinib in this setting remains to be established. FUNDING ARIAD Pharmaceuticals.

Tyrosine Kinase Inhibitors Noncompetitively Inhibit MCT8-Mediated Iodothyronine Transport

CONTEXT Tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKI) are used for the treatment of various cancers. Case reports and clinical trials have reported abnormal thyroid function tests (TFT) after treatment with sunitinib, imatinib, sorafenib, dasatinib, and nilotinib. An increased requirement for levothyroxine was reported in thyroidectomized patients during TKI treatment. OBJECTIVE We hypothesized that abnormal TFT are compatible with inhibition of thyroid hormone (TH) transporters and subsequently reduced pituitary-TH feedback. Monocarboxylate transporter 8 (MCT8) is a TH transmembrane transporter in brain, pituitary, and other organs. MCT8 mutation leads to abnormal TFT in patients and respective mouse models. We tested whether TKI are able to inhibit MCT8-mediated TH uptake into cells. DESIGN Madin-Darby-canine kidney (MDCK1) cells stably expressing human MCT8 were exposed in vitro to TKI at increasing concentrations, and MCT8-mediated [(125)I]T(3) uptake and efflux were measured. The mode of inhibition was determined. RESULTS TKI exposure dose-dependently inhibited MCT8-dependent T(3) and T(4) uptake. IC(50) values for sunitinib, imatinib, dasatinib, and bosutinib ranged from 13-38 μm, i.e. similar to the Michaelis-Menten constant K(m) for T(3) and T(4), 4 and 8 μm, respectively. Kinetic experiments revealed a noncompetitive mode of inhibition for all TKI tested. CONCLUSIONS Partial inhibition by TKI of pituitary or hypothalamic TH feedback may increase TSH or increase the levothyroxine requirement of thyroidectomized patients. It is still possible that other mechanisms contribute to TKI-mediated impairments of TFT, e.g. altered metabolism of TH. Bosutinib was not previously reported to alter TFT.

Clinical cardiac safety profile of nilotinib.

Background Nilotinib is a second-generation tyrosine kinase inhibitor with significant efficacy as first- or second-line treatment in patients with chronic myeloid leukemia. Despite preclinical evidence indicating a risk of prolongation of the QT interval, which was confirmed in clinical trials, detailed information on nilotinib’s cardiac safety profile is lacking. Design and Methods Here, we retrospectively assessed cardiovascular risk factors in 81 patients who were being or had previously been treated with nilotinib therapy and evaluated cardiovascular parameters by longitudinal monitoring of the QT interval and left ventricular ejection fraction. Detailed information on the occurrence and management of defined cardiac adverse events was extracted. Results The median duration of nilotinib therapy was 26 months (range, 1–72). The median QT interval at baseline was 413 msec (range, 368–499 msec). During follow-up, the median QT was not significantly different from the baseline value at any time-point. Sixteen of 81 patients (20%) had new electrocardiographic changes. Cardiac function, as assessed by measurement of left ventricular ejection fraction, did not change significantly from baseline at any time-point. During a median follow-up of 44 months (range, 2–73), seven patients (9%), all of whom had received prior imatinib therapy, developed 11 clinical cardiac adverse events requiring treatment. The median time from the start of nilotinib therapy to an event was 14.5 months (range, 2–68). Five of seven patients were able to continue nilotinib therapy with only one brief interruption. Conclusions Whereas new electrocardiographic abnormalities were recorded in 20% of all patients and some of them developed severe or even life-threatening coronary artery disease, QT prolongation, changes in left ventricular ejection fraction, and clinical cardiac adverse events were uncommon in patients treated with nilotinib.

Off-target effects of BCR–ABL1 inhibitors and their potential long-term implications in patients with chronic myeloid leukemia

Abstract In patients with chronic myeloid leukemia (CML), use of the BCR–ABL1-specific tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) imatinib, nilotinib and dasatinib has greatly improved patient survival and prolonged disease remission. More than 10 years of data from imatinib clinical studies and many years of data for nilotinib and dasatinib have demonstrated that these TKIs are well tolerated in most patients with CML. However, these inhibitors are not entirely BCR–ABL1-specific, and this lack of specificity could account for the off-target effects of these drugs. Adverse events (AEs) are off-target effects that are detrimental to the patient. The underlying mechanisms that contribute to these effects are poorly understood and the long-term consequences of chronic TKI therapy remain largely unknown, particularly with the newer agents. Here, we review the preclinical and clinical data for several of the more frequent AEs associated with TKIs and discuss the therapeutic relevance of these AEs for patients with CML.

Thyroid Dysfunction Caused by Second-Generation Tyrosine Kinase Inhibitors in Philadelphia Chromosome-Positive Chronic Myeloid Leukemia

BACKGROUND Thyroid dysfunction is a well-known adverse effect of first-generation tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs), like sunitinib. The aim of this study was to investigate the effect of second-generation TKIs on thyroid function. METHODS We retrospectively assessed the effect of the first-generation TKI imatinib and the second-generation TKI nilotinib and dasatinib on thyroid function tests in 73 Philadelphia chromosome-positive (Ph-positive) chronic myeloid leukemia patients. RESULTS Overall, 33 of 73 (45%) had one or more thyroid function test abnormalities during follow-up. Hypothyroidism or hyperthyroidism were found in 18 of 73 (25%) and 21 of 73 (29%) cases after a median of 6 and 22 weeks, respectively. In most patients (29 of 39, 74%) thyroid dysfunction was transient without clinical symptoms. Therapy of hypo-/hyperthyroidism was required in three patients. Thyroid dysfunction never resulted in the discontinuation of TKI therapy. Under treatment with imatinib, nilotinib, and dasatinib, thyroid abnormalities were detected in 25%, 55%, and 70%, respectively. Four of 55 patients (7%) treated with nilotinib had evidence for an autoimmune thyroiditis (antibody positive in 3 of 4 patients) with an episode of hyperthyroidism preceding hypothyroidism. CONCLUSIONS Thyroid dysfunction is a common adverse event with second-generation TKI therapy in patients with Ph-positive chronic myeloid leukemia. Although the mechanism is still unclear, the high frequency of thyroid abnormalities, including autoimmune thyroiditis, warrants regular and long-term monitoring of thyroid function in these patients.

Age and dPCR can predict relapse in CML patients who discontinued imatinib: The ISAV study

Imatinib is effective for the treatment of chronic myeloid leukemia (CML). However even undetectable BCR‐ABL1 by Q‐RT‐PCR does not equate to eradication of the disease. Digital‐PCR (dPCR), able to detect 1 BCR‐ABL1 positive cell out of 107, has been recently developed. The ISAV study is a multicentre trial aimed at validating dPCR to predict relapses after imatinib discontinuation in CML patients with undetectable Q‐RT‐PCR. CML patients under imatinib therapy since more than 2 years and with undetectable PCR for at least 18 months were eligible. Patients were monitored by standard Q‐RT‐PCR for 36 months. Patients losing molecular remission (two consecutive positive Q‐RT‐PCR with at least 1 BCR‐ABL1/ABL1 value above 0.1%) resumed imatinib. The study enrolled 112 patients, with a median follow‐up of 21.6 months. Fifty‐two of the 108 evaluable patients (48.1%), relapsed; 73.1% relapsed in the first 9 months but 14 late relapses were observed between 10 and 22 months. Among the 56 not‐relapsed patients, 40 (37.0% of total) regained Q‐RT‐PCR positivity but never lost MMR. dPCR results showed a significant negative predictive value ratio of 1.115 [95% CI: 1.013–1.227]. An inverse relationship between patients age and risk of relapse was evident: 95% of patients <45 years relapsed versus 42% in the class ≥45 to <65 years and 33% of patients ≥65 years [P(χ2) < 0.0001]. Relapse rates ranged between 100% (<45 years, dPCR+) and 36% (>45 years, dPCR‐). Imatinib can be safely discontinued in the setting of continued PCR negativity; age and dPCR results can predict relapse. Am. J. Hematol. 90:910–914, 2015.