Philippe Aftimos

The AURORA initiative for metastatic breast cancer.

Metastatic breast cancer is one of the leading causes of cancer-related mortality among women in the Western world. To date most research efforts have focused on the molecular analysis of the primary tumour to dissect the genotypes of the disease. However, accumulating evidence supports a molecular evolution of breast cancer during its life cycle, with metastatic lesions acquiring new molecular aberrations. Recognising this critical gap of knowledge, the Breast International Group is launching AURORA, a large, multinational, collaborative metastatic breast cancer molecular screening programme. Approximately 1300 patients with metastatic breast cancer who have received no more than one line of systemic treatment for advanced disease will, after giving informed consent, donate archived primary tumour tissue, as well as will donate tissue collected prospectively from the biopsy of metastatic lesions and blood. Both tumour tissue types, together with a blood sample, will then be subjected to next generation sequencing for a panel of cancer-related genes. The patients will be treated at the discretion of their treating physicians per standard local practice, and they will be followed for clinical outcome for 10 years. Alternatively, depending on the molecular profiles found, patients will be directed to innovative clinical trials assessing molecularly targeted agents. Samples of outlier patients considered as ‘exceptional responders’ or as ‘rapid progressors’ based on the clinical follow-up will be subjected to deeper molecular characterisation in order to identify new prognostic and predictive biomarkers. AURORA, through its innovative design, will shed light onto some of the unknown areas of metastatic breast cancer, helping to improve the clinical outcome of breast cancer patients.

Cardiotoxicity of systemic agents used in breast cancer.

Several breast cancer therapies can lead to cardiovascular toxicity: drugs such anthracyclines can cause permanent damage, anti-HER2 agents may cause transitory and reversible cardiac dysfunction and others, such as those used in endocrine therapy, primarily disturb lipid metabolism. Considering the seriousness of these complications, trials are now being conducted to address cardiotoxicity associated with new drugs; however, to fully understand their toxicity profiles, longer follow-up is needed. In this review, we compile the information available about cardiac toxicity related to well-established systemic breast cancer treatments, as well as newer drugs, including antiangiogenics, mTOR inhibitors and novel anti-HER2 agents. We also describe current and next generation cardiac biomarkers and functional tests that can optimize treatment and reduce and prevent the incidence of treatment-related cardiotoxicity.

Targeted therapies of solid cancers: New options, new challenges

Purpose of review The landscape of medical oncology is filled with approvals of new anticancer agents, the majority of which are targeted agents. This shift in therapies raises multiple challenges including the appearance of new toxicities, the need for biomarkers, the emergence of genomics and the evolution of cancer molecular imaging. Recent findings Biopsy of metastatic lesions is slowly becoming a standard of care before the initiation of any therapy. These invasive procedures have been found to be generally well tolerated and are being put to use with the emergence of genomics. Gene sequencing and new imaging techniques are serving the understanding of tumor biology and the search for ‘biomarkers’ predicting response and resistance to treatment. New clinical trial designs incorporating the ‘presumed’ biomarkers are guiding patients to specific treatments and have shown outcome improvements. Summary Many questions remain however unanswered and new challenges appear. Intratumor heterogeneity emerges as a brake to personalized cancer care. Relevant targets remain undruggable and costs may hinder progress. Furthermore, technical issues continue to arise. The ultimate goal remains to achieve cure by blocking the multiple pathways of cancer development and proliferation, while sparing the patients the burden of therapy.

Cardiac assessment of early breast cancer patients 18 years after treatment with cyclophosphamide-, methotrexate-, fluorouracil- or epirubicin-based chemotherapy.

BACKGROUND Epirubicin-based chemotherapy improves the outcome of early breast cancer (BC) patients. However, cardiotoxicity remains an important side effect. METHODS We re-consented node-positive BC patients enrolled in a phase III trial between 1988 and 1996 which compared six cycles of oral cyclophosphamide, methotrexate, fluorouracil (CMF) versus two epirubicin-cyclophosphamide regimens differing by the anthracycline cumulative dose [standard-dose epirubicin and cyclophosphamide (SDE) (8 × 60 mg/m(2)) and higher-dose epirubicin and cyclophosphamide (HDE) (8 × 100 mg/m(2))]. Eligible patients were those who were alive and free of disease and had no contra-indications to the proposed tests (cardiac evaluation). Cardiotoxicity was defined as asymptomatic systolic dysfunction (left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF)< 50%, New York Heart Association (NYHA) Class I) or symptomatic heart failure (NYHA Class II-IV). Differences in cardiotoxicity between CMF and SDE/HDE were assessed using chi-square and Fisher Exact tests for binary variables and t-test and Wilcoxon test for continuous variables. RESULTS Among the 777 patients, 20 cases of CHF were reported (CMF = 1, SDE = 5, HDE = 14; p < 0.001). Between September 2010 and June 2013, 82 patients (30%) out of 269 eligible patients accepted to participate in this substudy. Median follow-up was 18 years (range 15-24). Epirubicin-treated patients had significantly higher heart rate, more abnormal echocardiograms and LVEF by magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) compared to CMF-treated ones. A trend towards higher BNP was also observed in the SDE/HDE group (P = 0.08). No differences were observed in LVEF assessed by echocardiogram or troponin T levels. CONCLUSIONS Participation rate in this substudy was lower than expected highlighting the complexity of re-calling patients several years after the initial BC diagnosis. After 18 years, epirubicin-treated patients had a lower LVEF by MRI, more abnormal echocardiograms, higher heart rates compared to patients treated with CMF. However, no major delayed cardiotoxicity was observed.

Personalized management of patients with solid cancers: moving from patient characteristics to tumor biology.

Purpose of review In recent years, there has been a paradigm shift in the diagnosis as well as the treatment of solid tumors. This review will detail some of the recent findings that led to better subtyping and treatment of cancers, some of which were historically refractory. Recent findings Advances in molecular biology have recently led to the rapid development of personalized cancer management. Molecular markers and gene signatures allow better risk definition and treatment prediction, thus, avoiding ‘wasted toxicity’. Recent understandings in disease pathways are giving new hope to treatment of hard-to-treat cancers such as melanoma, subtypes of nonsmall cell lung cancer and several orphan tumors. Summary This progress transposed from lab to bedside has made personalized cancer care a reality. In addition, this concept is being integrated into clinical trial designs with the enrolment of molecularly selected patients, hopefully leading to high rates of success

Impact of tumor sequencing on the use of anticancer drugs.

Purpose of review Next generation sequencing (NGS) allows the rapid analysis of genomes and has brought invaluable information on cancer biology and drug targets. Laboratories have started to provide NGS data to physicians to aid in the prescription of targeted drugs. The review presents the recent clinical experience with NGS. Recent findings Clinical studies support the potential of NGS to tailor the treatment of patients to alterations in their cancer genome in a process called precision medicine. Case reports, analyses of early phase trials, and series of lung cancer patients have recently shown superior outcome for the matching of drug to specific molecular alterations. NGS is also useful to detect germline mutations associated with hereditary cancers. Summary NGS and other molecular technologies are transforming the practice of medical oncology and clinical research. Sequencing of primary tumors, metastases, or blood-derived circulating tumor DNA has great potential to guide individualized cancer treatment. However, the integration of NGS as a breakthrough technology is associated with operational challenges such as information processing, medical education and interpretation, and reimbursement.

Phase I study of the gamma secretase inhibitor PF-03084014 in combination with docetaxel in patients with advanced triple-negative breast cancer

Background The NOTCH signaling pathway may be involved in the survival of stem cell-like tumor-initiating cells and contribute to tumor growth. In this phase Ib, open-label, multicenter study (NCT01876251), we evaluated PF-03084014, a selective gamma-secretase inhibitor in patients with advanced triple-negative breast cancer. Methods The dose-finding part was based on a 2×3 matrix design using the modified toxicity probability interval method. Oral PF-03084014 was administered twice daily continuously in combination with intravenous docetaxel given on day 1 of each 21-day cycle. Primary endpoint was first-cycle dose-limiting toxicity (DLT) for the dose-finding part and 6-month progression-free survival (PFS) for the expansion cohort treated at the maximum tolerated dose (MTD). Secondary endpoints included safety, objective response, and pharmacokinetics of the combination. Results and Conclusions The MTD was estimated to be PF-03084014 100 mg twice daily / docetaxel 75 mg/m2. At this dose level, combination treatment was generally well tolerated (one DLT, grade 3 diarrhea, among eight DLT-evaluable patients). The most common all-grade, treatment-related adverse events reported in all patients (N = 29) were neutropenia (90%), fatigue (79%), nausea (72%), leukopenia (69%), diarrhea (59%), alopecia (55%), anemia (55%), and vomiting (48%). No effect was observed on the pharmacokinetics of docetaxel when administered in combination with PF-03084014. Four (16%) of 25 response-evaluable patients achieved a confirmed partial response; nine (36%) patients had stable disease, including five patients with unconfirmed partial response. In the expansion cohort, median PFS was 4.1 (95% CI 1.3-8.1) months (6-month PFS rate 17.1% [95% CI 0.8-52.6%]).

Emerging drugs targeting human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2) in the treatment of breast cancer

ABSTRACT Introduction: Human epidermal growth factor 2 (HER2) overexpression is present in 20% of breast cancer patients. It is associated with more aggressive disease and worse clinical outcome. New drugs are thus needed. Approved and future treatments will be discussed in this review. Areas covered: The monoclonal antibodies trastuzumab and pertuzumab, the tyrosine kinase inhibitor lapatinib and the antibody-drug conjugate trastuzmab emtansine are approved for HER2 positive breast cancer. The combination of trastuzumab, pertuzumab and docetaxel is currently the first-line treatment in the metastatic setting. New therapies are still needed due to frequent relapse and resistance. These include mammalian target of rapamycin inhibitors, heat shock protein 90 inhibitors, pan-HER2 tyrosine kinase inhibitors, antibody-drug conjugates, immunotherapy agents (antibodies and vaccines), radioimmunotherapy and HER2 specific affinity proteins. Possible developmental issues are the complexity of the molecular biology of the HER2 positive cancer cell, the occurrence of resistance, toxicity and the high cost. Expert opinion: The determination of the right sequence of use of old and new therapies remains a challenging issue. The selection of patients who do or don’t benefit from potentially toxic chemotherapy is also difficult. Central nervous system metastases are a common problem in HER2 positive breast cancer that needs to be addressed in future trials.

The current use and attitudes towards tumor genome sequencing in breast cancer.

There is increasing availability of technologies that can interrogate the genomic landscape of an individual tumor; however, their impact on daily practice remains uncertain. We conducted a 28-item survey to investigate the current attitudes towards the integration of tumor genome sequencing in breast cancer management. A link to the survey was communicated via newsletters of several oncological societies, and dedicated mailing by academic research groups. Multivariable logistic regression modeling was carried out to determine the relationship between predictors and outcomes. 215 physicians participated to the survey. The majority were medical oncologists (88%), practicing in Europe (70%) and working in academic institutions (66%). Tumor genome sequencing was requested by 82 participants (38%), of whom 21% reported low confidence in their genomic knowledge, and 56% considered tumor genome sequencing to be poorly accessible. In multivariable analysis, having time allocated to research (OR 3.37, 95% CI 1.84–6.15, p < 0.0001), working in Asia (OR 5.76, 95% CI 1.57 – 21.15, p = 0.01) and having institutional guidelines for molecular sequencing (OR 2.09, 95% 0.99–4.42, p = 0.05) were associated with a higher probability of use. In conclusion, our survey indicates that tumor genome sequencing is sometimes used, albeit not widely, in guiding management of breast cancer patients.

Evolving paradigms in multifocal breast cancer.

The 7th edition of the TNM defines multifocal breast cancer as multiple simultaneous ipsilateral and synchronous breast cancer lesions, provided they are macroscopically distinct and measurable using current traditional pathological and clinical tools. According to the College of American Pathologists (CAP), the characterization of only the largest lesion is considered sufficient, unless the grade and/or histology are different between the lesions. Here, we review three potentially clinically relevant aspects of multifocal breast cancers: first, the importance of a different intrinsic breast cancer subtype of the various lesions; second, the emerging awareness of inter-lesion heterogeneity; and last but not least, the potential introduction of bias in clinical trials due to the unrecognized biological diversity of these cancers. Although the current strategy to assess the lesion with the largest diameter has clearly its advantages in terms of costs and feasibility, this recommendation may not be sustainable in time and might need to be adapted to be compliant with new evolving paradigms in breast cancer.