Philippe Lesprit

Campylobacter Bacteremia: Clinical Features and Factors Associated with Fatal Outcome

BACKGROUND Campylobacter bacteremia is uncommon. The influence of underlying conditions and of the impact of antibiotics on infection outcome are not known. METHODS From January 2000 through December 2004, 183 episodes of Campylobacter bacteremia were identified in 23 hospitals in the Paris, France, area. The medical records were reviewed. Characteristics of bacteremia due to Campylobacter fetus and to other Campylobacter species were compared. Logistic regression analysis was performed to identify risk factors for fatal outcome within 30 days. RESULTS Most affected patients were elderly or immunocompromised. C. fetus was the most commonly identified species (in 53% of patients). The main underlying conditions were liver disease (39%) and cancer (38%). The main clinical manifestations were diarrhea (33%) and skin infection (16%). Twenty-seven patients (15%) died within 30 days. Compared with patients with bacteremia due to other Campylobacter species, patients with C. fetus bacteremia were older (mean age, 69.5 years vs. 55.6 years; P = .001) and were more likely to have cellulitis (19% vs. 7%; P = .03), endovascular infection (13% vs. 1%; P = .007), or infection associated with a medical device (7% vs. 0%; P = .02). Independent risk factors for death were cancer (odds ratio [OR], 5.1; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.2-20.8) and asymptomatic infection (OR, 6.7; 95% CI, 1.5-29.4) for C. fetus bacteremia, the absence of prescription of appropriate antibiotics (OR, 12.2; 95% CI, 0.9-157.5), and prescription of third-generation cephalosporins (OR, 10.2; 95% CI, 1.9-53.7) for bacteremia caused by other species. CONCLUSIONS Campylobacter bacteremia occurs mainly in immunocompromised patients. Clinical features and risk factors of death differ by infection species.

Determinant Roles of Environmental Contamination and Noncompliance with Standard Precautions in the Risk of Hepatitis C Virus Transmission in a Hemodialysis Unit

BACKGROUND Nosocomial transmission is the second most frequent cause of hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection. A prospective observational study was conducted to assess the roles of environmental contamination and noncompliance with standard precautions in HCV cross-transmission in a hemodialysis unit. METHODS Patients undergoing chronic hemodialysis in a French university hospital unit were systematically screened, revealing 2 sporadic cases of HCV transmission. An investigation was launched to determine whether the patients were infected in the hemodialysis unit and the possible roles of environmental contamination and noncompliance with standard precautions. We examined possible relationships among new cases of HCV infection, environmental contamination by blood and HCV RNA, and compliance with guidelines on hand hygiene and glove use. RESULTS Two patients experienced seroconversion to HCV during the study period. Phylogenetic analyses showed that 1 of these patients was infected with the same strain as that affecting a chronically infected patient also treated in the unit. Of 740 environmental surface samples, 82 (11%) contained hemoglobin; 6 (7%) of those contained HCV RNA. The rate of compliance with hand hygiene was 37% (95% confidence interval, 35%-39%), and gloves were immediately removed after patient care in 33% (95% confidence interval, 29%-37%) of cases. A low ratio of nurses to patients and poor hand hygiene were independent predictors of the presence of hemoglobin on environmental surfaces. CONCLUSION Blood-contaminated surfaces may be a source of HCV cross-transmission in a hemodialysis unit. Strict compliance with hand hygiene and glove use and strict organization of care procedures are needed to reduce the risk of HCV cross-transmission among patients undergoing hemodialysis.

Clinical impact of unsolicited post-prescription antibiotic review in surgical and medical wards: a randomized controlled trial

This study aimed to determine the clinical course of patients and the quality of antibiotic use using a systematic and unsolicited post-prescription antibiotic review. Seven hundred and fifty-three adult patients receiving antibiotic therapy for 3-5 days were randomized to receive either a post-prescription review by the infectious disease physician (IDP), followed by a recommendation to the attending physician to modify the prescription when appropriate, or no systematic review of the prescription. In the intervention group, 63.3% of prescriptions prompted IDP recommendations, which were mostly followed by ward physicians (90.3%). Early antibiotic modifications were more frequent in the intervention group (57.1% vs. 25.7%, p <0.0001), including stopping therapy, shortening duration and de-escalating broad-spectrum antibiotics. IDP intervention led to a significant reduction of the median [IQR] duration of antibiotic therapy (6 [4-9] vs. 7 days [5-9], p <0.0001). In-hospital mortality, ICU admission and new course of antibiotic therapy rates did not differ between the two groups. Fewer patients in the intervention group were readmitted for relapsing infection (3.4% vs. 7.9%, p 0.01). There was a trend for a shorter length of hospital stay in patients suffering from community-acquired infections in the intervention group (5 days [3-10] vs. 6 days [3-14], p 0.06). This study provides clinical evidence that a post-prescription antibiotic review followed by unsolicited IDP advice is effective in reducing antibiotic exposure of patients and increasing the quality of antibiotic use, and may reduce hospital stay and relapsing infection rates, with no adverse effects on other patient outcomes.

Reassessment of intravenous antibiotic therapy using a reminder or direct counselling

OBJECTIVES Encouraging reassessment of intravenous antibiotic therapy at days 3-4 is an important step in the management of patients and may be done by delivering a questionnaire or through systematic infectious disease physician (IDP) advice to prescribers. PATIENTS AND METHODS In this before-and-after study, prescriptions of 13 selected intravenous antibiotics from surgical or medical wards were screened from a computer-generated listing and prospectively included. Three strategies were compared over three consecutive 8 week periods: conventional management by the attending physician (control group); distribution of a questionnaire to the physician (questionnaire group); or distribution of the questionnaire followed by IDP advice (Q-IDP group). The primary outcome was the percentage of modifications of antibiotic therapy at day 4, including withdrawal of therapy, de-escalation, oral switch or reducing the planned duration of therapy. RESULTS Overall, 402 prescriptions were included. At day 4, 48.9% and 54.5% of prescriptions were modified in the control and questionnaire groups, respectively (P = 0.35). In contrast, more prescriptions (66.2%) were modified in the Q-IDP group as compared with the control group (P = 0.004). Stopping therapy in the absence of apparent bacterial infection occurred significantly more often in the Q-IDP group than in the control (P < 0.0001) or questionnaire groups (P = 0.002). CONCLUSIONS This study shows a modest impact of only distributing a questionnaire aimed at reminding physicians to reassess therapy, whereas systematic IDP intervention improves the modification rate.

Protracted Outbreak of Multidrug-Resistant Acinetobacter baumannii after Intercontinental Transfer of Colonized Patients

OBJECTIVE To describe the course and management of a protracted outbreak after intercontinental transfer of 2 patients colonized with multidrug-resistant Acinetobacter baumannii (MDRAB). DESIGN An 18-month outbreak investigation. SETTING An 860-bed university hospital in France. PATIENTS Case patients (ie, carriers) were those colonized or infected with an MDRAB isolate. METHODS During the epidemic period, all intensive care unit (ICU) patients and contacts of carriers who were transferred to wards were screened for MDRAB carriage. Contact precautions, environmental screening, and auditing of healthcare worker (HCW) practices were implemented; rooms were cleaned with hydrogen peroxide mist disinfection. One ICU, in which most of the cases occurred, was closed on 4 occasions for thorough cleaning and disinfection. RESULTS The 2 index case patients were identified as 2 patients who carried the same MDRAB strain and who were admitted to the hospital after repatriation from Tahiti 5 months apart. During an 18-month period, a total of 84 secondary cases occurred. Reintroduction of MDRAB into the ICUs occurred from patients previously colonized or from healthcare personnel. Termination of the outbreak was only achieved when all carriers from wards or the ICU were cohorted to an isolation unit with dedicated healthcare personnel. CONCLUSIONS Intercontinental transfer of carriers of MDRAB can result in extensive outbreaks and serious disruption of the hospitals organization. Transmission from carriers most likely occurred via the hands of HCWs, poor cleaning protocols, airborne spread, and contaminated water from sink traps. This protracted outbreak was controlled only after implementation of an extensive control program and eventual cohorting of all carriers in an isolation unit with dedicated healthcare personnel.

Bloodstream infection in adults with sickle cell disease : Association with venous catheters, staphylococcus aureus, and bone-joint infections

Abstract: Although well documented in children with sickle cell disease (SCD), the incidence, cause, and outcome of bloodstream infection (BSI) are poorly defined in adults with SCD. Through a 5-year retrospective analysis of a cohort of 900 patients followed at our institution, we identified 56 episodes of BSI in 47 patients. The incidence rate of BSI was 1.2 episodes per 100 patient-years. As compared to the patients followed in the cohort, those with BSI were more likely to be younger (p = 0.001), to have Hb-S disease (p = 0.008), severe disease (p = 0.001), or additional immunosuppression (p = 0.05). BSI was hospital-acquired in 46% of cases and mainly associated with venous catheters (41%) and Staphylococcus aureus (34%). Pneumococci were rarely identified (10.7%). Despite an adequate duration of antibiotic therapy, the course of BSI was marked by a high frequency of associated bone-joint infection. Bone-joint infection was noted in 18 patients (32% of episodes) and occurred either during the initial BSI episode (13 patients) or 1-6 months after BSI resolution (5 patients). Factors associated with the occurrence of bone-joint infection were previous osteonecrosis (relative risk, 2.5; 95% confidence interval, 1.2-5.3) and S. aureus infection (relative risk, 3.8; 95% confidence interval, 1.8-8.4). In conclusion, BSI is a rare event in adults with SCD compared to children. It mainly occurs in those with a severe underlying disease and a venous catheter. These patients have a high risk of associated bone-joint infection and therefore must be closely monitored. Abbreviations: BSI = bloodstream infection, SCD = sickle cell disease, VOC = vaso-occlusive crisis.

Clinical impact of a real-time PCR assay for rapid identification of Staphylococcus aureus and determination of methicillin resistance from positive blood cultures

The full identification and susceptibility profile of staphylococci from positive blood cultures (BCs) generally takes 24-48 h using phenotypic methods. The aim of this prospective study was to evaluate the clinical impact of a real-time PCR strategy for rapid identification of staphylococci and determination of methicillin resistance directly from positive BCs. During a 12-month period, 250 episodes of positive BCs with organism morphology resembling staphylococci were enrolled. Two strategies were compared: conventional (n = 128) using standard phenotypic methods or rapid (n = 122) using a real-time PCR assay that is able to detect specific genes of Staphylococcus aureus (nuc and sa442) and the encoding gene for methicillin resistance (mecA). Overall, 97 episodes (39%) were clinical-significant bloodstream infections. The prevalence of methicillin resistance of S. aureus was 24%. A favorable outcome (defined as clinical cure with resolution of signs and no evidence of recurrence or relapse at 12 weeks follow-up) was observed in similar proportions of episodes with (58%) or without (60%) PCR testing (p 0.8). In multivariate analyses, age and infection due to methicillin-susceptible S. aureus (adjusted OR 0.96, 95% CI 0.93-0.99; and adjusted OR 3.11, 95% CI 1.12-8.65, respectively) were the unique factors independently associated with a favorable outcome. Among the 153 episodes of contaminated BCs, similar proportions received unjustified antibiotic therapy (PCR strategy: 17%, conventional testing: 10%; p 0.33). In a setting with a moderate level of methicillin-resistant S. aureus and relatively high contamination of BCs, real-time PCR testing was not beneficial compared to conventional methods.

Postprescription review improves in-hospital antibiotic use: A multicenter randomized controlled trial

Although review of antibiotic therapy is recommended to optimize antibiotic use, physicians do not always perform it. This trial aimed to evaluate the impact of a systematic postprescription review performed by antimicrobial stewardship program (ASP) infectious disease physicians (IDP) on the quality of in-hospital antibiotic use. A multicenter, prospective, randomized, parallel-group trial using the PROBE (Prospective Randomized Open-label Blinded Endpoint) methodology was conducted in eight surgical or medical wards of four hospitals. Two hundred forty-six patients receiving antibiotic therapy prescribed by ward physicians for less than 24 hours were randomized to receive either a systematic review by the ASP IDP at day 1 and days 3 to 4 (intervention group, n = 123) or no systematic review (usual care, n = 123). The primary outcome measure was appropriateness of antimicrobial therapy, a composite score of appropriateness of antibiotic use at days 3 to 4 and appropriate treatment duration, adjudicated by a blinded committee. Analyses were performed on an intention-to-treat basis. In the intervention group, appropriateness of antimicrobial therapy was more frequent (55/123, 44.7% vs. 35/123, 28.5%; odds ratio 2.03, 95% confidence interval 1.20-3.45). Antibiotic treatment duration was lower in the intervention group (median (interquartile range) 7 (3-9) days vs. 10 (7-12) days; p 0.003). ASP IDP counseling to change therapy was more frequent at days 3 to 4 than at day 1 (114/123; 92.7% vs. 24/123; 19.5%, p <0.001). Clinical outcome was similar between groups. This study suggests that a systematic postprescription antibiotic review performed at days 1 and 3 to 4 results in higher quality of antibiotic use and lower antibiotic duration. This trial was registered at ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT01136200).

Improving antibiotic use in the hospital: Focusing on positive blood cultures is an effective option.

OBJECTIVES The unsolicited and systematic evaluation of positive blood cultures (pBC) after laboratory report by a single infectious disease specialist (IDS) was evaluated during one year, using a computer-generated alert by the laboratory. The main objectives of IDS counselling were to improve antibiotic use for bloodstream infection (i.e., initiating or modifying therapy) and to stop unjustified therapy for contaminated pBC. METHODS During the first part of the study (4 months), all pBC in patients from ICUs, medical and surgical wards were analyzed. After an interim analysis, only pBC from medical and surgical wards were evaluated during the second part (8 months). RESULTS Overall, 1090 episodes of pBC (representing 866 patients) were evaluated and classified as bloodstream infection (65.5%), contamination (29%) or undetermined (5.5%). Forty-three percent of episodes prompted IDS counselling, including initiation (5%), modification (27.5%), withdrawal (3.5%) and diagnosis workup (5%). Restricting the evaluation to medical and surgical wards increased the rate of counselling (61.2% vs. 27.7%, P<0.0001), notably for de-escalating (20% vs. 8%, P<0.0001), initiating (9% vs. 2%, P<0.0001), oral switch (6% vs. 2%, P<0.0001), withdrawing (5% vs. 2%, P=0.002) or reducing the duration of therapy (5% vs. 2%, P=0.002). DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS In complement to the laboratory report, a computer-generated alert used by the IDS was useful for the management of pBC in hospital. The impact of IDS counselling was more effective when the evaluation was restricted to medical and surgical wards.

Are infection specialists recommending short antibiotic treatment durations? An ESCMID international cross-sectional survey

Objectives To evaluate the current practice and the willingness to shorten the duration of antibiotic therapy among infection specialists. Methods Infection specialists giving at least weekly advice on antibiotic prescriptions were invited to participate in an online cross-sectional survey between September and December 2016. The questionnaire included 15 clinical vignettes corresponding to common clinical cases with favourable outcomes; part A asked about the antibiotic treatment duration they would usually advise to prescribers and part B asked about the shortest duration they were willing to recommend. Results We included 866 participants, mostly clinical microbiologists (22.8%, 197/863) or infectious diseases specialists (58.7%, 507/863), members of an antibiotic stewardship team in 73% (624/854) of the cases, coming from 58 countries on all continents. Thirty-six percent of participants (271/749) already advised short durations of antibiotic therapy (compared with the literature) to prescribers for more than half of the vignettes and 47% (312/662) chose shorter durations in part B compared with part A for more than half of the vignettes. Twenty-two percent (192/861) of the participants declared that their regional/national guidelines expressed durations of antibiotic therapy for a specific clinical situation as a fixed duration as opposed to a range and in the multivariable analysis this was associated with respondents advising short durations for more than half of the vignettes (adjusted OR 1.5, P = 0.02). Conclusions The majority of infection specialists currently do not advise the shortest possible duration of antibiotic therapy to prescribers. Promoting short durations among these experts is urgently needed.