Philippe Picaut

Minimal effective dose of dysport and botox in a rat model of neurogenic detrusor overactivity.

BACKGROUND Two botulinum toxins A have been evaluated for the treatment of refractory neurogenic detrusor overactivity (NDO) in humans: Dysport (abobotulinumtoxinA) and Botox (onabotulinumtoxinA). However, these two distinct commercialized products have different potency units and are not interchangeable. OBJECTIVE Assessment of the dose response and determination of minimal effective dose (MED) for Dysport and Botox in spinal cord-injured (SCI) rats with NDO. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS Female, adult, Sprague-Dawley rats (n=98) underwent T8-T9 spinal cord transection. Nineteen days after spinal cord injury, rats received intradetrusor injections (25μl injected, eight sites) of vehicle (V); Dysport 2, 5, 7.5, 10, and 12.5 U; and Botox 0.8, 2, 5, 7.5, and 10 U. Two days after injection, continuous cystometry was performed in conscious rats. MEASUREMENTS Voiding contractions (VC) were assessed by duration of VC, intercontraction interval, voided volume, maximal pressure, pressure threshold change, and intravesical baseline pressure (BP), while nonvoiding contractions (NVC) were evaluated by amplitude, frequency, and volume threshold to elicit NVC. MEDs for Dysport and Botox were determined by analysis of variance step-down trend test. RESULTS AND LIMITATIONS MEDs for Dysport and Botox were 10 U and 7.5 U, respectively. Regarding VC, only BP significantly decreased after 10 U Dysport and 7.5 U Botox compared to V (from 3.7±0.6 to 1.5±0.1 and 1.4±0.3mm Hg, respectively; p<0.01 and p<0.001, respectively). Dysport (10 U) and Botox (7.5 U) significantly inhibited NVC by decreasing their amplitude (from 7.4±1.1 to 5.8±0.5 and 5.4±0.6mm Hg, respectively; p<0.05); frequency (from 2.2±0.4 to 1.5±0.2 and 1.3±0.3 NVC per minute, respectively; p<0.01); and increasing volume threshold to elicit NVC (from 29.8±3.7 to 47.6±6.9 and 47.7±6.3%, respectively; p<0.05 and p<0.001, respectively). CONCLUSIONS This is the first preclinical dose-ranging study with Dysport and Botox under standardized conditions showing similar inhibiting effects on NDO, albeit at different MEDs. It highlights the importance of distinguishing each preparation for predicted outcomes and doses to be used. Further studies in patients with NDO are warranted to confirm these experimental results.

Efficacy and safety of two administration modes of an intra‐detrusor injection of 750 units dysport® (abobotulinumtoxinA) in patients suffering from refractory neurogenic detrusor overactivity (NDO): A randomised placebo‐controlled phase IIa study

Assess the efficacy and safety of abobotulinumtoxinA (Dysport®) in adult patients with neurogenic detrusor overactivity (NDO).

AbobotulinumtoxinA for Equinus Foot Deformity in Cerebral Palsy: A Randomized Controlled Trial.

BACKGROUND: Although botulinum toxin is a well-established treatment of focal spasticity in cerebral palsy, most trials have been small, and few have simultaneously assessed measures of muscle tone and clinical benefit. METHODS: Global, randomized, controlled study to assess the efficacy and safety of abobotulinumtoxinA versus placebo in cerebral palsy children with dynamic equinus foot deformity. Patients were randomized (1:1:1) to abobotulinumtoxinA 10 U/kg/leg, 15 U/kg/leg, or placebo injections into the gastrocnemius-soleus complex (1 or both legs injected). In the primary hierarchical analysis, demonstration of benefit for each dose required superiority to placebo on the primary (change in Modified Ashworth Scale from baseline to week 4) and first key secondary (Physician’s Global Assessment at week 4) end points. RESULTS: Two hundred and forty-one patients were randomized, and 226 completed the study; the intention to treat population included 235 patients (98%). At week 4, Modified Ashworth Scale scores significantly improved with abobotulinumtoxinA; mean (95% confidence interval) treatment differences versus placebo were –0.49 (–0.75 to –0.23; P = .0002) for 15 U/kg/leg and –0.38 (–0.64 to –0.13; P = .003) for 10 U/kg/leg. The Physician’s Global Assessment treatment differences versus placebo of 0.77 (0.45 to 1.10) for 15 U/kg/leg and 0.82 (0.50 to 1.14) for 10 U/kg/leg were also significant (both Ps < .0001). The most common treatment-related adverse event was muscular weakness (10 U/Kg/leg = 2; placebo = 1). CONCLUSIONS: AbobotulinumtoxinA improves muscle tone in children with dynamic equinus resulting in an improved overall clinical impression and is well tolerated.

Efficacy and safety of abobotulinumtoxinA liquid formulation in cervical dystonia: A randomized-controlled trial.

Approved botulinum toxin A products require reconstitution. AbobotulinumtoxinA solution for injection is a ready‐to‐use liquid formulation of abobotulinumtoxinA.

Immunoresistance in cervical dystonia patients after treatment with abobotulinumtoxinA.

ABSTRACT Formation of antibodies against botulinum toxin type A has been observed following treatment of Cervical Dystonia (CD). We present the immunological findings from two 12-week Phase III prospective, randomized, double-blind, single-dose, placebo-controlled studies (Study 1, n = 116; Study 2, n = 136). Patients in both studies were administered abobotulinumtoxinA 500U or placebo intramuscularly at baseline. Patients could receive up to three or four additional treatments (250–1000U) in an open-label follow-up period. Blood samples were collected at baseline and during treatment to test for antibodies to abobotulinumtoxinA using a radioimmunoprecipitation assay (Study 2 only) and a mouse protection assay. Loss of response was predefined using the Toronto Western Spasmodic Torticollis Rating Scale (TWSTRS) total score at 4 weeks following injection. No subjects in Study 1 and one individual in Study 2 developed neutralizing antibodies (nABs) during the double-blind treatment phase; the individual who developed immunoresistance had received botulinum toxin type A treatment prior to the study and did not respond to treatment. Two subjects demonstrated a change in nAB status during open-label treatment and overall responsiveness was maintained in these patients. In conclusion, the development of immunoresistance was rare and, in the presence of circulating nABs, patients may still gain benefit from intramuscular abobotulinumtoxinA treatment.

Effects of repeated abobotulinumtoxinA injections in upper limb spasticity

Introduction: The efficacy of single injections of abobotulinumtoxinA (Dysport) is established in adults with upper limb spasticity. In this study we assessed the effects of repeated injections of abobotulinumtoxinA over 1 year. Methods: Patients (n = 258, safety population) received 500 U, 1,000 U, or 1,500 U (1,500‐U dose included 500‐U shoulder injections) for up to 4 or 5 treatment cycles. Assessments included treatment‐emergent adverse events (TEAEs), muscle tone, passive and active range of motion (XV1, XA), angle of catch (XV3), Disability Assessment Scale (DAS) score, Modified Frenchay Scale (MFS) score, and Physician Global Assessment (PGA) score. Results: The incidence of TEAEs decreased across cycles. Muscle tone reduction and XV1 remained stable across cycles, whereas XV3 and XA continued to improve at the finger, wrist, and elbow flexors. DAS and PGA improved across cycles. MFS improved best with 1,500 U. Discussion: A favorable safety profile and continuous improvements in active movements and perceived and active function were associated with repeated abobotulinumtoxinA injections in upper limb muscles. Muscle Nerve 57: 245–254, 2018

Efficacy and safety of abobotulinumtoxinA in spastic lower limb: Randomized trial and extension

Objective: To demonstrate single abobotulinumtoxinA injection efficacy in lower limb vs placebo for adults with chronic hemiparesis and assess long-term safety and efficacy of repeated injections. Methods: In a multicenter, double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled, single-cycle study followed by a 1-year open-label, multiple-cycle extension, adults ≥6 months after stroke/brain injury received one lower limb injection (abobotulinumtoxinA 1,000 U, abobotulinumtoxinA 1,500 U, placebo) followed by ≤4 open-label cycles (1,000, 1,500 U) at ≥12-week intervals. Efficacy measures included Modified Ashworth Scale (MAS) in gastrocnemius–soleus complex (GSC; double-blind primary endpoint), physician global assessment (PGA), and comfortable barefoot walking speed. Safety was the open-label primary endpoint. Results: After a single injection, mean (95% confidence interval) MAS GSC changes from baseline at week 4 (double-blind, n = 381) were as follows: −0.5 (−0.7 to −0.4) (placebo, n = 128), −0.6 (−0.8 to −0.5) (abobotulinumtoxinA 1,000 U, n = 125; p = 0.28 vs placebo), and −0.8 (−0.9 to −0.7) (abobotulinumtoxinA 1,500 U, n = 128; p = 0.009 vs placebo). Mean week 4 PGA scores were as follows: 0.7 (0.5, 0.9) (placebo), 0.9 (0.7, 1.1) (1,000 U; p = 0.067 vs placebo), and 0.9 (0.7, 1.1) (1,500 U; p = 0.067); walking speed was not significantly improved vs placebo. At cycle 4, week 4 (open-label), mean MAS GSC change reached −1.0. Incremental improvements in PGA and walking speed occurred across open-label cycles; by cycle 4, week 4, mean PGA was 1.9, and walking speed increased +25.3% (17.5, 33.2), with 16% of participants walking >0.8 m/s (associated with community mobility; 0% at baseline). Tolerability was good and consistent with the known abobotulinumtoxinA safety profile. Conclusions: In chronic hemiparesis, single abobotulinumtoxinA (Dysport Ipsen) administration reduced muscle tone. Repeated administration over a year was well-tolerated and improved walking speed and likelihood of achieving community ambulation. Clinicaltrial.gov identifiers: NCT01249404, NCT01251367. Classification of evidence: The double-blind phase of this study provides Class I evidence that for adults with chronic spastic hemiparesis, a single abobotulinumtoxinA injection reduces lower extremity muscle tone.

Safety and Efficacy of Repeat Open-Label AbobotulinumtoxinA Treatment in Pediatric Cerebral Palsy:

This was a prospective, repeat-treatment, open-label study (NCT01251380) of abobotulinumtoxinA for the management of lower limb spasticity in children who had completed a double-blind study. Children (2-17 years) received injections into the gastrocnemius-soleus complex, and other distal and proximal muscles as required (maximum total dose per injection cycle: 30 U/kg or 1000U). A total of 216 of the 241 double-blind patients entered the extension study and 207 received ≥1 open label injection into the gastrocnemius-soleus; 17-24% of patients also had injections into the hamstrings. The most frequent adverse events were related to common childhood infections and the most frequent treatment-related adverse event was injection site pain (n = 10). There was no evidence of a cumulative effect on adverse events. Sustained significant clinical improvements in muscle tone (Modified Ashworth Scale), spasticity (Tardieu Scale), overall clinical benefit (Physicians Global Assessment), and goal attainment (Goal Attainment Scale) were also observed across treatment cycles.

The Expanding Therapeutic Utility of Botulinum Neurotoxins

Botulinum neurotoxin (BoNT) is a major therapeutic agent that is licensed in neurological indications, such as dystonia and spasticity. The BoNT family, which is produced in nature by clostridial bacteria, comprises several pharmacologically distinct proteins with distinct properties. In this review, we present an overview of the current therapeutic landscape and explore the diversity of BoNT proteins as future therapeutics. In recent years, novel indications have emerged in the fields of pain, migraine, overactive bladder, osteoarthritis, and wound healing. The study of biological effects distal to the injection site could provide future opportunities for disease-tailored BoNT therapies. However, there are some challenges in the pharmaceutical development of BoNTs, such as liquid and slow-release BoNT formulations; and, transdermal, transurothelial, and transepithelial delivery. Innovative approaches in the areas of formulation and delivery, together with highly sensitive analytical tools, will be key for the success of next generation BoNT clinical products.

Liquid Formulation of AbobotulinumtoxinA Exhibits a Favorable Efficacy and Safety Profile in Moderate to Severe Glabellar Lines: A Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo- and Active Comparator-Controlled Trial

Background In most countries, approved botulinum toxin type A formulations require reconstitution before injection. Objectives To evaluate the efficacy and safety of a ready-to-use liquid formulation of abobotulinumtoxinA (abobotulinumtoxinA solution for injection, ASI) in subjects with moderate to severe glabellar lines (GL). Methods In this Phase II, double-blind, placebo-controlled, randomized study, 176 female subjects (aged 30 to 60 years) were randomized into five treatment groups: ASI 20, 50, or 75 U, reconstituted abobotulinumtoxinA (aboBoNT-A) 50 U, and placebo. GL severity was assessed at maximum frown using a 4-point grading scale. Responders were subjects with severity grade of moderate [2] or severe [3] at baseline improving to none [0] or mild [1], evaluated at each time-point by Investigators Live Assessment (ILA) or Subjects Self-Assessment (SSA). Safety profiles were also determined. Results Baseline characteristics were similar across groups. Responder rates on Day 29 by ILA were significantly greater for ASI 20, 50, and 75 U versus placebo (88.9%, 91.4%, and 87.9% vs. 0%, respectively; P < 0.0001). Similar results were observed by SSA. A greater proportion of responders was observed in ASI groups vs placebo from Day 8 to 113 for ILA and SSA (P < 0.001). AboBoNT-A responder rate on Day 29 for ILA was 77.1% (P < 0.1006 vs ASI 50 U); with comparable results by SSA. The ASI safety profile was comparable to that of aboBoNT-A. Conclusions Ready-to-use liquid formulation of abobotulinumtoxinA was shown to be efficacious, with comparable results to reconstituted abobotulinumtoxinA, and to have a favorable safety profile in subjects with severe to moderate GL.