Phillip A. Horwitz
Roy J. and Lucille A. Carver College of Medicine
Network
Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.
Publication
Featured researches published by Phillip A. Horwitz.
European Heart Journal | 2003
Michael P. Kelley; Bruce D. Klugherz; Seyed M. Hashemi; Nicolas Meneveau; Janet M. Johnston; William H. Matthai; Vidya S. Banka; Howard C. Herrmann; John W. Hirshfeld; Stephen E. Kimmel; Daniel M. Kolansky; Phillip A. Horwitz; Francois Schiele; Jean-Pierre Bassand; Robert L. Wilensky
Aims To evaluate outcomes for left main coronary artery (LMCA) stenting and compare results between protected (left coronary grafted) and unprotected LMCA stenting in the current bare-metal stent era. Methods We reviewed outcomes among 142 consecutive patients who underwent protected or unprotected LMCA stenting since 1997. All-cause mortality, myocardial infarction (MI), target-lesion revascularization (TLR), and the combined majoradverse clinical event (MACE) rates at one year were computed. Results Ninety-nine patients (70%) underwent protected and 43 patients (30%) underwent unprotected LMCA stenting. In the unprotected group, 86% were considered poor surgical candidates. Survival at one year was 88% for all patients, TLR 20%, and MACE 32%. At one year, survival was reduced in the unprotected group (72% vs. 95%, P <0.001) and MACE was increased in the unprotected patients (49% vs. 25%, P =0.005). Conclusions In the current era, stenting for both protected and unprotected LMCA disease is still associated with high long-term mortality and MACE rates. Stenting for unprotected LMCA disease in a high-risk population should only be considered in the absence of other revascularization options. Further studies are needed to evaluate the role of stenting for unprotected LMCA disease.
JAMA Internal Medicine | 2015
Rohan Khera; Peter Cram; Xin Lu; Ankur Vyas; Alicia Gerke; Gary E. Rosenthal; Phillip A. Horwitz; Saket Girotra
IMPORTANCE Percutaneous ventricular assist devices (PVADs) provide robust hemodynamic support compared with intra-aortic balloon pumps (IABPs), but clinical use patterns are unknown. OBJECTIVE To examine contemporary patterns in PVAD use in the United States and compare them with use of IABPs. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS Retrospective study of adults older than 18 years who received a PVAD or IABP while hospitalized in the United States (2007-2012). MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES Temporal trends in utilization, patient and hospital characteristics, in-hospital mortality, and cost of PVAD use compared with IABP. RESULTS During 2007 through 2012, utilization of PVADs increased 30-fold (4.6 per million discharges in 2007 to 138 per million discharges in 2012; P for trend < .001) while utilization of IABPs decreased from 1738 per million discharges in 2008 to 1608 per million discharges in 2012 (P for trend = .02). In 2007, an estimated 72 hospitals used PVADs, increasing to 477 in 2011 (P for trend < .001). The number of hospitals with an annual volume of 10 or more PVAD procedures per year increased from 0 in 2007 to 102 in 2011 (21.4% of PVAD-using hospitals; P for trend < .001). Among PVAD recipients, 67.3% had a diagnosis of cardiogenic shock or acute myocardial infarction (AMI). There was a temporal increase in the use of PVADs in older patients and patients with AMI, hypertension, diabetes mellitus, and chronic kidney disease (P for trend < .001 for all). Overall, mortality in PVAD recipients was 28.8%, and mean (SE) hospitalization cost was
Catheterization and Cardiovascular Interventions | 2012
David J. Cohen; Tara A. Lavelle; Ben van Hout; Haiyan Li; Yang Lei; Katherine Robertus; Duane S. Pinto; Elizabeth A. Magnuson; Thomas F. Mcgarry; Scott K. Lucas; Phillip A. Horwitz; Carl A. Henry; Patrick W. Serruys; Friedrich W. Mohr; A. Pieter Kappetein
85,580 (
Catheterization and Cardiovascular Interventions | 2005
Howard C. Herrmann; Frank E. Silvestry; Ruchira Glaser; Vincent See; Scott E. Kasner; Danielle Bradbury; Gene Chang; John W. Hirshfeld; Phillip A. Horwitz; Michael H. Kelly
4165); both were significantly higher in PVAD recipients with cardiogenic shock (mortality, 47.5%; mean [SE] cost,
American Journal of Cardiology | 2009
John M. Lasala; David A. Cox; D. Lynn Morris; Jeffrey A. Breall; Paul D. Mahoney; Phillip A. Horwitz; Dinesh Shaw; Kristin L. Hood; Lazar Mandinov; Keith D. Dawkins
113,695 [
American Journal of Cardiology | 2003
Phillip A. Horwitz; Jesse A. Berlin; William H. Sauer; Warren K. Laskey; Ronald J. Krone; Stephen E. Kimmel
6260]; P < .001 for both). The PVAD recipients were less likely than IABP recipients to have cardiogenic shock (34.3% vs 41.2%; P = .001), AMI (48.0% vs 68.6%; P < .001), and undergo coronary artery bypass graft surgery (6.2% vs 43.2%; P < .001), but more likely to undergo percutaneous coronary intervention (70.9% vs 40.4%; P < .001). In propensity-matched analysis, PVADs were associated with higher mortality compared with IABP (odds ratio, 1.23 [95% CI, 1.06-1.43]; P = .007). CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE There has been a substantial increase in the use of PVADs in recent years with an accompanying decrease in the use of IABPs. Given the high mortality, associated cost, and uncertain evidence for a clear benefit, randomized clinical trials are needed to determine whether use of PVADs leads to improved patient outcomes.
American Heart Journal | 2016
Rohan Khera; Kelly Ann Light-McGroary; Firas Zahr; Phillip A. Horwitz; Saket Girotra
Objectives: To evaluate the cost‐effectiveness of alternative approaches to revascularization for patients with three‐vessel or left main coronary artery disease (CAD). Background: Previous studies have demonstrated that, despite higher initial costs, long‐term costs with bypass surgery (CABG) in multivessel CAD are similar to those for percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). The impact of drug‐eluting stents (DES) on these results is unknown. Methods: The SYNTAX trial randomized 1,800 patients with left main or three‐vessel CAD to either CABG (n = 897) or PCI using paclitaxel‐eluting stents (n = 903). Resource utilization data were collected prospectively for all patients, and cumulative 1‐year costs were assessed from the perspective of the U.S. healthcare system. Results: Total costs for the initial hospitalization were
Arteriosclerosis, Thrombosis, and Vascular Biology | 2013
Wassef Karrowni; Yan Li; Philip G. Jones; Sharon Cresci; Mouin Abdallah; David E. Lanfear; Thomas M. Maddox; Darren K. McGuire; John A. Spertus; Phillip A. Horwitz
5,693/patient higher with CABG, whereas follow‐up costs were
Journal of Interventional Cardiology | 2008
Heather R. Bream-Rouwenhorst; Ryan A. Hobbs; Phillip A. Horwitz
2,282/patient higher with PCI due mainly to more frequent revascularization procedures and higher outpatient medication costs. Total 1‐year costs were thus
American Heart Journal | 2011
David A. Katz; Fengming Tang; Babalola Faseru; Phillip A. Horwitz; Philip G. Jones; John A. Spertus
3,590/patient higher with CABG, while quality‐adjusted life expectancy was slightly higher with PCI. Although PCI was an economically dominant strategy for the overall population, cost‐effectiveness varied considerably according to angiographic complexity. For patients with high angiographic complexity (SYNTAX score > 32), total 1‐year costs were similar for CABG and PCI, and the incremental cost‐effectiveness ratio for CABG was