Network


Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.

Hotspot


Dive into the research topics where Phillip Tucker is active.

Publication


Featured researches published by Phillip Tucker.


The Lancet | 2003

Rest breaks and accident risk

Phillip Tucker; Simon Folkard; I Macdonald

Regular rest breaks are recommended to prevent accumulation of accident risk during sustained activities. We examined the effect of rest breaks on temporal trends in industrial accident risk, by assessment of accident records from a large engineering company, obtained over 3 years. In 2 h of continuous work, relative risk of an accident in the last half-hour of a shift was 2.08 (95% CI 1.73-2.43) higher than in the first half-hour. Trends in risk did not seem to differ between three 2-h work periods. Regular rest breaks seem to be an effective way to control accumulation of risk during industrial shift-work.


Chronobiology International | 2000

A COMPARISON OF SOME DIFFERENT METHODS FOR PURIFYING CORE TEMPERATURE DATA FROM HUMANS

Jim Waterhouse; D. Weinert; David Minors; Simon Folkard; Deborah Owens; Greg Atkinson; Ian Macdonald; Natalia Sytnik; Phillip Tucker; Thomas Reilly

Nine healthy females were studied about the time of the spring equinox while living in student accommodations and aware of the passage of solar time. After 7 control days, during which a conventional lifestyle was lived under a 24h “constant routine,” the subjects lived 17 × 27h “days” (9h sleep in the dark and 18h wake using domestic lighting, if required). Throughout the experiment, recordings of wrist activity and rectal (core) temperature were taken. The raw temperature data were assessed for phase and amplitude by cosinor analysis and another method, “crossover times,” which does not assume that the data set is sinusoidal. Two different purification methods were used in attempts to remove the masking effects of sleep and activity from the core temperature record and so to measure more closely the endogenous component of this rhythm; these two methods were “purification by categories” and “purification by intercepts.” The former method assumes that the endogenous component is a sinusoid, and that the masking effects can be estimated by putting activity into a number of bands or categories. The latter method assumes that a temperature that would correspond to complete inactivity can be estimated from measured temperatures by linear regression of these on activity and extrapolation to a temperature at zero activity. Three indices were calculated to assess the extent to which exogenous effects had been removed from the temperature data by these purification methods. These indices were the daily variation of phase about its median value; the ratio of this variation to the daily deviation of phase about midactivity; and the relationship between amplitude and the square of the deviation of phase from midactivity. In all cases, the index would decrease in size as the contribution of the exogenous component to a data set fell. The purification by categories approach was successful in proportion to the number of activity categories that was used, and as few as four categories produced a data set with significantly less masking than raw data. The method purification by intercepts was less successful unless the raw data had been “corrected” to reflect the direct effects of sleep that were independent of activity (a method to achieve this being produced). Use of this purification method with the corrected data then gave results that showed least exogenous influences. Both this method and the purification by categories method with 16 categories of activity gave evidence that the exogenous component no longer made a significant contribution to the purified data set. The results were not significantly influenced by assessing amplitude and phase of the circadian rhythm from crossover times rather than cosinor analysis. The relative merits of the different methods, as well as of other published methods, are compared briefly; it is concluded that several purification methods, of differing degrees of sophistication and ease of application to raw data, are of value in field studies and other circumstances in which constant routines are not possible or are ethically undesirable. It is also concluded that such methods are often somewhat limited insofar as they are based on pragmatic or biological, rather than mathematical, considerations, and so it is desirable to attempt to develop models based equally on mathematics and biology. (Chronobiology International, 17(4), 539–566, 2000)


Biological Rhythm Research | 2001

Modeling the effect of spontaneous activity on core temperature in healthy human subjects

J. Waterhouse; Alan M. Nevill; D. Weinert; Simon Folkard; David Minors; Greg Atkinson; Thomas Reilly; Ian Macdonald; Deborah Owens; Natalia Sytnik; Phillip Tucker

Nine healthy females were studied about the time of the spring equinox, while living in student accommodation and aware of the passage of solar time. After 7 control days, during which a conventional lifestyle was lived, subjects underwent a 24-h ‘constant routine’, followed by 17 ‘days’ on a 27-h ‘day’ (9 h sleep and 18 h wake). Throughout the experiment, regular recordings of (non-dominant) wrist activity (every 30 s) and rectal temperature (every 6 min) were made. Only the control and 27-h (experimental) ‘days’ have been analysed in the present report. From each subject, 24-h profiles of raw temperature (consisting of 240 points) were obtained: one (control days), by averaging the control days; the other (experimental days), by conflating 16 consecutive 27-h ‘days’. Activity data were first collected into 240 points by summing them over 6-min intervals; they were then converted into three data sets (each of 240 points) for control and, separately, for experimental days. These data sets were summed activities in the previous 18 min (A18), summed activity over the previous 18–30 min (A30), and summed activity over the previous 30–42 min (A42). The raw temperature data sets for control and experimental days were sepa-rately analysed by ANCOVA using two time-of-day factors: ‘hours’ (24 levels) and ‘six-minute-intervals’ (10 levels). The covariate was the three activity data sets; in order to make the analysis more versatile, a cubic polynomial model was used, with a linear, quadratic and cubic term for each of these activity data sets. Moreover, the effects of activity upon core temperature were separately assessed for four 6-h sections of the 24-h profile, centred on its low, rising, high and falling phases. The main results were as follows: 1. All three activity data sets made significant contributions to the model, but that by the A30 data set was the most powerful of the three. This supports the use of activity files covering the previous 30 min in other ‘purification’ methods. 2. Although the linear term was the one that was significant most frequently, quadratic and (negative) cubic terms were also present on several occasions. This result indicates that the effect of activity upon core temperature can be approximated by a linear function (as has been done in other ‘purification’ models), but that, with wider ranges of activity, a sigmoid curve would be more accurate, indicative of the process of thermoregulation. 3. During the experimental days, the effect of activity upon temperature was greater in the rising than the falling temperature phase, and greater in the low than in the high phase. These results are predicted from current understanding of the circadian rhythm of thermoregulation. 4. During control days, the effects of activity were more complex, probably due to the factors that were present at some, but not all, phases — factors such as sleep, meals, changes in posture, lighting, and so on. 5. The ANCOVA also enabled the temperature profiles, corrected for the effects of activity (and, therefore, to be considered as ‘purified’), to be displayed. We conclude that the use of ANCOVA to tackle the problem of ‘purifying’ raw temperature data is a promising one. So far, it has produced results that accord with those from other ‘purification’ methods and with predictions based on our current understanding of the circadian rhythm of thermoregulation.


Scandinavian Journal of Work, Environment & Health | 1998

Diurnal trends in mood and performance do not all parallel alertness.

Deborah Owens; Ian A. Macdonald; Phillip Tucker; Natalia Sytnik; David Minors; J. Waterhouse; Peter Totterdell; Simon Folkard


Neuroscience Letters | 1998

Light of domestic intensity produces phase shifts of the circadian oscillator in humans

J. Waterhouse; David Minors; Simon Folkard; Deborah Owens; Greg Atkinson; Ian Macdonald; Thomas Reilly; Natalia Sytnik; Phillip Tucker


Chronobiology International | 2001

Temperature profiles, and the effect of sleep on them, in relation to morningness-eveningness in healthy female subjects

Jim Waterhouse; Simon Folkard; Hans P. A. Van Dongen; David Minors; Deborah Owens; G.A. Kerkhof; Dietmar Weinert; Alan M. Nevill; Ian Macdonald; Natalia Sytnik; Phillip Tucker


Scandinavian Journal of Work, Environment & Health | 1998

SHIFT LENGTH AS A DETERMINANT OF RETROSPECTIVE ON-SHIFT ALERTNESS

Phillip Tucker; Smith L; Ian A. Macdonald; Simon Folkard


British Journal of Psychology | 2000

Diurnal variations in the mood and performance of highly practised young women living under strictly controlled conditions

Deborah Owens; Ian Macdonald; Phillip Tucker; Natalia Sytnik; Peter Totterdell; David Minors; J. Waterhouse; Simon Folkard


Chronobiology International | 1999

LACK OF EVIDENCE THAT FEEDBACK FROM LIFESTYLE ALTERS THE AMPLITUDE OF THE CIRCADIAN PACEMAKER IN HUMANS

Jim Waterhouse; David Minors; Simon Folkard; Deborah Owens; Greg Atkinson; Ian Macdonald; Alan M. Nevill; Thomas Reilly; Natalia Sytnik; Phillip Tucker; Dietmar Weinert


Chronobiology International | 1996

The Difference Between Activity When in Bed and Out of Bed. II. Subjects on 27-Hour “Days”

David Minors; Simon Folkard; Ian Macdonald; Deborah Owens; Natalia Sytnik; Phillip Tucker; J. Waterhouse

Collaboration


Dive into the Phillip Tucker's collaboration.

Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

David Minors

University of Manchester

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

J. Waterhouse

Liverpool John Moores University

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Greg Atkinson

Liverpool John Moores University

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Thomas Reilly

Liverpool John Moores University

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Alan M. Nevill

University of Wolverhampton

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Jim Waterhouse

Liverpool John Moores University

View shared research outputs
Researchain Logo
Decentralizing Knowledge