Phillip Y. Roland

Disparities in Ovarian Cancer Care Quality and Survival According to Race and Socioeconomic Status

BACKGROUND The relationship between racial and socioeconomic status (SES) disparities and the quality of epithelial ovarian cancer care and survival outcome are unclear. METHODS A population-based analysis of National Cancer Data Base (NCDB) records for invasive primary epithelial ovarian cancer diagnosed in the period from 1998 to 2002 was done using data from patients classified as white or black. Adherence to National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN) guideline care was defined by stage-appropriate surgical procedures and recommended chemotherapy. The main outcome measures were differences in adherence to NCCN guidelines and overall survival according to race and SES and were analyzed using binomial logistic regression and multilevel survival analysis. RESULTS A total of 47 160 patients (white = 43 995; black = 3165) were identified. Non-NCCN-guideline-adherent care was an independent predictor of inferior overall survival (hazard ratio [HR] = 1.43, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 1.38 to 1.47). Demographic characteristics independently associated with a higher likelihood of not receiving NCCN guideline-adherent care were black race (odds ratio [OR] = 1.36, 95% CI = 1.25 to 1.48), Medicare payer status (OR = 1.20, 95% CI = 1.12 to 1.28), and not insured payer status (OR = 1.33, 95% CI = 1.19 to 1.49). After controlling for disease and treatment-related variables, independent racial and SES predictors of survival were black race (HR = 1.29, 95% CI = 1.22 to 1.36), Medicaid payer status (HR = 1.29, 95% CI = 1.20 to 1.38), not insured payer status (HR = 1.32, 95% CI = 1.20 to 1.44), and median household income less than

Stage IC adenocarcinoma of the endometrium: survival comparisons of surgically staged patients with and without adjuvant radiation therapy.

35 000 (HR = 1.06, 95% CI = 1.02 to 1.11). CONCLUSIONS These data highlight statistically and clinically significant disparities in the quality of ovarian cancer care and overall survival, independent of NCCN guidelines, along racial and SES parameters. Increased efforts are needed to more precisely define the patient, provider, health-care system, and societal factors leading to these observed disparities and guide targeted interventions.

Ovarian cancer in the United States: Contemporary patterns of care associated with improved survival

OBJECTIVE The goal of this study was to determine the outcomes of stage IC endometrial carcinoma patients who are managed with and without adjuvant radiation therapy after comprehensive surgical staging. METHODS Patients with FIGO stage IC adenocarcinoma of the endometrium diagnosed from 1988 to 1999 were identified from tumor registry databases at four institutions. A retrospective chart review identified 220 women who underwent comprehensive surgical staging including a total hysterectomy, bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy, pelvic/paraaortic lymphadenectomy, and peritoneal cytology. RESULTS Of the 220 stage IC patients, 56 (25%) patients received adjuvant brachytherapy (BT), 19 (9%) received whole-pelvis radiation (WPRT), and 24 (11%) received both WPRT and BT. One hundred twenty-one patients (55%) did not receive adjuvant radiation. There were 6 recurrences (6%) in the radiated group and 14 (12%) in the observation group (P = 0.20). Seven of fourteen recurrences in the observation group were local, and all local recurrences were salvaged with radiation therapy. Two of seven distant recurrences in this group were also salvaged with surgery and chemotherapy. The overall salvage rate for the observation group was 64%. There was a statistical difference in 5-year disease-free survival between the radiated and observation groups (93% vs 75%, P = 0.013). However, the 5-year overall survival was similar in the two groups (92% vs 90%, P = 0.717). CONCLUSION Adjuvant radiation therapy improves disease-free survival in surgical stage IC patients; however, overall survival is not improved with adjuvant radiation therapy since the majority of local recurrences in conservatively managed patients can be salvaged with radiation therapy.

Endometrial cancer: is surgical staging necessary?

BACKGROUND Ovarian cancer (OC) requires complex multidisciplinary care with wide variations in outcome. We sought to determine the impact of institutional and process of care factors on overall survival (OS) and delivery of guideline care nationally. METHODS This was a retrospective cohort study of primary OC diagnosed from 1998 to 2007 using the National Cancer Data Base (NCDB) capturing 80% of all U.S. cases. Patient- (demographics, comorbidities, stage/grade), process of care (adherence to guidelines) and institutional- (facility type, case volume) factors were evaluated. Primary outcomes were OS and delivery of guideline therapy. Multivariable logistic regression and Cox proportional hazards models were used for analysis. RESULTS We analyzed 96,802 consecutive cases. Five-year OS was 84%, 66.3%, 32% and 15.7% for stages I, II, III and IV, respectively. The annual mean facility case volumes varied by cancer center type (range: 5.7 to 26.7), with 25% of cases spread over 65% of centers--all treating fewer than 8 cases. Overall, 56% of cases received non-guideline care. Low facility case volume and higher comorbidity index independently predicted non-guideline care; high volume centers were less likely to deliver non-guideline care (OR: 0.44, 95% CI: 0.41-0.47). Delivery of non-guideline care (OR: 1.4, 95% CI: 1.36-1.44), and higher facility case volume (OR: 0.91, 95% CI: 0.86-0.96) were both independent predictors of OS. CONCLUSIONS Delivery of guideline care and facility case volume are important drivers of overall survival. Most cancer centers treat very few women with OC. National efforts should focus on improved access to centers with expertise in OC and ensuring delivery of guideline care.

Subspecialty training: does it affect the outcome of women treated for a gynecologic malignancy?

Surgical staging has become the standard of care for the treatment of women with endometrial cancer. Recent scientific publications have confirmed the relative safety of this procedure when performed by subspecialty trained surgeons and have provided compelling evidence that the routine use of postoperative teletherapy is not cost effective, nor does it offer improved survival. New questions as to the safety and effectiveness of a laparoscopic staging approach have been answered in the affirmative. Although the extent of staging has not yet been defined, growing evidence suggests that preoperative studies and intraoperative clinical opinion cannot be consistently counted on to be predictive of postoperative histologic status. Therefore, all patients should be considered at risk and should undergo an operation in a clinical situation that offers the immediate availability of retroperitoneal staging or cytoreductive surgery if necessary.

Health literacy, cervical cancer risk factors, and distress in low-income African-American women seeking colposcopy.

A review of available direct and indirect scientific reports strongly suggests that subspecialty training increases the likelihood that the appropriate surgical procedure will be completed in women operated on for gynecologic cancer. It is likely that specialty care lessens the costs associated with diagnosis, treatment and surveillance, and frequently improves survival.