Phoebe Sharkey

National Outcomes of Cataract Extraction: Increased Risk of Retinal Complications Associated with Nd.-YAG Laser Capsulotomy

PURPOSE The authors studied 57,103 randomly selected Medicare beneficiaries who underwent extracapsular cataract extraction in 1986 or 1987 to determine the possible association between performance of neodymium (Nd):YAG laser capsulotomy and the risk of subsequent retinal break or detachment. METHODS Cases of cataract surgery were identified from Medicare claims submitted in 1986 and 1987 and were followed through the end of 1988. Episodes of cataract surgery, posterior capsulotomy, and retinal complications were ascertained based on procedure and diagnosis codes listed in physician bills and hospital discharge records. Lifetable and Coxs proportional hazards models were used to analyze the risk of retinal detachment or break in patients undergoing and not undergoing capsulotomy during the period of observation. RESULTS Of the 57,103 persons identified as having undergone extracapsular cataract extraction in 1986 or 1987, 13,709 subsequently underwent Nd:YAG laser capsulotomy between 1986 and 1988. A total of 337 persons had aphakic or pseudophakic retinal detachments between 1986 and 1988 and an additional 194 underwent repair of a retinal break. Proportional hazards modeling shows a 3.9-fold increase in the risk of retinal break or detachment among those who underwent capsulotomy (95% confidence interval: 2.89 to 5.25). Younger patient age, male sex, and white race also were associated with increased risk of retinal complications after extracapsular cataract extraction. CONCLUSION The authors conclude that there is a statistically significant increase in the risk of retinal detachment or break in those patients who undergo capsulotomy after cataract extraction. Therefore, capsulotomy should be deferred until the patients impairment caused by capsular opacification warrants the increased risk of retinal complications associated with performance of capsulotomy.

The Relationship Between Severity of Illness and Hospital Length of Stay and Mortality

To address the question of quantification of severity of illness on a wide scale, the Computerized Severity Index (CSI) was developed by a research team at the Johns Hopkins University. This article describes an initial assessment of some aspects of the validity and reliability of the CSI on a sample of 2,378 patients within 27 high-volume DRGs from five teaching hospitals. The 27 DRGs predicted 27% of the variation in LOS, while DRGs adjusted for Admission CSI scores predicted 38% and DRGs adjusted for Maximum CSI scores throughout the hospital stay predicted 54% of this variation. Thus, the Maximum CSI score increased the predictability of DRGs by 100%. We explored the impact of including a 7-day cutoff criterion along with the Maximum CSI score similar to a criterion used in an alternative severity of illness measure. The DRG/Maximum CSI scores predictive power increased to 63% when the 7-day cutoff was added to the CSI definition. The Admission CSI score was used to predict in-hospital mortality and correlated R = 0.603 with mortality. The reliability of Admission and Maximum CSI data collection was high, with agreement of 95% and kappa statistics of 0.88 and 0.90, respectively.

Interhospital differences in severity of illness. Problems for prospective payment based on diagnosis-related groups (DRGs).

We evaluated the ability of the diagnosis-related-group (DRG) classification system to account adequately for severity of illness and, by implication, for the costs of medical care. Hospital inpatients on medicine, surgery, obstetrics/gynecology, and pediatrics services in six hospitals were evaluated to provide a spectrum of patient and hospital characteristics. This evaluation was based on data from a generic index of severity of illness obtained by trained personnel from a review of hospital charts after patient discharge. Within each DRG, substantial differences were found in the distribution of severity of illness in different hospitals. Some hospitals treated larger proportions of severely ill patients and had a wide range of severity within each DRG, but these differences did not always agree with the teaching classification or the Health Care Financing Administrations case-mix index. These findings suggest that patient classification by means of unadjusted DRGs does not adequately reflect severity of illness, and they indicate that prospective payment programs based on DRGs alone may unfairly and adversely discriminate against certain hospitals.

National Outcomes of Cataract Extraction: Retinal Detachment and Endophthalmids after Outpatient Cataract Surgery

Background: A near-total shift to cataract extraction on an outpatient basis occurred as a result of an administrative ruling by the Health Care Financing Administration. No national study has been conducted to assess the possible effects of that decision on clinical outcomes of surgery. The authors compared the rates of retinal detachment (RD) repair and hospitalization for endophthalmitis after extracapsular cataract extraction (ECCE) (including phacoemulsification) in 1986 and 1987 with those following inpatient cataract extraction in 1984. Methods: Using the 5% random sample of Medicare beneficiaries, we analyzed the claims of all individuals 66 years of age or older who underwent ECCE by nuclear expression or phacoemulsification in 1986 and 1987. A total of 57,103 patients were identified and followed to the end of 1988. Cumulative probability of RD repair and hospitalization for endophthalmitis was calculated by standard lifetable methods. These findings were compared with the cumulative probability of the same complications in a cohort of 330,000 patients who underwent cataract extraction on an inpatient basis in 1984. Results: In the 1986-to-1987 cohort, the cumulative probability of RD within 3 years after cataract surgery was 0.81% and the cumulative probability of endophthalmitis within 1 year was 0.08%. The rate of RD is similar to that which we previously reported for 330,000 patients who underwent inpatient surgery in 1984, but the rate of endophthalmitis is significantly lower in the 1986-to-1987 outpatient cohort (0.08% versus 0.12%; z = 2.42; P = 0.01). Conclusions: The shift to outpatient cataract surgery was accompanied by no significant increase in the probability of RD repair and possibly a significant decrease in the rate of hospitalization for endophthalmitis.

Measuring severity of illness: homogeneous case mix groups.

In this article we evaluate a new severity of illness index for use in defining case mix groupings of hospitalized patients. We find that this index, which takes into account patient severity of illness, produces groups that are more homogeneous (with respect to total charges, length of stay, routine charges, and laboratory charges) than those produced by four other case mix grouping methods that do not reflect the total burden of the patients illness. These results have important implications for programs of prospective reimbursement and for cross-hospital comparison studies.

Psychiatric severity of illness. A case mix study.

This study was undertaken to determine if a measure of severity of illness for psychiatric patients, the Psychiatric Severity of Illness Index, could produce psychiatric case mix groups that are more homogeneous with respect to resource use than the diagnosis-related groups (DRGs). Psychiatric Severity of Illness data were collected on 1,672 cases in ten hospitals of various types. Of these cases, 1,418 had enough information in the medical record to be scored using the Psychiatric Severity Index, 1,173 of which were in MDC 19 (mental diseases and disorders). We found that four Psychiatric Severity of Illness groups explained between 34% and 50% of the variation in length of stay of the combined hospital data in MDC 19, whereas nine DRGs explained between 6% and 14%. DRGs subdivided by Psychiatric Severity of Illness groups explained between 40% and 54% of the variation in length of stay. The implications of these results for cross-hospital comparisons are discussed.

Severity of illness within DRGs. Homogeneity study.

The authors assess the ability of the Severity of Illness Index to explain variability of resource use within each DRG. The data came from 15 hospitals, all of which had a HCFA DRG case mix index greater than 1. The data set comprised approximately 106,000 discharges, for which discharge abstract data, financial data, and Severity of Illness data were available. To pool the data over the 15 hospitals, the authors converted all charges to costs and normalized them to fiscal year 1983. Adjustments were also made for medical education and wage levels. The Severity of Illness Index explained more than 10% of the variability in resource use in 94% of the DRGs, which contained 97% of the patients, and more than 50% of the variability in resource use in 36% of the DRGs, which contained 24% of the patients. For the whole data set, DRGs explained 28% of the variability in resource use, and severity-adjusted DRGs explained 61% of the variability in resource use. Thus the Severity of Illness Index explained a large amount of the variability in resource use within individual DRGs as well as in the whole data set. This explanatory power remained when outliers were removed. These results go beyond previous studies that were based on six disease conditions and/or were analyzed only within individual hospitals. The findings indicate that the phenomenon of severity of illness differences within DRGs, and the corresponding differences in resource use, is consistent across 15 hospitals that represent all sections of the United States and all teaching types.

Influence of shunt surgery on healthcare expenditures of elderly fee-for-service Medicare beneficiaries with hydrocephalus

OBJECT The goal in this study was to determine the percentage of patients with hydrocephalus who were treated with shunt surgery and to assess Medicare expenditures for those with and without shunt surgery. METHODS Retrospective cost analyses were performed using the Standard Analytic Files of paid claims for beneficiaries enrolled in both Parts A (Inpatient) and B (Outpatient) of the Medicare program for 1997 through 2001. The main outcome measures were 5-year total payments and 5-year payments for separate types of service; for example, acute hospital (inpatient and outpatient), skilled nursing facility, home health, and physician/supplier services. RESULTS Of 1441 patients with hydrocephalus, 25.1% underwent shunt surgery during the study period. The effect of a shunt procedure on 5-year Medicare expenditures is a cost difference of

Mining lung cancer patient data to assess healthcare resource utilization

25,477 (p < 0.0001) less per patient, which is equal to a potential -

Strategic decision-making under conditions of complex demand and market risks

184.3 million difference in 5-year Medicare expenditures. The following three factors had a negative association with whether shunt surgery was performed: (1) age 80 to 84 years (odds ratio [OR] 0.619, confidence interval [CI] 0.390-0.984); (2) age 85 years or older (OR 0.201, CI 0.110-0.366); and (3) African-American race (OR 0.506, CI 0.295-0.869). The effect of age on the likelihood of shunt surgery persisted after adjusting for the propensity to die score. CONCLUSIONS Medicare expenditures for patients with hydrocephalus treated with shunt surgery are significantly lower than expenditures for untreated patients. Research to improve the diagnosis and treatment of hydrocephalus has the potential to improve outcomes and reduce health care expenditures further.