Phoebe Thorpe
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention
Network
Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.
Publication
Featured researches published by Phoebe Thorpe.
Pharmacoepidemiology and Drug Safety | 2013
Phoebe Thorpe; Suzanne M. Gilboa; Sonia Hernandez-Diaz; Jennifer N. Lind; Janet D. Cragan; Gerald G. Briggs; Sandra L. Kweder; Jan M. Friedman; Allen A. Mitchell; Margaret A. Honein
To determine which medications are most commonly used by women in the first trimester of pregnancy and identify the critical gaps in information about fetal risk for those medications.
Birth Defects Research Part A-clinical and Molecular Teratology | 2013
Cara T. Mai; James E. Kucik; Jennifer Isenburg; Marcia L. Feldkamp; Lisa Marengo; Erin M. Bugenske; Phoebe Thorpe; Jodi M. Jackson; Adolfo Correa; Russel Rickard; Clinton J. Alverson; Russell S. Kirby
The annual National Birth Defects Prevention Network (NBDPN) Congenital Malformations Surveillance Report includes state-level data on major birth defects (i.e., conditions present at birth that cause adverse structural changes in one or more parts of the body) and a directory of population-based birth defects surveillance systems in the United States. Beginning in 2012, these annually updated data and directory information are available in an electronic format accompanied by a data brief. This year’s report includes data from 41 population-based birth defects surveillance programs and a data brief highlighting the more common trisomy conditions (i.e., disorders characterized by an additional chromosome): trisomy 21 (commonly referred to as Down syndrome), trisomy 18, and trisomy 13. State-Specific Data Collection and Presentation for Selected Birth Defects Data collection The NBDPN Data Committee, in collaboration with the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), invited population-based birth defects surveillance programs in the United States to submit data on major birth defects affecting central nervous, eye, ear, cardiovascular, orofacial, gastrointestinal, genitourinary, and musculoskeletal systems, as well as trisomies, amniotic bands, and fetal alcohol syndrome. Table 1 lists these 47 conditions and their diagnostic codes (International Classification of Diseases, 9th Revision, Clinical Modification [ICD-9-CM]; and Centers for Disease Control and Prevention/British Pediatric Association Classification of Diseases [CDC/BPA]). Table 1 ICD-9-CM and CDC/BPA Codes for 47 Birth Defects Reported in the NBDPN Annual Report Participating state birth defects programs provided counts of all cases of the birth defects listed in Table 1 as well as counts of live births and male live births in their catchment areas for births occurring from January 1, 2006 through December 31, 2010. The cases for all defects were reported by maternal census race/ethnic categories: White non-Hispanic, Black/African-American non-Hispanic, Hispanic, Asian/Pacific Islander non-Hispanic, American Indian/Alaska Native non-Hispanic. Additionally, trisomy cases were provided by six categories of maternal age at delivery: less than 20 years, 20 to 24 years, 25 to 29 years, 30 to 34 years, 35 to 39 years, and 40+ years.
Pediatrics | 2015
Babette S. Zemel; Mary Pipan; Virginia A. Stallings; Waynitra Hall; Kim Schadt; David S. Freedman; Phoebe Thorpe
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Children with Down syndrome (DS) have lower birth weights and grow more slowly than children without DS. Advances in and increased access to medical care have improved the health and well-being of individuals with DS; however, it is unknown whether their growth has also improved. Our objective was to develop new growth charts for children with DS and compare them to older charts from the United States and more contemporary charts from the United Kingdom. METHODS: The Down Syndrome Growing Up Study (DSGS) enrolled a convenience sample of children with DS up to 20 years of age and followed them longitudinally. Growth parameters were measured by research anthropometrists. Sex-specific growth charts were generated for the age ranges birth to 36 months and 2 to 20 years using the LMS method. Weight-for-length and BMI charts were also generated. Comparisons with other curves were presented graphically. RESULTS: New DSGS growth charts were developed by using 1520 measurements on 637 participants. DSGS growth charts for children <36 months of age showed marked improvements in weight compared with older US charts. DSGS charts for 2- to 20-year-olds showed that contemporary males are taller than previous charts showed. Generally, the DSGS growth charts are similar to the UK charts. CONCLUSIONS: The DSGS growth charts can be used as screening tools to assess growth and nutritional status and to provide indications of how growth of an individual child compares with peers of the same age and sex with DS.
Morbidity and Mortality Weekly Report | 2016
Carrie K. Shapiro-Mendoza; Wanda D. Barfield; Zsakeba Henderson; Arthur James; Jennifer L. Howse; John K. Iskander; Phoebe Thorpe
Preterm birth (delivery before 37 weeks and 0/7 days of gestation) is a leading cause of infant morbidity and mortality in the United States. In 2013, 11.4% of the nearly 4 million U.S. live births were preterm; however, 36% of the 8,470 infant deaths were attributed to preterm birth (1). Infants born at earlier gestational ages, especially <32 0/7 weeks, have the highest mortality (Figure) and morbidity rates. Morbidity associated with preterm birth includes respiratory distress syndrome, necrotizing enterocolitis, and intraventricular hemorrhage; longer-term consequences include developmental delay and decreased school performance. Risk factors for preterm delivery include social, behavioral, clinical, and biologic characteristics (Box). Despite advances in medical care, racial and ethnic disparities associated with preterm birth persist. Reducing preterm birth, a national public health priority (2), can be accomplished by implementing and monitoring strategies that target modifiable risk factors and populations at highest risk, and by providing improved quality and access to preconception, prenatal, and interconception care through implementation of strategies with potentially high impact.
Birth Defects Research Part A-clinical and Molecular Teratology | 2011
Cynthia H. Cassell; Scott D. Grosse; Phoebe Thorpe; Eleanor E. Howell; Robert E. Meyer
BACKGROUND National data on health care use among children with special needs are limited and do not address children with spina bifida (SB). One recent study examined health care costs during 2003 among privately insured individuals with SB. Our objective was to compare health care use and expenditures among publicly insured children with SB to children without a major birth defect and among children with SB with and without hydrocephalus. METHODS Data from the North Carolina Birth Defects Monitoring Program and Medicaid were linked to identify continuously enrolled children with SB (case children) and children without a major birth defect (control children) born from 1995 to 2002. Medicaid expenditures per child for medical, inpatient, outpatient, dental, well-child care, developmental/behavioral services, and home health for those aged 0 to 4 years old were calculated for case and control children and for case children with and without hydrocephalus. RESULTS Of 373 case children who survived infancy, 205 (55%) were enrolled in Medicaid. Expenditures were assessed for 144 case and 5674 control children aged 0 to 4 years old continuously enrolled in Medicaid. During infancy, mean expenditure was
Morbidity and Mortality Weekly Report | 2016
Stephen W. Banspach; Stephanie Zaza; Patricia Dittus; Shannon L. Michael; Claire D. Brindis; Phoebe Thorpe
33,135 per child with SB and
Morbidity and Mortality Weekly Report | 2015
Cynthia F. Hinton; Stephanie Griese; Michael R. Anderson; Esther Chernak; Georgina Peacock; Phoebe Thorpe; Nicole Lurie
3900 per unaffected child. The biggest relative expenditures were for developmental/behavioral services (82 times higher for case than control child [
Morbidity and Mortality Weekly Report | 2016
Leah S. Fischer; Scott Santibanez; Richard J. Hatchett; Daniel B. Jernigan; Lauren Ancel Meyers; Phoebe Thorpe; Martin I. Meltzer
1401 vs.
Morbidity and Mortality Weekly Report | 2017
Mary M. Hulihan; Kathryn L. Hassell; Jean Raphael; Kim Smith-Whitley; Phoebe Thorpe
17]) and home health services (20 times higher [
Reproductive Toxicology | 2014
Cheryl R. Stein; David A. Savitz; Beth Elston; Phoebe Thorpe; Suzanne M. Gilboa
821 vs.
Collaboration
Dive into the Phoebe Thorpe's collaboration.
National Center for Immunization and Respiratory Diseases
View shared research outputs