Phyllis I. Spuls

European S3‐Guidelines on the systemic treatment of psoriasis vulgaris

Of the 131 studies on monotherapy or combination therapy assessed, 56 studies on the different forms of phototherapy fulfilled the criteria for inclusion in the guidelines. Approximately three-quarters of all patients treated with phototherapy attained at least a PASI 75 response after 4 to 6 weeks, and clearance was frequently achieved (levels of evidence 2 and 3). Phototherapy represents a safe and very effective treatment option for moderate to severe forms of psoriasis vulgaris. The onset of clinical effects occurs within 2 weeks. Of the unwanted side effects, UV erythema from overexposure is by far the most common and is observed frequently. With repeated or long-term use, the consequences of high, cumulative UV doses (such as premature aging of the skin) must be taken into consideration. In addition, carcinogenic risk is associated with oral PUVA and is probable for local PUVA and UVB. The practicability of the therapy is limited by spatial, financial, human, and time constraints on the part of the physician, as well as by the amount of time required by the patient. From the perspective of the cost-bearing institution, phototherapy has a good cost-benefit ratio. However, the potentially significant costs for, and time required of, the patient must be considered.

Efficacy and safety of systemic treatments for moderate-to-severe atopic dermatitis: A systematic review

BACKGROUND Many patients with moderate-to-severe atopic dermatitis (AD) require systemic immunomodulating treatment to achieve adequate disease control. OBJECTIVE We sought to systematically evaluate the efficacy and safety of systemic treatments for moderate-to-severe AD. METHODS A systematic literature search was performed in MEDLINE, EMBASE, and CENTRAL (until June 2012). Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) evaluating systemic immunomodulating treatments for moderate-to-severe AD were included. Selection, data extraction, quality assessment, and generation of treatment recommendations using the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) approach were performed independently by 2 reviewers. Efficacy outcomes were clinical signs, symptoms, quality of life, and the course of AD. Safety data were compared by calculating the weekly incidence rates (as percentages) for adverse events. RESULTS Thirty-four RCTs with 12 different systemic treatments and totaling 1653 patients were included. Fourteen trials consistently indicate that cyclosporin A efficaciously improves clinical signs of AD. Cyclosporin A is recommended as first-line treatment for short-term use. A second-line treatment option is azathioprine, but efficacy is lower, and evidence is weaker. Methotrexate can be considered a third-line treatment option. Recommendations are impossible for mycophenolate, montelukast, intravenous immunoglobulins, and systemic glucocorticosteroids because of limited evidence. A meta-analysis was not performed because of a lack of standardization in outcome measures. CONCLUSION Although 12 different interventions for moderate-to-severe AD have been studied in 34 RCTs, strong recommendations are only possible for the short-term use of cyclosporin A. Methodological limitations in the majority of trials prevent evidence-based conclusions. Large head-to-head trials evaluating long-term treatments are required.

Composition of Innate Lymphoid Cell Subsets in the Human Skin: Enrichment of NCR+ ILC3 in Lesional Skin and Blood of Psoriasis Patients

Innate lymphoid cells (ILCs) are increasingly appreciated as important regulators of tissue homeostasis and inflammation. However, their role in human skin remains obscure. We found that healthy peripheral blood CD117(+) ILC3, lacking the natural cytotoxicity receptor (NCR) NKp44 (NCR(-) ILC3), CD117(-)NCR(-)CRTH2(-)CD161(+) ILC1, and CRTH2(+) ILC2, express the skin-homing receptor cutaneous lymphocyte antigen (CLA). NCR(+) ILC3 were scarce in peripheral blood. Consistently, we identified in normal skin ILC2 and NCR(-) ILC3, a small proportion of CD161(+) ILC1, and hardly any NCR(+) ILC3, whereas NCR(+) ILC3 were present in cultured dermal explants. The skin ILC2 and NCR(+) ILC3 subsets produced IL-13 and IL-22, respectively, upon cytokine stimulation. Remarkably, dermal NCR(-) ILC3 converted to NCR(+) ILC3 upon culture in IL-1β plus IL-23, cytokines known to be involved in psoriatic inflammation. In line with this observation, significantly increased proportions of NCR(+) ILC3 were present in lesional skin and peripheral blood of psoriasis patients as compared with skin and blood of healthy individuals, respectively, whereas the proportions of ILC2 and CD161(+) ILC1 remained unchanged. NCR(+) ILC3 from skin and blood of psoriasis patients produced IL-22, which is regarded as a key driver of epidermal thickening, suggesting that NCR(+) ILC3 may participate in psoriasis pathology.

European S3-Guidelines on the systemic treatment of psoriasis vulgaris - Update 2015 - Short version - EDF in cooperation with EADV and IPC

European S3-Guidelines on the systemic treatment of psoriasis vulgaris – Update 2015 – Short version – EDF in cooperation with EADV and IPC A. Nast,* P. Gisondi, A.D. Ormerod, P. Saiag, C. Smith, P.I. Spuls, P. Arenberger, H. Bachelez, J. Barker, E. Dauden, E.M. de Jong, E. Feist, A. Jacobs, R. Jobling, L. Kem eny, M. Maccarone, U. Mrowietz, K.A. Papp, C. Paul, K. Reich, S. Rosumeck, T. Talme, H.B. Thio, P. van de Kerkhof, R.N. Werner, N. Yawalkar Division of Evidence Based Medicine, Department of Dermatology, Charit e – Universit€ atsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany Section of Dermatology and Venereology, Department of Medicine, University of Verona, Verona, Italy Department of Dermatology, Aberdeen Royal Infirmary, Aberdeen, UK Service de Dermatologie, Hôpital Ambroise Par e Universit e Paris V, Boulogne, France Clinical Lead for Dermatology, St Johns Institute of Dermatology, St Thomas’ Hospital, London, UK Department of Dermatology, Academic Medical Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands Third Faculty of Medicine, Department of Dermatology, Charles University, Prague, Czech Republic Department of Dermatology, Hôpital Saint-Louis, Paris, France St. Johns Institute of Dermatology, St. Thomas’ Hospital, London, UK Hospital Universitario de la Princesa, Madrid, Spain University Medical Center Nijmegen St Radboud, Nijmegen, The Netherlands Medizinische Klinik mit Schwerpunkt Rheumatologie u. klinische Immonologie, Charit e – Universit€atsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany Cambridge, UK SZTE Borgyogyaszati Klinika, Szeged, Hungary Roma, Italy Department of Dermatology, Psoriasis-Center University Medical Center Schleswig Holstein, Kiel, Germany Waterloo, Canada Department of Dermatology, Paul Sabatier University, Toulouse, France Dermatologikum Hamburg, Hamburg, Germany Section of Dermatology and Venereology, Department of Medicine, Karolinska Institutet, Karolinska University Hospital, Huddinge, Stockholm, Sweden Department of Dermatology, Erasmus University, Rotterdam, The Netherlands Department of Dermatology, University Hospital Nijmegen, Nijmegen, The Netherlands Department of Dermatology, Inselspital, Universit€ atsklinik f€ ur Dermatologie, Bern, Switzerland *Correspondence: A. Nast. E-mail: alexander.nast@charite.de Received: 22 June 2015; Accepted: 7 July 2015

How Good Are Clinical Severity and Outcome Measures for Psoriasis?: Quantitative Evaluation in a Systematic Review

A large number of clinical measures of psoriasis are used in clinical trials and daily practice. These measures lack uniformity and validation. However, valid outcome and severity measures for psoriasis are a prerequisite for fully informative clinical research and evidence-based medicine. The purpose of this study was to identify all clinical measures of psoriasis severity and outcome in use and to evaluate the quality of these measures using clinimetric criteria; we identified 53 separate clinical measures, which were regrouped into 11 measures for quality analysis. No measure could be scored on all items used in the clinimetric analysis. The Lattice System Physicians Global Assessment and Physicians Global Assessment were most highly noted. We conclude that none of the psoriasis measures is adequately validated. The Psoriasis Area and Severity Index is the most commonly used clinical measure in research, but it has substantial limitations such as low response distribution, no consensus on interpretability, and low responsiveness in mild disease. Nevertheless, because of its widespread use the Psoriasis Area and Severity Index permits some degree of comparison of results among clinical trials. Overall, no best instrument was identified, and different situations may call for different measures.

Extent and Clinical Consequences of Antibody Formation Against Adalimumab in Patients With Plaque Psoriasis

OBJECTIVES To investigate the extent antibodies to adalimumab are formed in patients with plaque psoriasis and whether these antibodies have clinical consequences. Also, to examine the relationship between antibodies to adalimumab and adalimumab trough titers. DESIGN Prospective observational cohort study. SETTING Two Dutch dermatology departments in university hospitals. PATIENTS All consecutive patients starting a regimen of adalimumab for chronic plaque psoriasis. Patients were screened and fulfilled the Dutch reimbursement criteria for adalimumab to treat psoriasis. INTERVENTION Adalimumab treatment (per label). MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES The titer of antibodies to adalimumab, the adalimumab trough concentration, and the Psoriasis Area and Severity Index at weeks 12 and 24. RESULTS Antibodies to adalimumab were detected in 13 of 29 patients (45%) during 24 weeks of treatment. Differences in response rates among patients with low, high, and no titers of antibodies to adalimumab were significant at weeks 12 and 24 (P = .04 and P < .001, respectively). The median adalimumab trough concentrations varied significantly among patients with low, high, and no titers of antibodies to adalimumab (1.30 [range, 0.01-5.50], 0.0 [range, 0.0-0.0], and 9.6 [range, 0.0-22.6] mg/L, respectively; P < .001). At week 24, the median adalimumab trough concentrations also differed significantly among good responders, moderate responders, and nonresponders (9.7 [range, 0.0-22.6], 8.9 [range, 3.2-12.6], and 0.0 [range, 0.0-13.3] mg/L, respectively; P = .01). CONCLUSION Antibodies to adalimumab are associated with lower serum adalimumab trough concentrations and with nonresponse or loss of response to adalimumab in patients with plaque psoriasis.

Vitiligo-Like Depigmentation in Patients With Stage III-IV Melanoma Receiving Immunotherapy and Its Association With Survival: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

PURPOSE Vitiligo-like depigmentation in patients with melanoma may be associated with more favorable clinical outcome. We conducted a systematic review of patients with stage III to IV melanoma treated with immunotherapy to determine the cumulative incidence of vitiligo-like depigmentation and the prognostic value of vitiligo development on survival. METHODS We systemically searched and selected all studies on melanoma immunotherapy that reported on autoimmune toxicity and/or vitiligo between 1995 and 2013. Methodologic quality of each study was appraised using adapted criteria for systematic reviews in prognostic studies. Random-effect models were used to calculate summary estimates of the cumulative incidence of vitiligo-like depigmentation across studies. The prognostic value of vitiligo-like depigmentation on survival outcome was assessed using random-effects Cox regression survival analyses. RESULTS One hundred thirty-seven studies were identified comprising 139 treatment arms (11 general immune stimulation, 84 vaccine, 28 antibody-based, and 16 adoptive transfer) including a total of 5,737 patients. The overall cumulative incidence of vitiligo was 3.4% (95% CI, 2.5% to 4.5%). In 27 studies reporting individual patient data, vitiligo development was significantly associated with both progression-free-survival (hazard ratio [HR], 0.51; 95% CI, 0.32 to 0.82; P < .005) and overall survival (HR, 0.25; 95% CI, 0.10 to 0.61; P < .003), indicating that these patients have two to four times less risk of disease progression and death, respectively, compared with patients without vitiligo development. CONCLUSION Although vitiligo occurs only in a low percentage of patients with melanoma treated with immunotherapy, our findings suggest clear survival benefit in these patients. Awareness of vitiligo induction in patients with melanoma is important as an indicator of robust antimelanoma immunity and associated improved survival.

Low Systemic Exposure after Repeated Topical Application of Pimecrolimus (Elidel®, SD Z ASM 981) in Patients with Atopic Dermatitis

Background: Pimecrolimus is a cell-selective inhibitor of inflammatory cytokine release developed specifically for the treatment of inflammatory skin diseases. Aim: The objective of this study was to evaluate blood concentrations and tolerability of pimecrolimus during topical treatment. Methods: Twelve adult patients with extensive atopic dermatitis were enrolled in an open-label, noncontrolled, pharmacokinetic study. The patients were treated twice daily for 3 weeks with pimecrolimus cream 1% on all lesions. Pimecrolimus blood concentrations were measured at regular time points, and the safety and tolerability were monitored throughout the study. Results: In 78% of the 444 blood samples evaluated, pimecrolimus concentrations remained below the limit of quantitation (0.5 ng/ml). The highest concentration measured was 1.4 ng/ml. There was no indication of drug accumulation. Pimecrolimus was well tolerated locally and systemically. Conclusion: The 3-week twice daily treatment with pimecrolimus cream 1% results in consistently low pimecrolimus blood concentrations with no accumulation. Pimecrolimus cream appears suitable for the long-term management of atopic dermatitis.

A systematic review of five systemic treatments for severe psoriasis

We systematically reviewed the evidence concerning the ability of five systemic treatments to induce remission in patients with severe psoriasis: ultraviolet B (UVB), photochemotherapy (PUVA), methotrexate (MTX), retinoids (RET) and cyclosporin A (CYA). An elaborate literature search was performed, the validity of studies was assessed, and data were analysed. In total, 89, 193, 101, 155 and 127 studies (n=665) concerning UVB, PUVA, MTX, RET and CYA were found. The exclusion rate was high, mainly because of concomitant antipsoriatic therapy, outdated dosages or inadequate documentation. No study on MTX could be included. A total of 129 patient series was included in the analysis, reporting on 13,677 patients, Study size‐weighted averages of the proportions of patients with clearance and good, moderate and poor response (defined, respectively, as 95–100%, 75–100% and 50–75% and <50% reduction in the outcome measurements as compared with baseline) were calculated. PUVA therapy was associated with the highest average proportion of patients with clearance (70%) and the highest proportion of patients with good response (83%), followed by UVB (68%) and CYA (64%). Incidence of side‐effects per week was highest in the RET group and lowest in the phototherapy groups. This review may provide a basis for the development of guidelines for the treatment of psoriasis. Trials comparing oral modalities applied according to currently accepted standards should also be carried out.

Towards global consensus on outcome measures for atopic eczema research: results of the HOME II meeting

The use of nonstandardized and inadequately validated outcome measures in atopic eczema trials is a major obstacle to practising evidence‐based dermatology. The Harmonising Outcome Measures for Eczema (HOME) initiative is an international multiprofessional group dedicated to atopic eczema outcomes research. In June 2011, the HOME initiative conducted a consensus study involving 43 individuals from 10 countries, representing different stakeholders (patients, clinicians, methodologists, pharmaceutical industry) to determine core outcome domains for atopic eczema trials, to define quality criteria for atopic eczema outcome measures and to prioritize topics for atopic eczema outcomes research. Delegates were given evidence‐based information, followed by structured group discussion and anonymous consensus voting. Consensus was achieved to include clinical signs, symptoms, long‐term control of flares and quality of life into the core set of outcome domains for atopic eczema trials. The HOME initiative strongly recommends including and reporting these core outcome domains as primary or secondary endpoints in all future atopic eczema trials. Measures of these core outcome domains need to be valid, sensitive to change and feasible. Prioritized topics of the HOME initiative are the identification/development of the most appropriate instruments for the four core outcome domains. HOME is open to anyone with an interest in atopic eczema outcomes research.