Pia Britt Elberg

Content analysis of physical examination templates in electronic health records using SNOMED CT

OBJECTIVES Most electronic health record (EHR) systems are built on proprietary information models and terminology, which makes achieving semantic interoperability a challenge. Solving interoperability problems requires well-defined standards. In contrast, the need to support clinical work practice requires a local customization of EHR systems. Consequently, contrasting goals may be evident in EHR template design because customization means that local EHR organizations can define their own templates, whereas standardization implies consensus at some level. To explore the complexity of balancing these two goals, this study analyzes the differences and similarities between templates in use today. METHODS A similarity analysis was developed on the basis of SNOMED CT. The analysis was performed on four physical examination templates from Denmark and Sweden. The semantic relationships in SNOMED CT were used to quantify similarities and differences. Moreover, the analysis used these identified similarities to investigate the common content of a physical examination template. RESULTS The analysis showed that there were both similarities and differences in physical examination templates, and the size of the templates varied from 18 to 49 fields. In the SNOMED CT analysis, exact matches and terminology similarities were represented in all template pairs. The number of exact matches ranged from 7 to 24. Moreover, the number of unrelated fields differed a lot from 1/18 to 22/35. Cross-country comparisons tended to have more unrelated content than within-country comparisons. On the basis of identified similarities, it was possible to define the common content of a physical examination. Nevertheless, a complete view on the physical examination required the inclusion of both exact matches and terminology similarities. CONCLUSIONS This study revealed that a core set of items representing the physical examination templates can be generated when the analysis takes into account not only exact matches but also terminology similarities. This core set of items could be a starting point for standardization and semantic interoperability. However, both unmatched terms and terminology matched terms pose a challenge for standardization. Future work will include using local templates as a point of departure in standardization to see if local requirements can be maintained in a standardized framework.

Re-use of SNOMED CT subset in development of the Danish national standard for home care nursing problems

SNOMED CT was chosen as reference terminology for standardisation of homecare nursing documentation to make reporting comparable across the 98 Danish municipalities. The method outlined in this paper for developing a Danish national homecare nursing SNOMED CT subsets is a pragmatic approach to build new SNOMED CT subsets drawing on existing and available SNOMED CT subsets. Combining this approach with awareness of hierarchical coherency in SNOMED CT subsets makes effective retrieval of data possible.

SNOMED CT adoption in Denmark: why is it so hard?

What prevents the National Health Care Terminology based on SNOMED CT from being implemented in the EHR systems and ongoing EHR implementations in Denmark? SNOMED CT was translated into Danish language from 2006-2009 and by 2013 it is not yet implemented in a clinical information system. Fourteen key persons broadly representing all major stakeholders in the process of system configuration accepted an invitation to discuss questions about what kind of challenges they experience in handling terminology in clinical information systems today and what they expect from a future implementation of a SNOMED CT based national terminology. Three types of challenges of terminology implementations resulted from two parallel focus group interviews: 1. Methods to manage terminology-implementation like preventing inconsistency and redundant representations of identical information. 2. The existing terminology and classifications used are sufficient to accommodate the required governance and 3. SNOMED CT is expected to be immature for system-implementation. These results suggest further research in methods to facilitate implementation of a complex terminology and studies that evaluate SNOMED CT in clinical use; but the results also support national and regional decision makers regarding what kind of challenges they must manage.

SNOMED CT as reference terminology in the Danish national home care documentation standard

In Danish home care, multiple professions deliver services to citizens. FSIII is a national home care documentation standard, where one of the goals is to share documentation to improve coordination between these professional groups and avoid double documentation. The aim of this study was to develop a SNOMED-CT based navigation hierarchy to ensure that professions could preserve their documentation practice, to help avoid double documentation, and to ensure that the technical implementation did not require sophisticated semantic tools. The method involved mapping of non-SNOMED-CT content to SNOMED CT, visualization of merged graphs, identification of reference concepts, relating reference concepts to the documentation models of each profession, and representation of the navigation hierarchy in a reference set. The navigation hierarchy ensures that citizen conditions appear in a relevant context, regardless of which profession entered the data. Our approach paves the way for incremental standardization projects, where an implementation artefact, such as the navigation hierarchy, highlights the semantic features of SNOMED CT that can be used to reach specific business goals; in this case, sharing data across professional groups.

Applying the SNOMED CT concept model to represent value sets for head and neck cancer documentation

Health—exploring complexity: an interdisciplinary systems approach HEC2016 28 August–2 September 2016, Munich, Germany Eva Grill • Martin Müller • Ulrich Mansmann Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2016 Health is a complex process with potentially interacting components from the molecular to the societal and environmental level. Adequate research designs and data analysis methods are needed to improve our understanding of this complexity, to ultimately derive high quality evidence to inform patients, health professionals, and health policy decision makers. Also, effective patient-centred health care has to address the complexity of health, functioning, and disability, not only by implementing interventions, but also by using information technology that represents the complexity of health care to inform all actors. Given this background, we developed the concept of our conference HEC2016 as an interdisciplinary European event in beautiful Bavaria, in the city of München. Quite ironically this is the place, where William of Ockham, whose ideas of parsimony are the very opposite of complexity, accused of heresy, spent 17 years under the protection of the Bavarian King Ludwig IV. Furthermore, our local public health hero Max von Pettenkofer (1818–1901) contributed a lot to the basic systemic understanding of health, especially the relevance of a healthy environment. Under the joint theme of health as a complex system we joined the activities of five scientific disciplines: Medical Informatics, Medical Biometry, Bioinformatics, Epidemiology and Health Data Management. The mission behind this interdisciplinary effort was to serve as an important scientific forum for the exchange of new ideas and applications to strengthen health sciences on a national and international level. The analysis of health as a complex system opens needed perspectives on a challenging reality: filtering current hypotheses, resolving controversies, and tailoring interventions to the need of the individual within a health system environment. The conference encouraged the dialogue of the disciplines in order to advance our understanding of health and to decrease burden of disease. HEC2016 brought together the annual conferences of the German Association for Medical Informatics, Biometry and Epidemiology (GMDS), the German Society for Epidemiology (DGEpi), the International Epidemiological AssociationEuropean Region (IEA-EEF) and the European Federation for Medical Informatics Association (EFMI, MIE 2016). HEC2016 took place in München, Germany, in the main building of the Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität (LMU) from 28 August to 2 September 2016 under the auspices of the Institute for Medical Information Processing, Biometry and Epidemiology of LMU. The conference received 832 contributions for oral and poster presentation (Table 1). Fourteen percent of them were from outside Europe with the largest group of 10 % from Asia (Table 2). Scientific program committees and reviewers selected 408 submissions as oral contributions and 303 for poster presentations. The program was surrounded by twelve tutorials held by international renowned scientists and covered a broad spectrum from innovative biostatistical and epidemiological methods to tutorials in application of innovative software, scientific writing and data protection issues. Over 50 panel discussions and workshops allowed in-depth exchange of ideas on specific topics and underscored the interactive nature of HEC2016. A special focus of HEC2016 was on the promotion of young scientists from all disciplines whose participation was supported by numerous travel grants. We would like to express our deepest gratitude to all the colleagues who supported us as speakers, committee members and reviewers, lent us a hand before, during and after the conference, gave critical but friendly comments at all stages of the preparations, supported us by providing coffee, audience or Butterbrezen, and specifically to those who submitted contributions to the conference and attended the conference and its many tutorials, lectures and sessions. We extend our gratitude to the Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft for generous financial support (grant no. GR 3608/4-1). Last not least we would like to thank our families who allowed us to spend most of our weekends with organizing this conference, to William of Ockham for lending us his razor (from time to time) and to Max von Pettenkofer for guidance. Eva Grill Martin Müller Ulrich Mansmann for the local organizing committee (Tables 1, 2) 123 Eur J Epidemiol (2016) 31:S1–S239 DOI 10.1007/s10654-016-0183-1Original citation: Lim Choi Keung, Sarah Niukyun, Murphy, Paddie, Khan, Mohammed Omar, Perkins, Gavin D., Smith, Christopher and Arvanitis, Theodoros N. (2016) Perspectives of UK community first responders on a national public access defibrillator database. In: HEC 2016 (Health Exploring Complexity: An Interdisciplinary Systems Approach) Conference, Munich, Germany, 28 Aug 2 Sep 2016. Published in: European Journal of Epidemiology, 31 (Supplement 1). S117 (796).

Terminology-based recording of clinical data for multiple purposes within oncology

Health—exploring complexity: an interdisciplinary systems approach HEC2016 28 August–2 September 2016, Munich, Germany Eva Grill • Martin Müller • Ulrich Mansmann Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2016 Health is a complex process with potentially interacting components from the molecular to the societal and environmental level. Adequate research designs and data analysis methods are needed to improve our understanding of this complexity, to ultimately derive high quality evidence to inform patients, health professionals, and health policy decision makers. Also, effective patient-centred health care has to address the complexity of health, functioning, and disability, not only by implementing interventions, but also by using information technology that represents the complexity of health care to inform all actors. Given this background, we developed the concept of our conference HEC2016 as an interdisciplinary European event in beautiful Bavaria, in the city of München. Quite ironically this is the place, where William of Ockham, whose ideas of parsimony are the very opposite of complexity, accused of heresy, spent 17 years under the protection of the Bavarian King Ludwig IV. Furthermore, our local public health hero Max von Pettenkofer (1818–1901) contributed a lot to the basic systemic understanding of health, especially the relevance of a healthy environment. Under the joint theme of health as a complex system we joined the activities of five scientific disciplines: Medical Informatics, Medical Biometry, Bioinformatics, Epidemiology and Health Data Management. The mission behind this interdisciplinary effort was to serve as an important scientific forum for the exchange of new ideas and applications to strengthen health sciences on a national and international level. The analysis of health as a complex system opens needed perspectives on a challenging reality: filtering current hypotheses, resolving controversies, and tailoring interventions to the need of the individual within a health system environment. The conference encouraged the dialogue of the disciplines in order to advance our understanding of health and to decrease burden of disease. HEC2016 brought together the annual conferences of the German Association for Medical Informatics, Biometry and Epidemiology (GMDS), the German Society for Epidemiology (DGEpi), the International Epidemiological AssociationEuropean Region (IEA-EEF) and the European Federation for Medical Informatics Association (EFMI, MIE 2016). HEC2016 took place in München, Germany, in the main building of the Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität (LMU) from 28 August to 2 September 2016 under the auspices of the Institute for Medical Information Processing, Biometry and Epidemiology of LMU. The conference received 832 contributions for oral and poster presentation (Table 1). Fourteen percent of them were from outside Europe with the largest group of 10 % from Asia (Table 2). Scientific program committees and reviewers selected 408 submissions as oral contributions and 303 for poster presentations. The program was surrounded by twelve tutorials held by international renowned scientists and covered a broad spectrum from innovative biostatistical and epidemiological methods to tutorials in application of innovative software, scientific writing and data protection issues. Over 50 panel discussions and workshops allowed in-depth exchange of ideas on specific topics and underscored the interactive nature of HEC2016. A special focus of HEC2016 was on the promotion of young scientists from all disciplines whose participation was supported by numerous travel grants. We would like to express our deepest gratitude to all the colleagues who supported us as speakers, committee members and reviewers, lent us a hand before, during and after the conference, gave critical but friendly comments at all stages of the preparations, supported us by providing coffee, audience or Butterbrezen, and specifically to those who submitted contributions to the conference and attended the conference and its many tutorials, lectures and sessions. We extend our gratitude to the Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft for generous financial support (grant no. GR 3608/4-1). Last not least we would like to thank our families who allowed us to spend most of our weekends with organizing this conference, to William of Ockham for lending us his razor (from time to time) and to Max von Pettenkofer for guidance. Eva Grill Martin Müller Ulrich Mansmann for the local organizing committee (Tables 1, 2) 123 Eur J Epidemiol (2016) 31:S1–S239 DOI 10.1007/s10654-016-0183-1Original citation: Lim Choi Keung, Sarah Niukyun, Murphy, Paddie, Khan, Mohammed Omar, Perkins, Gavin D., Smith, Christopher and Arvanitis, Theodoros N. (2016) Perspectives of UK community first responders on a national public access defibrillator database. In: HEC 2016 (Health Exploring Complexity: An Interdisciplinary Systems Approach) Conference, Munich, Germany, 28 Aug 2 Sep 2016. Published in: European Journal of Epidemiology, 31 (Supplement 1). S117 (796).

Masters program in biomedical engineering and informatics: Research-based teaching and teaching-based research

In typical Master level Biomedical Engineering curricula the focus on research is most clearly visible in the final thesis work, whereas the first year (and a half) focuses on knowledge and engineering skills. The organization of the Aalborg Biomedical Engineering and Informatics program gives a framework for a much more intensive focus on research, throughout the Masters program, an opportunity that is used to involve the students in research activities from the very beginning. With positive results, in terms of study efficiency, grades, employment and research output.

Five Year Biomedical Engineering Curriculum — Experiences and Results from the First Eight Years

A full M.Sc- curriculum in Biomedical Engineering and Informatics was established at Aalborg University in 2000. The curriculum reflects the multidisciplinary composition of Biomedical Engineering and it consists of elements from engineering, informatics, medical and natural sciences as well as of elements from the social sciences.