Pierangelo Bonini

Haemolysis: an overview of the leading cause of unsuitable specimens in clinical laboratories.

Abstract Prevention of medical errors is a major goal of healthcare, though healthcare workers themselves have not yet fully accepted or implemented reliable models of system error, and neither has the public. While there is widespread perception that most medical errors arise from an inappropriate or delayed clinical management, the issue of laboratory errors is receiving a great deal of attention due to their impact on the quality and efficiency of laboratory performances and patient safety. Haemolytic specimens are a frequent occurrence in clinical laboratories, and prevalence can be as high as 3.3% of all of the routine samples, accounting for up to 40%–70% of all unsuitable specimens identified, nearly five times higher than other causes, such as insufficient, incorrect and clotted samples. This article focuses on this challenging issue, providing an overview on prevalence and leading causes of in vivo and in vitro haemolysis, and tentative guidelines on identification and management of haemolytic samples in clinical laboratories. This strategy includes continuous education of healthcare personnel, systematic detection/quantification of haemolysis in any sample, immediate clinicians warning on the probability of in vivo haemolysis, registration of non-conformity, completing of tests unaffected by haemolysis and request of a second specimen for those potentially affected. Clin Chem Lab Med 2008;46:764–72.

Causes, consequences, detection, and prevention of identification errors in laboratory diagnostics.

Abstract Laboratory diagnostics, a pivotal part of clinical decision making, is no safer than other areas of healthcare, with most errors occurring in the manually intensive preanalytical process. Patient misidentification errors are potentially associated with the worst clinical outcome due to the potential for misdiagnosis and inappropriate therapy. While it is misleadingly assumed that identification errors occur at a low frequency in clinical laboratories, misidentification of general laboratory specimens is around 1% and can produce serious harm to patients, when not promptly detected. This article focuses on this challenging issue, providing an overview on the prevalence and leading causes of identification errors, analyzing the potential adverse consequences, and providing tentative guidelines for detection and prevention based on direct-positive identification, the use of information technology for data entry, automated systems for patient identification and specimen labeling, two or more identifiers during sample collection and delta check technology to identify significant variance of results from historical values. Once misidentification is detected, rejection and recollection is the most suitable approach to manage the specimen. Clin Chem Lab Med 2009;47:143–53.

Laboratory network of excellence: enhancing patient safety and service effectiveness

Abstract Clinical laboratories have undergone major changes due to technological progress and economic pressure. While costs of laboratory testing continue to be the dominant issue within the healthcare service worldwide, quality, effectiveness and impact on outcomes are also emerging as critical value-added features. Five Italian laboratories are therefore promoting a network of excellence by investigating markers of effectiveness of laboratory services and sharing their experience of using them in clinical practice. In the present study we report preliminary data on indicators of quality in all phases of the so-called total testing process, the key to evaluating all phases of the total testing process, including the appropriateness of test requests and data interpretation. Initial findings in evaluating pre-analytical causes of specimen rejection in three different laboratories and the effects of introducing three laboratory clinical guidelines are reported. These data should stimulate debate in the scientific community and encourage more clinical laboratories to use the same indicators to improve clinical effectiveness and clinical outcomes within the healthcare service.

Cortisol, Testosterone, and Free Testosterone in Athletes Performing a Marathon at 4,000 m Altitude

Cortisol, testosterone, free testosterone and the ratio between free testosterone and cortisol (FTCR) were monitored in six athletes participating in a marathon starting at 3,860 and finishing at 3,400 m, having reached the top at 5,100 m altitude. Blood was drawn at sea level before the departure for the mountain area, after a week of acclimatization, immediately after the marathon and after a 24-hour recovery period from the run. Cortisol increased after acclimatization and especially after the marathon; it decreased to normal values after recovery. Testosterone decreased after acclimatization, especially after the run; it presented a partial recovery 24 h after the race. Free testosterone did not decrease after acclimatization and presented partial recovery. FTCR could also be useful for monitoring fitness, overtraining and overstrain in strenuous and ultraendurance exercise.

Process and risk analysis to reduce errors in clinical laboratories

Abstract Background: An important point in improving laboratory quality is the definition of some indicators to be monitored as measures of a laboratory trend. The continuous observation of these indicators can help to reduce errors and risk of errors, thus enhancing the laboratory outcome. In addition, the standardization of risk evaluation techniques and the definition of a set of indicators can eventually contribute to a benchmarking process in clinical laboratories. Methods: Five Italian hospital laboratories cooperated in a project in which methodologies for process and risk analysis, usually applied in fields other than healthcare (typically aeronautical and transport industries), were adapted and applied to laboratory medicine. The collaboration of a board of experts played a key role in underlining the limits of the proposed techniques and adapting them to the laboratory situation. A detailed process analysis performed in each center was the starting point, followed by risk analysis to evaluate risks and facilitate benchmarking among the participants. Results and conclusions: The techniques applied allowed the formulation of a list of non-conformities that represented risks of errors. The level of risk related to each was quantified and graphically represented for each laboratory to identify the risk area characteristic for each of the centers involved. Clin Chem Lab Med 2007;45:742–8.

Molecular diagnostics by microelectronic microchips.

Abstract Molecular diagnostics is being revolutionized by the completion of the human genome project and by the development of highly advanced technologies for DNA testing. One of the most important challenges is the introduction of high throughput systems such as DNA chips into diagnostic laboratories. DNA microchips are small devices permitting rapid analysis of genetic information, exploiting miniaturization of all components and automation of operational procedures. The most important biochip applications include gene expression and genetic variation identification and both may improve human molecular diagnostics. Here we review several approaches developed to allow rapid detection of many single nucleotide polymorphisms and mutations in large population samples. Among these, the use of microelectronics seems to best fit with the needs of molecular diagnostics.

Single-Nucleotide Polymorphism and Mutation Identification by the Nanogen Microelectronic Chip Technology

The present chapter describes a microarray technology developed by Nanogen Inc., for the identification of DNA variations based on the use of microelectronics. The NMW 1000 NanoChip Molecular Biology Workstation allows the active deposition and concentration of charged biotinylated molecules on designated test sites. The DNA at each pad is then hybridized with specific oligonucleotide probes, complementary to normal or mutant sequences, that labeled with Cy3 or Cy5 dyes, respectively. The array is imaged, and fluorescence signals are scanned, monitored, and quantified by highly developed, digital image-processing procedures. The experimental steps to be performed for the development and execution of a microchip assay are described. Attention is focused on the fundamental aspects of probe design, and guidelines and useful suggestions are given. Protocols for sample preparation, addressing, reporting, and data analysis are also detailed.

Molecular diagnostics by microelectronic microchips

Molecular diagnostics is being revolutionized by the development of highly advanced technologies for DNA and RNA testing. One of the most important challenges is the integration of microelectronics to microchip-based nucleic acid technologies. The specific characteristics of these microsystems make the miniaturization and automation of any step of a molecular diagnostic procedure possible. This review describes the application of microelectronics to all the processes involved in a genetic test, particularly to sample preparation, DNA amplification and sequence variation detection.

A two-center evaluation of the blood gas Immediate Response Mobile Analyzer (IRMA)

Abstract The Immediate Response Mobile Analyzer (IRMA) is a selective and portable point-of-care testing (POCT) blood gas, electrolyte and hematocrit (Hct) analyzer. The overall analytical performance was evaluated in a two-center study involving two Italian hospital laboratories, following the guidelines suggested by the manufacturer (based on the NCCLS protocol), after a preliminary evaluation of their formal validity. The IRMA was compared to the analyzers used in the routine laboratory as reference. The considered parameters were pH, pO2, pCO2, Na+, K+, ionized calcium and Hct. When using the aqueous quality control material provided by the manufacturer most of the parameters showed good precision, with the exception of pCO2 and pO2 that showed high CVs on two of the three levels of the aqueous control. We could demonstrate that this imprecision was material-related and was reduced when using a different material (blood equilibrated by tonometry). With tonometred blood for pO2 and pCO2 and the aqueous material for the remaining parameters the CVs were all below 5%, ranging from 0.08% to 2.8%. The IRMA results correlated adequately with the comparison instruments, with the exception of sodium and ionized calcium where contradictory results were obtained in the two centers.

Evaluation of a new semi-automated high-performance liquid chromatography method for glycosylated haemoglobins.

The measurement of glycosylated haemoglobin in blood is vital for monitoring metabolic control in diabetics [1-3]. The development of many different methods of measurement (based on cation-exchange chromatography, electrophoresis, high performance liquid chromatography [HPLC], affinity chromatography, radio and colorimetric immuno techniques) proves the importance of this assay [4]. Since the first HPLC method was described [5] a number of modifications have been reported (see the review by Ellis et al. [6]). Instruments have been specially designed and commercialized (for example by Helena Laboratories, Beaumont, Texas, USA and Kyoto Daichi, Japan).