Piercarlo Rey

Evaluation of fat grafting safety in patients with intra epithelial neoplasia: a matched-cohort study

BACKGROUND Fat grafting is widely carried out in breast cancer patients to improve quality in breast reconstruction. Recently, in vitro and animal studies have questioned the role of adipose tissues in cancer development. DESIGNS Matched-cohort study. We analysed: (i) 59 intraepithelial neoplasia patients who had undergone lipofilling, with no recurrence between primary surgery and lipofilling. (ii) A control group of 118 matched patients (two controls per lipofilling patient) with the corresponding recurrence-free intervals. Both groups were also matched for main cancer criteria. A local event (LE) was the primary end point, with follow-up starting from the baseline. RESULTS Median follow-up was 63 and 66 months from surgery, and 38 and 42 from baseline, for the lipofilling and control groups, respectively; the 5-year cumulative incidence of LE was 18% and 3% (P = 0.02). Ki-67 was the significant factor in univariate survival analysis. A subgroup analysis showed that lipofilling increased the risk of LE in women <50 years, with high grade neoplasia, Ki-67 ≥ 14 or who had undergone quadrantectomy. CONCLUSION Higher risk of LE was observed in intraepithelial neoplasia patients following lipofilling. Although further studies are required to validate our conclusions, patients belonging to this subgroup should be informed of these results and the potential risks.

The nipple-sparing mastectomy: Early results of a feasibility study of a new application of perioperative radiotherapy (ELIOT) in the treatment of breast cancer when mastectomy is indicated

Background Breast cancer surgery has become less and less mutilating, however a mastectomy is required in the case of multicentric, large tumors or recurrences after conservative treatment. The removal of the nipple areola complex during the mastectomy dramatically increases the feeling of mutilation. To reduce this negative psychological impact, in cancers located outside of the central area of the breast, we propose a new type of nipple-sparing mastectomy associated with intraoperative electron beam radiotherapy (ELIOT) delivered on the region of the areola. The nipple-sparing mastectomy is performed leaving 5 mm of glandular tissue behind the nipple areola complex to preserve its blood supply. The reconstruction is immediately performed with a prosthesis or an autologous flap. Patients and Methods Twenty-five patients were included in the study; two of them had a bilateral nipple-sparing mastectomy. Results Pathological examinations demonstrated the presence of 19 infiltrating carcinomas and 8 ductal carcinoma in situ. Two patients had a superficial skin areolar slough followed by spontaneous healing. One necrosis of the areola occurred due to extensive retroareolar dissection. In the early follow-up, the color of the areola was preserved. All patients except one expressed their satisfaction of having kept their areola. Conclusions These preliminary results are encouraging but they require further studies to evaluate the long-term results, the local recurrence rate and the psychological impact.

Nipple sparing mastectomy: Can we predict the factors predisposing to necrosis?

BACKGROUND Nipple sparing mastectomy (NSM) is an accepted surgical approach in selected breast cancer and prophylactic mastectomy, nevertheless post-mastectomy skin necrosis is one of the frequent complications. This study aimed to analyze the factors that may lead to skin necrosis after NSM. PATIENTS AND METHODS From May 2010 to July 2010, we prospectively registered 50 consecutive NSM from 45 patients. There were 40 mastectomies for cancer, and 10 prophylactic mastectomies. The various patients and surgical factors were registered during pre-, intra- and postoperative period. RESULTS No total necrosis of the nipple areola complex (NAC) was observed. There were thirteen cases with partial necrosis (26.0%) of the areola or the adjacent skin. All these necrosis were partial both for the surface and the thickness. Surgical debridement was performed in 9 (18.0%) cases. The significant risk factors are smoking, young age, type of incision and NAC involvement with areola flap thickness less than 5 mm. CONCLUSION NSM should be done with high caution in smokers. Young patients, periareolar incision and superior circumareolar incision have also a higher risk of necrosis. We recommend keeping areolar flap thickness more than 5 mm in areola region.

Risk factors associated with recurrence after nipple-sparing mastectomy for invasive and intraepithelial neoplasia

BACKGROUND To identify risk factors of recurrence in a large series of patients with breast cancer who underwent a nipple-sparing mastectomy (NSM). PATIENTS AND METHODS Breast-related recurrences and local recurrences (LR) in the breast and the nipple areola complex (NAC) were studied. Cumulative incidences of events were estimated through competing risk analysis. Multivariate Cox regression models were also applied. RESULTS We identified 934 consecutive NSM patients during 2002-2007. Median follow-up was 50 months. In 772 invasive carcinoma patients, the rate of LR in the breast and in the NAC was 3.6% and 0.8%, respectively. In the 162 patients with intraepithelial neoplasia, the rate of LR in the breast and in the NAC was 4.9% and 2.9%, respectively. The significant risk factors of LR in the breast for the group A were grade, overexpression/amplification of HER2/neu and breast cancer molecular subtype Luminal B. In group B, the risk factors of LR in the breast and in the NAC were age (<45 years), absence of estrogen receptors, grade, HER2/neu overexpression and high Ki-67. CONCLUSIONS The LR rate after NSM in our series was low. Biological features of disease and young age should be taken into account when considering NSM in breast cancer patients.BACKGROUND To identify risk factors of recurrence in a large series of patients with breast cancer who underwent a nipple-sparing mastectomy (NSM). PATIENTS AND METHODS Breast-related recurrences and local recurrences (LR) in the breast and the nipple areola complex (NAC) were studied. Cumulative incidences of events were estimated through competing risk analysis. Multivariate Cox regression models were also applied. RESULTS We identified 934 consecutive NSM patients during 2002-2007. Median follow-up was 50 months. In 772 invasive carcinoma patients, the rate of LR in the breast and in the NAC was 3.6% and 0.8%, respectively. In the 162 patients with intraepithelial neoplasia, the rate of LR in the breast and in the NAC was 4.9% and 2.9%, respectively. The significant risk factors of LR in the breast for the group A were grade, overexpression/amplification of HER2/neu and breast cancer molecular subtype Luminal B. In group B, the risk factors of LR in the breast and in the NAC were age (<45 years), absence of estrogen receptors, grade, HER2/neu overexpression and high Ki-67. CONCLUSIONS The LR rate after NSM in our series was low. Biological features of disease and young age should be taken into account when considering NSM in breast cancer patients.

Nipple-sparing mastectomy—is it worth the risk?

Nipple-sparing mastectomy (NSM) is a surgical protocol designed to reduce the disabling psychological effects of radical or skin-sparing mastectomy. The preservation of the nipple–areola complex produces a more-natural result of the breast reconstruction, but this preservation is suspected of increasing tumor local recurrence. To reduce this risk, different approaches have been proposed: restrict the inclusion criteria and/or add localized radiation therapy. The local recurrence rate in recent series of patients receiving NSM is comparable with the local recurrence rate in modified radical or skin-sparing mastectomies. Today, the quality of the subcutaneous mastectomy technique allows for a more radical glandular removal, especially in the retroareolar area; therefore, local recurrence is observed in 3–6% of patients at 5 years, consistent with traditional mastectomy.

Abdominal complications and sequelae after breast reconstruction with pedicled TRAM flap: is there still an indication for pedicled TRAM in the year 2003?

Five years ago, we published our results on abdominal sequelae as related to pedicled flaps, dealing at that time with poor aesthetic results, scarring, and abdominal strength disorders.1 Today, the majority of the studies underscore the decrease of abdominal sequelae thanks to microsurgical techniques. Nevertheless, we are still performing pedicled transverse rectus abdominis musculocutaneous (TRAM) flaps for autologous breast reconstructions. Since our last publication in 1997, 420 pedicled TRAM flaps for breast reconstruction have been performed. In this article, we compare these results with the results of the first series.

Immediate breast reconstruction and high-dose chemotherapy.

Background:Immediate breast reconstruction (IBR) is considered as a safe procedure nowadays, and it can be proposed in the majority of patients requiring a mastectomy. In fact, recent studies have demonstrated that immediate breast reconstruction is not detrimental also to patients with locally advanced breast cancers. However, IBR should be reevaluated in case of locally advanced breast cancer requiring high-dose chemotherapy (HDCT). The aim of this study is to evaluate both the risk of chemotherapy delay due to surgical complications and the risk of late surgical complications related to the association with HDCT. We considered 3 series of 23, 67, and 15 patients requiring a mastectomy at the European Institute of Oncology in Milan. After mastectomy, these groups respectively received an IBR and HDCT, an IBR and conventional chemotherapy, and only HDCT with no IBR. Methods:Files of 105 patients who were admitted to our department from October 1999 to January 2002 were reviewed. Twenty-three patients underwent a mastectomy, followed by IBR and HDCT; 67 underwent a mastectomy plus IBR plus conventional CT; and, finally, 15 underwent a mastectomy alone followed by HDCT. The reconstructive techniques performed were 72 permanent prosthesis and 18 temporary expanders. We excluded all patients with IBR by flap (latissimus dorsi or pedicled rectus abdominis) to improve the homogeneity of the sample. Results:All patients who underwent IBR started high-dose chemotherapy without any delay; the time elapsed between surgery and HDCT is not significantly different for patients with and without IBR (54 versus 60 days, P = 0.13). The early complication rate (before CT) was 2.9% (2 patients with infection). The late complication rate (after CT) was higher for the group that underwent IBR followed by HDCT (39% versus 20%). Conclusion:We did not observe any delay for the administration of high-dose chemotherapy after mastectomy with IBR surgery. The complication rate before HDCT is similar to the complication rates published in the literature. On the contrary, we observed a higher rate of infections (13% versus 0%, P = 0,014) after HDCT than after conventional CT, which can be related to the association with high-dose chemotherapy, inducing a decrease of the immune defenses. These results seems to demonstrate that the association of IBR with HDCT is not detrimental to patients from the oncological point of view, but the impact of HDCT on the reconstruction is more negative. Further studies are needed to verify if this risk exists, although lower, in the association with conventional CT. However, a careful evaluation of the risk of infections should be considered preoperatively, and perioperative contaminations should be carefully prevented.

Update on Breast Reconstruction Techniques and Indications

Breast reconstruction is considered as part of the breast cancer treatment when a mastectomy is required. Implants or expanders are the most frequent techniques used for the reconstructions. Expander provides usually a better symmetry. A contralateral mastoplasty often is required to improve the symmetry. The nipple areola complex, which can be preserved in certain conditions, is usually removed and can be reconstructed in a second stage under local anesthesia. In case of radical mastectomy and/or radiotherapy, a musculocutaneous flap, such as rectus abdominis or latissimus dorsi autologous flaps, is required. When microsurgical facilities are available, free or perforator flaps respecting the muscle are preferred to decrease the donor site complications. In situ carcinomas or prophylactic mastectomy can be reconstructed immediately as well as invasive carcinoma according to the recent literature. Locally advanced breast cancer can be reconstructed after complete oncologic treatment. Radiotherapy of the thoracic wall is proposed in case of lymph node metastases, raising the discussion about the technique choice and the timing of the reconstruction. Plastic surgery procedures can improve the cosmetic results of the conservative surgery, also extending its indications and reducing both mastectomy and reexcision rates. Oncoplasty techniques are becoming more and more sophisticated, requiring the skill of trained plastic surgeons. Numerous publications confirm the psychosocial benefit resulting from the breast reconstruction.

Outcome of Immediate Breast Reconstruction in Patients With Nonendocrine-Responsive Breast Cancer: A Monoinstitutional Case-Control Study.

BACKGROUND The long-term prognostic relevance of immediate breast reconstruction (IBR) for patients with estrogen receptor (ER)-negative breast cancer (BC) has not been fully elucidated. PATIENTS AND METHODS The study population included 444 patients with ER-negative BC who underwent total mastectomy with complete axillary dissection between 1995 and 2006, 339 patients with and 105 patients without IBR. The median follow-up was 8.6 years. RESULTS Patients treated with IBR were younger (P < .001) and received surgery more recently (2003-2006: 53.1% vs. 39%; P = .0003), and had a lower number of metastatic lymph nodes (>4 lymph nodes involvement: 29.5% vs. 45.7%; P = .0026), smaller tumors (pT1/2: 15% vs. 26.7%; P = .0007), and lower extent of peritumoral vascular invasion (15.9% vs. 21%; P = .032). The 5-year cumulative incidence of locoregional recurrence was 7.1% in the IBR group and 11.7% in the no IBR group (hazard ratio [HR], 0.81; P = .63). The 5-year cumulative incidence of distant metastases were similar in the 2 groups (P = .79). The 5-year overall and disease-free survival proportions were 79.9% versus 69.5% (HR, 1.11; P = .67) and 66.6% versus 54.1% (HR, 1.04; P = .83) in the IBR group and no IBR group, respectively. CONCLUSION IBR intervention does not significantly affect prognosis of ER-negative BC patients.

Cosmetic and reconstructive surgery and risk of breast cancer

SUMMARY Cosmetic surgery of the breast has been performed since the onset of plastic surgery and nowadays it is a part of cancer treatment. In the last decades, cancer risk related to these procedures has been investigated, especially with regards to implant reconstructions. Experimental studies and clinical trials have been published testing different filling materials of prostheses, first in animals and then in human bodies. In no human study has a cancer transformation been induced by filling materials. Moreover, in the case of implant placement no evidence of delayed diagnosis of local recurrence or primary cancer has been described in literature. With regards to autologous tissue reconstructions, they do not add an increased risk of recurrences or secondary cancer. In addition, small areas of liponecrosis and liposclerosis inside the flaps can be easily investigated with ultrasonography and/or with a mammogram. Another cosmetic procedure is frequently proposed to improve final aesthetic results in patients who underwent a breast reconstruction: a reduction mastoplastly or mastopexy of the contralateral breast. This procedure adds a cancer benefit since a pathological examination of the reduction specimens is always performed. With regards to cosmetic breast augmentation, although the silicone prosthesis behind or above the gland decreased the percentage of breast tissue visualized with a mammogram, the ultrasonography allows a good evaluation both of the glandular tissue and the implant. In this paper we evaluate experimental and clinical data in literature concerning cosmetic and reconstructive surgery and risk of breast cancer. We conclude that breast cosmetic surgery should be considered as a safe procedure if performed after a careful ‘carcinogenic’ check-up preoperatively and planned pathological examinations of any specimen.