Network


Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.

Hotspot


Dive into the research topics where Pierluigi Lopalco is active.

Publication


Featured researches published by Pierluigi Lopalco.


Journal of Clinical Microbiology | 2004

Outbreak of Infection with Hepatitis A Virus (HAV) Associated with a Foodhandler and Confirmed by Sequence Analysis Reveals a New HAV Genotype IB Variant

Maria Chironna; Pierluigi Lopalco; Rosa Prato; Cinzia Germinario; S. Barbuti; Michele Quarto

ABSTRACT An outbreak of infection with hepatitis A virus associated with a foodhandler and involving 26 subjects occurred in Southern Italy. Sequence analysis of the VP3-VP1 and VP1-P2A junctions confirmed that the outbreak was due to a point source and allowed the identification of a new genotype IB variant. This report confirms the usefulness of sequence-based molecular fingerprinting during outbreaks.


PLOS ONE | 2013

Perspectives on the Impact of Varicella Immunization on Herpes Zoster. A Model-Based Evaluation from Three European Countries

Piero Poletti; Alessia Melegaro; Marco Ajelli; Emanuele Del Fava; Giorgio Guzzetta; Luca Faustini; Giampaolo Scalia Tomba; Pierluigi Lopalco; Caterina Rizzo; Stefano Merler; Piero Manfredi

The introduction of mass vaccination against Varicella-Zoster-Virus (VZV) is being delayed in many European countries because of, among other factors, the possibility of a large increase in Herpes Zoster (HZ) incidence in the first decades after the initiation of vaccination, due to the expected decline of the boosting of Cell Mediated Immunity caused by the reduced varicella circulation. A multi-country model of VZV transmission and reactivation, is used to evaluate the possible impact of varicella vaccination on HZ epidemiology in Italy, Finland and the UK. Despite the large uncertainty surrounding HZ and vaccine-related parameters, surprisingly robust medium-term predictions are provided, indicating that an increase in HZ incidence is likely to occur in countries where the incidence rate is lower in absence of immunization, possibly due to a higher force of boosting (e.g. Finland), whereas increases in HZ incidence might be minor where the force of boosting is milder (e.g. the UK). Moreover, a convergence of HZ post vaccination incidence levels in the examined countries is predicted despite different initial degrees of success of immunization policies. Unlike previous model-based evaluations, our investigation shows that after varicella immunization an increase of HZ incidence is not a certain fact, rather depends on the presence or absence of factors promoting a strong boosting intensity and which might or not be heavily affected by changes in varicella circulation due to mass immunization. These findings might explain the opposed empirical evidences observed about the increases of HZ in sites where mass varicella vaccination is ongoing.


Eurosurveillance | 2013

Ethics of mandatory vaccination for healthcare workers

Emmanouil Galanakis; Andreas Jansen; Pierluigi Lopalco; J Giesecke

Healthcare workers (HCWs) are at increased risk of contracting infections at work and further transmitting them to colleagues and patients. Immune HCWs would be protected themselves and act as a barrier against the spread of infections and maintain healthcare delivery during outbreaks, but vaccine uptake rates in HCWs have often been low. In order to achieve adequate immunisation rates in HCWs, mandatory vaccination policies are occasionally implemented by healthcare authorities, but such policies have raised considerable controversy. Here we review the background of this debate, analyse arguments for and against mandatory vaccination policies, and consider the principles and virtues of clinical, professional, institutional and public health ethics. We conclude that there is a moral imperative for HCWs to be immune and for healthcare institutions to ensure HCW vaccination, in particular for those working in settings with high-risk groups of patients. If voluntary uptake of vaccination by HCWs is not optimal, patients’ welfare, public health and also the HCW’s own health interests should outweigh concerns about individual autonomy: fair mandatory vaccination policies for HCWs might be acceptable. Differences in diseases, patient and HCW groups at risk and available vaccines should be taken into consideration when adopting the optimal policy.


Vaccine | 2010

Hepatitis B immunisation programmes in European Union, Norway and Iceland: where we were in 2009?

Jolita Mereckiene; Suzanne Cotter; Pierluigi Lopalco; Fortunato D'Ancona; D Lévy-Bruhl; Cristina Giambi; Kari Johansen; L Dematte; Stefania Salmaso; Pawel Stefanoff; Darina O'Flanagan

In January 2009 25 European Union (EU) Member States (MSs), Norway and Iceland, participated in a survey seeking information on national hepatitis B vaccination programmes. Details of vaccination policy, schedule, population groups targeted for vaccination, programme funding, vaccine coverage and methods of monitoring of vaccine coverage were obtained. Twenty (74%) countries reported that they have a universal hepatitis B vaccination programme, in addition to immunisation of at risk groups; seven (26%) countries recommend HBV for high risk groups only (with some inter-country variation on groups considered at high risk). Among countries without universal hepatitis B vaccination programmes, the major factor for non-introduction is low disease endemicity.


Virology Journal | 2007

Genetic characterization of measles virus strains isolated during an epidemic cluster in Puglia, Italy 2006–2007

Maria Chironna; Rosa Prato; Anna Sallustio; Domenico Martinelli; Cinzia Germinario; Pierluigi Lopalco; Michele Quarto

The genetic characterization of wild-type measles strains isolated during an epidemic cluster of measles occurred in Puglia (South Italy), between November 2006 and January 2007, was performed. Measles virus (MV) detection was carried out by a nested RT-PCR on 8 of 18 total cases. The viruses were analyzed using the standard genotyping protocols. The N gene sequences of the strains from outbreak were identical to each other, and sequence analysis revealed that the viruses belonged to genotype B3, subgroup B3.1, never identified before in Italy. An importation of measles B3.1 strains from Africa was hypothesized. Molecular surveillance will help to monitor the progress in measles elimination.


Clinical Microbiology and Infection | 2014

Actual immunization coverage throughout Europe: are existing data sufficient?

Pierluigi Lopalco; P. Carrillo Santisteve

Assessing vaccine coverage is an essential component of vaccine programme monitoring and evaluation. Vaccine coverage data are available in EU/EEA countries at both national and subnational levels and are used for programmatic purposes at any level. European-wide data collection is performed by WHO through the Centralized Information System for Infectious Diseases, as part of the global data collection jointly conducted with UNICEF. Data quality and comparability are still challenging at an international level. According to available information, vaccination registries are available in 11 countries in the EU/EEA, but only in five countries do they have national coverage. In 2012 ECDC, through the VENICE II network, started the European Vaccination Coverage Collection System (EVACO project), with the final aim of improving the quality of vaccine coverage data at EU level, by defining and implementing standards.


Expert Review of Vaccines | 2011

Assessing vaccination coverage in the European Union: is it still a challenge?

M. Haverkate; Fortunato D'Ancona; Kari Johansen; K. van der Velden; Johan Giesecke; Pierluigi Lopalco

Assessing vaccination coverage is of paramount importance for improving quality and effectiveness of vaccination programs. In this article, some of the different systems that are used for assessing vaccination coverage within and outside the EU are reviewed in order to explore the need for improving vaccination coverage data quality. All countries in the EU have implemented vaccination programs for children, which include vaccinations to protect against between nine and 14 infectious diseases. Collecting and assessing vaccination coverage regularly is part of such programs, but the methods used vary widely. Some quality issues are evident when data reported through administrative methods are compared with seroprevalence studies or other surveys. More thorough assessment of vaccination coverage and more effective information sharing are needed in the EU. A homogeneous system for assessing vaccination coverage would facilitate comparability across countries and might increase the level of the quality of both the national and local systems. Cooperative and coordinated responses to vaccine-preventable disease threats might be improved by better information sharing.


Frontiers in Public Health | 2016

Can Digital Tools Be Used for improving immunization Programs

Alberto E. Tozzi; Francesco Gesualdo; Angelo D’Ambrosio; Elisabetta Pandolfi; Eleonora Agricola; Pierluigi Lopalco

In order to successfully control and eliminate vaccine-preventable infectious diseases, an appropriate vaccine coverage has to be achieved and maintained. This task requires a high level of effort as it may be compromised by a number of barriers. Public health agencies have issued specific recommendations to address these barriers and therefore improve immunization programs. In the present review, we characterize issues and challenges of immunization programs for which digital tools are a potential solution. In particular, we explore previously published research on the use of digital tools in the following vaccine-related areas: immunization registries, dose tracking, and decision support systems; vaccine-preventable diseases surveillance; surveillance of adverse events following immunizations; vaccine confidence monitoring; and delivery of information on vaccines to the public. Subsequently, we analyze the limits of the use of digital tools in such contexts and envision future possibilities and challenges.


BioMed Research International | 2015

Strong Public Health Recommendations from Weak Evidence? Lessons Learned in Developing Guidance on the Public Health Management of Meningococcal Disease

Germaine Hanquet; Pawel Stefanoff; Wiebke Hellenbrand; Sigrid Heuberger; Pierluigi Lopalco; James M. Stuart

The evidence underpinning public health policy is often of low quality, leading to inconsistencies in recommended interventions. One example is the divergence in national policies across Europe for managing contacts of invasive meningococcal disease. Aiming to develop consistent guidance at the European level, a group of experts reviewed the literature and formulated recommendations. The group defined eight priority research questions, searched the literature, and formulated recommendations using GRADE methodology. Five of the research questions are discussed in this paper. After taking into account quality of evidence, benefit, harm, value, preference, burden on patient of the intervention, and resource implications, we made four strong recommendations and five weak recommendations for intervention. Strong recommendations related not only to one question with very low quality of evidence as well as to two questions with moderate to high quality of evidence. The weak recommendations related to two questions with low and very low quality of evidence but also to one question with moderate quality of evidence. GRADE methodology ensures a transparent process and explicit recognition of additional factors that should be considered when making recommendations for policy. This approach can be usefully applied to many areas of public health policy where evidence quality is often low.


Eurosurveillance | 2010

Differences in national influenza vaccination policies across the European Union, Norway and Iceland 2008-2009.

Jolita Mereckiene; Suzanne Cotter; Fortunato D'Ancona; Cristina Giambi; A. Nicoll; D Lévy-Bruhl; Pierluigi Lopalco; J T Weber; Kari Johansen; L Dematte; Stefania Salmaso; Pawel Stefanoff; D Greco; F Dorleans; Polkowska A; Darina O'Flanagan

Collaboration


Dive into the Pierluigi Lopalco's collaboration.

Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Fortunato D'Ancona

Istituto Superiore di Sanità

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Kari Johansen

European Centre for Disease Prevention and Control

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Cristina Giambi

Istituto Superiore di Sanità

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Pawel Stefanoff

Norwegian Institute of Public Health

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

D Lévy-Bruhl

Institut de veille sanitaire

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Stefania Salmaso

Istituto Superiore di Sanità

View shared research outputs
Researchain Logo
Decentralizing Knowledge