Piero O. Bonetti

Drug-Eluting Stents Compared with Bare Metal Stents Improve Late Outcome after Saphenous Vein Graft but Not after Large Native Vessel Interventions

Objectives: To define long-term efficacy of different stent types in saphenous vein graft (SVG) interventions. Methods: In BASKET (Basel Stent Cost Effectiveness Trial), major adverse cardiac events (MACE), i.e. cardiac death, myocardial infarction and symptom-driven target vessel revascularization (TVR) were assessed after 18 months comparing drug-eluting stents (DES) versus bare metal stents (BMS), and SVG and large native vessels (≧3.0 mm). Results: Large vessel interventions were performed in 605 patients. Patients with SVG interventions (n = 47, 8%) were older and had more often hypertension, prior myocardial infarction, prior revascularization and multivessel disease and less frequent ST-elevation myocardial infarction than patients with large native vessel interventions (n = 558, 92%). Stent number and length were higher in SVG than in large native vessel interventions. Baseline characteristics were similar for DES and BMS. In SVG stenting, long-term outcome was better in DES- than in BMS-treated patients (MACE 21 vs. 62%, p = 0.007, mainly due to TVR 18 vs. 46%, p = 0.045), but for large native vessel stenting, no significant difference was noted (MACE: 13 vs. 16%, p = 0.40). Conclusions: Among patients with SVG disease, treatment with DES resulted in a better long-term outcome than treatment with BMS. In contrast, no DES benefit was found in similarly sized native vessels regarding MACE.

Drug-eluting or bare-metal stents for large coronary vessel stenting? The BASKET-PROVE (PROspective Validation Examination) trial: Study protocol and design

BACKGROUND Based on a subgroup analysis of 18-month BAsel Stent Kosten Effektivitäts Trial (BASKET) outcome data, we hypothesized that very late (> 12 months) stent thrombosis occurs predominantly after drug-eluting stent implantation in large native coronary vessel stenting. METHODS To prove or refute this hypothesis, we set up an 11-center 4-country prospective trial of 2260 consecutive patients treated with > or = 3.0-mm stents only, randomized to receive Cypher (Johnson & Johnson, Miami Lakes, FL), Vision (Abbott Vascular, Abbott Laboratories, IL), or Xience stents (Abbott Vascular). Only patients with left main or bypass graft disease, in-stent restenosis or stent thrombosis, in need of nonheart surgery, at increased bleeding risk, without compliance/consent are excluded. All patients are treated with dual antiplatelet therapy for 12 months. The primary end point will be cardiac death/nonfatal myocardial infarction after 24 months with further follow-up up to 5 years. RESULTS By June 12, 229 patients (10% of the planned total) were included with a baseline risk similar to that of the same subgroup of BASKET (n = 588). CONCLUSIONS This study will answer several important questions of contemporary stent use in patients with large native vessel stenting. The 2-year death/myocardial infarction-as well as target vessel revascularization-and bleeding rates in these patients with a first- versus second-generation drug-eluting stent should demonstrate the benefit or harm of these stents compared to cobalt-chromium bare-metal stents in this relevant, low-risk group of everyday patients. In addition, a comparison with similar BASKET patients will allow to estimate the impact of 12- versus 6-month dual antiplatelet therapy on these outcomes.

Effect of brief secondhand smoke exposure on endothelial function and circulating markers of inflammation.

OBJECTIVE In contrast to the well defined detrimental consequences of long-term secondhand smoke (SHS) exposure, little is known about the acute effects of passive smoking on endothelial function and inflammation. The aim of the present study was to assess the acute effects of short-term SHS exposure on endothelial function and circulating markers of inflammation. METHODS Peripheral microvascular endothelial function assessed by reactive hyperemia peripheral arterial tonometry (RH-PAT) index, circulating markers of endothelial function (von Willebrand factor antigen, Thrombomodulin, E-selectin) and circulating inflammatory markers (high sensitivity C-reactive protein (hsCRP), Interleukin-6 (IL-6)) were measured in eighteen male, non-smoking volunteers before and 12h after a 1-h SHS exposure. RESULTS Twelve hours after passive smoking, average RH-PAT index was significantly lower than before SHS exposure (1.54±0.49 vs 2.01±0.55 (mean±SD), p=0.01) indicating deterioration of peripheral microvascular endothelial function. von Willebrand factor antigen as a marker of endothelial activation was significantly increased after SHS exposure (93.0±25.5% vs 78.4±17.9%, p=0.03). Levels of Thrombomodulin, E-selectin, hsCRP, and IL-6 were unaffected by SHS exposure. CONCLUSION Short-term SHS exposure leads to a measurable disturbance of endothelial function. However, 1h of passive smoking appears to be too short to elicit a significant inflammatory response.

Long-Term Benefits and Limitations of Combined Antianginal Drug Therapy in Elderly Patients with Symptomatic Chronic Coronary Artery Disease

Background: Chronic angina is a common and disabling disorder in the elderly. Combined antianginal drug treatment represents the mainstay of therapy in this population. However, there is a paucity of data regarding the effect of this strategy on long-term outcome in the elderly. Methods: To assess the long-term effect of combined antianginal drug therapy in elderly individuals, we performed a long-term follow-up analysis of all 148 patients of the Trial of Invasive versus Medical therapy in Elderly (TIME) patients with chronic symptomatic coronary-artery disease assigned to an optimized medical therapy strategy. Angina severity, measures of quality of life (QOL), and survival were assessed after a median of 3.7 (0.1-6.9) years. Results: At baseline, patients were 79.8 ± 3.5 years old with Canadian Cardiovascular Society (CCS) class angina 3.0 ± 0.7 despite the use of 2.4 ± 0.6 antianginal drugs. Although antianginal drugs were increased to 2.8 ± 0.9 (P < .01), 63 (43%) patients needed revascularization for refractory symptoms during the first year of observation (REVASC). At baseline, REVASC patients had more frequently CCS class 4 angina (37% vs 20%, P < 0.05) but reported less prior heart failure (5% vs 20%, P < 0.01), fewer prior cerebral events (3% vs 13%, P < .05) and a lower rate of two or more comorbidities (10% vs 33%, P < .01) than patients on continued drug therapy (DRUG). At long-term follow-up, angina severity was still higher in DRUG compared to REVASC patients (CCS class, 1.8 ± 1.6 vs 1.0 ± 1.4, P < .05) despite more antianginal drugs (2.1 ± 1.1 vs 1.5 ± 1.0, P < .01), whereas measures of QOL had improved similarly in both groups. In addition, long-term mortality was significantly higher in DRUG than in REVASC patients (38% vs 13%, P < .01). Conclusion: Combined antianginal drug therapy successfully relieved symptoms in most elderly patients with chronic angina but failed to do so in 43%. Patients who needed revascularization for refractory symptoms reported less angina, despite lower drug use during long-term follow-up and had a better long-term survival. Thus, the widely used strategy to increase antianginal drug therapy in elderly patients instead of evaluating them for revascularization should be reconsidered.

Incidence and time frame of life-threatening arrhythmias in patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction undergoing primary percutaneous coronary intervention.

BACKGROUND Life-threatening arrhythmias may complicate the hospital course of patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) undergoing primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PPCI). The optimal duration of electrocardiographic monitoring in such patients is not well established. We aimed to determine the incidence and the time of occurrence of life-threatening arrhythmias in STEMI patients undergoing PPCI. METHODS Data of 382 consecutive patients with STEMI undergoing PPCI were analysed regarding the occurrence of ventricular fibrillation (VF), sustained ventricular tachycardia (sVT) or bradycardia necessitating temporary or permanent pacing. RESULTS Of these patients, 55% had inferior STEMI, 41% anterior and 4% lateral STEMI. The infarct-related arteries were the right in 41%, the left anterior descending in 41%, the left circumflex in 16%, the left main stem in 1% and a vein graft in <1%. During hospitalisation, 27 (7.0%) patients developed 29 life-threatening arrhythmias (incidence 7.6%): 19 episodes occurred during PPCI (VF n = 11, bradycardia n = 8), 9 episodes during the first 24 hours after PPCI (VF n = 7, sVT n = 2), and 1 sVT episode in a hypokalemic patient on the 4th post-procedural day. A total of 17 patients (4.5%) died within the first 30 days, and 3 of these died during the PPCI procedure. CONCLUSIONS Life-threatening arrhythmias occur in a considerable proportion of STEMI patients undergoing PPCI during hospitalisation. Most of these arrhythmias occur during the PPCI procedure. Post-procedural life-threatening arrhythmias are virtually limited to the first 24 hours after PPCI. Thus, routine electrocardiographic monitoring beyond the first 24 hours after PPCI might not be required in most patients with uncomplicated STEMI.

Tradeoff between bleeding and stent thrombosis in different dual antiplatelet therapy regimes: Importance of case fatality rates and effective treatment durations

BACKGROUND The tradeoff between stent thrombosis (ST) and major bleeding (MB) of 12- versus 6-month dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) after coronary stent implantation has not been clearly defined. METHODS Definite/probable ST and MB (TIMI major and Bleeding Academic Research Consortium (BARC) ≥ 3) were compared in 2 subsequent trials with similar inclusion criteria but different DAPT duration, that is, BASKET (6 months; n = 557) and BASKET-PROVE (12 months; n = 2,314), between months 0 to 6 (DAPT in both trials), 7 to 12 (DAPT in BASKET-PROVE only), and 13 to 24 (aspirin in both trials) using propensity score-adjusted, time-stratified Cox proportional hazard models. RESULTS Overall, event rates were low with fewer ST but similar MB in prolonged DAPT. Analysis of the 3 periods showed a uniform pattern for ST (interaction DAPT/period; P = .145) but an inconsistent pattern for MB (interaction DAPT/period; P < .001 for TIMI major and P = .046 for BARC ≥ 3), with more MB occurring during months 7 to 12 with prolonged DAPT. Considering observed case fatality rates of 31% with ST and 11% with MB, the extrapolated prevention of 27 ST deaths and the excess of 5 MB deaths resulted in an expected benefit of 22 survivors/10,000 patients treated over 2 years with prolonged DAPT. CONCLUSION Despite overall low event rates, prolonged DAPT was associated with more MB during months 7 to 12 according to the interaction DAPT/period. Given the higher observed case fatality rates of ST versus MB, 12- versus 6-month DAPT was associated with an extrapolated reduction in mortality. Effective treatment periods and case fatality rates seem important in the analysis of different DAPT durations, specifically with regard to ongoing trials.

Can the optimal type of stent be predicted based on clinical risk factors? A subgroup analysis of the randomized BASKET-PROVE trial

BACKGROUND The randomized BASKET-PROVE study showed no significant differences between sirolimus-eluting stents (SES), everolimus-eluting stents (EES), and bare-metal stents (BMS) with respect to the primary end point, rates of death from cardiac causes, or myocardial infarction (MI) at 2 years of follow-up, in patients requiring stenting of a large coronary artery. Clinical risk factors may affect clinical outcomes after percutaneous coronary interventions. We present a retrospective analysis of the BASKET-PROVE data addressing the question as to whether the optimal type of stent can be predicted based on a cumulative clinical risk score. METHODS A total of 2,314 patients (mean age 66 years) who underwent coronary angioplasty and implantation of ≥1 stents that were ≥3.0 mm in diameter were randomly assigned to receive SES, EES, or BMS. A cumulative clinical risk score was derived using a Cox model that included age, gender, cardiovascular risk factors (hypercholesterolemia, hypertension, family history of cardiovascular disease, diabetes, smoking), presence of ≥2 comorbidities (stroke, peripheral artery disease, chronic kidney disease, chronic rheumatic disease), a history of MI or coronary revascularization, and clinical presentation (stable angina, unstable angina, ST-segment elevation MI). RESULTS An aggregate drug-eluting stent (DES) group (n = 1,549) comprising 775 patients receiving SES and 774 patients receiving EES was compared to 765 patients receiving BMS. Rates of death from cardiac causes or nonfatal MI at 2 years of follow-up were significantly increased in patients who were in the high tertile of risk stratification for the clinical risk score compared to those who were in the aggregate low-mid tertiles. In patients with a high clinical risk score, rates of death from cardiac causes or nonfatal MI were lower in patients receiving DES (2.4 per 100 person-years, 95% CI 1.6-3.6) compared with BMS (5.5 per 100 person-years, 95% CI 3.7-8.2, hazard ratio 0.45, 95% CI 0.26-0.80, P = .007). However, they were not significantly different between receivers of DES and BMS in patients in the low-mid risk tertiles. CONCLUSIONS This exploratory analysis suggests that, in patients who require stenting of a large coronary artery, use of a clinical risk score may identify those patients for whom DES use may confer a clinical advantage over BMS, beyond lower restenosis rates.

Complement inhibition to treat myocardial infarction

The authors describe the case of a middle-aged women who presented with an acute myocardial infarction due to thrombotic occlusion of angiographically normal coronary arteries. Coronary thrombosis was caused by a hypercoagulable state related to a haemolytic crisis of paroxysmal nocturnal haemoglobinuria and the patient was treated conservatively with antithrombotic agents. The clinical course was complicated by both severe bleeding and thrombotic complications and the patient eventually died of a massive intracerebral haemorrhage. The rapid occurrence of complications inhibited a timely administration of a specific treatment for complement-mediated haemolysis (eculizumab).