Pierre Bey

Prognostic implications of downstaging following preoperative radiation therapy for operable T3-T4 rectal cancer.

PURPOSE To evaluate the prognostic value of tumor downstaging after preoperative radiation for resectable rectal cancer. METHODS AND MATERIALS Eighty-eight patients with non-metastatic resectable rectal cancers (76 T3 and 12 T4) were treated with preoperative irradiation. Median dose was 40 Gy (30-46 Gy) delivered over 32 days (range 11-40). Seventeen patients received preoperative chemotherapy, two courses of 5-fluorouracil (5FU) 350 mg/m2/day and folinic acid 20 mg/m2/day; 5 days per week during the first and fifth weeks of radiotherapy. Surgery was performed with a mean delay of 46 days after completion of irradiation and included 66 abdominoperineal resections and 22 anal sphincter-preserving procedures. Postoperative chemotherapy was administered in 44 patients. RESULTS Histological tumor stages were: complete histological response in 7%, pT2N0 in 19%, pT3N0 in 46%, and pT2-3N1 in 28%. Tumor downstaging occurred in 26%. No predictive factor of downstaging was statistically significant. The median follow-up was 33 months. The 3- and 5-year cancer-specific survival rates were 100% for the pT0N0 and pT2N0, respectively, 89% and 68% for pT3N0, and 64% and 0% for pT2T3N1. After preoperative irradiation, the pathological tumor stages remained a prognostic factor. Patients with downstaging (pT0T2N0) had significantly higher cancer-specific survival rates than the group without downstaging: 100% and 80% at 3 years, and 100% and 45% at 5 years; respectively (p = 0.011). The 3- and 5-year recurrence free-survival rates were 94% for the group with downstaging and 56% and 50%, respectively, for the group without downstaging (p = 0.002). CONCLUSION Downstaging after preoperative irradiation in this retrospective study results in an improvement in local control and survival.

Conservative treatment by irradiation of epidermoid cancers of the anal canal: Prognostic factors of tumoral control and complications

UNLABELLED We analyzed in a retrospective series of patients treated by conservative irradiation for an epidermoid cancer of the anal canal (ECAC) the prognostic factors of locoregional control (LRC), survival, late severe complications (LSC), and sphincter conservation (SC). METHODS AND MATERIALS From 1976 until 1994, 118 patients presenting with an ECAC were conservatively treated (mean age, 65 years). According to the 1987 International Union Against Cancer (TNM) classification, they were: 19 T1, 70 T2, 22 T3, 7 T4, 94 N0, and 24 N1-3. The treatment started with external beam irradiation (EBI) (36 Gy in 3 weeks or 45 Gy in 5 weeks). Concomitant chemotherapy (5-fluorouracil and mitomycin C) was delivered to 31 patients. Two months later, a boost of 20 Gy was delivered by interstitial 192Ir brachytherapy to 101 patients and EBI in 5. Twelve other patients had an abdominoperineal resection (APR). The mean follow-up was 6 years. RESULTS At 5 years the overall survival was 60%, and specific survival (SS) was 75%; it was 94% for T1, 79% for T2, 53% for T3, and 19% for T4. In multivariate analysis, tumor size (> or = 4 cm), node involvement, and no response to the EBI were factors of poor prognosis for SS. Thirty-two locoregional recurrences occurred of which 21 were local recurrences in the 106 patients treated by a conservative schedule. Only tumor size and response to the EBI were prognostic factors on multivariate analysis for local and LRC. A total of 17 patients presented with LSC (Grade 3, 16 patients; and Grade 4, 1 patient), which was treated by APR in 4 patients and colostomy in 11 (of which 7 were definitive). The only significant prognostic factor for LSC in the multivariate analysis was the total extrapolated response dose of irradiation. The definitive rate of SC after conservative treatment in cured patients was 100% for T1, 82% for T2, 58% for T3, and 100% for T4. Since 1989, improvements of the technique have allowed reduction of the LSC in maintaining the same local control. CONCLUSION The results of this series are similar to those of the literature. The confirmation of pretherapeutic prognostic factors related to response to the treatment should allow us to adapt the therapeutic intensity for each case to obtain better tumor control, with as few sequelae as possible, to yield a better rate of SC.

Dose escalation with 3D-CRT in prostate cancer: French study of dose escalation with conformal 3D radiotherapy in prostate cancer—preliminary results

PURPOSE To evaluate the feasibility of dose escalation in a multi-institutional study in prostate cancer patients. METHODS AND MATERIALS Between October 1995 and October 1998, 164 patients with localized adenocarcinoma of the prostate were treated with 3-dimensional conformal radiotherapy at one of five French institutions. The dose of radiation was escalated from 66 to 80 Gy (ICRU point). The maximum dose to the rectal wall was limited to 75 Gy. RESULTS Results were compared in two groups, one (group 1) receiving the standard dose (n = 46 patients; 66 to 70 Gy) and the other (group 2) receiving the escalated dose (n = 118 patients; 74 to 80 Gy). There was no difference in the characteristics of patients between the two groups. The mean follow-up time was 32 months in group 1 and 17.5 months in group 2. No statistical difference between the two groups was observed in the incidence of late gastrointestinal and urinary toxicities. The probability of achieving a posttreatment prostate-specific antigen nadir of </=1 ng/mL in the 120 patients who did not receive neoadjuvant androgen-deprivation therapy was significantly higher in the dose-escalation group and was directly related to the dose of radiation given. CONCLUSION This multi-institutional study demonstrated the feasibility of escalating the dose of radiation to 80 Gy in prostate cancer patients.

Detection of errors in individual patients in radiotherapy by systematic in vivo dosimetry

Abstract We report 5 years of systematic measurements of the dose delivered to each patient undergoing radiotherapy treatment with photon beams in order to detect any systematic error that may have escaped the different checks performed at each step of planning and calculation prior to the first treatment session, or may have arisen during the set-up or the treatment delivery. For each patient the target-absorbed dose is derived from the entrance and exit doses measured by silicon diodes, on the beam axis at the patients skin. Depending on the discrepancies observed between the measured and expected doses we have set decision levels for the corrective actions to be taken. In addition these measurements allow us to obtain information on the overall accuracy or on the quality of a specific treatment. During 5 years, 7519 patients have been measured and 79 errors were detected. Half could have induced a variation of over 10% in the dose delivered. Seventy-eight out of 79 errors were of human origin. As part of an overall quality assurance programme, it is of the utmost importance to check the dose delivered for each patient undergoing radiotherapy treatment in order to avoid systematic underdosing or overdosing.

The study of tumoral, radiobiological, and general health factors that influence results and complications in a series of 448 oral tongue carcinomas treated exclusively by irradiation

PURPOSE Our aim was to study the different factors that influence the results and complications in a series of 448 carcinomas of the oral tongue treated from January 31, 1972 to December 31, 1986, by brachytherapy (Br) +/- neck dissection (181 cases) or combination of external beam irradiation and brachytherapy (EBI + Br) (267 cases). METHODS AND MATERIALS The patients distribution (TNM classification 1979) was: 125 T1, 186 T2, 128 T3, 9 T4Tx, 78% N0, and 22% N+. We used guide gutter or plastic tubes technique (Paris system dosimetry). Results at 5 and 10 years are: local control 68% and 64%, locoregional control 58% and 53%, specific survival 45% and 39%, and overall survival 44% and 27%. RESULTS In the univariate analysis for local control (LC) and overall survival (OS), we considered the tumoral factors. At 5 years, the LC for T1, T2, T3 are 93%, 65%, and 49%, and the OS 69%, 41%, and 25%, respectively (p < 0.002). The lesions of the undersurface of the tongue have a better LC (77%) than other localizations (64%) (p = 0.02). For general factors, the index of general health condition, age, and sex were not significant for LC, but proved significant for OS (p = 0.01). Significant radiobiological factors: the safety margin (expressed by the ratio treated surface on tumoral surface > or = 1.2) is significant for LC and OS. This is the same if the interval between EBI and Br is < or = 20 days. Neither the dose rate, the spacing between the sources, the total dose, nor Br dose were significant, but the last two were adapted according to the infiltration. In the univariate study for grade 2 and 3 complications (tissue and bone), the surface treated (> 12 cm2), and the dose rate > 0.7 Gy/h were significant. CONCLUSION The multivariate study showed that the small size of the lesion is the most important factor for local control, with brachytherapy alone for T1T2N0 and the number of days between EBI and brachytherapy < or = 20 days. For the complications, the most important factors are the total dose > 80 Gy and a treated surface > 12 cm2.

Efficacy of external fractionated radiation therapy in the treatment of meningiomas: a 20-year experience.

BACKGROUND This is a retrospective analysis of a series of meningiomas treated by radiotherapy. MATERIALS AND METHODS From 1978 to 1997, 45 patients with intracranial meningiomas were referred for external fractionated radiotherapy at Centre Alexis Vautrin. All patients were given 50-70Gy to the tumor bed (median: 56Gy), 1.8-2Gy per fraction. RESULTS Evaluation was performed in June 1999 using the Kaplan-Meyer actuarial method with a median follow-up of 30 months (range: 1-166), relapse-free survivals (RFSs) were 75% at 5 years and 67% at 8 years; overall survival (OS) was 74% at 5 and 8 years. For the 26 benign histologically documented lesions, RFSs were 95% at 5 years and 81% at 8 years; OS was 85% at 5 and 8 years. One major radiation-induced complication occurred in this series (decline of cognitive function). According to the indication of radiotherapy, we divided the series into four groups: postoperative irradiation after a first subtotal resection (11 patients), 5-year RFS was 90%; after first recurrence (+/-salvage surgery, 14 patients), 73%; after further recurrence (+/-salvage surgery, 11 patients), 67%; as exclusive treatment (nine patients), 80%. Atypical and malignant lesions (n=7) all relapsed before 24 months of follow-up, all patients but one died before 42 months. Age at the time of irradiation (> or =60 vs. <60 years) and radiotherapy dose (> or =60 vs. <60Gy) did not influence local control or OS. Atypical and malignant lesions (WHO grades II and III) meningiomas had a worse outcome than benign lesions (WHO grade I, P<0.01). CONCLUSIONS These results compare favorably with previously published data. External fractionated radiotherapy is well tolerated and effective. There is still a debate about the place of radiotherapy in the treatment of meningiomas: after subtotal resection, should radiotherapy be given postoperatively or at the time of progression? Should radiotherapy replace surgery when the risk of postoperative sequellae is high? Prospective randomized trials would be required to address these issues.

Cervical lymph node metastasis from an unknown primary: is a tonsillectomy necessary?

PURPOSE The detection of an infraclinical primary by tonsillectomy in case of cervical lymph node of an epidermoid carcinoma with unknown primary after a radical neck dissection, allows avoiding irradiation of the normal larynx. The aim of this study is to quantify the rate of tonsil primary to justify this procedure. METHODS AND MATERIALS From 1969 to 1992, 87 patients had a tonsillectomy as part of the workup for cervical nodal metastasis of an epidermoid carcinoma with unknown primary. The mean age was 57 years (range: 39-75 years) and the sex ratio was 8.6. Sixty-seven patients had a single cervical adenopathy (17 N1, 30 N2a, 5 N3, 15 Nx), and 20 patients multiple cervical adenopathies (17 N2b, 3 N2c). The treatments included always an irradiation to the node areas (50 Gy), and to the pharyngolarynx in case of normal tonsil (50 Gy), or to the tonsil if it was the primary (50 Gy with a brachytherapy boost of 20-25 Gy). In this last case, the larynx could be protected. RESULTS Tonsillectomy never induced specific complication. Out of 87 patients, 26% had a tonsil primary. There was not specific histological differentiation in this group. In the 67 patients with a single cervical adenopathy, 31% had a tonsil primary (6 N1, 7 N2, 1 N3, 7 Nx). It was a subdigastric adenopathy in 38%, a submandibular in 28% and a midjugulocarotidian in 23%. Among the 17 patients N2b, none had a tonsil primary. In the three patients N2c, two presented a tonsil carcinoma (two subdigastric nodes). CONCLUSION Tonsillectomy allows avoiding irradiation of normal larynx in 26% of patients who have a cervical lymph node with unknown primary. It should be performed in case of a single node of the subdigastric, midjugulocarotidian or submandibular area or bilateral subdigastric adenopathies.

Results of a european randomized trial of Etanidazole combined with radiotherapy in head and neck carcinomas

Purpose: The aim of the study was to evaluate the efficacy and toxicity of Etanidazole, a hypoxic cell sensitizer, combined with radiotherapy in the treatment of head and neck squamous cell carcinoma. Methods and Materials: A total of 374 patients from 27 European centers were included in this trial between 1987 and 1990. Treatment was either conventional radiotherapy alone (between 66 Gy in 33 fractions and 74 Gy in 37 fractions, 5 fractions per week), or the same radiotherapy dose plus Etanidazole 2 g/m 2 , three times weekly for 17 doses. A minimization procedure, balancing for center, site, and T stage (T1-T3 vs. T4) was used for randomization. Results: Among the 187 patients in the Etanidazole group, 82% received at least 14 doses of the drug. Compliance to the radiotherapy protocol was 92% in the Etanidazole group and 88% in the control group; the main cause of deviation was acute toxicity, which was observed at an equal rate in the two treatment groups. Fifty-two cases of Grade 1 to 3 peripheral neuropathy were observed in the Etanidazole group vs. 5 cases, all of Grade 1, in the control group (p < 0.001). The 2-year actuarial loco-regional control rates were 53% in the Etanidazole group and 53% in the control group (p = 0.93), and the overall 2-year survival rates were 54% in each group (p = 0.99). Conclusion: Adding Etanidazole to conventional radiotherapy did not afford any benefit for patients with head and neck carcinoma. This study failed to confirm the hypothesis of a benefit for patients with N0-N1 disease, which had been suggested by the results of a previous study (10).

Salvage irradiation by brachytherapy of velotonsillar squamous cell carcinoma in a previously irradiated field: Results in 73 cases

PURPOSE The salvage brachytherapy performed in patients presenting velotonsillar carcinoma in a previously irradiated field is evaluated in terms of local control, complications and survival. METHODS AND MATERIALS Between 1976 and 1990, 73 patients presenting with velotonsillar squamous cell carcinoma in a previously irradiated area were treated at Center Alexis Vautrin with brachytherapy along using an 192Ir implant (afterloading technique) with curative intent. According to the UICC 1987 TNM classification, there were 45 T1 N0, 20 T2 N0, one T3 NO, one T3 N2 and six Tx Nx. RESULTS The 5-year actuarial local control for T1 N0 and T2 N0 are 80% and 67% respectively. The regional relapse rate was 10% in both groups. Grade 2 complications occurred in 13% of patients and these were neither related to the volume treated nor the dose rate. There were no Grade 3 or 4 complications. The 5-year specific survival is 64%, with a plateau after the 5th year, but the 5-year overall survival is only 30%. Fourty-two percent of the patients in this series died from another carcinoma. All but two of these were related to continued alcohol and tobacco intoxication. CONCLUSION We conclude that brachytherapy alone (60 Gy) is optimal treatment for patients presenting with velontonsillar carcinoma in a previously irradiated field. The greatest challenge is the screening of these patients and the prevention of subsequent head and neck cancers. Recognizing the fact that these patients are at high risk for subsequent malignancies of upper aerodigestive tract, lung and esophagus, close surveillance is necessary for: (a) early diagnosis and prompt treatment; and (b) development of prevention strategies of field cancerization.

Role of interstitial brachytherapy in oral and oropharyngeal carcinoma: reflection of a series of 1344 patients treated at the time of initial presentation.

Our study focuses on a series of 1344 cases of carcinoma of the oral cavity and oropharynx treated between 1973 and 1992. Brachytherapy was always performed with iridium 192, either alone or in combination with external-beam irradiation or with surgery for the treatment of the primary tumor. For the oral cavity, we studied 565 cases of mobile tongue. The local control and overall survival rates, respectively, at 5 years are as follows: for T1, 92% and 70%; for T2, 62% and 42%; and for T3, 50% and 29%. For the subgroup T1T2NO, there was a better prognosis for treatment by brachytherapy of the primary lesion alone (p < 0.0001). Two hundred seven cases of floor-of-mouth carcinoma have been reported. The T3T4 patients were not considered surgical candidates. The local control and overall survival rates, respectively, at 5 years are as follows: for T1, 97% and 71%; for T2 72% and 42%; and for T3, 51% and 35%. Ninety-seven patients were treated by postoperative brachytherapy. These were patients for whom the margins after surgery were positive or narrow. A technique termed the modified bridge is described for lesions located in the mandible. Carcinomas of the buccal mucosa are rare in our country; only 42 cases were treated in this comparison of two techniques, and the overall survival rate was 48%. Epidermoid carcinomas of the oropharynx have nearly always been treated by a combination of external-beam irradiation and brachytherapy because of the bilateral node risk. Seventy-two patients with epidermoid cancers of the base of the tongue had an overall survival rate of 44%. The tonsil, soft palate, and pillars benefited from the use of the loop technique of brachytherapy combined with external-beam irradiation. Three hundred sixty-one patients were treated. Among these patients were two groups with different prognoses. Patients with tonsil, soft palate, and posterior pillar carcinomas had a local control rate of 84% and an overall survival rate of 57%. Conversely, the anterior pillar and the pharyngoglossal sulcus have a local control rate of only 65% and an overall survival rate of 38%. Statistical analysis revealed the prognostic factors for local control. The complications were classified into four grades: minor (20%), moderate (9%), major (4%), or inducing death (0.2%). The bone complications of grade 2 or 3 are more frequent for the floor of the mouth than for other locations.