Pierre Capy

A unified classification system for eukaryotic transposable elements

Our knowledge of the structure and composition of genomes is rapidly progressing in pace with their sequencing. The emerging data show that a significant portion of eukaryotic genomes is composed of transposable elements (TEs). Given the abundance and diversity of TEs and the speed at which large quantities of sequence data are emerging, identification and annotation of TEs presents a significant challenge. Here we propose the first unified hierarchical classification system, designed on the basis of the transposition mechanism, sequence similarities and structural relationships, that can be easily applied by non-experts. The system and nomenclature is kept up to date at the WikiPoson web site.

Stress and transposable elements: co‐evolution or useful parasites?

The activity of transposable elements can be induced by environmental and population factors and in particular by stresses in various organisms. A consequence of the increase in transposable element mobility is the creation of new genetic variability that can be useful in the face of stressful conditions. In this review, results supporting this hypothesis are presented and discussed. The main question is how stress induces the activity of transposable elements. We discuss hypotheses based upon the existence of promoters or fixation sites of transcription activators in the untranslated regions of transposable elements, similar to those found in regulatory regions of host defence genes.

Phenotypic and genetic variability of morphometrical traits in natural populations of Drosophila melanogaster and D simulans. I. Geographic variations

Summary - Geographical variability between natural populations of the 2 related cosmopolitan species Drosophila melanogaster and D simulans was investigated on a large number of populations (ie 55 and 25, respectively) for 6 morphometrical traits concerning weight, size, reproductive capacity and bristle numbers. For 21 populations, sympatric samples of the 2 species were available. For most traits, the mean values of D melanogaster are higher than those of D simulans, with the exception of the sternopleural bristle number, for which the species are similar. In D melanogaster, similar latitudinal variations exist along an African-European axis, in both hemispheres, and on the American continent. In D simulans, a latitudinal cline that is parallel to those observed in D melanogaster was observed suggesting that variability between populations is partially adaptive. In addition to these parallel variations, in which the mean values of all traits increase with latitude, inter-continental variations were also detected in D melanogaster when populations sampled at similar latitudes were compared (eg, West Indian and Far Eastern populations). Different demographic strategies (r or K) could explain such variations. Analysis of morphological distances (Mahalanobis generalized distance D between populations of the 2 species, showed that D melanogaster is much more diversified than D simulans. All the traits except the sternopleural bristle number are involved in these differences.

Revisiting horizontal transfer of transposable elements in Drosophila

Horizontal transfer (HT), defined as the transfer of genetic material between species, is considered to be an essential step in the ‘life cycle’ of transposable elements. We present a broad overview of suspected cases of HT of transposable elements in Drosophila. Hundred-one putative events of HT have been proposed in Drosophila for 21 different elements (5.0% refer to non-long terminal repeat (LTR) retrotransposons, 42.6% to LTR retrotransposons and 52.4% to DNA transposons). We discuss the methods used to infer HT, their limits and the putative vectors of transposable elements. We outline all the alternative hypotheses and ask how we can be almost certain that phylogenetic inconsistencies are due to HT.

Isofemale lines in Drosophila: an empirical approach to quantitative trait analysis in natural populations

Founding isofemale lines from wild collected females is a basic tool for investigating the genetic architecture of Drosophila natural populations. The method permits the analysis of quantitative traits under laboratory conditions, with a much broader scope than the mere evidence of a significant genetic heterogeneity among lines. Genetic variability is generally demonstrated by a significant coefficient of intraclass correlation, but several experimental precautions are needed and explained here. The relationship between classical (additive) heritability and intraclass correlation is not straightforward, presumably because the genetic bottlenecks due to the initiation of the lines unravel a significant, nonadditive genetic variance due to dominance and epistatic effects. It is thus suggested to consider intraclass correlation as a specific genetic parameter that enables comparisons between different traits, different populations or different environments. The use of isofemale lines is, however, not restricted to the calculation of an intraclass correlation. It can be used to estimate genetic correlations among traits or environments. The method is also convenient for the analysis of phenotypic plasticity in relation to an environmental gradient. A precise description of the response curves (the reaction norms) is possible, distinguishing trait parameters and plasticity parameters. A fairly general conclusion is that, for a given trait, mean value and plasticity are genetically independent. It is also possible to analyze traits, which, like sexual dimorphism, must be measured on different individuals, and even to demonstrate their genetic variability. In many cases, further empirical and theoretical analyses are possible and needed. It is argued that, in the future, isofemale lines will have an increasing significance among the various techniques appropriate to the analysis of quantitative evolutionary genetics in a diversity of species.

The transposable element impala, a fungal member of the Tc1-mariner superfamily

A new transposable element has been isolated from an unstable niaD mutant of the fungus Fusarium oxysporum. This element, called impala, is 1280 nucleotides long and has inverted repeats of 27 bp. Impala inserts into a TA site and leaves behind a “footprint” when it excises. The inserted element, impala-160, is cis-active, but is probably trans-defective owing to several stop codons and frameshifts. Similarities exist between the inverted repeats of impala and those of transposons belonging to the widely dispersed mariner and Tc1 families. Moreover, translation of the open reading frame revealed three regions showing high similarities with Tc1 from Caenorhabditis elegans and with the mariner element of Drosophila mauritiana. The overall comparison shows that impala occupies an intermediate position between the mariner and Tcl-like elements, suggesting that all these elements belong to the same superfamily. The degree of relatedness observed between these elements, described in different kingdoms, raises the question of their origin and evolution.

The strange phylogenies of transposable elements: are horizontal transfers the only explanation?

Analyses of the evolution of transposable elements reveal some inconsistencies when the phylogenies of such elements are compared to conventional phylogenies of the host species. Such discrepancies are generally interpreted as resulting from occasional horizontal transfers of transposable elements across species boundaries. This phenomenon has been clearly demonstrated for only a few elements and both its frequency and the mechanism by which it occurs remain unknown. Moreover, in many cases, the hypothesis of horizontal transfer must be compared with alternative evolutionary scenarios.

Long-term evolution of transposable elements

Transposable elements are often considered parasitic DNA sequences, able to invade the genome of their host thanks to their self-replicating ability. This colonization process has been extensively studied, both theoretically and experimentally, but their long-term coevolution with the genomes is still poorly understood. In this work, we aim to challenge previous population genetics models by considering features of transposable elements as quantitative, rather than discrete, variables. We also describe more realistic transposable element dynamics by accounting for the variability of the insertion effect, from deleterious to adaptive, as well as mutations leading to a loss of transposition activity and to nonautonomous copies. Individual-based simulations of the behavior of a transposable-element family over several thousand generations show different ways in which active or inactive copies can be maintained for a very long time. Results reveal an unexpected impact of genetic drift on the “junk DNA” content of the genome and strongly question the likelihood of the sustainable long-term stable transposition-selection equilibrium on which numerous previous works were based.

Abundance, distribution and dynamics of retrotransposable elements and transposons: similarities and differences

Retrotransposable elements and transposons are generally both found in most eukaryotes. These two classes of elements are usually distinguished on the basis of their differing mechanisms of transposition. However, their respective frequencies, their intragenomic dynamics and distributions, and the frequencies of their horizontal transfer from one species to another can also differ. The main objective of this review is to compare these two types of elements from a new perspective, using data provided by genome sequencing projects and relating this to the theoretical and observed dynamics. It is shown that the traditional division into two classes, based on the transposition mechanisms, becomes less obvious when other factors are taken into consideration. A great diversity in distribution and dynamics within each class is observed. In contrast, the impact on and the interactions with the genome can show striking similarities between families of the two classes.

Relationships Between Transposable Elements Based Upon the Integrase-Transposase Domains: Is There a Common Ancestor?

The integrase domain of RNA-mediated elements (class I) and the transposase domain of DNA-mediated transposable elements (class II) were compared. A number of elements contain the DDE signature, which plays an important role in their integration. The possible relationships betweenmariner-Tc1 andIS elements, retrotransposons, and retroviruses were analyzed from an alignment of this region. Themariner-Tc1 superfamily, and LTR retrotransposons and retroviruses were found to be monophyletic groups. However, theIS elements of bacteria were found in several groups. These results were used to propose an evolutionary history that suggests a common ancestor for some integrases and transposases.