Pierre Coulie

Tumor regressions observed in patients with metastatic melanoma treated with an antigenic peptide encoded by gene MAGE-3 and presented by HLA-A1.

Thirty‐nine tumor‐bearing patients with metastatic melanoma were treated with 3 subcutaneous injections of the MAGE‐3.A1 peptide at monthly intervals. No significant toxicity was observed. Of the 25 patients who received the complete treatment, 7 displayed significant tumor regressions. All but one of these regressions involved cutaneous metastases. Three regressions were complete and 2 of these led to a disease‐free state, which persisted for more than 2 years after the beginning of treatment. No evidence for a cytolytic T lymphocyte (CTL) response was found in the blood of the 4 patients who were analyzed, including 2 who displayed complete tumor regression. Our results suggest that injection of the MAGE‐3.A1 peptide induced tumor regression in a significant number of the patients, even though no massive CTL response was produced. Int. J. Cancer 80:219–230, 1999.

Characterization of an Antigen That Is Recognized on a Melanoma Showing Partial HLA Loss by CTL Expressing an NK Inhibitory Receptor

Melanoma lines MEL.A and MEL.B were derived from metastases removed from patient LB33 in 1988 and 1993, respectively. The MEL.A cells express several antigens recognized by autologous cytolytic T lymphocytes (CTL) on HLA class I molecules. The MEL.B cells have lost expression of all class I molecules except for HLA-A24. By stimulating autologous lymphocytes with MEL.B, we obtained an HLA-A24-restricted CTL clone that lysed these cells. A novel gene, PRAME, encodes the antigen. It is expressed in a large proportion of tumors and also in some normal tissues, albeit at a lower level. Surprisingly, the CTL failed to lyse MEL.A, even though these cells expressed the gene PRAME. The CTL expresses an NK inhibitory receptor that inhibits its lytic activity upon interaction with HLA-Cw7 molecules, which are present on MEL.A cells and not on MEL.B. Such CTL, active against tumor cells showing partial HLA loss, may constitute an intermediate line of anti-tumor defense between the CTL, which recognize highly specific tumor antigens, and the NK cells, which recognize HLA loss variants.

Bage - A New Gene Encoding An Antigen Recognized On Human Melanomas By Cytolytic T-Lymphocytes

Several tumor antigens are recognized by autologous cytolytic T lymphocytes (CTL) on human melanoma MZ2-MEL. Some of them are encoded by genes MAGE-1 and MAGE-3, which are not expressed in normal tissues except in testis. Here, we report the identification of a new gene that codes for another of these antigens. This gene, named BAGE, codes for a putative protein of 43 aa and seems to belong to a family of several genes. The antigen recognized by the autologous CTL consists of BAGE-encoded peptide AARAVFLAL bound to an HLA-Cw 1601 molecule. Gene BAGE is expressed in 22% of melanomas, 30% of infiltrating bladder carcinomas, 10% of mammary carcinomas, 8% of head and neck squamous cell carcinomas, and 6% of non-small cell lung carcinomas. Like the MAGE genes, it is silent in normal tissues with the exception of testis. Because of its tumor-specific expression, the BAGE-encoded antigen may prove useful for cancer immunotherapy.

Tumor antigens recognized by T cells

A large number of human tumor-specific antigens have been identified. Here, Thierry Boon and colleagues explain that the priority now is to demonstrate that immunization against them is clinically valuable.

Tumour antigens recognized by T lymphocytes: at the core of cancer immunotherapy

In this Timeline, we describe the characteristics of tumour antigens that are recognized by spontaneous T cell responses in cancer patients and the paths that led to their identification. We explain on what genetic basis most, but not all, of these antigens are tumour specific: that is, present on tumour cells but not on normal cells. We also discuss how strategies that target these tumour-specific antigens can lead either to tumour-specific or to crossreactive T cell responses, which is an issue that has important safety implications in immunotherapy. These safety issues are even more of a concern for strategies targeting antigens that are not known to induce spontaneous T cell responses in patients.

Genes Coding for Tumor Antigens Recognized by Cytolytic T Lymphocytes

Presuming that T lymphocytes might be able to eradicate cancer cells as effectively as they kill virus-infected celts, tumor immunologists have been trying to identify specific target antigens displayed by cancer cells that could make them recognizable to cytolytic T lymphocytes (CTL). During the last few years several mouse and human tumor antigens recognized by CTL have been identified at the molecular level. This review focuses on the tumor antigens identified in our laboratory. Interestingly, none of these antigens arises from the product of known oncogenes or tumor-supressor genes. The antigens fall into three categories: antigens encoded by genes expressed in tumors but not in most normal tissues, differentiation antigens and antigens derived from mutated genes that are expressed ubiquitously.

Membrane protein GARP is a receptor for latent TGF-beta on the surface of activated human Treg.

Human Treg and Th clones secrete the latent form of TGF‐β, in which the mature TGF‐β protein is bound to the latency‐associated peptide (LAP), and is thereby prevented from binding to the TGF‐β receptor. We previously showed that upon TCR stimulation, human Treg clones but not Th clones produce active TGF‐β and bear LAP on their surface. Here, we show that latent TGF‐β, i.e. both LAP and mature TGF‐β, binds to glycoprotein A repetitions predominant (GARP), a transmembrane protein containing leucine rich repeats, which is present on the surface of stimulated Treg clones but not on Th clones. Membrane localization of latent TGF‐β mediated by binding to GARP may be necessary for the ability of Treg to activate TGF‐β upon TCR stimulation. However, it is not sufficient as lentiviral‐mediated expression of GARP in human Th cells induces binding of latent TGF‐β to the cell surface, but does not result in the production of active TGF‐β upon stimulation of these Th cells.

Natural Human Plasmacytoid Dendritic Cells Induce Antigen-Specific T-Cell Responses in Melanoma Patients

Vaccination against cancer by using dendritic cells has for more than a decade been based on dendritic cells generated ex vivo from monocytes or CD34(+) progenitors. Here, we report on the first clinical study of therapeutic vaccination against cancer using naturally occurring plasmacytoid dendritic cells (pDC). Fifteen patients with metastatic melanoma received intranodal injections of pDCs activated and loaded with tumor antigen-associated peptides ex vivo. In vivo imaging showed that administered pDCs migrated and distributed over multiple lymph nodes. Several patients mounted antivaccine CD4(+) and CD8(+) T-cell responses. Despite the limited number of administered pDCs, an IFN signature was observed after each vaccination. These results indicate that vaccination with naturally occurring pDC is feasible with minimal toxicity and that in patients with metastatic melanoma, it induces favorable immune responses.

An antigen produced by splicing of noncontiguous peptides in the reverse order

CD8-positive T lymphocytes recognize peptides that are usually derived from the degradation of cellular proteins and are presented by class I molecules of the major histocompatibility complex. Here we describe a human minor histocompatibility antigen created by a polymorphism in the SP110 nuclear phosphoprotein gene. The antigenic peptide comprises two noncontiguous SP110 peptide segments spliced together in reverse order to that in which they occur in the predicted SP110 protein. The antigenic peptide could be produced in vitro by incubation of precursor peptides with highly purified 20S proteasomes. Cutting and splicing probably occur within the proteasome by transpeptidation.

The determinants of tumour immunogenicity

Many standard and targeted therapies, as well as radiotherapy, have been shown to induce an anti-tumour immune response, and immunotherapies rely on modulating the host immune system to induce an anti-tumour immune response. However, the immune response to such therapies is often reliant on the immunogenicity of a tumour. Tumour immunogenicity varies greatly between cancers of the same type in different individuals and between different types of cancer. So, what do we know about tumour immunogenicity and how might we therapeutically improve tumour immunogenicity? We asked four leading cancer immunologists around the world for their opinions on this important issue.