Pierre de Grandmont

Impact of implant support for mandibular dentures on satisfaction, oral and general health‐related quality of life: a meta‐analysis of randomized‐controlled trials

OBJECTIVES The aim of this study was to examine systematically the data published on the efficacy of mandibular implant-retained overdentures from the patients perspective. MATERIAL AND METHODS Medline, Embase, The Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials and The Cochrane Systematic Reviews Database were searched and complemented by hand searching. All randomized-controlled trials published in English or French up to April 2007 were included, in which conventional dentures and mandibular implant overdentures in adult edentulous individuals were compared. The outcomes of interest were patient satisfaction, oral and general health-related quality of life. Random effects models were used to pool the effect sizes (ES) of all included studies. RESULTS Ten publications of seven randomized-controlled trials were identified and eight were included in the meta-analysis. When compared with mandibular conventional dentures, implant overdentures were rated to be more satisfactory at a clinically relevant level [pooled ES 0.80, z=3.56, 95% confidence intervals (CI) 0.36-1.24, P=0.0004], but a statistical heterogeneity was found (chi(2)=31.63, df=5, P<0.00001, I(2)=84%). The pooled ES for oral health quality of life was -0.41 (z=1.31, 95% CI, -1.02 to 0.20; P=0.19, chi(2)=11.53, df=2, P<0.003, I(2)=83%). There was a lack of evidence to show the impact of mandibular implant overdenture on perceived general health. CONCLUSIONS Our findings suggest that, although mandibular implant-retained overdentures may be more satisfying for edentulous patients than new conventional dentures, the magnitude of the effect is still uncertain. There is a need for additional evidence including cost-effectiveness analyses on the impact of mandibular implant overdentures and conventional dentures.

Does immediate loading affect clinical and patient-centered outcomes of mandibular 2-unsplinted-implant overdenture? : a 2-year within-case analysis

OBJECTIVE To provide 2-year clinical- and patient-oriented data with regard to mandibular overdenture assisted by 2 immediately loaded unsplinted implants. MATERIAL AND METHODS In this pre-post design, Phase-I clinical trial, 18 edentate individuals (62.4±7.7years) received a new set of complete denture. Then, following standard procedures, 3 threaded implants (OsseoSpeed TX™, Dentsply Implants, Mölndal, Sweden) were placed in the mandible in each patient, and locator abutments (Zest Anchors LLC, Escondido, U.S.A.) were inserted on the right and left side implants. The midline implant served as a control for within-patient comparison. The immediate loading was conducted within 24h of surgery. Data were collected at baseline (T0), 12 (T1) and 24 (T2) months after immediate loading. The clinical outcomes included implant survival rate, crestal bone level changes and implant stability. These criteria were assessed through clinical and radiographic examinations as well as resonance frequency analysis. Patient-centered outcomes included patient satisfaction and oral health-related quality of life measured using validated questionnaires. Brunner-Langer approach was used for statistical analysis. RESULTS Implant survival rate for immediate loaded implants was 91.7% at 2-year follow-up. None of the unloaded implants failed. There was no statistically significant difference at baseline and follow-ups with regard to clinical outcomes between loaded and unloaded implants. Patient satisfaction and quality of life improved (p<0.0001) from baseline to 2-year follow-up. CONCLUSION Immediate loading protocol did not negatively affect clinical outcomes, satisfaction and quality of life of patients wearing 2-unsplinted-implant mandibular overdenture for 2 years. This conclusion requires confirmation by randomized control trials. CLINICAL SIGNIFICANCE STATEMENT Mandibular overdenture assisted by two immediately-loaded unsplinted implants is successful treatment based on 2-year clinical and patient-based outcomes.

Contribution of orodental status to the intensity of orofacial tardive dyskinesia: An interdisciplinary and video-based assessment

BACKGROUND Tardive dyskinesia (TD) is a neurological motor complication eventually arising in one-third of patients chronically exposed to antipsychotic drugs. Some orodental peripheral factors have been reported to influence TD. OBJECTIVE To measure orodental factors such as temporomandibular joint function, static occlusal contacts, and denture condition, and attempt correlations with orofacial TD intensity. METHODS In this exploratory cross-sectional pilot study, 31 subjects between 30 and 75 years of age were divided in two groups displaying minimal to mild, or moderate to severe orofacial TD, respectively, and underwent a detailed oral, dental, and prosthetic evaluation to capture various aspects of oral health compared between the two groups. Blinded video-based TD ratings along a validated scale were obtained to compare dentulous and edentulous subjects, and contrast TD intensity in complete denture wearers with and without their own prostheses. RESULTS None of the factors examined tightly correlated with orofacial TD intensity. However, edentulism was associated with a higher median orofacial TD rating compared to the dentulous group (p = 0.001). Further, a significant intra-subject difference was observed in the edentulous subjects rated with their own complete dentures in place or not (p = 0.028), the dentures attenuating the mean orofacial ratings by 21.8 ± 7.3%. CONCLUSION Of all orodental factors considered, only edentulism and complete denture wearing influenced oral TD expression, calling for the close monitoring of the dental status in antipsychotic drug-exposed patients to prevent tooth loss. Further studies to measure the impact of an adequate prosthodontic rehabilitation in edentulous subjects with orofacial TD seem warranted.