Network


Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.

Hotspot


Dive into the research topics where Piet Peters is active.

Publication


Featured researches published by Piet Peters.


Environmental Science & Technology | 2016

Microplastics in the Terrestrial Ecosystem: Implications for Lumbricus terrestris (Oligochaeta, Lumbricidae)

Esperanza Huerta Lwanga; Hennie Gertsen; Harm Gooren; Piet Peters; Tamás Salánki; Martine van der Ploeg; Ellen Besseling; Albert A. Koelmans; Violette Geissen

Plastic debris is widespread in the environment, but information on the effects of microplastics on terrestrial fauna is completely lacking. Here, we studied the survival and fitness of the earthworm Lumbricus terrestris (Oligochaeta, Lumbricidae) exposed to microplastics (Polyethylene, <150 μm) in litter at concentrations of 7, 28, 45, and 60% dry weight, percentages that, after bioturbation, translate to 0.2 to 1.2% in bulk soil. Mortality after 60 days was higher at 28, 45, and 60% of microplastics in the litter than at 7% w/w and in the control (0%). Growth rate was significantly reduced at 28, 45, and 60% w/w microplastics, compared to the 7% and control treatments. Due to the digestion of ingested organic matter, microplastic was concentrated in cast, especially at the lowest dose (i.e., 7% in litter) because that dose had the highest proportion of digestible organic matter. Whereas 50 percent of the microplastics had a size of <50 μm in the original litter, 90 percent of the microplastics in the casts was <50 μm in all treatments, which suggests size-selective egestion by the earthworms. These concentration-transport and size-selection mechanisms may have important implications for fate and risk of microplastic in terrestrial ecosystems.


Zeitschrift Fur Geomorphologie | 2013

Comparative measurements with seven rainfall simulators on uniform bare fallow land

Thomas Iserloh; Johannes B. Ries; Artemi Cerdà; M.T. Echeverría; Wolfgang Fister; Christian Geißler; Nikolaus J. Kuhn; F.J. León; Piet Peters; Marcus Schindewolf; Jürgen Schmidt; Thomas Scholten; Manuel Seeger

To assess the inflfl uence of rainfall simulator type and plot dimensions on runoff and erosion, seven small portable rainfall simulators from Freiberg, Tubingen, Trier (all Germany), Valencia, Zaragoza (both Spain), Basel (Switzerland) and Wageningen (the Netherlands) were compared on a prepared bare fallow fifi eld. The experiments were carried out during an international rainfall simulator workshop, organized at Trier University (Germany) from 30th of June to 1st of July 2011.The tested rainfall simulators differ in design, rainfall intensities, rain spectra, etc. and represent most of the devices which have been used over the last decade in Europe. The plots for the different rainfall simulators were selected as similar as possible concerning soil physical and chemical properties, aspect and inclination and were chosen to be placed side by side in horizontal direction. Test procedure was standardized in order to examine the inflfl uence of the rainfall simulator andplot dimension only. The results show a clear and consistent relationship in runoff, erosion and infifi ltration behaviour of the different used rainfall simulators. With all the devices total soil loss is measurable, but different plot sizes, intensities and kinetic energies of the simulated rainfall caused differences in soil loss and runoff quantities per unit of area. Regarding course characteristics over runs, similarities could be observed especially in runoff behaviour. The rainfall simulators (> 1 m² plot size) are able to reproduce infifi ltration and interrillerosion processes. With an increase of plot size (≥ 1 m²), rill-erosion will be also reflfl ected. Therefore it can be concluded that up to a certain plot size, the results of the different simulators are comparable and depend in their magnitude on the properties of the applied rainfall. The increase in process complexity with increasing plot size shows, that the scale of the simulation is one of the most important parameters to be taken intoaccount when comparing values of erosion and runoff.


Geocarto International | 2010

Evaluation of digital elevation models for delineation of hydrological response units in a Himalayan watershed

Sameer Saran; Geert Sterk; Piet Peters; V. K. Dadhwal

This study reports results from evaluation of the quality of digital elevation model (DEM) from four sources viz. topographic map (1:50,000), Shuttle Radar Topographic Mission (SRTM) (90 m), optical stereo pair from ASTER (15 m) and CARTOSAT (2.5 m) and their use in derivation of hydrological response units (HRUs) in Sitla Rao watershed (North India). The HRUs were derived using water storage capacity and slope to produce surface runoff zones. The DEMs were evaluated on elevation accuracy and representation of morphometric features. The DEM derived from optical stereo pairs (ASTER and CARTOSAT) provided higher vertical accuracies than the SRTM and topographic map-based DEM. The SRTM with a coarse resolution of 90 m provided vertical accuracy but better morphometry compared to topographic map. The HRU maps derived from the fine resolution DEM (ASTER and CARTOSAT) were more detailed but did not provide much advantage for hydrological studies at the scale of Sitla Rao watershed (5800 ha).


Science of The Total Environment | 2018

A simple method for the extraction and identification of light density microplastics from soil

Shaoliang Zhang; Xiaomei Yang; Hennie Gertsen; Piet Peters; Tamás Salánki; Violette Geissen

This article introduces a simple and cost-saving method developed to extract, distinguish and quantify light density microplastics of polyethylene (PE) and polypropylene (PP) in soil. A floatation method using distilled water was used to extract the light density microplastics from soil samples. Microplastics and impurities were identified using a heating method (3-5s at 130°C). The number and size of particles were determined using a camera (Leica DFC 425) connected to a microscope (Leica wild M3C, Type S, simple light, 6.4×). Quantification of the microplastics was conducted using a developed model. Results showed that the floatation method was effective in extracting microplastics from soils, with recovery rates of approximately 90%. After being exposed to heat, the microplastics in the soil samples melted and were transformed into circular transparent particles while other impurities, such as organic matter and silicates were not changed by the heat. Regression analysis of microplastics weight and particle volume (a calculation based on image J software analysis) after heating showed the best fit (y=1.14x+0.46, R2=99%, p<0.001). Recovery rates based on the empirical model method were >80%. Results from field samples collected from North-western China prove that our method of repetitive floatation and heating can be used to extract, distinguish and quantify light density polyethylene microplastics in soils. Microplastics mass can be evaluated using the empirical model.


Hydrology and Earth System Sciences | 2011

Effect of hydraulic parameters on sediment transport capacity in overland flow over erodible beds

Mazhar Ali; Geert Sterk; Manuel Seeger; M. P. Boersema; Piet Peters


Aeolian Research | 2009

Laboratory wind tunnel testing of three commonly used saltation impact sensors

R. Scott Van Pelt; Piet Peters; Saskia M. Visser


Land Degradation & Development | 2015

The Wageningen Rainfall Simulator: Set-up and Calibration of an Indoor Nozzle-Type Rainfall Simulator for Soil Erosion Studies

Tamás Lassu; Manuel Seeger; Piet Peters; Saskia Keesstra


Environmental Pollution | 2017

Incorporation of microplastics from litter into burrows of Lumbricus terrestris.

Esperanza Huerta Lwanga; Hennie Gertsen; Harm Gooren; Piet Peters; Tamás Salánki; Martine van der Ploeg; Ellen Besseling; Albert A. Koelmans; Violette Geissen


Journal of Hydrology | 2014

Momentum or kinetic energy – How do substrate properties influence the calculation of rainfall erosivity?

Philipp Goebes; Steffen Seitz; Christian Geißler; Tamás Lassu; Piet Peters; Manuel Seeger; Karin Nadrowski; Thomas Scholten


Catena | 2012

Aeolian sediment mass fluxes on a sandy soil in Central Patagonia

Geert Sterk; Jacopo Parigiani; Eduardo Cittadini; Piet Peters; Johannes Scholberg; Pablo Luis Peri

Collaboration


Dive into the Piet Peters's collaboration.

Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Manuel Seeger

Wageningen University and Research Centre

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Violette Geissen

Wageningen University and Research Centre

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Tamás Salánki

Wageningen University and Research Centre

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Albert A. Koelmans

Wageningen University and Research Centre

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Ellen Besseling

Wageningen University and Research Centre

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Esperanza Huerta Lwanga

Wageningen University and Research Centre

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Hennie Gertsen

Wageningen University and Research Centre

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Martine van der Ploeg

Wageningen University and Research Centre

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Researchain Logo
Decentralizing Knowledge