Network


Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.

Hotspot


Dive into the research topics where Pietro Ortolani is active.

Publication


Featured researches published by Pietro Ortolani.


Leiden Journal of International Law | 2017

Are Bondholders Investors? Sovereign Debt and Investment Arbitration after Poštová

Pietro Ortolani

As a result of the 2010 sovereign debt crisis and the subsequent restructuring operations, bondholders have pursued different dispute resolution strategies. Litigation before US courts has proved to be a viable option, as demonstrated by Argentine cases. State court litigation, however, is not the only available forum: in some cases, bondholders have commenced arbitration proceedings against the issuing State. Arbitral case-law so far seemed to be consistent in concluding that the holders of sovereign bonds issued by the host State qualify as investors and thus have standing to bring investment treaty-based claims. The recent Postova award, however, casts doubts as to whether holders of sovereign bonds qualify as investors for the purposes of international investment law.This article illustrates the main problems revolving around the qualification of sovereign bond as investments for the purposes of international investment law. The article summarises the relevant legal framework and the solutions adopted by arbitral case-law so far. Subsequently, the contents of the Postova decision are addressed in detail and the consequences of this decision are scrutinised.


Archive | 2014

The Public Perception of Investment Arbitration

Tony Cole; Pietro Ortolani

This paper examines the controversies around the incorporation of investment arbitration into the Transatlantic Trade and Investment Partnership (TTIP). It was drafted to be read by a non-specialist audience, and addresses the primary arguments made regarding the use of arbitration in the TTIP. For each argument it offers a clear explanation of the opposing positions, and then presents an accessible analysis of the issue on the basis of the available evidence.The paper was originally prepared at the request of the Legal Affairs Committee of the European Parliament, and was produced under a grant from the Parliament for a study on arbitration in the European Union. It was supplied to the Parliament in late 2014.


Oxford Journal of Legal Studies | 2016

Self-Enforcing Online Dispute Resolution: Lessons from Bitcoin

Pietro Ortolani


Procedural science at the crossroads of different generations, 2015, ISBN 978-3-8487-2497-0, págs. 125-158 | 2015

The recast Brussels I regulation and arbitration

Pietro Ortolani


Journal of International Dispute Settlement | 2015

Intra-EU Arbitral Awards vis-à-vis Article 107 TFEU: State Aid Law as a Limit to Compliance

Pietro Ortolani


Training course for practitioners | 2014

Il processo Civile telematico

Pietro Ortolani


Archive | 2014

The Legal Instruments and Practice of Arbitration in the EU

Pietro Ortolani; Tony Cole; Ilias Bantekas; Christine Riefa; Federico Ferretti; Barbara Warwas


International Chamber of Commerce Young Arbitrators Forum | 2014

Brussels, Europe and the Future of Arbitration

Pietro Ortolani


Archive | 2018

Arbitration in its Psychological Context: A Contextual Behavioural Account of Arbitral Decision-Making

Tony Cole; Pietro Ortolani; Sean Wright


University of Milan | 2017

Domestic civil courts and European jurisdictions

Pietro Ortolani

Collaboration


Dive into the Pietro Ortolani's collaboration.

Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Tony Cole

University of Leicester

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Ilias Bantekas

Brunel University London

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Barbara Alicja Warwas

The Hague University of Applied Sciences

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Barbara Warwas

Brunel University London

View shared research outputs
Researchain Logo
Decentralizing Knowledge