Pietro Tedesco

Idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis: How often is it really idiopathic?

The cause of idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF) is unknown. The pathology suggests that IPF results from serial lung injury. It has been suggested that gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) may relate to the cause or the progression of the disease. The aims of this study were to determine the prevalence of GERD, the clinical presentation of GERD, and the manometric and reflux profiles in patients with end-stage IPF. Between July 2003 and October 2004, 18 patients with IPF on the lung transplant waiting list were referred for evaluation to the Swallowing Center of the University of California San Francisco. On the basis of the results of the pH monitoring test (5 and 20 cm above the lower esophageal sphincter), the patients were divided into two groups: group A, 12 patients (66%), GERD+; group B, 6 patients (34%), GERD-. The incidence of heartburn and regurgitation was similar between GERD+ and GERD-patients; reflux was clinically silent in one third of GERD+ patients. Reflux was associated with a hypotensive lower esophageal sphincter and abnormal esophageal peristalsis, and it was present in the upright and supine position. The reflux often extended into the proximal esophagus. These results show the following: (1) Two thirds of patients with IPF had GERD; (2) symptoms could not distinguish between those with and without GERD; (3) reflux occurred in the presence of a hypotensive lower esophageal sphincter and abnormal esophageal peristalsis; and (4) reflux occurred in the upright and supine positions, and often extended into the proximal esophagus. We conclude that patients with IPF should be screened for GERD, and if GERD is present, a fundoplication should be performed before or shortly after lung transplantation.

Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease and Obesity. Pathophysiology and Implications for Treatment

Although the etiology of gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) is multifactorial, the pathophysiology of the disease in morbidly obese patients remains incompletely understood. The aims of this study were to compare in morbidly obese (body mass index (BMI) ≥35) and nonmorbidly patients (BMI <35) with GERD: (a) lower esophageal sphincter (LES) profile; (b) esophageal body function; and (c) esophageal acid exposure. We reviewed esophageal manometry and ambulatory 24-hour pH monitoring studies of 599 consecutive patients with GERD (DeMeester score >14.7). Patients were divided into two groups according to the BMI: (1) 520 patients (86.8%) with BMI <35 and (2) 79 patients (13.2%) with BMI ≥35. While the DeMeester score was not different between the two groups, morbidly obese patients had higher LES pressure and higher amplitude of peristalsis in the distal esophagus (DEA). Among these patients, LES and DEA pressures were often hypertensive. A linear regression model showed that BMI, LES pressure, LES abdominal length, and DEA were independently associated with the DeMeester score. These data showed that: (a) BMI was independently associated to the severity of GERD; and (b) in most morbidly obese patients with GERD, reflux occurred despite normal or hypertensive esophageal motility. These findings show that the pathophysiology of GERD in morbidly obese patients might differ from that of nonobese patients, suggesting the need for a different therapeutic approach.

Effect of partial and total laparoscopic fundoplication on esophageal body motility

BackgroundAbnormal esophageal body motility often accompanies gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD). Although the effect of surgery on the pressure and behavior of the lower esophageal sphincter (LES) has been extensively studied, it still is unclear whether a successful fundoplication improves esophageal peristalsis.MethodsThe pre- and postoperative esophageal manometries of 71 patients who underwent a successful laparoscopic fundoplication (postoperative DeMeester score < 14.7) were reviewed. The patients were grouped according to the type of fundoplication (partial vs total) and preoperative esophageal peristalsis (normal vs abnormal): group A (partial fundoplication and abnormal esophageal peristalsis; n = 16), group B (total fundoplication and normal peristalsis; n = 41), and group C (total fundoplication and abnormal peristalsis; n = 14).ResultsThe LES pressure was increased in all the groups. A significant increase in amplitude of peristalsis was noted in groups A and C. Normalization of peristalsis was achieved in 31% of the group A patients and 86% of the group C patients. No changes occurred in group B.ConclusionsLaparoscopic fundoplication increased LES pressure and the strength of esophageal peristalsis in patients with abnormal preoperative esophageal motility. A total fundoplication resulted in normalization of peristalsis in the majority of patients.

Esophageal mucosal damage may promote dysmotility and worsen esophageal acid exposure

This study determines the relationship among esophageal dysmotility, esophageal acid exposure, and esophageal mucosal injury in patients with gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD). A total of 827 patients with GERD (confirmed by ambulatory pH monitoring) were divided into three groups based on the degree of mucosal injury: group A, no esophagitis, 493 patients; group B, esophagitis grades I to III, 273 patients; and group C, Barrett’s esophagus, 61 patients. As mucosal damage progressed from no esophagitis to Barrett’s esophagus, there was a significant decrease in lower esophageal sphincter pressure and amplitude of peristalsis in the distal esophagus, with a subsequent increase in the number of reflux episodes in 24 hours, the number of reflux episodes longer than 5 minutes, and the reflux score. These data suggest that in patients with GERD, worsening of esophageal mucosal injury may determine progressive deterioration of esophageal motor function with impairment of acid clearance and increase of esophageal acid exposure. These findings suggest that Barrett’s esophagus is an end-stage form of gastroesophageal reflux, and that if surgical therapy is performed early in the course of the disease, this cascade of events might be blocked.

Side-to-side stapled intra-thoracic esophagogastric anastomosis reduces the incidence of leaks and stenosis.

Trans-hiatal esophagectomy with a hand-sewn anastomosis was for 2 decades the preferred approach in our institution for patients with esophageal cancer. In our experience, this anastomotic technique was associated with a 12% leak rate and a 48% rate of stricture requiring dilatation. We sought to determine if a side-to-side intra-thoracic anastomosis was associated with a lower rate of anastomotic stricture and leak. Thirty-three consecutive patients with distal esophageal cancer or Barretts esophagus with high grade dysplasia underwent a trans-thoracic esophagectomy with a side-to-side stapled intra-thoracic anastomosis. The overall morbidity was 27%, with no anastomotic stricture or leaks. One patient died (3%). The median time to the resumption of an oral diet was 7 days (range 5-28), and the median length of stay in hospital was 9 days (range 6-45). Trans-thoracic esophagectomy with a side-to-side stapled anastomosis is safe and it is associated with a very low rate of anastomotic complications. We consider this to be the procedure of choice for patients with distal esophageal cancers.

Outcomes after laparoscopic Nissen fundoplication are not influenced by the pattern of reflux

The purpose of this study was to compare the outcomes of patients with different types of gastroesophageal reflux disease (upright, supine, or bipositional) after laparoscopic Nissen fundoplication and determine if patients with upright reflux have worse outcomes. Two hundred and twenty-five patients with reflux confirmed by 24-h pH monitoring were divided into three groups based on the type of reflux present. Patients were questioned pre- and post-fundoplication regarding the presence and duration of symptoms (heartburn, regurgitation, dysphagia, cough and chest pain). Symptoms were scored using a 5-point scale, ranging from 0 (no symptom) to 4 (disabling symptom). Esophageal manometry and pH results were also compared. There was no statistically significant difference in lower esophageal sphincter length, pressure or function between the three groups. There was no significant difference in any of the postoperative symptom categories between the three groups. The type of reflux identified preoperatively does not have an adverse effect on postoperative outcomes after Nissen fundoplication and should not discourage physicians from offering antireflux surgery to patients with upright reflux.

Timing of surgical intervention does not influence return of esophageal peristalsis or outcome for patients with achalasia

BackgroundIt has been suggested that abnormal function of the lower esophageal sphincter is the primary abnormality in esophageal achalasia, and that the absence of esophageal peristalsis is secondary to the outflow obstruction caused by the lower esophageal sphincter. Furthermore, it has been proposed that early elimination of the resistance at the level of the gastroesophageal junction by surgical intervention could result in return of esophageal peristalsis. This study aimed to assess whether the timing of surgical intervention affects the return of esophageal peristalsis and the clinical outcome for patients with achalasia.MethodsBetween January 1991 and May 2003, 173 patients underwent a Heller myotomy by minimally invasive surgery for treatment of esophageal achalasia. Of these patients, 41 (24%) had pre- and postoperative esophageal manometry. These patients were divided into three groups based on the duration of symptoms: group A (10 patients; duration of symptoms 12 months group B (19 patients, duration of symptoms 12 to 60 months), and group C (12 patients; duration of symptoms longer than 60 months).ResultsThe average duration of symptoms (dysphagia was present in all patients) was as follows: group A (8 ± 4 months), group B, (35 ± 16 months), and group C, (157 ± 94 months). Vigorous achalasia was present in 40%, 21%, and 17% of the groups respectively. The differences between the groups were not significant. Postoperatively, improvement in esophageal motility was seen in no patient in group A, 1 patient (5%) in group B, and 1 patient (8%) in group C. Excellent or good results were obtained for 90% of the group A patients, 95% of group B patients, and 92% of the group C patients. Again, the differences were not significant.ConclusionsThe results show that: a) the presence of vigorous achalasia is independent of symptoms duration; b) the timing of surgical intervention does not influence the return of peristalsis; and c) the results of a Heller myotomy are independent of symptoms duration.