Pijun Gong
Wuhan University of Technology
Network
Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.
Publication
Featured researches published by Pijun Gong.
Chinese Journal of Catalysis | 2017
Pijun Gong; Junlin Xie; De Fang; Da Han; Feng He; Fengxiang Li; Kai Qi
Abstract α-, β-, δ-, and γ-MnO2 nanocrystals are successfully prepared. We then evaluated the NH3 selective catalytic reduction (SCR) performance of the MnO2 catalysts with different phases. The NOx conversion efficiency decreased in the order: γ-MnO2 > α-MnO2 > δ-MnO2 > β-MnO2. The NOx conversion with the use of γ-MnO2 and α-MnO2 catalysts reached 90% in the temperature range of 140–200 °C, while that based on β-MnO2 reached only 40% at 200 °C. The γ-MnO2 and α-MnO2 nanowire crystal morphologies enabled good dispersion of the catalysts and resulted in a relatively high specific surface area. We found that γ-MnO2 and α-MnO2 possessed stronger reducing abilities and more and stronger acidic sites than the other catalysts. In addition, more chemisorbed oxygen existed on the surface of the γ-MnO2 and α-MnO2 catalysts. The γ-MnO2 and α-MnO2 catalysts showed excellent performance in the low-temperature SCR of NO to N2 with NH3.
Reaction Kinetics, Mechanisms and Catalysis | 2018
Fengxiang Li; Junlin Xie; Haifeng Cui; Pijun Gong; Feng He
A series of Mn/TiO2 catalysts were prepared using different dosage of cetyl trimethyl ammonium bromide (CTAB) and polyethylene glycol (PEG) 600 as surfactants by sol–gel method. When CTAB/Ti and PEG/Ti were 0.075 and 0.13, the morphology of the catalysts exhibited nano rod and regular sphere structure, respectively, and the activity was also the highest. The superior SCR activity of NC(0.075)-Mn/TiO2 and NP(0.13)-Mn/TiO2 catalysts was mainly due to the larger surface area and stronger reduction ability. In addition, it was found that the SCR activity of the catalysts with PEG600 as surfactants was generally higher than that of CTAB as surfactants, which may be due to its advantages in specific surface area, crystallinity, acidity, surface ion and chemisorbed oxygen concentration, and reducibility.
Chinese Materials Conference | 2017
Junlin Xie; Pijun Gong; Zhe Zhang; Feng He; Fengxiang Li; Kai Qi
In this paper, CeO2 was synthesized and used as carrier, meanwhile, MnOx was supported by different methods. The NH3-SCR activity of MnOx/CeO2 at low temperature has also been studied. The results show that the performance of the MnOX/CeO2 catalyst prepared by hydrothermal deposition method (MC-h) can reach up to 80% at 180 ℃, while the impregnation method (MC-i) is only 70% at 180 ℃. Testing results indicate that the catalysts synthesized by the hydrothermal deposition method have larger specific surface area and higher reducibility, and manganese oxide existed in the form of nanorods is more favorable for the contact between the active component and the reactive gas. All of these are beneficial to the SCR reaction.
Chinese Materials Conference | 2017
Fengxiang Li; Junlin Xie; Pijun Gong; Kai Qi; De Fang; Feng He
A series of Fe–S/TiO2 catalysts were prepared at different calcination temperatures by impregnation method and its performance of selective catalytic reduction (SCR) of NO with NH3 was investigated at temperatures ranging from 200 to 400 °C. Fe–S/TiO2-300 °C catalyst showed the highest activity, the NO conversion reaching over 80% in the range of 280–400 °C. With the help of XRD, H2-TPR and NH3-TPD, the structures and properties of catalysts were characterized. With the increase of calcination temperature, the Fe(OH)SO4 content in the catalyst decreased gradually. In addition, When the calcination temperature was below 400 °C, the main crystal phase in the catalyst is Fe(OH)SO4 and FeSO4. However, when it was 500 °C, the crystal phase of the active material became Fe2(SO4)3 and FeSO4. What’s more, the reduction ability of several catalysts showed no much difference, but the surface acidity was quite different, as the acidity of the Fe–S/TiO2-300 °C catalyst was the strongest.
Research on Chemical Intermediates | 2017
Fengxiang Li; Junlin Xie; De Fang; Feng He; Kai Qi; Pijun Gong
Chemical Engineering Journal | 2019
Pijun Gong; Junlin Xie; De Fang; Xiaoqing Liu; Feng He; Fengxiang Li
Powder Technology | 2018
Kai Qi; Junlin Xie; Zhe Zhang; De Fang; Da Han; Xiaoqing Liu; Pijun Gong; Fengxiang Li; Feng He
Materials Research Express | 2018
Pijun Gong; Junlin Xie; De Fang; Feng He; Fengxiang Li
Materials Chemistry and Physics | 2018
Kai Qi; Junlin Xie; De Fang; Xiaoqing Liu; Pijun Gong; Fengxiang Li; Da Han; Feng He
Chemical Engineering Journal | 2018
Kai Qi; Junlin Xie; Hua Hu; Da Han; De Fang; Pijun Gong; Fengxiang Li; Feng He; Xiaoqing Liu