Pinak Chakrabarti

Dissecting protein-protein recognition sites

The recognition sites in 70 pairwise protein–protein complexes of known three‐dimensional structure are dissected in a set of surface patches by clustering atoms at the interface. When the interface buries <2000 Å2 of protein surface, the recognition sites usually form a single patch on the surface of each component protein. In contrast, larger interfaces are generally multipatch, with at least one pair of patches that are equivalent in size to a single‐patch interface. Each recognition site, or patch within a site, contains a core made of buried interface atoms, surrounded by a rim of atoms that remain accessible to solvent in the complex. A simple geometric model reproduces the number and distribution of atoms within a patch. The rim is similar in composition to the rest of the protein surface, but the core has a distinctive amino acid composition, which may help in identifying potential protein recognition sites on single proteins of known structures. Proteins 2002;47:334–343.

Protein-protein interaction and quaternary structure.

Protein-protein recognition plays an essential role in structure and function. Specific non-covalent interactions stabilize the structure of macromolecular assemblies, exemplified in this review by oligomeric proteins and the capsids of icosahedral viruses. They also allow proteins to form complexes that have a very wide range of stability and lifetimes and are involved in all cellular processes. We present some of the structure-based computational methods that have been developed to characterize the quaternary structure of oligomeric proteins and other molecular assemblies and analyze the properties of the interfaces between the subunits. We compare the size, the chemical and amino acid compositions and the atomic packing of the subunit interfaces of protein-protein complexes, oligomeric proteins, viral capsids and protein-nucleic acid complexes. These biologically significant interfaces are generally close-packed, whereas the non-specific interfaces between molecules in protein crystals are loosely packed, an observation that gives a structural basis to specific recognition. A distinction is made within each interface between a core that contains buried atoms and a solvent accessible rim. The core and the rim differ in their amino acid composition and their conservation in evolution, and the distinction helps correlating the structural data with the results of site-directed mutagenesis and in vitro studies of self-assembly.

Dissecting subunit interfaces in homodimeric proteins

The subunit interfaces of 122 homodimers of known three‐dimensional structure are analyzed and dissected into sets of surface patches by clustering atoms at the interface; 70 interfaces are single‐patch, the others have up to six patches, often contributed by different structural domains. The average interface buries 1,940 Å2 of the surface of each monomer, contains one or two patches burying 600–1,600 Å2, is 65% nonpolar and includes 18 hydrogen bonds. However, the range of size and of hydrophobicity is wide among the 122 interfaces. Each interface has a core made of residues with atoms buried in the dimer, surrounded by a rim of residues with atoms that remain accessible to solvent. The core, which constitutes 77% of the interface on average, has an amino acid composition that resembles the protein interior except for the presence of arginine residues, whereas the rim is more like the protein surface. These properties of the interfaces in homodimers, which are permanent assemblies, are compared to those of protein‐protein complexes where the components associate after they have independently folded. On average, subunit interfaces in homodimers are twice larger than in complexes, and much less polar due to the large fraction belonging to the core, although the amino acid compositions of the cores are similar in the two types of interfaces. Proteins 2003.

Conservation and relative importance of residues across protein-protein interfaces

A core region surrounded by a rim characterizes biological interfaces. We ascertain the importance of the core by showing the sequence entropies of the residues comprising the core to be smaller than those in the rim. Such a distinction is not seen in the 2-fold-related, nonphysiological interfaces formed in crystal lattices of monomeric proteins, thereby providing a procedure for characterizing the oligomeric state from crystal structures of protein molecules. This method is better than those that rely on the comparison of the sequence entropies in the interface and the rest of the protein surface, especially in cases where the surface harbors additional binding sites. To a good approximation there is a correlation between the accessible surface area lost because of complexation and ΔΔG values obtained through alanine-scanning mutagenesis (26-38 cal per Å2 of the surface buried) for residues located in the core, a relationship that is not discernable for rim residues. If, however, a residue participates in hydrogen bonding across the interface, the extent of stabilization is 52 cal/mol per 1 Å2 of the nonpolar surface area buried by the residue. As opposed to an amino acid classification used earlier, an environment-based grouping of residues yields a better discrimination in the sequence entropy between the core and the rim.

Hydration of protein–protein interfaces

We present an analysis of the water molecules immobilized at the protein–protein interfaces of 115 homodimeric proteins and 46 protein–protein complexes, and compare them with 173 large crystal packing interfaces representing nonspecific interactions. With an average of 15 waters per 1000 Å2 of interface area, the crystal packing interfaces are more hydrated than the specific interfaces of homodimers and complexes, which have 10–11 waters per 1000 Å2, reflecting the more hydrophilic composition of crystal packing interfaces. Very different patterns of hydration are observed: Water molecules may form a ring around interfaces that remain “dry,” or they may permeate “wet” interfaces. A majority of the specific interfaces are dry and most of the crystal packing interfaces are wet, but counterexamples exist in both categories. Water molecules at interfaces form hydrogen bonds with protein groups, with a preference for the main‐chain carbonyl and the charged side‐chains of Glu, Asp, and Arg. These interactions are essentially the same in specific and nonspecific interfaces, and very similar to those observed elsewhere on the protein surface. Water‐mediated polar interactions are as abundant at the interfaces as direct protein–protein hydrogen bonds, and they may contribute to the stability of the assembly. Proteins 2005.

The interrelationships of side-chain and main-chain conformations in proteins.

The accurate determination of a large number of protein structures by X-ray crystallography makes it possible to conduct a reliable statistical analysis of the distribution of the main-chain and side-chain conformational angles, how these are dependent on residue type, adjacent residue in the sequence, secondary structure, residue-residue interactions and location at the polypeptide chain termini. The interrelationship between the main-chain (phi, psi) and side-chain (chi 1) torsion angles leads to a classification of amino acid residues that simplify the folding alphabet considerably and can be a guide to the design of new proteins or mutational studies. Analyses of residues occurring with disallowed main-chain conformation or with multiple conformations shed some light on why some residues are less favoured in thermophiles.

Contrasting Effect of Gold Nanoparticles and Nanorods with Different Surface Modifications on the Structure and Activity of Bovine Serum Albumin

Nanoparticles exposed to biofluids become coated with proteins, thus making protein-nanoparticle interactions of particular interest. The consequence on protein conformation and activity depends upon the extent of protein adsorption on the nanoparticle surface. We report the interaction of bovine serum albumin (BSA) with gold nanostructures, particularly gold nanoparticles (GNP) and gold nanorods (GNR). The difference in the geometry and surface properties of nanoparticles is manifested during complexation in terms of different binding modes, structural changes, thermodynamic parameters, and the activity of proteins. BSA is found to retain native-like structure and properties upon enthalpy-driven BSA-GNP complexation. On the contrary, the entropically favored BSA-GNR complexation leads to substantial loss in protein secondary and tertiary structures with the release of a large amount of bound water, as indicated by isothermal calorimetry (ITC), circular dichroism (CD), and Fourier transform infrared (FTIR) and fluorescence spectroscopies. The esterase activity assay demonstrated a greater loss in BSA activity after complexation with GNR, whereas the original activity is retained in the presence of GNP. The formation of large assemblies (aggregates) and reduced average lifetime, as evidenced from dynamic light scattering and fluorescence decay measurements, respectively, suggest that GNR induces protein unfolding at its surface. The effect of temperature on the CD spectra of BSA-GNP was found to be similar to that of pristine BSA, whereas BSA-GNR shows distortion in CD spectra at lower wavelengths, strengthening the perception of protein unfolding. High binding constant and entropy change for BSA-GNR complexation determined by ITC are consistent with large surfacial interaction that may lead to protein unfolding. The present work highlights the differential response of a protein depending on the nature of the nanostructure and its surface chemistry, which need to be modulated for controlling the biological responses of nanostructures for their potential biomedical applications.

Non-hydrogen Bond Interactions Involving the Methionine Sulfur Atom †

Abstract Of all the nonbonded interactions, hydrogen bond, because of its geometry involving polar atoms, is the most easily recognizable. Here we characterize two interactions involving the divalent sulfur of methionine (Met) residues that do not need any participation of proton. In one an oxygen atom of the main-chain carbonyl group or a carboxylate side chain is used. In another an aromatic atom interacting along the face of the ring is utilized. In these, the divalent sulfur behaves as an electrophile and the other electron-rich atom, a nucleophile. The stereochemistry of the interaction is such that the nucleophile tends to approach approximately along the extension of one of the covalent bonds to S. The nitrogen atom of histidine side chain is extensively used in these nonbonded contacts. There is no particular geometric pattern in the interaction of S with the edge of an aromatic ring, except when an N-H group in involved, which is found within 40° from the perpendicular to the sulfide plane, thus defining the geometry of hydrogen bond interaction involving the sulfur atom. As most of the Met residues which partake in such stereospecific interactions are buried, these would be important for the stability of the protein core, and their incorporation in the binding site would be useful for molecular recognition and optimization of the sites affinity for partners (especially containing aromatic and heteroaromatic groups). Mutational studies aimed at replacing Met by other residues would benefit from the delineation of these interactions.

Environment of tryptophan side chains in proteins.

Although relatively rare, the tryptophan residue (Trp), with its large hydrophobic surface, has a unique role in the folded structure and the binding site of many proteins, and its fluorescence properties make it very useful in studying the structures and dynamics of protein molecules in solution. An analysis has been made of its environment and the geometry of its interaction with neighbors using 719 Trp residues in 180 different protein structures. The distribution of the number of partners interacting with the Trp aromatic ring shows a peak at 6 (considering protein residues only) and 8 (including water and substrate molecules also). The means of the solvent‐accessible surface areas of the ring show an exponential decrease with the increase in the number of partners; this relationship can be used to assess the efficiency of packing of residues around Trp. Various residues exhibit different propensities of binding the Trp side chain. The aromatic residues, Met and Pro have high values, whereas the smaller and polar‐chain residues have weaker propensities. Most of the interactions are with residues far away in sequence, indicating the importance of Trp in stabilizing the tertiary structure. Of all the ring atoms NE1 shows the highest number of interactions, both along the edge (hydrogen bonding) as well as along the face. Various weak but specific interactions, engendering stability to the protein structure, have been identified. Proteins 2000;38:288–300.

Structure and Activity of Lysozyme on Binding to ZnO Nanoparticles

The interaction between ZnO nanoparticles (NPs) and lysozyme has been studied using calorimetric as well as spectrophotometric techniques, and interpreted in terms of the three-dimensional structure. The circular dichroism spectroscopic data show an increase in alpha-helical content on interaction with ZnO NPs. Glutaraldehyde cross-linking studies indicate that the monomeric form occurs to a greater extent than the dimer when lysozyme is conjugated with ZnO NPs. The enthalpy-driven binding between lysozyme and ZnO possibly involves the region encompassing the active site in the molecule, which is also the site for the dimer formation in a homologous structure. The enzyme retains high fraction of its native structure with negligible effect on its activity upon attachment to NPs. Compared to the free protein, lysozyme-ZnO conjugates are more stable in the presence of chaotropic agents (guanidine hydrochloride and urea) and also at elevated temperatures. The possible site of binding of NP to lysozyme has been proposed to explain these observations. The stability and the retention of a higher level of activity in the presence of the denaturing agent of the NP-conjugated protein may find useful applications in biotechnology ranging from diagnostic to drug delivery.