Piotr M. Starewicz
Dartmouth College
Network
Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.
Publication
Featured researches published by Piotr M. Starewicz.
Medical Physics | 2012
Irving N. Weinberg; Pavel Y. Stepanov; Stanley T. Fricke; Roland Probst; Mario G. Urdaneta; Daniel Warnow; Howard D. Sanders; Steven C. Glidden; Alan McMillan; Piotr M. Starewicz; J. Patrick Reilly
PURPOSE A time-varying magnetic field can cause unpleasant peripheral nerve stimulation (PNS) when the maximum excursion of the magnetic field (ΔB) is above a frequency-dependent threshold level [P. Mansfield and P. R. Harvey, Magn. Reson. Med. 29, 746-758 (1993)]. Clinical and research magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) gradient systems have been designed to avoid such bioeffects by adhering to regulations and guidelines established on the basis of clinical trials. Those trials, generally employing sinusoidal waveforms, tested human responses to magnetic fields at frequencies between 0.5 and 10 kHz [W. Irnich and F. Schmitt, Magn. Reson. Med. 33, 619-623 (1995), T. F. Budinger et al., J. Comput. Assist. Tomogr. 15, 909-914 (1991), and D. J. Schaefer et al., J. Magn. Reson. Imaging 12, 20-29 (2000)]. PNS thresholds for frequencies higher than 10 kHz had been extrapolated, using physiological models [J. P. Reilly et al., IEEE Trans. Biomed. Eng. BME-32(12), 1001-1011 (1985)]. The present study provides experimental data on human PNS thresholds to oscillating magnetic field stimulation from 2 to 183 kHz. Sinusoidal waveforms were employed for several reasons: (1) to facilitate comparison with earlier reports that used sine waves, (2) because prior designers of fast gradient hardware for generalized waveforms (e.g., including trapezoidal pulses) have employed quarter-sine-wave resonant circuits to reduce the rise- and fall-times of pulse waveforms, and (3) because sinusoids are often used in fast pulse sequences (e.g., spiral scans) [S. Nowak, U.S. patent 5,245,287 (14 September 1993) and K. F. King and D. J. Schaefer, J. Magn. Reson. Imaging 12, 164-170 (2000)]. METHODS An IRB-approved prospective clinical trial was performed, involving 26 adults, in which one wrist was exposed to decaying sinusoidal magnetic field pulses at frequencies from 2 to 183 kHz and amplitudes up to 0.4 T. Sham exposures (i.e., with no magnetic fields) were applied to all subjects. RESULTS For 0.4 T pulses at 2, 25, 59, 101, and 183 kHz, stimulation was reported by 22 (84.6%), 24 (92.3%), 15 (57.7%), 2 (7.7%), and 1 (3.8%) subjects, respectively. CONCLUSIONS The probability of PNS due to brief biphasic time-varying sinusoidal magnetic fields with magnetic excursions up to 0.4 T is shown to decrease significantly at and above 101 kHz. This phenomenon may have particular uses in dynamic scenarios (e.g., cardiac imaging) and in studying processes with short decay times (e.g., electron paramagnetic resonance imaging, bone and solids imaging). The study suggests the possibility of new designs for human and preclinical MRI systems that may be useful in clinical practice and scientific research.
Journal of Magnetic Resonance Imaging | 2000
Frank G. Shellock; Malcolm Hatfield; Bruce J. Simon; Spencer Block; Jennifer Wamboldt; Piotr M. Starewicz; William F. B. Punchard
The objective of this investigation was to perform magnetic resonance (MR) imaging safety and artifact testing of an implantable spinal fusion stimulator. Magnetic field interactions, artifacts, and operational aspects of an implantable spinal fusion stimulator were evaluated in association with a 1.5 T MR system. Magnetic field‐related translational attraction was measured using the deflection angle test. A special test apparatus was used to determine torque at 4.7 T. Artifacts were characterized using fast multiplanar spoiled gradient‐echo, T1‐weighted spin‐echo, and T1‐weighted fast spin‐echo sequences. Operational aspects of the implantable spinal fusion stimulator before and after exposure to MR imaging at 1.5 T were assessed. In addition, nine patients (six lumbar spine and three cervical spine) with implantable spinal fusion stimulators underwent MR imaging. The findings indicated that magnetic field interactions were relatively minor, artifacts were well characterized and should not create diagnostic problems, and there were no changes in the operation of the spinal fusion stimulator. The nine patients underwent MR procedures without substantial adverse events or complaints. Based on the results of this investigation and in consideration of the findings from previous studies of MR imaging safety for the implantable spinal fusion stimulator , MR imaging may be performed safely in patients using MR systems operating at 1.5 T or less following specific recommendations and precautions. J. Magn. Reson. Imaging 2000;12:214–223.
ieee international pulsed power conference | 2011
Howard D. Sanders; Steven C. Glidden; Daniel Warnow; Irving N. Weinberg; Pavel Y. Stepanov; Roland Probst; Alan McMillan; Rao P. Gullapalli; Piotr M. Starewicz; William F. B. Punchard; Kai-Ming Lo; Stanley T. Fricke
Pulsed gradient magnetic fields are required for magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). Many imaging sequences (e.g., echo planar imaging, diffusion tensor imaging) could be improved with shorter gradient pulses. MRI systems currently available typically require ramp times of hundreds of microseconds. The goal of the work described here is to achieve very high gradient fields, with very short rise times to peak gradient strength, in order to improve MRI studies while avoiding neuronal stimulation. The magnet driver is capable of generating unipolar and bipolar pulses in a 100µH resistive electromagnet. Pulse rise-times, determined by the value of the initial storage capacitance, as short as 3.5µs and 13µs, with peak currents as high as 700A, have been achieved. The driver operates at up to 9kV and uses an array of opening and closing switches to determine the pulse shape, polarity and magnitude. When generating bipolar pulses, >85% energy in the magnetic field is recovered and reused on the following pulse, significantly reducing operational costs.
Archive | 2000
Andrzej Jesmanowicz; James S. Hyde; William F. B. Punchard; Piotr M. Starewicz
Radiation Protection Dosimetry | 2006
Harold M. Swartz; Akinori Iwasaki; Tadeusz Walczak; Eugene Demidenko; Ildar Salikhov; Nadeem Khan; Piotr Lesniewski; Jerry A. Thomas; Alex Romanyukha; David A. Schauer; Piotr M. Starewicz
Applied Radiation and Isotopes | 2005
Harold M. Swartz; Akinori Iwasaki; Tadeusz Walczak; Eugene Demidenko; Ildar Salikov; Piotr Lesniewski; Piotr M. Starewicz; David A. Schauer; Alex Romanyukha
Archive | 2011
William F. B. Punchard; Kai-Ming Lo; Piotr M. Starewicz; Hoby P. Hetherington
Archive | 2003
Harold M. Swartz; William F. B. Punchard; Piotr M. Starewicz; Tadeusz Walczak
Archive | 2003
Peter Feenan; Rory Warner; William F. B. Punchard; Piotr M. Starewicz
Archive | 2011
Shahin Pourrahimi; Nadder Pourrahimi; William F. B. Punchard; Piotr M. Starewicz