Network


Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.

Hotspot


Dive into the research topics where Poul Andersen is active.

Publication


Featured researches published by Poul Andersen.


Ocean Engineering | 1985

On the calculation of two-dimensional added mass and damping coefficients by simple Green's function technique

Poul Andersen; He Wuzhou

Abstract This paper describes a numerical method for calculating the two-dimensional hydrodynamic coefficients of one or two infinitely long, arbitrary cylinders forced to oscillate in or below the free water surface. The oscillation modes, amplitudes and phases of the cylinders may be different from one another. Finite water depth and a quay can be taken into account. Special consideration has been given to the radiation boundary conditions. The computer program developed has been tested in various two-dimensional boundary situations; it has produced results in good agreement with results obtained by other methods.


Ocean Engineering | 1979

Ship motions and sea loads in restricted water depth

Poul Andersen

Abstract The influence of the sea bottom on ship motions and sea loads is examined. It is described how to calculate the vertical motions and loads for a ship with non-zero forward speed in regular waves by use of sttip theory and fluid finite element method. Results of such calculations are shown. The effects of shallow water are significant as is seen from several figures.


Archive | 2016

Hull-Propeller Interaction and Its Effect on Propeller Cavitation

Pelle Bo Regener; Poul Andersen

Hull-Propeller Interaction and Its Effect on Propeller Cavitation In order to predict the required propulsion power for a ship reliably and accurately, it is not sufficient to only evaluate the resistance of the hull and the propeller performance in open water alone. Interaction effects between hull and propeller can even be a decisive factor in ship powering prediction and design optimization. The hull-propeller interaction coefficients of effective wake fraction, thrust deduction factor, and relative rotative efficiency are traditionally determined by model tests. Self-propulsion model tests consistently show an increase in effective wake fractions when using a Kappel propeller (propellers with a tip smoothly curved towards the suction side of the blade) instead of a propeller with conventional geometry. The effective wake field, i.e. the propeller inflow when it is running behind the ship, but excluding the propellerinduced velocities, can not be measured directly and only its mean value can be determined experimentally from selfpropulsion tests. In the present work the effective wake field is computed using a hybrid simulation method, known as RANS-BEM coupling, where the flow around the ship is computed by numerically solving the Reynolds-averaged Navier–Stokes equations, while the flow around the propeller is computed by a Boundary Element Method. The velocities induced by the propeller working behind the ship are known explicitly in such method, which allows to directly compute the complete effective flow field by subtracting the induced velocities from the total velocities. This offers an opportunity for additional insight into hullpropeller interaction and the propeller’s actual operating condition behind the ship, as the actual (effective) inflow is computed. Self-propulsion simulations at model and full scale were carried out for a bulk carrier, once with a conventional propeller, and once with a Kappel propeller. However, in contrast to the experimental results, neither a significant difference in effective wake fraction nor other notable differences in effective flow were observed in the simulations. It is therefore concluded that the differences observed in model tests are not due to the different radial load distributions of the two propellers. One hypothesis is that the differences are a consequence of the geometry of the vortices shed from the propeller blades. The shape and alignment of these trailing vortices were modeled in a relatively simple way, which presumably does not reflect the differences between the propellers sufficiently. Obtaining effective wake fields using the hybrid RANS-BEM approach at model and full scale also provides the opportunity to investigate the behind-ship cavitation performance of propellers with comparably low computational effort. The boundary element method for propeller analysis includes a partially nonlinear cavitation model, which is able to predict partial sheet cavitation and supercavitation. The cavitation behaviour of the conventional propeller and the Kappel propeller from the earlier simulations was investigated in the behind-ship condition using this model, focusing on the influence of the velocity distribution of the inflow field. Generally, the results agree well with experiments and the calculations are able to reproduce the differences between conventional and Kappel propellers seen in previous experiments. Nominal and effective wake fields at model and full scale were uniformly scaled to reach the same axial wake fraction, so that the only difference lies in the distribution of axial of velocities and in-plane velocity components. Calculations show that details of the velocity distribution have a major effect on propeller cavitation, signifying the importance of using the correct inflow, i.e. the effective wake field when evaluating propeller cavitation performance.


Journal of Physics: Conference Series | 2015

CFD analysis of cloud cavitation on three tip-modified propellers with systematically varied tip geometry

Keun Woo Shin; Poul Andersen

The blade tip loading is often reduced as an effort to restrain sheet and tip vortex cavitation in the design of marine propellers. This CFD analysis demonstrates that an excessive reduction of the tip loading can cause cloud cavitation responsible for much of noise and surface erosion. Detached eddy simulations (DES) are made for cavitating flows on three tip- modified propellers, of which one is a reference propeller having an experimental result from a cavitation tunnel test with a hull model, and the other two are modified from the reference propeller by altering the blade tip loading. DES results have been validated against the experiment in terms of sheet and cloud cavitation. In DES, non-uniform hull wake is modelled by using the inlet flow and momentum sources instead of including a hull model. A 4-bladed Kappel propeller with a smooth tip bending towards the suction side is used as the reference propeller. For the reference propeller, sheet cavitation extends over a whole chord length in the hull wake peak. As the blade gets out of the wake peak, the rear part of sheet cavity is detached in a form of cloud cavitation. For the reference propeller, the tip pitch reduction from the maximum is about 35%. When decreasing the tip pitch reduction to 10%, tip vortex cavitation is formed and cloud cavitation is significantly weakened. When increasing the tip pitch reduction to 60%, sheet cavitation slightly moves to inner radii and cloud cavitation grows larger.


Archive | 1993

Hydrodynamics of Ship Propellers: Sources of figures

John P. Breslin; Poul Andersen

Note: Includes references and index Reference Record created on 2004-09-07, modified on 2016-08-08


Archive | 1993

Hydrodynamics of Ship Propellers: Abbreviations

John P. Breslin; Poul Andersen

Note: Includes references and index Reference Record created on 2004-09-07, modified on 2016-08-08


Archive | 1993

Hydrodynamics of Ship Propellers: Authors cited

John P. Breslin; Poul Andersen

Note: Includes references and index Reference Record created on 2004-09-07, modified on 2016-08-08


Archive | 1996

Hydrodynamics of Ship Propellers

John P. Breslin; Poul Andersen


Marine Structures | 2010

Hydro-elastic analysis and optimization of a composite marine propeller

José Pedro Albergaria Amaral Blasques; Christian Berggreen; Poul Andersen


Archive | 2000

Rudder, Propeller and Hull Interaction by RANS

Claus Daniel Simonsen; Poul Andersen

Collaboration


Dive into the Poul Andersen's collaboration.

Top Co-Authors

Avatar

John P. Breslin

Stevens Institute of Technology

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Jørgen Juncher Jensen

Technical University of Denmark

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Jan Baatrup

Technical University of Denmark

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Christian Berggreen

Technical University of Denmark

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

He Wuzhou

Technical University of Denmark

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Jan Larsen

Technical University of Denmark

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Researchain Logo
Decentralizing Knowledge