Network


Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.

Hotspot


Dive into the research topics where Prabhakar Shrestha is active.

Publication


Featured researches published by Prabhakar Shrestha.


Monthly Weather Review | 2014

A Scale-Consistent Terrestrial Systems Modeling Platform Based on COSMO, CLM, and ParFlow

Prabhakar Shrestha; Mauro Sulis; Matthieu Masbou; Stefan Kollet; Forschungszentrum J; Geoverbund Abc

A highly modular and scale-consistent Terrestrial Systems Modeling Platform (TerrSysMP) is presented. The modeling platform consists of an atmospheric model (Consortium for Small-Scale Modeling; COSMO), a land surface model (the NCARCommunityLand Model,version3.5; CLM3.5), anda 3D variablysaturated groundwater flow model (ParFlow). An external coupler (Ocean Atmosphere Sea Ice Soil, version 3.0; OASIS3) with multiple executable approaches is employed to couple the three independently developed component models, which intrinsically allows for a separation of temporal‐spatial modeling scales and the coupling frequencies between the component models. IdealizedTerrSysMPsimulations arepresented,whichfocuson theinteractionofkey hydrologic processes, like runoff production (excess rainfall and saturation) at different hydrological modeling scales and the drawdown of the water table through groundwater pumping, with processes in the atmospheric boundary layer. The results show a strong linkage between integrated surface‐groundwater dynamics, biogeophysical processes, and boundary layer evolution. The use of the mosaic approach for the hydrological component model (to resolve subgrid-scale topography) impacts simulated runoff production, soil moisture redistribution, and boundary layer evolution, which demonstrates the importance of hydrological modeling scales and thus the advantages of the coupling approach used in this study. Real data simulations were carried out with TerrSysMP over the Rur catchment in Germany. The inclusion oftheintegratedsurface‐groundwaterflowmodelresultsin systematicpatternsin therootzonesoilmoisture, which influence exchange flux distributions and the ensuing atmospheric boundary layer development. In a first comparison to observations, the 3D model compared to the 1D model shows slightly improved predictions of surface fluxes and a strong sensitivity to the initial soil moisture content.


Bulletin of the American Meteorological Society | 2015

Monitoring and Modeling the Terrestrial System from Pores to Catchments: The Transregional Collaborative Research Center on Patterns in the Soil–Vegetation–Atmosphere System

Clemens Simmer; Insa Thiele-Eich; Matthieu Masbou; Wulf Amelung; Heye Bogena; Susanne Crewell; Bernd Diekkrüger; Frank Ewert; Harrie-Jan Hendricks Franssen; Johan Alexander Huisman; Andreas Kemna; Norbert Klitzsch; Stefan Kollet; Matthias Langensiepen; Ulrich Löhnert; A. S. M. Mostaquimur Rahman; Uwe Rascher; Karl Schneider; Jan H. Schween; Yaping Shao; Prabhakar Shrestha; Maik Stiebler; Mauro Sulis; Jan Vanderborght; Harry Vereecken; Jan van der Kruk; Guido Waldhoff; Tanja Zerenner

AbstractMost activities of humankind take place in the transition zone between four compartments of the terrestrial system: the unconfined aquifer, including the unsaturated zone; surface water; vegetation; and atmosphere. The mass, momentum, and heat energy fluxes between these compartments drive their mutual state evolution. Improved understanding of the processes that drive these fluxes is important for climate projections, weather prediction, flood forecasting, water and soil resources management, agriculture, and water quality control. The different transport mechanisms and flow rates within the compartments result in complex patterns on different temporal and spatial scales that make predictions of the terrestrial system challenging for scientists and policy makers. The Transregional Collaborative Research Centre 32 (TR32) was formed in 2007 to integrate monitoring with modeling and data assimilation in order to develop a holistic view of the terrestrial system. TR32 is a long-term research program ...


Journal of the Atmospheric Sciences | 2008

Revisiting Low and List (1982): Evaluation of Raindrop Collision Parameterizations Using Laboratory Observations and Modeling

Ana P. Barros; Olivier P. Prat; Prabhakar Shrestha; Firat Yener Testik; Larry F. Bliven

Abstract Raindrop collision and breakup is a stochastic process that affects the evolution of drop size distributions (DSDs) in precipitating clouds. Low and List have remained the obligatory reference on this matter for almost three decades. Based on a limited number of drop sizes (10), Low and List proposed generalized parameterizations of collisional breakup across the raindrop spectra that are standard building blocks for numerical models of rainfall microphysics. Here, recent laboratory experiments of drop collision at NASA’s Wallops Island Facility (NWIF) using updated high-speed imaging technology with the objective of assessing the generality of Low and List are reported. The experimental fragment size distributions (FSDs) for the collision of selected drop pairs were evaluated against explicit simulations using a dynamical microphysics model (Prat and Barros, with parameterizations based on Low and List updated by McFarquhar). One-to-one comparison of the FSDs shows similar distributions; however...


Journal of Hydrometeorology | 2015

Evaluating the Influence of Plant-Specific Physiological Parameterizations on the Partitioning of Land Surface Energy Fluxes

Mauro Sulis; Matthias Langensiepen; Prabhakar Shrestha; Anke Schickling; Clemens Simmer; Stefan Kollet

Plantphysiologicalpropertieshaveasignificantinfluenceonthepartitioningofradiativeforcing,thespatial and temporal variability of soil water and soil temperature dynamics, and the rate of carbon fixation. Because of the direct impact on latent heat fluxes, these properties may also influence weather-generating processes, such as the evolution of the atmospheric boundary layer (ABL). In this work, crop-specific physiological characteristics, retrieved from detailed field measurements, are included in the biophysical parameterization of the Terrestrial Systems Modeling Platform (TerrSysMP). The physiological parameters for two typical European midlatitudinal crops (sugar beet and winter wheat) are validated using eddy covariance fluxes over multiple years from three measurement sites located in the North Rhine‐Westphalia region of Germany. Comparison with observations and a simulation utilizing the generic crop type shows clear improvements when using the crop-specific physiological characteristics of the plant. In particular, the increase of latent heat fluxes in conjunction with decreased sensible heat fluxes as simulated by the two crops leads to an improved quantification of the diurnal energy partitioning. An independent analysis carried out using estimates of gross primary production reveals that the better agreement between observed and simulated latent heat adopting the plant-specific physiological properties largely stems from an improved simulation of the photosynthesis process. Finally, to evaluate the effects of the crop-specific parameterizations on the ABL dynamics, a series of semi-idealized land‐atmosphere coupled simulations is performed by hypothesizing three cropland configurations. These numerical experiments reveal different heat and moisture budgets of the ABL using the crop-specific physiological properties, which clearly impacts the evolution of the boundary layer.


Journal of Hydrometeorology | 2017

Coupling Groundwater, Vegetation, and Atmospheric Processes: A Comparison of Two Integrated Models

Mauro Sulis; John L. Williams; Prabhakar Shrestha; Malte Diederich; Clemens Simmer; Stefan Kollet; Reed M. Maxwell

AbstractThis study compares two modeling platforms, ParFlow.WRF (PF.WRF) and the Terrestrial Systems Modeling Platform (TerrSysMP), with a common 3D integrated surface–groundwater model to examine the variability in simulated soil–vegetation–atmosphere interactions. Idealized and hindcast simulations over the North Rhine–Westphalia region in western Germany for clear-sky conditions and strong convective precipitation using both modeling platforms are presented. Idealized simulations highlight the strong variability introduced by the difference in land surface parameterizations (e.g., ground evaporation and canopy transpiration) and atmospheric boundary layer (ABL) schemes on the simulated land–atmosphere interactions. Results of the idealized simulations also suggest a different range of sensitivity in the two models of land surface and atmospheric parameterizations to water-table depth fluctuations. For hindcast simulations, both modeling platforms simulate net radiation and cumulative precipitation clos...


Journal of Geophysical Research | 2016

Studying the influence of groundwater representations on land surface‐atmosphere feedbacks during the European heat wave in 2003

Jessica Keune; Fabian Gasper; Klaus Goergen; Andreas Hense; Prabhakar Shrestha; Mauro Sulis; Stefan Kollet

The impact of 3D groundwater dynamics as part of the hydrologic cycle is rarely considered in regional climate simulation experiments. However, there exists a spatial and temporal connection between groundwater and soil moisture near the land surface, which can influence the land surface-atmosphere feedbacks during heat waves. This study assesses the sensitivity of bedrock-to-atmosphere simulations to groundwater representations at the continental scale during the European heat wave 2003 using an integrated fully coupled soil-vegetation-atmosphere model. The analysis is based on the comparison of two groundwater configurations: (1) 3D physics-based variably saturated groundwater dynamics and (2) a 1D free drainage (FD) approach. Furthermore, two different subsurface hydrofacies distributions (HFD) account for the uncertainty of the subsurface hydraulic characteristics, and ensemble simulations address the uncertainty arising from different surface-subsurface initial conditions. The results show that the groundwater representation significantly impacts land surface-atmosphere processes. Differences between the two groundwater configurations follow subsurface patterns, and the largest differences are observed for shallow water table depths. While the physics-based setup is less sensitive to the HFD, the parameterized FD simulations are highly sensitive to the hydraulic characteristics of the subsurface. An analysis of variance shows that both, the groundwater configuration and the HFD, induce variability across all compartments with decreasing impact from the subsurface to the atmosphere, while the initial condition has only a minor impact.


Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics | 2010

Chemical composition and aerosol size distribution of the middle mountain range in the Nepal Himalayas during the 2009 pre-monsoon season

Prabhakar Shrestha; Ana P. Barros; Andrey Khlystov


Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics | 2010

Joint spatial variability of aerosol, clouds and rainfall in the Himalayas from satellite data

Prabhakar Shrestha; Ana P. Barros


Geoscientific Model Development | 2014

Implementation and scaling of the fully coupled Terrestrial Systems Modeling Platform (TerrSysMP v1.0) in a massively parallel supercomputing environment – a case study on JUQUEEN (IBM Blue Gene/Q)

Fabian Gasper; Klaus Goergen; Prabhakar Shrestha; Mauro Sulis; J. Rihani; Markus Geimer; Stefan Kollet


Hydrology and Earth System Sciences | 2015

Impacts of grid resolution on surface energy fluxes simulated with an integrated surface-groundwater flow model

Prabhakar Shrestha; Stefan Kollet; Mauro Sulis; Clemens Simmer

Collaboration


Dive into the Prabhakar Shrestha's collaboration.

Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Stefan Kollet

Forschungszentrum Jülich

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Fabian Gasper

Forschungszentrum Jülich

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Researchain Logo
Decentralizing Knowledge