Prachi K. Dandekar
Hartford Hospital
Network
Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.
Publication
Featured researches published by Prachi K. Dandekar.
The Journal of Clinical Pharmacology | 2003
Joseph L. Kuti; Prachi K. Dandekar; Charles H. Nightingale; David P. Nicolau
Prolonging the infusion of meropenem over 3 hours increases the percentage of the dosing interval that drug concentrations remain above the minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC), there by maximizing the pharmacodynamics of this agent and adhering to drug stability constraints. Monte Carlo simulation was employed to determine pharmacodynamic target attainment rates for several prolonged infusion (PI) meropenem dosage regimens as compared with the traditional 30‐minute infusion (TI) against Enterobacteriaceae, Acinetobacter species, and Pseudomonas aeruginosa populations. Percent time above the MIC (%T>MIC) exposures for 1000 mg TI q8h, 2000 mg TI q8h, 500 mg PI q8h, 1000 mg PI q12h, 1000 mg PI q8h, 2000 mg PI q12h, and 2000 mg PI q8h were simulated for 10,000 subjects. Variability in pharmacokinetic parameters and MIC distributions were derived from studies in healthy volunteers and the MYSTIC surveillance program, respectively. The probabilities of attaining bacteriostatic (30% T>MIC) and bactericidal (50% T>MIC) exposures were high for all dosage regimens against populations of Enterobacteriaceae. Against Acinetobacter species and Pseudomonas aeruginosa, the 2000‐mg PI q8h dosage regimen provided the highest target attainment rates. For mild to moderate infections caused by Enterobacteriaceae, prolonged infusion regimens of 500 mg PI q8h and 1000 mg PI q12h would provide equivalent target attainment rates to the traditional 30‐minute infusion while requiring less drug over 24 hours. For more serious infections presumably caused by Acinetobacter species or Pseudomonas aeruginosa, a dose of 2000 mg PI q8h is recommended because of its high bactericidal target attainment rate against these pathogens. Further study of these dosage recommendations in clinical trials is suggested.
Pharmacotherapy | 2003
Prachi K. Dandekar; Dana Maglio; Christina A. Sutherland; Charles H. Nightingale; David P. Nicolau
Study Objective. To assess the pharmacokinetics of meropenem administered as a 3‐hour infusion.
Chemotherapy | 2005
Christine T. Ong; Prachi K. Dandekar; Christina A. Sutherland; Charlie H. Nightingale; David P. Nicolau
Background: Antimicrobial efficacy is dependent on the ability of the agent to reach the site of infection. To assess the bronchopulmonary drug disposition of a novel ketolide, telithromycin (TEL), the epithelial lining fluid (ELF) and alveolar macrophage (AM) concentrations were utilized as a surrogate marker for lung penetration. Methods: Adult subjects scheduled for diagnostic bronchoscopy received oral TEL 800 mg once daily for 5 days. Plasma and bronchoalveolar lavage (BAL) samples were collected 2, 8, 12, or 24 h after the last TEL dose. TEL concentrations in the ELF and AM were determined using a validated HPLC assay. ELF drug concentrations were calculated using the urea dilution method. Results: Seventeen subjects with a mean age 65 ± 13 years and a mean weight of 81 ± 25 kg completed this open-label study. The median (range) TEL concentrations in plasma and ELF, respectively, were 1.09 mg/l (1.00–4.81) and 3.91 mg/l (2.64–9.59) at 2 h (n = 6), 0.48 and 1.09 mg/l at 8 h (n = 1), 0.65 mg/l (0.18–1.55) and 1.81 mg/l (0.61–10.0) at 12 h (n = 5), and 0.11 mg/l (0.09–0.24) and 0.69 mg/l (0.15–1.58) at 24 h (n = 5). The median AM concentrations obtained from these subjects were 53.35 mg/l at 2 h, 32.55 mg/l at 8 h, 65.96 mg/l at 12 h, and 26.43 mg/l at 24 h. Overall TEL was well tolerated. No discontinuation was required due to an adverse event. Conclusions: TEL displayed high intrapulmonary penetration with ELF concentrations exceeding that of plasma at all time points. AM intracellular concentrations were multiple times higher than in the ELF and plasma. These data support the clinical efficacy of TEL against intracellular and extracellular pathogens, particularly with Streptococcus pneumoniae having an MIC90 well below achievable concentrations at the site of infection.
Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy | 2005
Pamela R. Tessier; Holly M. Mattoes; Prachi K. Dandekar; Charles H. Nightingale; David P. Nicolau
ABSTRACT The new ketolide telithromycin has potent in vitro activity against Streptococcus pneumoniae, including strains resistant to penicillin, macrolides, and fluoroquinolones. The aim of the present study was to define the pharmacodynamic profile of telithromycin against S. pneumoniae strains with various resistance profiles in an in vivo system. Ten S. pneumoniae strains were studied; seven exhibited penicillin resistance, six demonstrated macrolide resistance, and two exhibited gatifloxacin resistance. The telithromycin MICs for all isolates were ≤0.5 μg/ml. Using the murine thigh infection model, CD-1/ICR mice were rendered neutropenic and were then inoculated with 105 to 106 CFU of S. pneumoniae per thigh. Telithromycin was administered orally at doses ranging from 25 to 800 mg/kg of body weight/day, with the doses administered one, two, three, or four times a day. The activity of telithromycin was assessed by determination of the change in the bacterial density in thigh tissue after 24 h of treatment for each treatment group and the untreated controls. Pharmacokinetic studies of telithromycin were conducted in infected, neutropenic animals. The levels of protein binding by telithromycin in mice ranged from 70 to 95% over the observed range of pharmacokinetic concentrations. By using either the total or the free concentrations of telithromycin, the area under the concentration-time curve (AUC)/MIC ratio was a strong determinant of the response against S. pneumoniae, regardless of the phenotypic resistance profile. The maximal efficacy (the 95% effective dose) against this cohort of S. pneumoniae strains and bacterial inhibition (stasis) of telithromycin were predicted by ratios of the AUC for the free drug concentration/MIC of approximately 1,000 and 200, respectively.
Chemotherapy | 2004
Prachi K. Dandekar; Pamela R. Tessier; Peter Williams; Cuilian Zhang; Charlie H. Nightingale; David P. Nicolau
Background: Daptomycin has demonstrated in vitro activity against gram-positive organisms, including Streptococcus pneumoniae. However, the pharmacodynamic (PD) profile of daptomycin is needed to relate the activity of the drug to biologically achievable concentrations. Methods: The PD profile of daptomycin against four S. pneumoniae isolates was determined using the immunocompromised murine thigh model. Due to the high protein binding of this agent, PD parameters were calculated based on free drug exposures. Efficacy was assessed by the change in log colony-forming units (CFU) in thighs after 24 h of drug treatment. Results: Daptomycin produced a 7.1 (95% confidence interval 7.0–7.2) log10 CFU kill. The ratio between overall drug exposure and the minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) (AUC/MIC) was the most predictive of the PD parameters. The S. pneumoniae AUC/MIC required for static effects was 12 (95% confidence interval 10–14). Eighty percent and 99% of maximal kill was achieved at ratios of 35 (95% confidence interval 32–39) and 184 (95% confidence interval 160–208), respectively. Conclusion: Clinically achievable serum drug exposures produced by the lowest dose of daptomycin currently studied in humans (4 mg/kg/day) should result in a potent in vivo bactericidal effect against infections due to S. pneumoniae such as bacteremia, where serum drug concentrations adequately reflect the concentration at the site of infection.
Journal of Antimicrobial Chemotherapy | 2003
Prachi K. Dandekar; Pamela R. Tessier; Peter Williams; Charlie H. Nightingale; David P. Nicolau
Diagnostic Microbiology and Infectious Disease | 2004
Prachi K. Dandekar; Janice Tetreault; John P. Quinn; Charles H. Nightingale; David P. Nicolau
International Journal of Antimicrobial Agents | 2005
Prachi K. Dandekar; Peter Williams; Pamela R. Tessier; David J. Farrell; Charles H. Nightingale; David P. Nicolau
Connecticut medicine | 2002
Prachi K. Dandekar; Richard Quintiliani; Charles H. Nightingale; David P. Nicolau
Connecticut medicine | 2003
Prachi K. Dandekar; Nancy L. Barrett; Charles H. Nightingale; David P. Nicolau