Pradip Das

Diagnostic accuracy of VIA and HPV detection as primary and sequential screening tests in a cervical cancer screening demonstration project in India

Visual inspection after acetic acid application (VIA) and human papillomavirus (HPV) detection tests have been recommended to screen women for cervical cancer in low and middle income countries. A demonstration project in rural India screened 39,740 women with both the tests to compare their accuracies in real population setting. The project also evaluated the model of screening women in the existing primary health care facilities, evaluating the screen positive women with colposcopy (and biopsy) in the same setup and recalling the women diagnosed to have disease for treatment at tertiary center. Accuracy of VIA and HPV test used sequentially was also studied. VIA was performed by trained health workers and Hybrid Capture II (HC II) assay was used for oncogenic HPV detection. Test positivity was 7.1% for VIA and 4.7% for HC II. Detection rate of CIN 3+ disease was significantly higher with HC II than VIA. Sensitivities of VIA and HC II to detect 162 histology proved CIN 3+ lesions were 67.9 and 91.2%, respectively after adjusting for verification bias. Specificity for the same disease outcome and verification bias correction was 93.2% for VIA and 96.9% for HC II. Triaging of VIA positive women with HPV test would have considerably improved the positive predictive value (4.0 to 37.5% to detect CIN 3+) without significant drop in sensitivity. All VIA positive women and 74.0% of HC II positive women had colposcopy. There was high compliance to treatment and significant stage‐shift of the screen‐detected cancers towards more early stage.

Evaluation of downstaging in the detection of cervical neoplasia in Kolkata, India

Unaided visual inspection or “downstaging” has been suggested as a potential alternative method for cervical cancer screening in developing countries. Our study was designed to evaluate the accuracy of downstaging to detect cervical neoplasia in a low‐resource setting. A total of 6,399 women aged 30–64 years were screened with downstaging by trained nonmedical health workers. Two thresholds were used to define positive downstaging: “low threshold” when any visible abnormality on the cervix was considered positive and “high threshold” when selected abnormalities such as bleeding on touch, bleeding erosion, hypertrophied oedematous cervix, congested stippled cervix and growth or ulcer constituted the positive test. All women underwent a colposcopy examination. Biopsies were directed when colposcopy revealed abnormal lesions. True disease status was defined as histologically proven moderate dysplasia and worse lesions. Since all the participants received a diagnostic (reference) investigation (biopsy and/or colposcopy), sensitivity, specificity and predictive values were estimated directly. Low‐ and high‐threshold downstaging were positive in 1,585 (24.8%) and 460 (7.2%) women, respectively. The sensitivities of low‐ and high‐threshold downstaging to detect high‐grade precursors and invasive cancers were 48.9% and 31.9%, respectively. The specificities were 75.8% and 93.3%, respectively. These results indicate that downstaging is not suitable as an independent primary screening modality for cervical neoplasia.

Risk of high grade precancerous lesions and invasive cancers in high risk HPV positive women with normal cervix or CIN 1 at baseline – a population based cohort study

Infection with high‐risk human papillomavirus (HR‐HPV) is transient and clears on its own in majority of the women. Only a few women who have persistent infection may finally develop cervical intraepithelial neoplasia (CIN) or cervical cancer in later years. The risk of progression in the HR‐HPV‐positive women with normal cervix or low‐grade lesion on colposcopy and histopathology at baseline is less studied. We performed a longitudinal study on 650 HR‐HPV‐positive women with colposcopy and/or histopathology‐proved normal or CIN1 diagnosis at baseline to assess the cumulative risk of development of high‐grade CIN. After a mean follow‐up of 2.1 person years of observation (PYO) (range 0.1–5.1), the cumulative incidence of CIN2+ (6.4%; 3.0/100 PYO) was significantly higher in women who had persistent HR‐HPV infection compared to those who cleared the infection (adjusted HR 6.28; 95% CI 2.87–13.73). The risk of viral persistence in women aged 50–60 years was two times higher compared to women aged 40–49 years and three times higher compared to women aged 30–39 years. The probability of having persistent infection increased progressively with higher viral load at baseline (adjusted HR 3.29, 95% CI 2.21–4.90 for RLU ≥100; adjusted HR 2.69, 95% CI 1.71–4.22 for RLU 10–100). Women with increasing viral load at follow‐up had four times higher risk of developing CIN2 or worse lesions as compared to those with decreasing load (20.9% vs 4.8%; p < 0.001). In the context of developing countries where cytology or genotyping triaging is not feasible, colposcopy referral of HR‐HPV‐positive women with advancing age, viral persistence, and increasing viral load may be considered.

Extra-Genital Bowen’s Disease on Abdomen Co-existing with Vulvar Intraepithelial Neoplasia

Bowen’s disease was first described by the American dermatologist Dr. John T Bowen in 1912 as a form of intraepidermal squamous cell carcinoma in situ of the genital region [1]. However, the International Society for Study of Vulvar Disease (ISSVD) in the latest classification of the neoplastic conditions of vulva has included Bowen’s disease in the group of vulvar premalignant lesions termed as vulvar intraepithelial neoplasia (VIN). Lesions which have gross and histopathological appearance similar to Bowen’s disease have been reported infrequently in the non-genital areas. This is known as extra-genital Bowen’s disease (EGBD). Such lesions have been described in the exposed parts of the Dr. Dipanwita Banerjee is Consultant; Dr. Ishita Ghosh is Research Scholar; Dr. Pradip Das is General Duty Medical Officer; Dr. Ranajit Mandal is Associate Professor and Head of the Department, Department of Gynecologic Oncology, Dr. Partha Basu works in Screening Group, Early Detection and Prevention Section, International Agency for Research on Cancer (WHO), Lyon, France.