Prashant Pandey

Quality evaluation of four hemoglobin screening methods in a blood donor setting along with their comparative cost analysis in an Indian scenario

Background: Despite the wide range of methods available for measurement of hemoglobin, no single technique has emerged as the most appropriate and ideal for a blood donation setup. Materials and Methods: A prospective study utilizing 1014 blood samples was carried out in a blood donation setting for quality evaluation of four methods of hemoglobin estimation along with cost analysis: Hematology cell analyzer (reference), HCS, CuSO4 method and HemoCue. Results: Mean value of HemoCue (mean ± SD = 14.7 ± 1.49 g/dl) was higher by 0.24 compared to reference (mean ± SD = 13.8 ± 1.52 g/dl) but not statistically significant ( P > 0.05). HemoCue proved to be the best technique (sensitivity 99.4% and specificity 84.4%) whereas HCS was most subjective with 25.2% incorrect estimations. CuSO4 proved to be good with 7.9% false results. Comparative cost analysis of each method was calculated to be 35 INR/test for HemoCue, 0.76 INR /test for HCS and 0.06-0.08 INR /test for CuSO4. Conclusion: CuSO4 method gives accurate results, if strict quality control is applied. HemoCue is too expensive to be used as a primary screening method in an economically restricted country like India.

Transfusion-associated immunomodulation: Quantitative changes in cytokines as a measure of immune responsiveness after one time blood transfusion in neurosurgery patients

Very few studies in humans have investigated the laboratory evidences suggestive of transfusion-associated immunologic changes. In this prospective study, we examined the effects of perioperative blood transfusion on immune response, by measuring various cytokines production, namely, interferon-gamma (IFN-γ), interleukin-10 (IL-10), and Fas Ligand (FasL). A total of 40 patients undergoing neurosurgery were randomly allocated into four groups: (a) no transfusion, (b) allogeneic non-leukofiltered transfusion, (c) prestorage leukofiltered transfusion, (d) autologous transfusion. Samples were collected before operation (day 0) and postoperative days (post-op) 1, 7, and 14. IFN-γ and IL-10 production capacity was measured in supernatant after whole blood culture and serum FasL levels in patients’ sera using commercially available ELISA kits. Change in ratios (cytokine value after PHA stimulation/control value) of IFN-γ and IL-10 and percentage change from baseline for serum FasL levels across different transfusion groups during the sampling period were calculated. There was an increase in IL-10 production in patients receiving allogeneic non-leukofiltered transfusion on days 1 and 7 (mean ratio 2.22 (± 2.16), 4.12 (± 1.71), 4.46 (± 1.97) on days 0, 1, and 7, respectively). Similarly there was a significant (P<0.05) decrease in IFN-γ production in patients who received allogeneic non-leukofiltered red cell transfusion on post-op days 1, 7, and 14 (mean ratio 6.88 (± 4.56), 2.53 (± 0.95), 3.04 (± 1.38) and 2.58 (± 1.48) on day 0, 1, 7, and 14, respectively). Serum FasL production was increased across all patients till 7th day except for ‘no transfusion’ group and this increase was most significant in the non-leukofiltered group. We conclude that one time transfusion leads to quantitative changes in levels of these cytokines largely through interplay of Th2/Th1 pathways in allogeneic nonleukofiltered blood transfusion; however, soluble mediators like FasL which are also present in autologous and leukofiltered blood products may contribute toward minor immunologic effect in these settings.

A 3‐year analysis of plateletpheresis donor deferral pattern in a tertiary health care institute: Assessing the current donor selection criteria in Indian scenario

Introduction: This study reports the frequency and nature of plateletpheresis deferrals and evaluates donors with low platelet count and hemoglobin levels so as to assess the possibility of reentry without hampering donor safety. Materials and methods: Three‐year retrospective data of plateletpheresis deferral was collected. Data from actual procedures was also reviewed to analyze the safety of performing plateletpheresis in donors with low hemoglobin and platelet values. Results: Four hundred sixteen donors were deferred for various reasons among 1,515 screened (27.5%), of which 69.7% deferrals were because of low platelet count (55.8%) and less hemoglobin levels. Among the low platelet count donor group, 20.3% had a count between 141 and 149 × 109/L and 41.8% below 120 × 109/L. Of the 14% donors deferred for low hemoglobin, 62.1% had values in the range of 11.5–12.4 g/dL with normal mean corpuscular volume and red cell distribution width in most (86.2%) of them. Expected blood loss in each procedure varied between 20 and 30 mL, whereas RBC contamination in the product varied from 0 to 1.6 mL in 538 procedures. There were 176 donations with predonation platelet count <180 × 109/L (32.7%). None of the 14 procedures performed on donors with platelet count of 150 × 109/L showed evidence of thrombocytopenia or donor reaction. Conclusion: Lowering the cut‐off value for plateletpheresis from 12.5 g/dL to 11.5 g/dL has no deleterious effect on donor safety as the blood loss is minimal. One‐fifth deferrals can be reconsidered if the criteria of plateletpheresis donor selection are relaxed for hemoglobin and platelet count. J. Clin. Apheresis, 2008.

Errors reported in cross match laboratory: A prospective data analysis

BACKGROUND Human errors contribute to one half of all ABO-incompatible transfusions and transfusion-associated fatalities. MATERIAL AND METHODS We report distribution, type and frequency of errors through a prospective study designed specifically to determine errors reported in the cross match lab with their clinical outcome, and to investigate the contributing factors, and underlying system problems. RESULTS A total of 342 errors (6.2 per 1000 samples) were reported with majority of the errors being clerical (87.1%) and occurred outside the blood bank (86.5%). Labelling errors were the most frequent incidents encountered with bedside being the major site of deviation. The rate of labeling errors was 6.4 errors per 1000 samples (0.64%) in 32,189 samples studied. Among 80,100 components transfused, the frequency of incorrect blood component transfusion (IBCT) was estimated to be 22.5/100,000 blood components transfused. Miscollected samples (WBIT) occurred at a rate of 1 in 1532 samples (0.65 per 1000 samples). More than half of these errors occurred during the day shift (9 errors per 1000 request form) but more with urgent demands (11 errors per 1000 request form). CONCLUSION This study indicates the importance of proper specimen labeling and implemented cost-effective, non-compromising policy of rejecting each mislabelled specimen and realises the importance of ongoing quality monitoring to improve laboratory performance.

Autologous peripheral blood stem cell harvest: Collection efficiency and factors affecting it

Background: Harvest of hematopoietic progenitor cells via leukapheresis is being used increasingly for transplants in India. Adequate yield of cells per kilogram body weight of recipient is required for successful engraftment. Collection efficiency (CE) is an objective quality parameter used to assess the quality of leukapheresis program. In this study, we calculated the CE of the ComTec cell separator (Fresenius Kabi, Germany) using two different formulae (CE1 and CE2) and analyzed various patient and procedural factors, which may affect it. Materials and Methods: One hundred and one consecutive procedures in 77 autologous donors carried out over 3 years period were retrospectively reviewed. Various characteristics like gender, age, weight, disease status, hematocrit, preprocedure total leukocyte count, preprocedure CD34 positive (CD34+) cells count, preprocedure absolute CD34+ cell count and processed apheresis volume effect on CE were compared. CE for each procedure was calculated using two different formulae, and results were compared using statistical correlation and regression analysis. Results: The mean CE1 and CE2 was 41.2 and 49.1, respectively. CE2 appeared to be more accurate indicator of overall CE as it considered the impact of continued mobilization of stem cells during apheresis procedure, itself. Of all the factors affecting CE, preprocedure absolute CD34+ was the only independent factor affecting CE. Conclusion: The only factor affecting CE was preprocedure absolute CD34+ cells. Though the mean CE2 was higher than CE1, it was not statistically significant.

Change in therapeutic apheresis practices: Role of continuing medical education (CME)

American society for apheresis (ASFA) publishes guidelines for therapeutic apheresis (TA) and physicians ordering TA procedures should be aware of the appropriate indications based on scientific evidence. Transfusion Medicine specialists (apheresis physicians) can steer physicians in right direction through CME on right indications, duration of therapy and replacement fluid. Therefore, authors reviewed, collated, and interpreted effect of formal CME interventions.

Approach to a case of multiple irregular red cell antibodies in a liver transplant recipient: Need for developing competence

Liver transplant procedure acts as a challenge for transfusion services in terms of specialized blood components, serologic problems, and immunologic effects of transfusion. Red cell alloimmunization in patients awaiting a liver transplant complicate the process by undue delay or unavailability of compatible red blood cell units. Compatible blood units can be provided by well-equipped immunohematology laboratory, which has expertise in resolving these serological problems. This report illustrates resolution of a case with multiple alloantibodies using standard techniques, particularly rare antisera. Our case re-emphasizes the need for universal antibody screening in all patients as part of pretransfusion testing, which helps to identify atypical antibodies and plan for appropriate transfusion support well in time. We recommend that the centers, especially the ones that perform complex procedures like solid organ transplants and hematological transplants should have the necessary immunohematological reagents including rare antisera to resolve complex cases of multiple antibodies as illustrated in this case.