Network


Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.

Hotspot


Dive into the research topics where Preet K. Dhillon is active.

Publication


Featured researches published by Preet K. Dhillon.


Lancet Oncology | 2014

Evidence-informed frameworks for cost-effective cancer care and prevention in low, middle, and high-income countries

Kalipso Chalkidou; Patricio Marquez; Preet K. Dhillon; Yot Teerawattananon; Thunyarat Anothaisintawee; Carlos Augusto Grabois Gadelha; Richard Sullivan

Evidence-informed frameworks for cost-effective cancer prevention and management are essential for delivering equitable outcomes and tackling the growing burden of cancer in all resource settings. Evidence can help address the demand side pressures (ie, pressures exerted by people who need care) faced by economies with high, middle, and low incomes, particularly in the context of transitioning towards (or sustaining) universal health-care coverage. Strong systems, as opposed to technology-based solutions, can drive the development and implementation of evidence-informed frameworks for prevention and management of cancer in an equitable and affordable way. For this to succeed, different stakeholders-including national governments, global donors, the commercial sector, and service delivery institutions-must work together to address the growing burden of cancer across economies of low, middle, and high income.


International Journal of Epidemiology | 2012

Status of epidemiology in the WHO South-East Asia region: burden of disease, determinants of health and epidemiological research, workforce and training capacity

Preet K. Dhillon; Panniyammakal Jeemon; Narendra K Arora; Prashant Mathur; Mahesh Maskey; Ratna Djuwita Sukirna; Dorairaj Prabhakaran

BACKGROUND The South-East Asia region (SEAR) accounts for one-quarter of the worlds population, 40% of the global poor and ∼30% of the global disease burden, with a disproportionately large share of tuberculosis (35%), injuries (30%), maternal (33%) and <5-year-old mortality (30%). In this article, we describe the disease burden and status of epidemiological research and capacity in the SEAR to understand, analyse and develop capacity in response to the diverse burdens of diseases in the region. METHODS Data on morbidity, mortality, risk factors, social determinants, research capacity, health education, workforce and systems in the SEAR were obtained using global data on burden of disease, peer-reviewed journals, World Health Organization (WHO) technical and advisory reports, and where available, validated country reports and key informants from the region. RESULTS SEAR countries are afflicted with a triple burden of disease-infectious diseases, non-communicable diseases and injuries. Of the seven WHO regions, SEAR countries account for the highest proportion of global mortality (26%) and due to relatively younger ages at death, the second highest percentage of total years of life lost (30%). The SEAR exceeds the global average annual mortality rate for all three broad cause groupings-communicable, maternal, perinatal and nutritional conditions (334 vs 230 per 100 000); non-communicable diseases (676 vs 573 per 100 000); and injuries (101 vs 78 per 100 000). Poverty, education and other social determinants of health are strongly linked to inequities in health among SEAR countries and within socio-economic subgroups. India, Thailand and Bangladesh produce two-thirds of epidemiology publications in the region. Significant efforts to increase health workforce capacity, research and training have been undertaken in the region, yet considerable heterogeneity in resources and capacity remains. CONCLUSIONS Health systems, statistics and surveillance programmes must respond to the demographic, economic and epidemiological transitions that define the current disease burden and risk profile of SEAR populations. Inequities in health must be critically analysed, documented and addressed through multi-sectoral approaches. There is a critical need to improve public health intelligence by building epidemiological capacity in the region.


Lancet Oncology | 2014

Cancer research in India: national priorities, global results

Richard Sullivan; Rajendra A. Badwe; Goura K. Rath; C.S. Pramesh; Viswanathan Shanta; Raghunadharao Digumarti; Anil D'Cruz; Suresh C. Sharma; Lokesh Viswanath; Arun Shet; Manavalan Vijayakumar; Grant Lewison; Mammen Chandy; Priyadarshini Kulkarni; M R Bardia; Shaleen Kumar; Rajiv Sarin; Paul Sebastian; Preet K. Dhillon; Preetha Rajaraman; Edward L. Trimble; Ajay Aggarwal; D K Vijaykumar; Arnie Purushotham

Over the past 20 years, cancer research in India has grown in size and impact. Clinicians, scientists, and government and state policy makers in India have championed cancer research, from studies to achieve low-tech, large-scale health outcomes to some of the most advanced areas of fundamental cancer science. In this paper, we frame public policy discussions about cancer with use of an in-depth analysis of research publications from India. Cancer research in India is a complex environment that needs to balance public policy across many competing agendas. We identify major needs across these environments such as those for increased research capacity and training and protected time for clinical researchers; for more support from states and enhanced collaborative funding programmes from government; for development of national infrastructures across a range of domains (ie, clinical trials, tissue banking, registries, etc); and for a streamlined and rational regulatory environment. We also discuss improvements that should be made to translate research into improvements in cancer outcomes and public health.


PLOS ONE | 2014

The Association between a Vegetarian Diet and Cardiovascular Disease (CVD) Risk Factors in India: The Indian Migration Study

Krithiga Shridhar; Preet K. Dhillon; Liza Bowen; Sanjay Kinra; A. V. Bharathi; Dorairaj Prabhakaran; Kolli Srinath Reddy; Shah Ebrahim

Background Studies in the West have shown lower cardiovascular disease (CVD) risk among people taking a vegetarian diet, but these findings may be confounded and only a minority selects these diets. We evaluated the association between vegetarian diets (chosen by 35%) and CVD risk factors across four regions of India. Methods Study participants included urban migrants, their rural siblings and urban residents, of the Indian Migration Study from Lucknow, Nagpur, Hyderabad and Bangalore (n = 6555, mean age-40.9 yrs). Information on diet (validated interviewer-administered semi-quantitative food frequency questionnaire), tobacco, alcohol, physical history, medical history, as well as blood pressure, fasting blood and anthropometric measurements were collected. Vegetarians ate no eggs, fish, poultry or meat. Using robust standard error multivariate linear regression models, we investigated the association of vegetarian diets with blood cholesterol, low density lipoprotein (LDL), high density lipoprotein (HDL), triglycerides, fasting blood glucose (FBG), systolic (SBP) and diastolic blood pressure (DBP). Results Vegetarians (32.8% of the study population) did not differ from non-vegetarians with respect to age, use of smokeless tobacco, body mass index, and prevalence of diabetes or hypertension. Vegetarians had a higher standard of living and were less likely to smoke, drink alcohol (p<0.0001) and were less physically active (p = 0.04). In multivariate analysis, vegetarians had lower levels of total cholesterol (β = −0.1 mmol/L (95% CI: −0.03 to −0.2), p = 0.006), triglycerides (β = −0.05 mmol/L (95% CI: −0.007 to −0.01), p = 0.02), LDL (β = −0.06 mmol/L (95% CI: −0.005 to −0.1), p = 0.03) and lower DBP (β = −0.7 mmHg (95% CI: −1.2 to −0.07), p = 0.02). Vegetarians also had decreases in SBP (β = −0.9 mmHg (95% CI: −1.9 to 0.08), p = 0.07) and FBG level (β = −0.07 mmol/L (95% CI: −0.2 to 0.01), p = 0.09) when compared to non-vegetarians. Conclusion We found beneficial association of vegetarian diet with cardiovascular risk factors compared to non-vegetarian diet.


Lancet Oncology | 2015

Recommendations for screening and early detection of common cancers in India

Preetha Rajaraman; Benjamin O. Anderson; Partha Basu; Jerome L. Belinson; Anil D’Cruz; Preet K. Dhillon; Prakash C. Gupta; Tenkasi S Jawahar; Niranjan Joshi; Uma Kailash; Sharon Kapambwe; Vishwa Mohan Katoch; Suneeta Krishnan; Dharitri Panda; Rengaswamy Sankaranarayanan; Jerard Selvam; Keerti V. Shah; Surendra Shastri; Krithiga Shridhar; Maqsood Siddiqi; Sudha Sivaram; Tulika Seth; Anurag Srivastava; Edward L. Trimble; Ravi Mehrotra

Cancers of the breast, uterine cervix, and lip or oral cavity are three of the most common malignancies in India. Together, they account for about 34% of more than 1 million individuals diagnosed with cancer in India each year. At each of these cancer sites, tumours are detectable at early stages when they are most likely to be cured with standard treatment protocols. Recognising the key role that effective early detection and screening programmes could have in reducing the cancer burden, the Indian Institute for Cytology and Preventive Oncology, in collaboration with the US National Cancer Institute Center for Global Health, held a workshop to summarise feasible options and relevant evidence for screening and early detection of common cancers in India. The evidence-based recommendations provided in this Review are intended to act as a guide for policy makers, clinicians, and public health practitioners who are developing and implementing strategies in cancer control for the three most common cancers in India.


European Journal of Cancer | 2015

A review of breast cancer awareness among women in India: Cancer literate or awareness deficit?

Adyya Gupta; K. Shridhar; Preet K. Dhillon

Background Breast cancer is the most common female cancer worldwide including India, where advanced stages at diagnosis, and rising incidence and mortality rates, make it essential to understand cancer literacy in women. We conducted a literature review to evaluate the awareness levels of risk factors for breast cancer among Indian women and health professionals. Methods A structured literature search using combined keywords was undertaken on bibliographic databases including MEDLINE, Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health (CINAHL) and SCOPUS. Searches were restricted to research published in English language peer-reviewed journals through December, 2014 in India. Results A total of 7066 women aged 15–70 years showed varied levels of awareness on risk factors such as family history (13–58%), reproductive history (1–88%) and obesity (11–51%). Literacy levels on risk factors did not improve over the 8-year period (2005–2013). On average, nurses reported higher, though still varied, awareness levels for risk factors such as family history (40.8–98%), reproductive history (21–90%) and obesity (34–6%). Awareness levels were not consistently higher for the stronger determinants of risk. Conclusion Our review revealed low cancer literacy of breast cancer risk factors among Indian women, irrespective of their socio-economic and educational background. There is an urgent need for nation- and state-wide awareness programmes, engaging multiple stakeholders of society and the health system, to help improve cancer literacy in India.


Oral Oncology | 2016

DNA methylation markers for oral pre-cancer progression: A critical review

Krithiga Shridhar; Gagandeep Kaur Walia; Aastha Aggarwal; Smriti Gulati; A.V. Geetha; Dorairaj Prabhakaran; Preet K. Dhillon; Preetha Rajaraman

Graphical abstract


Cancer Epidemiology | 2012

Increase in breast cancer incidence among older women in Mumbai: 30-Year trends and predictions to 2025

Rajesh Dikshit; Bb Yeole; Rajini Nagrani; Preet K. Dhillon; Rajan Badwe; Freddie Bray

BACKGROUND Increasing trends in the incidence of breast cancer have been observed in India, including Mumbai. These have likely stemmed from an increasing adoption of lifestyle factors more akin to those commonly observed in westernized countries. Analyses of breast cancer trends and corresponding estimation of the future burden are necessary to better plan rationale cancer control programmes within the country. METHODS We used data from the population-based Mumbai Cancer Registry to study time trends in breast cancer incidence rates 1976-2005 and stratified them according to younger (25-49) and older age group (50-74). Age-period-cohort models were fitted and the net drift used as a measure of the estimated annual percentage change (EAPC). Age-period-cohort models and population projections were used to predict the age-adjusted rates and number of breast cancer cases circa 2025. RESULTS Breast cancer incidence increased significantly among older women over three decades (EAPC = 1.6%; 95% CI 1.1-2.0), while lesser but significant 1% increase in incidence among younger women was observed (EAPC = 1.0; 95% CI 0.2-1.8). Non-linear period and cohort effects were observed; a trends-based model predicted a close-to-doubling of incident cases by 2025 from 1300 mean cases per annum in 2001-2005 to over 2500 cases in 2021-2025. CONCLUSIONS The incidence of breast cancer has increased in Mumbai during last two to three decades, with increases greater among older women. The number of breast cancer cases is predicted to double to over 2500 cases, the vast majority affecting older women.


Asian Pacific Journal of Cancer Prevention | 2015

Breast Cancer Awareness at the Community Level among Women in Delhi, India

Subhojit Dey; Arti Mishra; Jyotsna Govil; Preet K. Dhillon

BACKGROUND To assess womens awareness from diverse sections of society in Delhi regarding various aspects of breast cancer (BC)--perceptions, signs and symptoms, risk factors, prevention, screening and treatment. MATERIALS AND METHODS Community-level survey was undertaken in association with the Indian Cancer Society (ICS), Delhi during May 2013-March 2014. Women attending BC awareness workshops by ICS were given self-administered questionnaires before the workshop in the local language to assess BC literacy. Information provided by 2017 women was converted into awareness scores (aware=1) for analysis using SPSS. Awareness scores were dichotomized with median score=19 as cut off, create more aware and less aware categories. Bivariate and multivariate analysis provided P-values, odds ratios (ORs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs). RESULTS Broadly, 53.4% women were aware about various aspects of BC. Notably, 49.1% women believed that BC was incurable and 73.9% women believed pain to be an initial BC symptom. Only 34.9% women performed breast self-examination (BSE) and 6.9% women had undergone clinical breast-examination/mammography. 40.5% women had higher awareness (awareness score>median score of 19), which was associated with education [graduates (OR=2.31; 95%CI=1.78, 3.16), post-graduates (OR=7.06; 95%CI=4.14, 12.05) compared to ≤high school] and socio-economic status (SES) [low-middle (OR=4.20; 95%CI=2.72, 6.49), middle (OR=6.00; 95%CI=3.82, 9.42) and upper (OR=6.97; 95%CI=4.10, 11.84) compared to low SES]. CONCLUSIONS BC awareness of women in Delhi was suboptimal and was associated with low SES and education. Awareness must be drastically increased via community outreach and use of media as a first step in the fight against BC.


Cancer Causes & Control | 2015

Report from a symposium on catalyzing primary and secondary prevention of cancer in India.

Suneeta Krishnan; Preet K. Dhillon; Afsan Bhadelia; Anna Schurmann; Partha Basu; Neerja Bhatla; Praveen Birur; Rajeev Colaco; Subhojit Dey; Surbhi Grover; Harmala Gupta; Rakesh Gupta; Vandana Gupta; Megan A. Lewis; Ravi Mehrotra; Ann McMikel; Arnab Mukherji; Navami Naik; Laura Nyblade; Sanghamitra Pati; M. Radhakrishna Pillai; Preetha Rajaraman; Chalurvarayaswamy Ramesh; Gayatri Rath; Richard Reithinger; Rengaswamy Sankaranarayanan; Jerard Selvam; M. S. Shanmugam; Krithiga Shridhar; Maqsood Siddiqi

AbstractPurposeOral, breast, and cervical cancers are amenable to early detection and account for a third of India’s cancer burden. We convened a symposium of diverse stakeholders to identify gaps in evidence, policy, and advocacy for the primary and secondary prevention of these cancers and recommendations to accelerate these efforts. MethodsIndian and global experts from government, academia, private sector (health care, media), donor organizations, and civil society (including cancer survivors and patient advocates) presented and discussed challenges and solutions related to strategic communication and implementation of prevention, early detection, and treatment linkages.ResultsInnovative approaches to implementing and scaling up primary and secondary prevention were discussed using examples from India and elsewhere in the world. Participants also reflected on existing global guidelines and national cancer prevention policies and experiences.ConclusionsSymposium participants proposed implementation-focused research, advocacy, and policy/program priorities to strengthen primary and secondary prevention efforts in India to address the burden of oral, breast, and cervical cancers and improve survival.

Collaboration


Dive into the Preet K. Dhillon's collaboration.

Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Krithiga Shridhar

Public Health Foundation of India

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Preetha Rajaraman

National Institutes of Health

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Dorairaj Prabhakaran

Public Health Foundation of India

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Edward L. Trimble

United States Department of Health and Human Services

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

A. V. Bharathi

Indira Gandhi National Open University

View shared research outputs
Researchain Logo
Decentralizing Knowledge