Priti Bajaj

Osteoarthritis and its association with muscle hyperalgesia: an experimental controlled study.

&NA; Hypertonic saline effectively excites muscle nociceptors. Muscle hyperalgesia was assessed in osteoarthritis (OA) by intramuscular infusion of 0.5 ml hypertonic saline (6%) into the tibialis anterior muscle in humans. Patients (n=14) with OA in the lower extremities were compared with an equal number of age‐ and sex‐matched healthy controls. Ten of the 14 OA patients had pain in the knee joint as the most common presenting complaint. Visual analogue scale (VAS) pain intensity and assessment of pain areas were recorded before infusion and immediately, 2, 5, 10 and 20 min after infusion, and then every 10 min, until the pain vanished. The mean pain offset time in OA patients (11.3±7.9 min) was larger as compared with the control subjects (6.04±2.1 min) (P=0.025). OA patients had increased pain intensity VAS after the infusion in the right leg compared with controls (P<0.05). Referred and radiating pain areas at 2 min post‐infusion increased in OA patients and not in controls as compared with the local pain areas (P<0.05). It is concluded that muscle hyperalgesia and extended pain areas might be due to central sensitization caused by painful osteoarthritis.

Endometriosis Is Associated With Central Sensitization: A Psychophysical Controlled Study

Endometriosis is a pain syndrome representing a major cause of pelvic pain in women of reproductive age. The aim of this study was to test the hypothesis that persistent nociceptive input from endometriotic tissues leads to central sensitization manifested by somatic hyperalgesia and increased referred pain areas to experimental saline-induced muscle pain in patients with endometriosis, compared to healthy control subjects. Ten women with laparoscopically confirmed endometriosis and 10 healthy, age-matched women participated in the study. Hypertonic saline (0.5 mL, 5.8%) was injected intramuscularly, in random succession, into 1 site of menstrual pain referral (the multifidus muscle at the low back) and into 1 non-pain control site (first dorsal interosseous muscle [FDI] of the hand). The post-saline pain intensity and pain areas at the FDI were significantly greater in patients with endometriosis than in control subjects (P <.05) but were not different between the groups for the back. An absence of enhancement of post-saline pain responses at the back in the endometriosis group suggests that saline-induced pain at the back appears to activate segmental inhibitory systems in patients with endometriosis. Manifestation of central sensitization in women with endometriosis is demonstrated by increased muscle nociceptor input in the form of increased post-saline pain intensity, pain areas at the FDI, and hypersensitivity to pressure stimulation. These findings provide new insights into the complex pain mechanisms associated with endometriosis.

Mechanomyography and electromyography force relationships during concentric, isometric and eccentric contractions

The purpose of this study was to investigate systematically if complementary knowledge could be obtained from the recordings of electromyography (EMG) and mechanomyography (MMG) signals. EMG and MMG activities were recorded from the first dorsal interosseous muscle during slow concentric, isometric, and eccentric contraction at 0, 25, 50, 75 and 100% of the maximal voluntary contraction (MVC). The combination of the EMG and MMG recordings during voluntary concentric-isometric-eccentric contraction showed significant different non-linear EMG/force and MMG/force relationships (P<0.001). The EMG root mean square (rms) values increased significantly from 0 to 50% MVC during concentric and isometric contraction and up to 75% MVC during eccentric contraction (P<0.05). The MMG rms values increased significantly from 0 to 50% MVC during concentric contraction (P<0.05). The non-linear relationships depended mainly on the type and the level of contraction together with the angular velocity. Furthermore, the type of contraction, the contraction level, and the angular velocity influenced the electromechanical efficiency evaluated as the MMG to EMG ratio (P<0.05). These results highlight that EMG and MMG provide complementary information about the electrical and mechanical activity of the muscle. Different activation strategies seem to be used during graded isometric and anisometric contraction.

Health related quality of life and quantitative pain measurement in females with chronic non-malignant pain

The aim of the present study was to assess, compare, and correlate the pain response to an experimental pain stimulus (hyperalgesia to pressure pain threshold (PPT) measured from different body sites), the pain intensity (VAS) of the habitual pain, and quality of life parameters (SF‐36) in groups of females with chronic non‐malignant pain syndromes. Forty female pain patients with fibromyalgia/whiplash (n = 10), endometriosis (n = 10), low back pain (n = 10), or rheumatoid arthritis (n = 10), as well as 41 age‐matched healthy female controls participated in the study.

A comparison of modality-specific somatosensory changes during menstruation in dysmenorrheic and nondysmenorrheic women.

ObjectiveThe objective was to evaluate somatosensory thresholds to a multimodality stimulation regimen applied both within and outside areas of referred menstrual pain in dysmenorrheic women, over four phases of confirmed ovulatory cycles, and to compare them with thresholds in nondysmenorrheic women during menstruation. DesignTwenty dysmenorrheic women with menstrual pain scoring 5.45 ± 0.39 cm (mean ± standard error of mean) on a visual analog scale (10 cm) participated. Fifteen nondysmenorrheic women with a menstrual pain score of 0.4 ± 0.2 cm participated as controls. Ovulation was confirmed by an enzyme-multiplied immunoassay technique. Menstrual pain was described with the McGill Pain Questionnaire. Areas within menstrual pain referral were two abdominal sites and the midline of the low back, and the arm and thigh were the control areas. The pressure pain threshold (PPT) and pinch pain threshold were determined by a hand-held electronic pressure algometer, the heat pain threshold (HPT) by a contact thermode, and the tactile threshold with von Frey hairs. ResultsIn dysmenorrheic women the McGill Pain Questionnaire showed a larger sensory and affective component of pain than the evaluative and miscellaneous groups. The HPT and PPT were lower in the menstrual phase than in the ovulatory, luteal, and premenstrual phases, both within and outside areas of referred menstrual pain (p <0.01), with a more pronounced decrease at the referral pain areas. The pinch pain threshold was lower in the menstrual phase than in the ovulatory phase (p <0.02), and the tactile threshold did not differ significantly across the menstrual phases or within any site. Dysmenorrheic women had a lower HPT at the control sites and a lower PPT at the abdomen, back, and control sites, than in those of nondysmenorrheic women in the menstrual phase. ConclusionsThe results show reduced somatosensory pain thresholds during menstruation to heat and pressure stimulation, both within and outside areas of referred menstrual pain in dysmenorrheic women. Dysmenorrheic women showed a lower HPT at the control sites and a lower PPT at all the sites than those for nondysmenorrheic women in the menstrual phase. The altered somatosensory thresholds may be dependent on a spinal mechanism of central hyperexcitability, induced by recurrent moderate to severe menstrual pain.

Visceral pain: gender differences in response to experimental and clinical pain

Gender differences in response to visceral pain have important implications for experimental studies and when evaluating clinical pain. Few studies have in details explored specific gender differences in response to experimental stimulation of selected visceral organs or specific visceral diseases. Lower pain threshold to e.g. oesophageal distension has however been shown in females. The effect of female sex hormones on visceral function and pain is studied in greater details in both experimental and clinical studies. Pronounced differences in pain sensitivity are found across the menstrual phases. This may also interact with pharmacological interventions. For clinicians assessing the pain level of female patients in the reproductive age group should take into consideration the physiological and clinical effects of the menstrual cycle and the somatic segmental sites related to the uterus and cervix when clinically evaluating the pain and assessing for disease activity.

Sensory changes during the ovulatory phase of the menstrual cycle in healthy women

This study compared the pain sensitivity in healthy women at the abdomen and lower back (presumed referral areas of menstrual pain), thigh and arm (control areas), in the menstrual, ovulatory, luteal and premenstrual phases of confirmed ovulatory cycles, with that of males. The pressure pain threshold (PPT) and pinch pain threshold (PiPT) was determined by an electronic pressure algometer, heat pain threshold (HPT) by a contact thermode and tactile threshold (TT) with von Frey hairs. The abdominal PPT was significantly lower in females in all menstrual phases as compared to the control sites ( p<0.0007). The abdominal and lower back HPT was significantly lower in females in all menstrual phases compared with control areas, and to the sites in males ( p<0.002). The TT was significantly reduced in females compared with males ( p< 0.013). There was no difference in the PiPT between females and males. In males, the HPT, PPT and TT were not different within any site. During the ovulatory phase, the HPT was significantly reduced at the abdomen and the PPT at the back compared with the menstrual, luteal and premenstrual phases (p<0.0002). There were no within‐menstrual phase variations in the PiPT and TT at any site, or for the HPT and PPT at the control areas. The reduced thresholds in menstruating women may be due to the presence of latent uterine algogenic stimuli, and the increased levels of oestrogen and leuteinizing hormone at ovulation may enhance nociception by acting both at the peripheral and central level, resulting in the hypersensitivity changes at the abdomen and lower back areas. Copyright 2001 European Federation of Chapters of the International Association for the Study of Pain Copyright 2001 European Federation of Chapters of the International As̋Ér the Study of Pain

Trigger Points in Patients with Lower Limb Osteoarthritis

Objectives: Studies have shown that osteoarthritis [OA] is associated with hyperalgesia and weakness in muscles resulting in muscle strain, poor positioning, and inappropriate muscle use. Hyperalgesia and indirect injuries resulting from forces generated within the musculoskeletal structures during activity may result in the formation of trigger points [TrPs]. The purpose of this study was to compare the occurrence of TrPs in healthy controls and patients with OA of the lower limbs. Methods: Both lower limbs of fourteen OA patients and an equal number of age and sex matched healthy controls were palpated for the presence of TrPs by examining the local twitch reaction, taut bands, nodules, and the pattern of pain radiation and pain referral. Results: Significantly greater numbers of latent TrPs in muscles acting on the hip joint were present in the OA patients with OA secondary to trauma [N = 9], as compared to the controls with out any history of trauma [N = 9] [P < 0.05]. In creased TrPs were found in muscles acting on the knee joint in knee OA as compared to hip OA [P = 0.016]. The total number of TrPs in OA patients correlated with the radiological scores of OA [Spearmans R = 0.57, P = 0.04]. The pain evoked by pressure to the TrPs in OA patients was associated with a significantly larger radiation and referral as compared to the control subjects [P < 0.05]. Conclusion: The large number of TrPs in secondary [traumatic] OA patients may be due to hyperalgesia resulting from the chronic nociceptive inputs from the sensitized joint nociceptors and central sensitization. The treatment or elimination of TrPs may play an important role in pain relief of chronic OA of lower limbs.

Post-exercise muscle soreness after eccentric exercise: psychophysical effects and implications on mean arterial pressure.

The aim of the study was to examine the time course of changes in pressure pain threshold (PPT), visual analogue scale (VAS) pain and tenderness scores, McGill Pain Questionnaire (MPQ) descriptors, pain areas, skin temperature and mean arterial pressure (MAP) following intensive eccentric exercise. In 11 healthy male subjects, eccentric exercise of the first dorsal interosseous muscle (FDI) of the right hand with 114% maximum voluntary contraction weight (MVC) was used to induce post‐exercise muscle soreness (PEMS) in the right hand, while the left hand served as a control. At 24 h to 48 h all the pain profiles indicated the presence of PEMS in the right hand when compared to before exercise (P<0.05). MPQ and pain area assessments also indicated PEMS immediately after the exercise, while the pain assessment by PPT and tenderness VAS showed insignificant pain immediately after the exercise. Skin temperature measured in the first web space of the hand did not change at any time. MAP was significantly reduced at 48 h. It is concluded that eccentric exercise of a small hand muscle is followed by PEMS and a reduced MAP after 48 h that may suggest a role of central mechanisms in the PEMS, thereby giving further insight into clinical aspects of muscle pain.

Controlled dilatation of the uterine cervix – an experimental visceral pain model

&NA; Pain originating from the female reproductive organs is a substantial clinical problem to treat. Experimental models may be a tool for the study of visceral pain mechanisms and hence provide information to aid in formulating new treatment strategies. The aim was to develop and evaluate the performance and safety of a model for nociceptive stimulation of the uterine cervix by balloon dilatation using impedance planimetry. Three consecutive (repeated) dilatations at 1 ml/min, an isovolumetric and a fast dilatation at 2 ml/min were performed. Pilot studies were conducted in vitro on hysterectomy specimens, followed by application of the model in 14 healthy females. Subjects indicated the quality of perception and pain during dilatations by verbal reports and the McGill Pain Questionnaire (MPQ), and the intensity by a continuous electronic visual analog scale. The pain location was marked on an anatomical map. The balloon cross‐sectional area (CSA) was measured simultaneously. The experimental procedure was atraumatic. Pain was evoked in all subjects, with referral to the hypogastric and low back regions. The word descriptors on the MPQ and the areas of referred sensations were similar to that seen clinically in abortion, labor and menstrual pain. The pain intensity correlated with balloon CSA (r=0.9, P<0.001). No significant differences were found for the balloon volumes (4.2, 3.8 and 3.9 ml) or CSA (163, 122 and 123 mm2) to pain threshold (PT) for repeated dilatations, suggesting the reliability of the model. There was significant correlation between the balloon volume and CSA to reach the PT for single and repeated cervical dilatations. During isovolumetric distension, greater overall pain intensity was demonstrated for the prolonged as compared to the shorter duration cervical stimulation. In conclusion, this is the first human experimental pain model for dilatation of the uterine cervix, providing a safe, controlled, quantifiable stimulus that evoked reliable pain scores. The model thus provides a new possibility to study gynecological pain and may lead to better characterization and treatment of female visceral pain syndromes.