Priti Tewari
University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center
Network
Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.
Publication
Featured researches published by Priti Tewari.
Journal of Visualized Experiments | 2015
Pappanaicken R. Kumaresan; Mathew Figliola; Judy S. Moyes; M. Helen Huls; Priti Tewari; Elizabeth J. Shpall; Richard E. Champlin; Laurence J.N. Cooper
The adoptive transfer of pathogen-specific T cells can be used to prevent and treat opportunistic infections such as cytomegalovirus (CMV) infection occurring after allogeneic hematopoietic stem-cell transplantation. Viral-specific T cells from allogeneic donors, including third party donors, can be propagated ex vivo in compliance with current good manufacturing practice (cGMP), employing repeated rounds of antigen-driven stimulation to selectively propagate desired T cells. The identification and isolation of antigen-specific T cells can also be undertaken based upon the cytokine capture system of T cells that have been activated to secrete gamma-interferon (IFN-γ). However, widespread human application of the cytokine capture system (CCS) to help restore immunity has been limited as the production process is time-consuming and requires a skilled operator. The development of a second-generation cell enrichment device such as CliniMACS Prodigy now enables investigators to generate viral-specific T cells using an automated, less labor-intensive system. This device separates magnetically labeled cells from unlabeled cells using magnetic activated cell sorting technology to generate clinical-grade products, is engineered as a closed system and can be accessed and operated on the benchtop. We demonstrate the operation of this new automated cell enrichment device to manufacture CMV pp65-specific T cells obtained from a steady-state apheresis product obtained from a CMV seropositive donor. These isolated T cells can then be directly infused into a patient under institutional and federal regulatory supervision. All the bio-processing steps including removal of red blood cells, stimulation of T cells, separation of antigen-specific T cells, purification, and washing are fully automated. Devices such as this raise the possibility that T cells for human application can be manufactured outside of dedicated good manufacturing practice (GMP) facilities and instead be produced in blood banking facilities where staff can supervise automated protocols to produce multiple products.
Clinical Lymphoma, Myeloma & Leukemia | 2014
Antonio Di Stasi; Borje S. Andersson; Yago Nieto; Roy B. Jones; Marcos de Lima; Chitra Hosing; Uday Popat; Partow Kebriaei; Betul Oran; Amin M. Alousi; Katayoun Rezvani; Muzaffar H. Qazilbash; Qaiser Bashir; Catherine M. Bollard; Laurence J.N. Cooper; Laura L. Worth; Priti Tewari; Ian McNiece; Kaci Willhelm; Richard E. Champlin; Elizabeth J. Shpall
Cord blood transplantation is being used with increasing frequency for patients with high-risk hematologic malignancies. Myeloablative preparative regimens provide antitumor efficacy and facilitate engraftment but are associated with higher morbidity and nonrelapse mortality rates than nonablative regimens. We evaluated 3 sequential myeloablative regimens in the cord blood transplant setting. Regimen 1 (melphalan, fludarabine, and thiotepa) produced prompt engraftment and minimal engraftment failure but was associated with a high nonrelapse mortality rate. Regimen 2 (busulfan and fludarabine) was very well tolerated but was associated with a high rate of engraftment failure and relapse. Regimen 3 (busulfan, clofarabine, fludarabine, and low-dose total body irradiation given 9 days after the chemotherapy) was associated with a low rate of engraftment failure but was logistically difficult to administer. Finally, regimen 3 that included the total body irradiation given immediately after the chemotherapy was well tolerated, with prompt engraftment and tumor control. This latter regimen appears to be effective in preliminary studies and warrants further evaluation.
Pediatric Transplantation | 2015
Kris M. Mahadeo; Priti Tewari; Suhag Parikh; Timothy A. Driscoll; Kristin Page; Paul L. Martin; Joanne Kurtzberg; Vinod K. Prasad
The use of HSCT is the only potentially curative treatment for CAMT, but access is limited by the availability of suitable donors. We report five consecutive patients with CAMT who received MAC and partially HLA‐mismatched, UCBT (unrelated, n = 4). Median times to neutrophil (>500/μL) and platelet (≥20 000 and ≥50 000/μL) engraftment were 19, 57, and 70 days, respectively. Acute GvHD, grade II, developed in one patient, who subsequently developed limited chronic GvHD. At median follow‐up of 14 yr, all patients are alive with sustained donor cell engraftment. To our knowledge, this is the largest single‐center series of UCBT for patients with this disease and suggests that UCBT is a successful curative option for patients with CAMT.
Acta Haematologica | 2014
Priti Tewari; Anna R. Franklin; Nidale Tarek; Martha A. Askins; Scott Mofield; Partow Kebriaei
Background: Adolescents and young adults (AYAs) are a very unique subset of our population journeying through a dynamic stage of their lives. This age group often remains understudied as a separate entity because they are commonly lumped into either pediatric or adult subgroups. Methods: Here we review acute and chronic issues surrounding hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) with a focus on the AYA age group. Results: HSCT is a commonly used treatment modality for patients with certain types of cancers. AYA patients undergoing HSCT present a very unique perspective, circumstances, medical, psychological and social issues requiring a diligent workup, care and follow-up. Conclusion: The medical care of these patients should be approached in a multidisciplinary method involving the patient, caregivers, physicians, psychologists and social workers.
Pediatric Blood & Cancer | 2015
Hisham Abdel-Azim; Chelsea Balian; Priti Tewari; Ruth Santizo; Neena Kapoor; Kris M. Mahadeo
We assessed clinical practice standards for infectious complications among pediatric blood and marrow transplant (PBMT) recipients. An anonymous online survey was sent to all 64 pediatric program directors (PD) of PBMT centers in the United States, which are accredited by the Foundation for the Accreditation of Cellular Therapy (FACT). The overall response rate was 56% (CI: 44–68%); variations in clinical practices were noted regarding (i) surveillance for late onset cytomegalovirus (CMV) infection and (ii) pharmacokinetic/therapeutic drug monitoring of antimicrobials. Prospective studies among PBMT recipients to address infectious complications among this population and variations in clinical practice may be required. Pediatr Blood Cancer 2015;62:731–735.
Pediatric Transplantation | 2017
Ossama M. Maher; Jorge Galvez Silva; Jimin Wu; Diane Liu; Laurence J.N. Cooper; Nidale Tarek; Laura L. Worth; Dean A. Lee; Demetrios Petropoulos; Anna R. Franklin; Patrick A. Zweidler-McKay; Robert J. Wells; Gabriela Rondon; Richard E. Champlin; Priti Tewari
We conducted a retrospective analysis of outcomes for children and young adults with sAML/sMDS who underwent HSCT at our institution. Thirty‐two patients (median age 20 years) with sAML (n=24) and sMDS (n=8) received HSCT between 1990 and 2013. The median time from sAML/sMDS diagnosis to HSCT was 4.1 months (range: 1.2‐27.2 months). The transplant regimens were primarily busulfan based (n=19). BM was the primary donor source (n=15). Eleven recipients were transplanted with residual disease. At a median follow‐up of 62.3 months (range: 0.4‐250.9 months), 14 patients had disease recurrence. Acute GVHD, grade III/IV, occurred in three patients. Causes of death were as follows: disease relapse (n=12), infection (n=2), pneumonia (n=1), pulmonary hemorrhage (n=1), acute GVHD (n=1), and graft failure (n=1). A PS of ≥90% at the time of HSCT had a significant impact on PFS (P=.02). Patients achieving pretransplant primary CR (n=8) and those with sMDS and RA (n=6) had prolonged PFS (P=.04). On multivariate analysis, shorter time to transplantation (≤6 months from diagnosis of sAML/sMDS) was associated with superior OS (P=.0018) and PFS (P=.0005).
Journal of Pediatric Hematology Oncology | 2017
Ossama M. Maher; Jorge Galvez Silva; Winston W. Huh; Branko Cuglievan; April DePombo; Partow Kebriaei; Minjeong Park; Diane Liu; Chloe Tillman; Nidale Tarek; Laurence J.N. Cooper; Priti Tewari
Introduction: High rates of patients require readmission to the hospital within 6 months of hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT). We investigated the relationship between readmission rates and outcomes after HSCT in children, adolescents, and young adults (CAYA). Materials and Methods: A retrospective analysis of patients (26 years or younger) treated with HSCT was conducted. Results: A chart review of 435 CAYA who underwent HSCT from 2008 to 2015 revealed that 171 patients (39%) had at least 1 hospital readmission within 180 days of transplant; 87% received allogeneic and 13% received autologous HSCT. A total of 312 readmission events were reported. The median follow-up time was 31 months. Documented infection (n=99) and graft-versus-host disease complications (n=60) were the most common causes. Higher than 2 readmission rates were associated with lower overall survival (OS) (P=0.001) and disease-free survival (P<0.001) in patients who received allogeneic HSCT. These findings were not found in the autologous HSCT. In a multivariate analysis of those who received allogeneic HSCT, prior treatment with ≥2 chemotherapy regimens (P=0.03) was independent predictor of lower OS. There were also trends noted toward lower OS for patients with documented infections at index admission or subsequent readmissions (P=0.09). Conclusions: More than 2 hospital readmissions within 6 months of allogeneic HSCT in CAYA, who are either heavily pretreated or had documented infections at index admission or subsequent readmissions adversely affected the outcomes.
Biology of Blood and Marrow Transplantation | 2017
Jorge Galvez-Silva; Ossama M. Maher; Minjeong Park; Diane Liu; Fiorela Hernandez; Priti Tewari; Yago Nieto
Previous studies in adults have shown that peripheral blood absolute lymphocyte and monocyte count ratio (ALC/AMC) after autologous stem cell transplantation (ASCT) can predict outcome in patients with relapsed/refractory (R/R) Hodgkin lymphoma (HL). We retrospectively reviewed all of our children, adolescent, and young adult (CAYA) patients (age ≤26) who underwent transplantation for R/R HL between 2004 and 2015. Seventy-six patients (median age, 21; range, 10 to 26 years) who reached day 100 disease free were analyzed; 33% of them had positron emission tomography (PET)-positive tumors before ASCT. Patients received high-dose carmustine, etoposide, cytarabine, and melphalan (n = 40) or gemcitabine/busulfan/melphalan (n = 36). Median follow-up after day 100 was 3.9 years (95% confidence interval [CI], 2.8 to 4.9). A day 100 ALC/AMC ratio >2.1 correlated with lower risk of relapse (hazard ratio, .097; 95% CI, .03 to .29; P <.0001). Patients with day 100 ALC/AMC ratios >2.1 and ≤2.1 had 4-year relapse-free survival rates of 93% and 33%, respectively (P = .0001) and 4-year overall survival rates of 96% and 76%, respectively (P = .0001). In addition, an ALC/AMC ratio increase >1.8 from day 15 to day 100 correlated with lower risk of relapse (hazard ratio, .24; 95% CI, .08 to 0.73; P = .01). Likewise, an ALC/AMC ratio change >.26 from day 30 to day 100 also correlated with a lower likelihood of relapse (hazard ratio, .20; 95% CI, .081 to .51; P = .0007). Multivariate analysis showed that a positive PET scan at ASCT, day 100 ALC/AMC ratio ≤ 2.1, and an ALC/AMC ratio change either ≤1.8 from day 15 to day 100 or ≤.26 from day 30 to day 100 were independent adverse predictors. In conclusion, our analysis confirms in CAYA patients prior observations in adults indicating a major prognostic effect of peripheral lymphocyte and monocyte counts at day 100 and earlier post-ASCT time points in R/R HL.
Nature Reviews Clinical Oncology | 2018
Kris M. Mahadeo; Sajad Khazal; Hisham Abdel-Azim; Julie C. Fitzgerald; Agne Taraseviciute; Catherine M. Bollard; Priti Tewari; Christine Duncan; Chani Traube; David McCall; Marie E. Steiner; Ira M. Cheifetz; Leslie Lehmann; Rodrigo Mejia; John M. Slopis; Rajinder Bajwa; Partow Kebriaei; Paul L. Martin; Jerelyn Moffet; Jennifer McArthur; Demetrios Petropoulos; Joan O’Hanlon Curry; Sarah Featherston; Jessica Foglesong; Basirat Shoberu; Alison Gulbis; Maria E. Mireles; Lisa Hafemeister; Cathy Nguyen; Neena Kapoor
In 2017, an autologous chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T cell therapy indicated for children and young adults with relapsed and/or refractory CD19+ acute lymphoblastic leukaemia became the first gene therapy to be approved in the USA. This innovative form of cellular immunotherapy has been associated with remarkable response rates but is also associated with unique and often severe toxicities, which can lead to rapid cardiorespiratory and/or neurological deterioration. Multidisciplinary medical vigilance and the requisite health-care infrastructure are imperative to ensuring optimal patient outcomes, especially as these therapies transition from research protocols to standard care. Herein, authors representing the Pediatric Acute Lung Injury and Sepsis Investigators (PALISI) Network Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation (HSCT) Subgroup and the MD Anderson Cancer Center CAR T Cell Therapy-Associated Toxicity (CARTOX) Program have collaborated to provide comprehensive consensus guidelines on the care of children receiving CAR T cell therapy.Chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T cell therapies have impressive activity in the treatment of cancer but are associated with potentially fatal toxicities. In light of the approval of CAR T cell therapy for paediatric patients, a panel of experts from the Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation (HSCT) Subgroup of the Pediatric Acute Lung Injury and Sepsis Investigators (PALISI) Network, the CAR T Cell Therapy-Associated Toxicity (CARTOX) Program at The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, and several other institutions have developed consensus guidelines for the use and management of these treatments in paediatric patients, which are presented herein.
The American Journal of Surgical Pathology | 2017
Jin S. Im; Susan C. Abraham; Rima M. Saliba; Gabriela Rondon; William A. Ross; Asif Rashid; Elizabeth J. Shpall; Uday Popat; Muzaffar H. Qazilbash; Chitra Hosing; Betul Oran; Nina Shah; Priti Tewari; Yago Nieto; Partow Kebriaei; Richard E. Champlin; Amin M. Alousi
Histologic confirmation is considered a standard practice to diagnose gastrointestinal graft versus host disease (GI GVHD) and is often used in making treatment decisions. A histologic grade is often determined in cases that are diagnosed with GI GVHD. Although extensive crypt loss (histologic grade 4) is associated with high nonrelapse mortality (NRM), the prognostic value for the more common grade 1 is poorly understood. As clinical decisions are made on the degree of histologic evidence, it is important to establish its prognostic significance. Therefore, we evaluated 309 patients who underwent endoscopic biopsy for suspected GI GVHD within 6 months posttransplant between 2009 and 2012. The presence of histologic grade 1 was associated with increased NRM (hazard ratio=2.7, P=0.02) when compared with one of negative biopsy in patients with lower but not isolated upper GI GVHD. Multivariate competing-risk regression analysis confirmed the independent impact of histologic grade 1 in patients with early clinical stages of lower GI GVHD (stage 0 to 2) (hazard ratio=2.7, P=0.044). When compared with advanced histologic grades, histologic grade 1 did not lessen the adverse outcome for patients with advanced lower GI GVHD (stage 3 to 4) (cumulative incidence NRM of 84%). In conclusion, the presence of histologic grade 1 is associated with increased NRM in patients presenting with lower GI GVHD (stages 0 to 2) and is sufficient evidence for decision to initiate therapy. At the same time, histologic grade 1 does not lessen the markedly adverse impact of advanced lower GI GVHD (stage 3 to 4) and is not synonymous with “mild” GVHD.