Przemyslaw Karpowicz
University of Gdańsk
Network
Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.
Publication
Featured researches published by Przemyslaw Karpowicz.
Current Pharmaceutical Design | 2012
Elżbieta Jankowska; Julia Stoj; Przemyslaw Karpowicz; Pawel A. Osmulski; Maria Gaczynska
The giant proteolytic factory called the proteasome came a long way from a biochemical curio to a major regulator of cellular physiology and a renowned drug target within the ubiquitin proteasome pathway (UPP). Thanks to availability of highly specific inhibitors of the proteasome, in less than twenty years it was possible to identify major transcription factors, cyclins, and products of oncogenes as crucial substrates for the UPP. Nine years passed since the FDA speedily approved bortezomib, the inhibitor of proteasome, for treatment of multiple myeloma. One year after its approval, the field was honored by awarding the Nobel Prize to Hershko, Ciechanover and Rose for introducing the concept of controlled proteolysis of ubiquitin-tagged substrates, with proteasome as the intracellular recycling facility. Taking into consideration the universal involvement of the proteasome in the life of all cells in human body, it comes to no surprise that the enzyme is deeply implicated in etiology, progression, diagnosis or cure of multiple diseases. Below we discuss some aspects of the involvement: from direct causative links to changes in proteasome properties that correlate with pathological conditions. We start with diseases collectively known as cancer, and with immune system-related pathologies. Here, the proteasome inhibitors are either already used in clinics, or undergo advanced preclinical screening. Then, we will continue with cardiovascular disorders, followed by aging. Changes of the proteasome make-up during aging may be a priming factor for neurodegenerative diseases, described last. We discuss the potential for proteasome regulation: inhibition, activation or specificity modulation, to successfully enter the clinical setting.
Journal of Peptide Science | 2014
Julia Witkowska; Przemyslaw Karpowicz; Maria Gaczynska; Pawel A. Osmulski; Elżbieta Jankowska
Proteasome is a ‘proteolytic factory’ that constitutes an essential part of the ubiquitin‐proteasome pathway. The involvement of proteasome in regulation of all major aspects of cellular physiology makes it an attractive drug target. So far, only inhibitors of the proteasome entered the clinic as anti‐cancer drugs. However, proteasome regulators may also be useful for treatment of inflammatory and neurodegenerative diseases. We established in our previous studies that the peptide Tat2, comprising the basic domain of HIV‐1 Tat protein: R49KKRRQRR56, supplemented with Q66DPI69 fragment, inhibits the 20S proteasome in a noncompetitive manner. Mechanism of Tat2 likely involves allosteric regulation because it competes with the proteasome natural 11S activator for binding to the enzyme noncatalytic subunits. In this study, we performed alanine walking coupled with biological activity measurements and FTIR and CD spectroscopy to dissect contribution of a charge and conformation of Tat2 to its capability to influence peptidase activity of the proteasome. In solution, Tat2 and most of its analogs with a single Ala substitution preferentially adopted a conformation containing PPII/turn structural motifs. Replacing either Asp10 or two or more adjacent Arg/Lys residues induced a random coil conformation, probably by disrupting ionic interactions responsible for stabilization of the peptides ordered structure. The random coil Tat2 analogs lost their capability to activate the latent 20S proteasome. In contrast, inhibitory properties of the peptides more significantly depended on their positive charge. The data provide valuable clues for the future optimization of the Tat2‐based proteasome regulators. Copyright
Proteins | 2012
Elżbieta Jankowska; Piotr Stefanowicz; Marta Sosnowska; Przemyslaw Karpowicz; Karolina Radziszewska; Zbigniew Szewczuk; Aneta Szymańska
Recently, we presented a convenient method combining a deuterium‐hydrogen exchange and electrospray mass spectrometry for studying high‐pressure denaturation of proteins (Stefanowicz et al., Biosci Rep 2009; 30:91–99). Here, we present results of pressure‐induced denaturation studies of an amyloidogenic protein—the wild‐type human cystatin C (hCC) and its single‐point mutants, in which Val57 residue from the hinge region was substituted by Asn, Asp or Pro, respectively. The place of mutation and the substituting residues were chosen mainly on a basis of theoretical calculations. Observation of H/D isotopic exchange proceeding during pressure induced unfolding and subsequent refolding allowed us to detect differences in the proteins stability and folding dynamics. On the basis of the obtained results we can conclude that proline residue at the hinge region makes cystatin C structure more flexible and dynamic, what probably facilitates the dimerization process of this hCC variant. Polar asparagine does not influence stability of hCC conformation significantly, whereas charged aspartic acid in 57 position makes the protein structure slightly more prone to unfolding. Our experiments also point out pressure denaturation as a valuable supplementary method in denaturation studies of mutated proteins. Proteins 2012;.
PLOS ONE | 2015
Przemyslaw Karpowicz; Pawel A. Osmulski; Julia Witkowska; Emilia Sikorska; Małgorzata Giżyńska; Agnieszka Belczyk-Ciesielska; Maria Gaczynska; Elżbieta Jankowska
The proteasome is a giant protease responsible for degradation of the majority of cytosolic proteins. Competitive inhibitors of the proteasome are used against aggressive blood cancers. However, broadening the use of proteasome-targeting drugs requires new mechanistic approaches to the enzyme’s inhibition. In our previous studies we described Tat1 peptide, an allosteric inhibitor of the proteasome derived from a fragment of the basic domain of HIV-Tat1 protein. Here, we attempted to dissect the structural determinants of the proteasome inhibition by Tat1. Single- and multiple- alanine walking scans were performed. Tat1 analogs with stabilized beta-turn conformation at positions 4–5 and 8–9, pointed out by the molecular dynamics modeling and the alanine scan, were synthesized. Structure of Tat1 analogs were analyzed by circular dichroism, Fourier transform infrared and nuclear magnetic resonance spectroscopy studies, supplemented by molecular dynamics simulations. Biological activity tests and structural studies revealed that high flexibility and exposed positive charge are hallmarks of Tat1 peptide. Interestingly, stabilization of a beta-turn at the 8–9 position was necessary to significantly improve the inhibitory potency.
Scientific Reports | 2017
Julia Witkowska; Małgorzata Giżyńska; Przemyslaw Grudnik; Przemyslaw Golik; Przemyslaw Karpowicz; Artur Giełdoń; Grzegorz Dubin; Elżbieta Jankowska
Proteasomes are responsible for protein turnover in eukaryotic cells, degrading short-lived species but also removing improperly folded or oxidatively damaged ones. Dysfunction of a proteasome results in gradual accumulation of misfolded/damaged proteins, leading to their aggregation. It has been postulated that proteasome activators may facilitate removal of such aggregation-prone proteins and thus prevent development of neurodegenerative disorders. However, the discovery of pharmacologically relevant compounds is hindered by insufficient structural understanding of the activation process. In this study we provide a model peptidic activator of human proteasome and analyze the structure-activity relationship within this novel scaffold. The binding mode of the activator at the relevant pocket within the proteasome has been determined by X-ray crystallography. This crystal structure provides an important basis for rational design of pharmacological compounds. Moreover, by providing a novel insight into the proteasome gating mechanism, our results allow the commonly accepted model of proteasome regulation to be revisited.
Tetrahedron | 2015
Emilia Sikorska; Dorota Tuwalska; Przemyslaw Karpowicz; Elżbieta Jankowska; Andrzej Nowacki; Beata Liberek
Biophysical Journal | 2017
Pawel A. Osmulski; Przemyslaw Karpowicz; Matthew B. Giletto; Corey L. Jones; Kristin E. Cano; Dmitri Ivanov; Tim H M Huang; Elżbieta Jankowska; Jetze J. Tepe; Maria Gaczynska
Biophysical Journal | 2014
Pawel A. Osmulski; Senli Guo; Przemyslaw Karpowicz; Maria Gaczynska
Biophysical Journal | 2013
Pawel A. Osmulski; Maria Gaczynska; Przemyslaw Karpowicz; Christine Stuart; Wesley Jong; Malgorzata Mikolajczyk; Martha C. Anderson; Ewa Marszal
Acta Neurobiologiae Experimentalis | 2013
J. Stoj; Przemyslaw Karpowicz; Maria Gaczynska; Pawel A. Osmulski; Elżbieta Jankowska
Collaboration
Dive into the Przemyslaw Karpowicz's collaboration.
University of Texas Health Science Center at San Antonio
View shared research outputsUniversity of Texas Health Science Center at San Antonio
View shared research outputs