Punam Mistry

Evidence of acceptability of oral paediatric medicines: a review

The aim of this review was to map the currently available evidence on acceptability of oral paediatric medicines to aid in the selection of suitable platform formulations for the development of new acceptable paediatric products.

Urinary biomarkers of acute kidney injury in deceased organ donors--kidney injury molecule-1 as an adjunct to predicting outcome.

Deceased kidney donors are increasingly “marginal,” and many have risk factors for acute kidney injury (AKI) that may impact on subsequent renal transplant outcome. Despite this, determining the presence of AKI at the time of deceased organ donation remains difficult.

Accelerated Loss of TCR Repertoire Diversity in Common Variable Immunodeficiency

Although common variable immunodeficiency (CVID) has long been considered as a group of primary Ab deficiencies, growing experimental data now suggest a global disruption of the entire adaptive immune response in a segment of patients. Oligoclonality of the TCR repertoire was previously demonstrated; however, the manner in which it relates to other B cell and T cell findings reported in CVID remains unclear. Using a combination approach of high-throughput TCRβ sequencing and multiparametric flow cytometry, we compared the TCR repertoire diversity between various subgroups of CVID patients according to their B cell immunophenotypes. Our data suggest that the reduction in repertoire diversity is predominantly restricted to those patients with severely reduced class-switched memory B cells and an elevated level of CD21lo B cells (Freiburg 1a), and may be driven by a reduced number of naive T cells unmasking underlying memory clonality. Moreover, our data indicate that this loss in repertoire diversity progresses with advancing age far exceeding the expected physiological rate. Radiological evidence supports the loss in thymic volume, correlating with the decrease in repertoire diversity. Evidence now suggests that primary thymic failure along with other well-described B cell abnormalities play an important role in the pathophysiology in Freiburg group 1a patients. Clinically, our findings emphasize the integration of combined B and T cell testing to identify those patients at the greatest risk for infection. Future work should focus on investigating the link between thymic failure and the severe reduction in class-switched memory B cells, while gathering longitudinal laboratory data to examine the progressive nature of the disease.

Methodology Used to Assess Acceptability of Oral Pediatric Medicines: A Systematic Literature Search and Narrative Review

BackgroundRegulatory guidelines require that any new medicine designed for a pediatric population must be demonstrated as being acceptable to that population. There is currently no guidance on how to conduct or report on acceptability testing.AimOur objective was to undertake a review of the methods used to assess the acceptability of medicines within a pediatric population and use this review to propose the most appropriate methodology.MethodsWe used a defined search strategy to identify literature reports of acceptability assessments of medicines conducted within pediatric populations and extracted information about the tools used in these studies for comparison across studies.ResultsIn total, 61 articles were included in the analysis. Palatability was the most common (54/61) attribute measured when evaluating acceptability. Simple scale methods were most commonly used, with visual analog scales (VAS) and hedonic scales used both separately and in combination in 34 of the 61 studies. Hedonic scales alone were used in 14 studies and VAS alone in just five studies. Other tools included Likert scales; forced choice or preference; surveys or questionnaires; observations of facial expressions during administration, ease of swallowing, or ability to swallow the dosage; prevalence of complaints or refusal to take the medicine; and time taken for a nurse to administer the medicine.ConclusionsThe best scale in terms of validity, reliability, feasibility, and preference to use when assessing acceptability remains unclear. Further work is required to select the most appropriate method to justify whether a medicine is acceptable to a pediatric population.

A mixed methods study of the administration of flucloxacillin oral liquid; identifying strategies to overcome administration issues of medicines with poor palatability

The palatability of flucloxacillin oral liquid is poor. Parents/carers use strategies to aid the administration of poorly palatable medicines.

Acceptability of placebo multiparticulate formulations in children and adults

Patient acceptability is an important consideration in the design of medicines for children. The aim of this study was to investigate acceptability of multiparticulates in healthy children and adults. A randomised, single-blind acceptability testing was performed involving 71 children (4–12 years) and 61 adults (18–37 years). Each participant received three 500 mg samples of microcrystalline cellulose pellets administered on a medicine spoon with water at 5–10 minutes intervals. Acceptability was measured based on voluntary intake of the samples, facial expressions, ratings on hedonic scales and reported willingness to take multiparticulates everyday as a medicine. Multiparticulates were voluntarily swallowed by 92% of children and 100% of adults. However, palatability issues were identified, with emphasis on textural aspects. Grittiness perception received negative ratings on hedonic scales by 60% of children and 51% of adults. Researcher observations revealed that 72% of children and 42% of adults displayed negative facial expressions towards the samples. Children reported their willingness to take multiparticulates as a medicine in 30% of the cases, compared to 74% in adults. This study demonstrates that multiparticulates may be a suitable formulation platform for children and adults, although palatability concerns have been highlighted. Additional work is required to define acceptability criteria and to standardise methodologies.

Evaluation of patient-reported outcome measurements as a reliable tool to measure acceptability of the taste of paediatric medicines in an inpatient paediatric population

Objective To evaluate the age appropriateness and suitability of patient-reported outcome measures to assess the acceptability of the taste of oral liquid medicines in children. Design and setting An observational mixed-methods study involving children aged 2–16 years taking oral liquid medicine in paediatric inpatient wards across the West Midlands (UK). Assessment tools included patient-reported scores on the taste of medicines via a five-point Facial Hedonic Scale; a Visual Analogue Scale (VAS); a question, ‘Did you think the medicine tasted OK?’ and researcher observations of facial expressions and behaviours immediately before, during and after administration. Results 611 children participated. The percent unable to complete the scales was 7% (n=46) for the VAS; 2% (n=15) for the hedonic scale and 1% (n=7) for the question about taste. Significant correlations (Spearman’s r) were observed between the patient-reported outcome measures: 0.80 and 0.78 for the taste question and hedonic and VAS, respectively, and 0.84 for the hedonic and VAS. Researcher observations demonstrated the ability of the patient to take the medicine as intended but did not provide sensitive measures of taste. 5% of administrations were not taken as intended by the children. Medicines known to have poor taste (clarithromycin and prednisolone) showed mean hedonic and VAS scores of ≥3.5 and >65 mm, respectively. Conclusions Patient-reported outcome measures correlate with each other and are a useful means to assess the taste (and acceptability) of medicines. Hedonic scales are better understood by children and should be the first choice tool in the assessment of medicines taste.

Abstract 2893: Engineered release and presentation of antibody-bound viral antigens: A highly specific and novel immunotherapeutic approach to target cancer in vivo

Proceedings: AACR Annual Meeting 2014; April 5-9, 2014; San Diego, CA Harnessing the power of adaptive immunity to combat cancer has been a long-term goal of translational immunotherapy. Tumor-specific immunity, where present, is typically at low frequency and affinity with compromised effector function. By contrast, immunity against persistent herpesviruses in man is characterised by high affinity cytotoxic T-lymphocytes (CTL) at high frequency with potent effector function. Furthermore, the immunosubversive mechanisms employed by herpesviruses show striking parallels to tumors, yet the associated anti-viral immunity limits these to life-long asymptomatic infections. We reasoned that the delivery of immunodominant viral peptide epitopes to the tumor surface might facilitate passive-loading of peptides into empty MHC class-I molecules, effectively mimicking viral infection, rendering tumors susceptible to lysis by anti-viral immunity. To address this we developed a new class of targeting antibodies: APEC (Antibody Peptide Epitope Complexes) that are able to deliver an antigenic payload at the cell surface through proteolytic release of covalently-coupled peptide antigens. As a proof-of-concept we used clinically-validated antibodies cetuximab (anti-EGFR) and rituximab (anti-CD20) to develop APECs that are able to target human tumors. We screened 15 HLA-A*0201+ EGFR-expressing NCI-60 cell lines, CD20+ lymphoma cell lines, 20 primary CD20+ CLL tumor samples and four healthy B-cells against a library of 190 cetuximab-APECs (cAPEC) or rituximab (rAPEC) incorporating the immunodominant cytomegalovirus (CMV) pp65495-503 epitope and candidate protease cleavage sites following co-incubation with CMV-specific CTL (CMV-CTL). The most effective cAPEC and rAPEC were those incorporating MMP2, MMP9, Cathepsin B and Cathepsin D protease recognition domains. Very few (2/190) rAPEC were able to redirect CMV-CTL against healthy cells. Heterogeneity was observed for primary CLL tumors but a limited number of rAPEC were effective in all cases (5/190). Mechanistic studies demonstrated that: (i) peptide loading occurred at the cell surface, (ii) required the expression of target antigens at the cell surface and (iii) T-cell recognition could be inhibited by unconjugated antibody (92%) or by incubation with protease inhibitors (83%). T-cell specificity was examined using rAPEC treated tumor targets co-incubated with various HLA-matched effector T-cell populations. No activation of CD4+ was observed including CD4+CD25hi regulatory T-cell populations. Incubation with CD8+ T-cells revealed that only pp65495-503-specific CD8+ T-cells engaged with APEC-treated tumor cells. Lastly, xenograft studies using EGFR+ and CD20+ tumor cell lines demonstrated efficacy of both cAPEC and rAPEC to eliminate tumors in vivo by redirecting anti-viral CTL. These data indicate that APECs represent a powerful new approach to combat cancer. Citation Format: David G. Millar, Laura Morton, Manuela Carvalho Gaspar, Punam Mistry, Hugo De La Pena, Ricky Joseph, Sarah Penny, Oliver C. Goodyear, Margaret Goodall, Guy E. Pratt, Mark Cobbold. Engineered release and presentation of antibody-bound viral antigens: A highly specific and novel immunotherapeutic approach to target cancer in vivo. [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 105th Annual Meeting of the American Association for Cancer Research; 2014 Apr 5-9; San Diego, CA. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2014;74(19 Suppl):Abstract nr 2893. doi:10.1158/1538-7445.AM2014-2893