Puneet S. Basi
Brooklyn Hospital Center
Network
Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.
Publication
Featured researches published by Puneet S. Basi.
International Scholarly Research Notices | 2014
Shashideep Singhal; Kinesh Changela; Puneet S. Basi; Siddharth Mathur; Sridhar G Reddy; Mojdeh Momeni; Mahesh Krishnaiah; Sury Anand
Background. Utilization of colonoscopy for routine colorectal cancer (CRC) screening in the elderly (patients over 75) is controversial. This study was designed to evaluate if using fecal occult blood test (FOBT) to select patients for colonoscopy can improve yield and be a cost- effective approach for the elderly. Methods. Records of 10,908 subjects who had colonoscopy during the study period were reviewed. 1496 (13.7%) were ≥75 years. In 118 of these subjects, a colonoscopy was performed to evaluate a positive FOBT. Outcomes were compared between +FOBT group (F-Group) and the asymptomatic screening group (AS-Group). The cost-effectiveness was also calculated using a median estimated standardized worldwide colonoscopy and FOBT cost (rounded to closest whole numbers) of 1000 US
Gastroenterology | 2010
Shashideep Singhal; Puneet S. Basi; Siddharth Mathur; Manpreet Singh; Mojdeh Momeni; Sury Anand
and 10 US
Gastroenterology | 2012
Shashideep Singhal; Manpreet Singh; Puneet S. Basi; Sury Anand
, respectively. Results. 118/1496 (7.9%) colonoscopies were performed for evaluation of +FOBT. 464/1496 (31%) colonoscopies were performed in AS-Group. In F-Group, high risk adenoma detection rate (HR-ADR) was 15.2%, and 11.9% had 1-2 tubular adenomas. In comparison, the control AS-Group had HR-ADR of 19.2% and 17.7% had 1-2 tubular adenomas. In the FOBT+ group, CRC was detected in 5.1% which was significantly higher than the AS-Group in which CRC was detected in 1.7% (P = 0.03). On cost-effectiveness analysis, cost per CRC detected was significantly lower, that is, 19,666 US
Gastrointestinal Endoscopy | 2011
Puneet S. Basi; Hirenkumar Pansheriya; Shashideep Singhal; Josmi Joseph; Sury Anand
in F-Group in comparison to AS-Group 58,000 US
Gastrointestinal Endoscopy | 2011
Shashideep Singhal; Manpreet Singh; Puneet S. Basi; Siddharth Mathur; Harleen Bahga; Mojdeh Momeni; Mahesh Krishnaiah; Sury Anand
(P < 0.05). There were no significant differences in other parameters among groups. Conclusion. Prescreening with FOBT to select elderly for colonoscopy seems to improve the yield and can be a cost-effective CRC screening approach in this subset. The benefit in the risk benefit analysis of screening the elderly appears improved by prescreening with an inexpensive tool.
Gastrointestinal Endoscopy | 2010
Shashideep Singhal; Puneet S. Basi; Siddharth Mathur; Manpreet Singh; Amir S. Butt; Mojdeh Momeni; Sury Anand
Gastrointestinal Endoscopy | 2010
Shashideep Singhal; Siddharth Mathur; Puneet S. Basi; Manpreet Singh; Josmi Joseph; Niket Sonpal; Amir S. Butt; Mojdeh Momeni; Sury Anand
Gastrointestinal Endoscopy | 2010
Shashideep Singhal; Siddharth Mathur; Puneet S. Basi; Amir S. Butt; Manpreet Singh; Niket Sonpal; Mojdeh Momeni; Sury Anand
Gastrointestinal Endoscopy | 2010
Shashideep Singhal; Siddharth Mathur; Puneet S. Basi; Chethana Kanaparthi; Amir S. Butt; Manpreet Singh; Mojdeh Momeni; Sury Anand