Network


Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.

Hotspot


Dive into the research topics where R. C. Stuart is active.

Publication


Featured researches published by R. C. Stuart.


Biology Letters | 2005

Benefits of organic farming to biodiversity vary among taxa

Robert J. Fuller; L. R. Norton; Ruth E. Feber; Paul J. Johnson; D. E. Chamberlain; Andrew Joys; Fiona Mathews; R. C. Stuart; M.C Townsend; Will Manley; Martin S. Wolfe; David W. Macdonald; L. G. Firbank

Habitat and biodiversity differences between matched pairs of organic and non-organic farms containing cereal crops in lowland England were assessed by a large-scale study of plants, invertebrates, birds and bats. Habitat extent, composition and management on organic farms was likely to favour higher levels of biodiversity and indeed organic farms tended to support higher numbers of species and overall abundance across most taxa. However, the magnitude of the response varied; plants showed larger and more consistent responses than other taxa. Variation in response across taxa may be partly a consequence of the small size and isolated context of many organic farms. Extension of organic farming could contribute to the restoration of biodiversity in agricultural landscapes.


Landscape Ecology | 2004

Effects of area and isolation of woodland patches on herbaceous plant species richness across Great Britain

Sandrine Petit; Leila Griffiths; Simon S. Smart; Geoff Smith; R. C. Stuart; S.M. Wright

Richness of Ancient Woodland Indicator plant species was analysed in 308 woodland patches that were surveyed during the Countryside Survey of Great Britain carried out in 1998. The Countryside Survey recorded vegetation plots and landscape structure in 569 stratified 1 km sample squares and developed a remotely-sensed land cover map of the UK. Using these datasets, we tested the hypothesis that Ancient Woodland Indicator species richness in woodland fragments was limited by patch area, shape and spatial isolation and that woodland patches located in the lowland region of Great Britain would respond differently than those in the upland region. The variation in Ancient Woodland Indicator species richness in the British lowlands (n = 218) was mainly explained by patch area and two measures of connectivity, the length of hedgerows and lines of trees in the 1 km square and the area of woodland within 500 m of the vegetation plot. By contrast, variation in Ancient Woodland Indicator species richness in the British uplands (n = 90) was related to Ellenberg scores of the vegetation communities sampled – a surrogate for habitat quality – and no significant effect of spatial structure was detected. It therefore appears that the degree of fragmentation of woodland in the British lowlands limits the distribution of Ancient Woodland Indicator species, while in the uplands, failed colonisation is a matter of habitat quality rather than a result of landscape structure.


Proceedings of the Royal Society of London B: Biological Sciences | 2006

Weed seed resources for birds in fields with contrasting conventional and genetically modified herbicide-tolerant crops

David W. Gibbons; David A. Bohan; Peter Rothery; R. C. Stuart; A. J. Haughton; R. J. Scott; Jeremy D. Wilson; Joe N. Perry; S. J. Clark; Robert J.G Dawson; L. G. Firbank

The UK Farm Scale Evaluations (FSEs) have shown that the use of broad spectrum herbicides on genetically modified herbicide-tolerant (GMHT) crops can have dramatic effects on weed seed production compared to management of conventional varieties. Here, we use FSE data and information on bird diets to determine how GMHT cropping might change the food resources available to farmland birds. More than 60 fields of each of four crops, spring- and winter-sown oilseed rape, beet and maize, were split, one half being sown with a conventional variety, the other with a GMHT variety. Seed rain from weeds known to be important in the diets of 17 granivorous farmland bird species was measured under the two treatments. In beet and spring oilseed rape, rain of weed seeds important in the diets of 16 bird species was significantly reduced in GMHT compared to conventional halves; for no species did it increase. In winter oilseed rape, rain of weed seeds important in the diets of 10 species was significantly reduced in GMHT halves; for only one species did it increase significantly. By contrast, in maize, rain of weed seeds important in the diets of seven species was significantly greater in GMHT halves; for no species was it reduced. Treatment effects for the total weed seed energy available to each bird species were very similar to those for seed rain alone. Measuring the effects on individual bird species was outside the scope of this study. Despite this, these results suggest that should beet, spring and winter rape crops in the UK be largely replaced by GMHT varieties and managed as in the FSEs, this would markedly reduce important food resources for farmland birds, many of which declined during the last quarter of the twentieth century. By contrast, GMHT maize would be beneficial to farmland birds.


Journal of Environmental Management | 2003

Field boundaries in Great Britain: stock and change between 1984, 1990 and 1998

Sandrine Petit; R. C. Stuart; M.K Gillespie; C. J. Barr

Field boundaries are man-made features found worldwide and their multiple functions in agricultural landscapes are now widely recognised. These landscape features have declined drastically in many developed countries as a result of agricultural intensification. In Great Britain, field boundaries are regarded as elements of particular significance in the countryside, both in term of extent and value, whether ecological, cultural, or aesthetic. The Countryside Surveys of Great Britain, a national ecological, surveillance programme initiated in the late 1970s, provides information about the change in extent and ecological condition of field boundaries. In this paper, we present the main results on field boundaries derived from the latest survey, Countryside Survey 2000. These include stock and change of boundaries for the 1990-1998 period as well as an update of the previously published 1984-1990 data. Special attention is given to the evolution of the length of hedges. Applicability of the Countryside Survey methodology to other monitoring programmes and further use of the data is discussed together with the potential ecological consequences of the changes described in the paper.


Biology Letters | 2006

Effects of genetically modified herbicide-tolerant cropping systems on weed seedbanks in two years of following crops

L. G. Firbank; Peter Rothery; M. J. May; S. J. Clark; R. J. Scott; R. C. Stuart; C.W.H. Boffey; D. R. Brooks; G. T. Champion; A. J. Haughton; Cathy Hawes; Matthew S. Heard; Alan M. Dewar; Joe N. Perry; G. R. Squire

The Farm Scale Evaluations (FSEs) showed that genetically modified herbicide-tolerant (GMHT) cropping systems could influence farmland biodiversity because of their effects on weed biomass and seed production. Recently published results for winter oilseed rape showed that a switch to GMHT crops significantly affected weed seedbanks for at least 2 years after the crops were sown, potentially causing longer-term effects on other taxa. Here, we seek evidence for similar medium-term effects on weed seedbanks following spring-sown GMHT crops, using newly available data from the FSEs. Weed seedbanks following GMHT maize were significantly higher than following conventional varieties for both the first and second years, while by contrast, seedbanks following GMHT spring oilseed rape were significantly lower over this period. Seedbanks following GMHT beet were smaller than following conventional crops in the first year after the crops had been sown, but this difference was much reduced by the second year for reasons that are not clear. These new data provide important empirical evidence for longer-term effects of GMHT cropping on farmland biodiversity.


Landscape Research | 2003

Changes in Land Cover and Parcel Size of British Lowland Woodlands over the Last Century in Relation to Game Management

J. C. Duckworth; L. G. Firbank; R. C. Stuart; S. Yamamoto

The area and number of woodlands within landscapes managed for shooting pheasants and other lowland game birds are contrasted with those not managed for game. The study locations were sample 1-km squares from the Countryside Survey (CS), a survey of the land cover of Great Britain. Two-hundred-and-thirty-two appropriate CS squares were divided into game and non-game squares on the basis of evidence of management for game. No significant differences were found in changes in woodland area or parcel number during the periods 1984-90 and 1990-98. Twelve matched pairs of game and non-game squares were selected, and the disposition of woodland was taken from maps of the 1870s, 1940s, 1960s and 1980s, recording total area, number of woodland parcels and parcel sizes. The number of parcels of woodland in game squares increased more than that in non-game squares during the period 1960s-1980s, but mean parcel size changed little. Landscapes where management for game has taken place have retained a greater proportion of the woodland present in the 1870s. It seems that game shooting has encouraged landowners to retain existing woodlands, and to plant new ones, during the period 1960s-1980s.


Earth System Science Data Discussions | 2017

Ecological landscape elements: long-term monitoring in Great Britain, the Countryside Survey 1978–2007 and beyond

C.M. Wood; R. G. H. Bunce; Lisa Norton; Lindsay C. Maskell; Simon M. Smart; W. Andrew Scott; Peter A. Henrys; D.C. Howard; S.M. Wright; Michael Brown; R. J. Scott; R. C. Stuart; J. W. Watkins

This is a detailed and comprehensive review and description of the evolution of the Countryside Survey (CS) of Great Britain. CS has been operating for 30 years and this review is a timely reminder of the critical importance of systematic, long –term monitoring of our environment. Whilst the paper is necessarily detailed and, for readers unfamiliar with CS, some of this detail may be difficult to follow in places, the paper repays careful reading as the level of detail and explanation is sufficiently clear for a good understanding. The paper is well-written and structured with only minor errors/lack of clarity. The authors make the point that this type of long-term monitoring, with only


Accounting for nature: assessing habitats in the UK countryside. | 2000

Accounting for nature: assessing habitats in the UK countryside

R. H. Haines-Young; C. J. Barr; H. I. J. Black; D. J. Briggs; R.G.H Bunce; R. T. Clarke; A. Cooper; F.H. Dawson; L. G. Firbank; R. M. Fuller; M. T. Furse; M. K. Gillespie; Ross A. Hill; M. Hornung; D.C. Howard; T. McCann; Michael D. Morecroft; Sandrine Petit; A.R.J. Sier; M. Smart; G. M. Smith; A.P. Stott; R. C. Stuart; J. W. Watkins


Journal of Environmental Management | 2000

Hedgerows as habitat for woodland plants

D McCollin; J.I Jackson; R. G. H. Bunce; C. J. Barr; R. C. Stuart


Agriculture, Ecosystems & Environment | 2009

Consequences of organic and non-organic farming practices for field, farm and landscape complexity

Lisa Norton; Paul Johnson; Andrew Joys; R. C. Stuart; Dan E. Chamberlain; Ruth E. Feber; L. G. Firbank; Will Manley; Martin S. Wolfe; Barbara Hart; Fiona Mathews; David W. Macdonald; Robert J. Fuller

Collaboration


Dive into the R. C. Stuart's collaboration.

Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Sandrine Petit

Institut national de la recherche agronomique

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

R. G. H. Bunce

Estonian University of Life Sciences

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Andrew Joys

British Trust for Ornithology

View shared research outputs
Researchain Logo
Decentralizing Knowledge