R. Cawthon
University of Chicago
Network
Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.
Publication
Featured researches published by R. Cawthon.
Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society | 2016
D. Kirk; Y. Omori; A. Benoit-Lévy; R. Cawthon; C. L. Chang; P. Larsen; Adam Amara; David Bacon; T. M. Crawford; Scott Dodelson; P. Fosalba; T. Giannantonio; Gilbert P. Holder; Bhuvnesh Jain; Tomasz Kacprzak; Ofer Lahav; N. MacCrann; Andrina Nicola; Alexandre Refregier; E. Sheldon; K. Story; M. A. Troxel; J. D. Vieira; V. Vikram; J. Zuntz; Timothy M. C. Abbott; F. B. Abdalla; M. R. Becker; B. A. Benson; G. M. Bernstein
We measure the cross-correlation between weak lensing of galaxy images and of the cosmic microwave background (CMB). The effects of gravitational lensing on different sources will be correlated if the lensing is caused by the same mass fluctuations. We use galaxy shape measurements from 139 deg(2) of the Dark Energy Survey (DES) Science Verification data and overlapping CMB lensing from the South Pole Telescope (SPT) and Planck. The DES source galaxies have a median redshift of z(med) similar to 0.7, while the CMB lensing kernel is broad and peaks at z similar to 2. The resulting cross-correlation is maximally sensitive to mass fluctuations at z similar to 0.44. Assuming the Planck 2015 best-fitting cosmology, the amplitude of the DESxSPT cross-power is found to be A(SPT) = 0.88 +/- 0.30 and that from DESxPlanck to be A(Planck) = 0.86 +/- 0.39, where A = 1 corresponds to the theoretical prediction. These are consistent with the expected signal and correspond to significances of 2.9 sigma and 2.2 sigma, respectively. We demonstrate that our results are robust to a number of important systematic effects including the shear measurement method, estimator choice, photo-z uncertainty and CMB lensing systematics. We calculate a value of A = 1.08 +/- 0.36 for DESxSPT when we correct the observations with a simple intrinsic alignment model. With three measurements of this cross-correlation now existing in the literature, there is not yet reliable evidence for any deviation from the expected LCDM level of cross-correlation. We provide forecasts for the expected signal-to-noise ratio of the combination of the five-year DES survey and SPT-3G.
The Astrophysical Journal | 2018
N. Shipp; A. Drlica-Wagner; E. Balbinot; P. Ferguson; Denis Erkal; T. S. Li; K. Bechtol; Vasily Belokurov; B. Buncher; Daniela Carollo; M. Carrasco Kind; K. Kuehn; J. L. Marshall; A. B. Pace; E. S. Rykoff; I. Sevilla-Noarbe; E. Sheldon; Louis E. Strigari; A. K. Vivas; Brian Yanny; A. Zenteno; T. M. C. Abbott; F. B. Abdalla; S. Allam; S. Avila; E. Bertin; David J. Brooks; D. L. Burke; J. Carretero; Francisco J. Castander
We perform a search for stellar streams around the Milky Way using the first 3 yr of multiband optical imaging data from the Dark Energy Survey (DES). We use DES data covering ∼5000 deg2 to a depth of g>23.5 with a relative photometric calibration uncertainty of <1%. This data set yields unprecedented sensitivity to the stellar density field in the southern celestial hemisphere, enabling the detection of faint stellar streams to a heliocentric distance of ∼50 kpc. We search for stellar streams using a matched filter in color–magnitude space derived from a synthetic isochrone of an old, metal-poor stellar population. Our detection technique recovers four previously known thin stellar streams: Phoenix, ATLAS, Tucana III, and a possible extension of Molonglo. In addition, we report the discovery of 11 new stellar streams. In general, the new streams detected by DES are fainter, more distant, and lower surface brightness than streams detected by similar techniques in previous photometric surveys. As a by-product of our stellar stream search, we find evidence for extratidal stellar structure associated with four globular clusters: NGC 288, NGC 1261, NGC 1851, and NGC 1904. The ever-growing sample of stellar streams will provide insight into the formation of the Galactic stellar halo, the Milky Way gravitational potential, and the large- and small-scale distribution of dark matter around the Milky Way.
Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society | 2018
N MacCrann; J. DeRose; Risa H. Wechsler; J. Blazek; E. Gaztanaga; M. Crocce; E. S. Rykoff; M. R. Becker; Bhuvnesh Jain; Elisabeth Krause; T. F. Eifler; D. Gruen; J Zuntz; M. A. Troxel; J. Elvin-Poole; J. Prat; M Wang; S. Dodelson; Andrey V. Kravtsov; P Fosalba; Michael T. Busha; August E. Evrard; Dragan Huterer; T. M. C. Abbott; F. B. Abdalla; S. Allam; J. Annis; S Avila; G. M. Bernstein; David J. Brooks
We use mock galaxy survey simulations designed to resemble the Dark Energy Survey Year 1 (DES Y1) data to validate and inform cosmological parameter estimation. When similar analysis tools are applied to both simulations and real survey data, they provide powerful validation tests of the DES Y1 cosmological analyses presented in companion papers. We use two suites of galaxy simulations produced using different methods, which therefore provide independent tests of our cosmological parameter inference. The cosmological analysis we aim to validate is presented in DES Collaboration et al. (2017) and uses angular two-point correlation functions of galaxy number counts and weak lensing shear, as well as their cross-correlation, in multiple redshift bins. While our constraints depend on the specific set of simulated realisations available, for both suites of simulations we find that the input cosmology is consistent with the combined constraints from multiple simulated DES Y1 realizations in the Omega(m) - sigma(8) plane. For one of the suites, we are able to show with high confidence that any biases in the inferred S-8 = sigma(8)(Omega(m)/0.3)(0.5) and Omega(m) are smaller than the DES Y1 1 - sigma uncertainties. For the other suite, for which we have fewer realizations, we are unable to be this conclusive;we infer a roughly 60 per cent (70 per cent) probability that systematic bias in the recovered Omega(m) (S-8) is sub-dominant to the DES Y1 uncertainty. As cosmological analyses of this kind become increasingly more precise, validation of parameter inference using survey simulations will be essential to demonstrate robustness.
Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society | 2018
C. Davis; Eduardo Rozo; A. Roodman; A. Alarcon; R. Cawthon; M. Gatti; H. Lin; R. Miquel; E. S. Rykoff; M. A. Troxel; P. Vielzeuf; T. M. C. Abbott; F. B. Abdalla; S. Allam; J. Annis; K. Bechtol; A. Benoit-Lévy; E. Bertin; David J. Brooks; E. Buckley-Geer; D. L. Burke; A. Carnero Rosell; M. Carrasco Kind; J. Carretero; Francisco J. Castander; M. Crocce; C. E. Cunha; C. B. D'Andrea; L. N. da Costa; S. Desai
Galaxy cross-correlations with high-fidelity redshift samples hold the potential to precisely calibrate systematic photometric redshift uncertainties arising from the unavailability of complete and representative training and validation samples of galaxies. However, application of this technique in the Dark Energy Survey (DES) is hampered by the relatively low number density, small area, and modest redshift overlap between photometric and spectroscopic samples. We propose instead using photometric catalogues with reliable photometric redshifts for photo-z calibration via cross-correlations. We verify the viability of our proposal using redMaPPer clusters from the Sloan Digital Sky Survey (SDSS) to successfully recover the redshift distribution of SDSS spectroscopic galaxies.We demonstrate how to combine photo-z with cross-correlation data to calibrate photometric redshift biases while marginalizing over possible clustering bias evolution in either the calibration or unknown photometric samples. We apply our method to DES Science Verification (DES SV) data in order to constrain the photometric redshift distribution of a galaxy sample selected for weak lensing studies, constraining the mean of the tomographic redshift distributions to a statistical uncertainty of Δz ~ ±0.01. We forecast that our proposal can, in principle, control photometric redshift uncertainties in DES weak lensing experiments at a level near the intrinsic statistical noise of the experiment over the range of redshifts where redMaPPer clusters are available. Our results provide strong motivation to launch a programme to fully characterize the systematic errors from bias evolution and photo-z shapes in our calibration procedure.
Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society | 2018
M. Crocce; A. Ross; I. Sevilla-Noarbe; E. Gaztanaga; J. Elvin-Poole; S. Avila; A. Alarcon; K C Chan; N. Banik; J. Carretero; E. Sanchez; W. G. Hartley; C. Sánchez; T. Giannantonio; Rogerio Rosenfeld; A.I. Salvador; M. Garcia-Fernandez; J García-Bellido; T. M. C. Abbott; F. B. Abdalla; S. Allam; J. Annis; K. Bechtol; A. Benoit-Lévy; G. M. Bernstein; R. A. Bernstein; E. Bertin; David J. Brooks; E. Buckley-Geer; A. Carnero Rosell
We define and characterise a sample of 1.3 million galaxies extracted from the first year of Dark Energy Survey data, optimised to measure Baryon Acoustic Oscillations in the presence of significant redshift uncertainties. The sample is dominated by luminous red galaxies located at redshifts
Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society | 2018
R. Cawthon; C. Davis; M. Gatti; P. Vielzeuf; J. Elvin-Poole; Eduardo Rozo; Joshua A. Frieman; E. S. Rykoff; A. Alarcon; G. M. Bernstein; C. Bonnett; A. Carnero Rosell; Francisco J. Castander; C. L. Chang; L. N. da Costa; J. De Vicente; J. DeRose; A. Drlica-Wagner; E. Gaztanaga; T. Giannantonio; D. Gruen; J. Gschwend; W. G. Hartley; B. Hoyle; H. Lin; M. A. G. Maia; R. Miquel; R. Ogando; Markus Rau; A. Roodman
z \gtrsim 0.6
Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society | 2016
M. Crocce; J. Carretero; A. Bauer; A. Ross; I. Sevilla-Noarbe; T. Giannantonio; F. Sobreira; J. Sanchez; E. Gaztanaga; M. Carrasco Kind; C. Sanchez; C. Bonnett; A. Benoit-Lévy; Robert J. Brunner; A. Carnero Rosell; R. Cawthon; P. Fosalba; W. Hartley; Edward J. Kim; Boris Leistedt; R. Miquel; Hiranya V. Peiris; Will J. Percival; Rogerio Rosenfeld; E. S. Rykoff; E. Sanchez; T. D. Abbott; F. B. Abdalla; S. Allam; M. Banerji
. We define the exact selection using color and magnitude cuts that balance the need of high number densities and small photometric redshift uncertainties, using the corresponding forecasted BAO distance error as a figure-of-merit in the process. The typical photo-
Physical Review D | 2018
D. Gruen; O. Friedrich; E. Krause; J. DeRose; R. Cawthon; C. J. Davis; J. Elvin-Poole; Eli S. Rykoff; Risa H. Wechsler; A. Alarcon; G. M. Bernstein; J. Blazek; C. L. Chang; Joseph Clampitt; M. Crocce; J. De Vicente; M. Gatti; M. S. S. Gill; W. G. Hartley; S. Hilbert; B. Hoyle; Bhuvnesh Jain; M. J. Jarvis; O. Lahav; N. MacCrann; T. McClintock; J. Prat; R. P. Rollins; A. Ross; Eduardo Rozo
z
arXiv: Cosmology and Nongalactic Astrophysics | 2018
D. Gruen; Y. Zhang; A. Palmese; Brian Yanny; V. Busti; B. Hoyle; P. Melchior; Christopher J. Miller; E. Rozo; Eli S. Rykoff; T. N. Varga; F. B. Abdalla; S. Allam; J. Annis; S. Avila; David J. Brooks; D. L. Burke; A. Carnero Rosell; M. Carrasco Kind; J. Carretero; R. Cawthon; M. Crocce; C. E. Cunha; L. N. da Costa; C. J. Davis; J. De Vicente; S. Desai; H. T. Diehl; J. P. Dietrich; A. Drlica-Wagner
uncertainty varies from
arXiv: Cosmology and Nongalactic Astrophysics | 2018
E. Baxter; Y. Omori; C. L. Chang; T. Giannantonio; D. Kirk; E. Krause; J. Blazek; L. E. Bleem; Ami Choi; T. M. Crawford; S. Dodelson; T. F. Eifler; O. Friedrich; D. Gruen; G. P. Holder; Bhuvnesh Jain; M. J. Jarvis; N. MacCrann; Andrina Nicola; S. B. Pandey; J. Prat; C. L. Reichardt; S. Samuroff; C. Sanchez; L. F. Secco; E. Sheldon; M. A. Troxel; J. Zuntz; T. M. C. Abbott; F. B. Abdalla
2.3\%